Archive for January 5th, 2009

4 million existing homes on the market … so what?

January 5, 2009

There’s a lot of hand-wringing going on over the fact that there are about double the number of existing homes on the market now versus historical averages.  And, there 4 million number is probably low since some people would like to sell but aren’t listing their homes because of the bad market.

But, put the number in perspective.  The 4 million homes represent only about 3% of total households and about 5% of owner-occupied households. That means that for 95% of home owners, the number is largely irrelevant.  They’re paying their mortgages and taxes, and they aren’t planning on selling to move.  Sure, house prices are down, but — unless they have  home equity loans  — the only short-term impact is simply “on paper”.  These folks will be fine until the housing market rebounds … and it eventually will !

My suggested remedy to the problem: (1) set a zero capital gains tax rate on houses bought in 2009 and 2010 as long as they’re held at least 2 years, and (2) allow landlord-investor’s who buy residential homes in 2009 and 2010 to accelerate depreciation and offset ordinary income with all rental losses.  The 2 million “overhang” in houses would be cleared in weeks, and folks who can’t afford to buy houses would have more rental choices,

[Buyers' strike]

Source: WSJ, 01-02-09
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123084433166547199.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Nine driving forces to watch in 2009

January 5, 2009

The best list I’ve seen so far.  I especially like #4 … and I agree with the logic.

* * * * *

Excerpted from IBD, “Nine Possibilities Heading Into 2009”,  December 31, 2008

1. A Less Safe Homeland ?

Will Obama take the heat from the left of his own party and boldly use his constitutional authority as president to go the extra mile in protecting the country, as  Bush did, or will he dilute the indispensable tools that have helped keep us safe since the 9/11 attacks ? 

We’ll see. Promising to get Osama bin Laden sounds great in a campaign; governing requires more than catchphrases.

2. Stimulus Pushes Deficit To $1 Tril

Late in 2008, talk centered around a deal involving up to $800 billion in new spending, focused mainly on infrastructure and so-called Green Jobs. Tax cuts of $150 billion or more will focus on the middle class. Under Obama, those who no longer pay any taxes will surge from 44 million currently to more than 50 million, as those in the top 5% of incomes shoulder a greater share of the tax burden.

Obama’ s stimulus, along with the nearly $2 trillion in outlays for 2008’s financial and auto bailout, will push the deficit to more than $1 trillion — 7% of GDP, the biggest deficit since 1946.

Republican efforts to cut capital gains taxes — a proven way to strong economic and job growth — will fail.

Businesses may start feeling left out, and the GOP will try to make it a wedge issue in congressional elections of 2010.  

3. China Falls Into Recession

After decades of stunning 10% GDP growth, China’s economy stumbled late in 2008. It will continue to slow in 2009 — and possibly beyond. The main trigger for their slump: Soaring energy prices during early 2008, and a steep decline in U.S. demand for China’s goods.

If China grows by 5% or less over the next year or so, it won’t create enough jobs and will face serious social pressures that could break into open violence.

Despite its rapid growth, China still only ranks No. 81 on the U.N.’s human development index, a gauge that combines health, education and income. Things are far worse for the more than half of China’s 1.3 billion people who live in rural areas.

4. Recovery In The U.S.?

The U.S. economy will pull out of its recession as a massive home inventory overhang is worked off, oil prices stay low, trillions of dollars in stimulus and bailout funds are put to work and Fed interest-rate cuts kick in.

Banks and finance companies will start lending again, and rising demand will push companies to hire.

World demand for oil will fall, as it did in 2008.  And since each 10-cent drop in gas prices is equal to a $12 billion tax cut, the U.S. will get a “silent” tax cut of about $295 billion.

The bear market in stocks — which are one of the economy’s best leading indicators — should be drawing to a close. This bear is now in its 15th month, and most don’t last more than 15 or 16. Nine to 10 is more like it.

5. Energy Fever, Climate Change Cool Off

The cooling trend that began in 1998 will continue as solar activity remains dormant. Last year was the coolest year in a decade.

As the evidence grows, more scientists will join the list of climate “deniers,” as protests arise in Europe and the U.S. over expensive alternate-energy schemes that slow global economic recovery.

But as long as crude remains below $70 a barrel — the make-or-break level for many energy projects and alternative energy — Congress will continue to drag its feet on drilling for more oil and gas in the U.S.

6. Big Labor Fights For Relevance

Organized labor made a big deal about its $400 million in campaign spending to win the election for Democrats in 2008.

But as 2009 rolls in, all that cash is starting to look less like power projection and more like a last-gasp bid to go for broke.

The big problem is that in a weak economy, the union agenda is incompatible with economic growth. Businesses can’t grow and create jobs in an atmosphere where workers are forced into unions and free trade is restricted. Given the choice of a recovering economy or a satisfied union base, Obama is likely to tilt toward saving the economy, if only for the sake of his own political viability.

Unions want to show they still matter after watching their share of the U.S. work force shrink from 31.4% in 1960 to less than 12% today.

Two fronts will emerge: “card-check” — a change to the National Labor Relations Act that would eliminate secret ballots to make organizing new unions easier — and free-trade pacts.  

7. Obama Seeks Health Care Reform

Even health care experts sympathetic to Obama’s goals argue the president-elect understates his plan’s costs. Obama’s plan of near universal coverage means “a $100 billion infusion of new health care spending.”

ObamaCare’s massive new spending will be a tough political sell, especially with taxpayers already footing the bill for bailouts of banks and the auto sector, and millions of Americans losing their jobs.

Obama will insist that a big government health care reform is imperative for economic recovery, imposing the kind of socialized medicine found in France, Britain and Canada, where waiting lists and substandard quality are the norm.

8. India Gets Assertive

India’s citizens have gained a lot from their opening to the world in 1991 and they aren’t about to give it up. But threats remain from the global economic downturn and terror attacks out of Pakistan.

Fiscal stimulus is on the plate, and possibly more defense spending. The government may tighten its alliance with the U.S. to modernize its military.

As a large market, India will forge closer trade ties with markets like the U.S., Japan, and EU.

9. Israel Gets Rid Of Iran’s Nuclear Threat

Will Israel use its altercation with the Iranian-backed Hamas as a stepping stone toward a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities?

The signs are that an Obama Administration, committed to “tough diplomacy,” will be less likely to let Israel take matters into its own hands and strike Tehran.

Lack of U.S. support would make such airstrikes more difficult, and leave Israel even more vulnerable politically on the world stage.

Still, Israel might be tempted to go for broke, taking out Iran’s burgeoning nuclear threat rather than letting Tel Aviv go up in a mushroom cloud.

* * * * * *
Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=283999323921715 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Now, it's the phone, not the carrier calling the shots …

January 5, 2009

Excerpted from Business Week, “How Apple’s iPhone Reshaped the Industry”, December 11, 2008

Today, apps are where the action is, and consumers are reaping the benefits

A few years ago, if someone asked what sort of cell phone you had, your response would probably be to name a network, like Sprint or Cingular. Wireless carriers so completely controlled the business, especially in the U.S., that many manufacturers weren’t even allowed to put their brand names on handsets. Now this relationship is changing in ways that will reduce the power of carriers and, with luck, increase consumers’ choices.

The relationship started to shift when people began using phones for more than voice calls and text messages. As browsers and e-mail systems became important, it mattered more whether you had a Palm Treo or a BlackBerry than whether your phone ran on the Verizon Wireless or AT&T network. Then along came Apple’s iPhone to rewrite the rules completely.

The conventional wisdom holds that AT&T scored a coup when it signed on as the exclusive U.S. iPhone carrier. The company reported that it activated 2.4 million of the new 3G iPhones in the third quarter, that 40% of those customers came to AT&T from rival operators, and that their average monthly bill was 1.6 times that of other subscribers.

But the impact on AT&T’s bottom line is another story. Mostly because of the fat subsidy it pays Apple for each iPhone, AT&T’s third-quarter earnings of $3.2 billion were $900 million less than they would otherwise have been.

More importantly, the carrier has probably lost forever its ownership of the customer, through a process economists call “disintermediation.”

Before the iPhone, relatively few owners of any phones—smart or dumb—downloaded applications. The carriers had a nice business selling ringtones and the odd game. But with iTunes and the App Store, Apple became the exclusive supplier of applications as well as music and videos. The content suppliers got about two-thirds of the revenue, Apple kept about a third, and the carriers were frozen out.

A key test of the new relationship between handset makers and smartphone software publishers, carriers, and customers will arrive when turn-by-turn driving instructions come to the iPhone. Apple seems to have created the phone with navigation in mind. Rumors are flying that Apple plans a navigation offering that leaves carriers in the cold.

This shift in power is a bad thing for wireless carriers, whose nightmares of being turned into commodity sellers of bandwidth are coming true. But it may be a win for everyone else.

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_51/b4113078121012.htm 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Now, it’s the phone, not the carrier calling the shots …

January 5, 2009

Excerpted from Business Week, “How Apple’s iPhone Reshaped the Industry”, December 11, 2008

Today, apps are where the action is, and consumers are reaping the benefits

A few years ago, if someone asked what sort of cell phone you had, your response would probably be to name a network, like Sprint or Cingular. Wireless carriers so completely controlled the business, especially in the U.S., that many manufacturers weren’t even allowed to put their brand names on handsets. Now this relationship is changing in ways that will reduce the power of carriers and, with luck, increase consumers’ choices.

The relationship started to shift when people began using phones for more than voice calls and text messages. As browsers and e-mail systems became important, it mattered more whether you had a Palm Treo or a BlackBerry than whether your phone ran on the Verizon Wireless or AT&T network. Then along came Apple’s iPhone to rewrite the rules completely.

The conventional wisdom holds that AT&T scored a coup when it signed on as the exclusive U.S. iPhone carrier. The company reported that it activated 2.4 million of the new 3G iPhones in the third quarter, that 40% of those customers came to AT&T from rival operators, and that their average monthly bill was 1.6 times that of other subscribers.

But the impact on AT&T’s bottom line is another story. Mostly because of the fat subsidy it pays Apple for each iPhone, AT&T’s third-quarter earnings of $3.2 billion were $900 million less than they would otherwise have been.

More importantly, the carrier has probably lost forever its ownership of the customer, through a process economists call “disintermediation.”

Before the iPhone, relatively few owners of any phones—smart or dumb—downloaded applications. The carriers had a nice business selling ringtones and the odd game. But with iTunes and the App Store, Apple became the exclusive supplier of applications as well as music and videos. The content suppliers got about two-thirds of the revenue, Apple kept about a third, and the carriers were frozen out.

A key test of the new relationship between handset makers and smartphone software publishers, carriers, and customers will arrive when turn-by-turn driving instructions come to the iPhone. Apple seems to have created the phone with navigation in mind. Rumors are flying that Apple plans a navigation offering that leaves carriers in the cold.

This shift in power is a bad thing for wireless carriers, whose nightmares of being turned into commodity sellers of bandwidth are coming true. But it may be a win for everyone else.

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_51/b4113078121012.htm 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

More subscribers, continuing losses … sat radio still alive (but not well)

January 5, 2009

Excerpted from Marketing Daily, “Flying High: Sirius-XM Revs up 14%” by Eric Sass

* * * * *

In an ironic twist, Sirius-XM saw revenues and subscribers jump compared to last year…But there is some doubt that the good times will continue, as one of the satcaster’s major sources of new subscriptions–factory installations in vehicles–appears to be headed for a ditch in 2009…

First, the good news: Sirius-XM will finish 2008 with over 19 million subscribers, which is up 10% …and revenues of around $2.4 billion–up 14%.

Satellite radio is a niche medium, and may be somewhat immune to the sharp downward trend in the economy at large…the average satellite radio customer is relatively well-heeled, with an average household income of almost $80,000 versus a national average of about $45,000, so satellite subscribers may have more of a cushion for discretionary expenditures…

In 2008, the company added 500,000 new subscriptions through vehicle sales, despite the “dramatic” slowdown in the automobile industry, accounting for about 30% of all new subscriptions. At Sirius, the proportion was even higher during its last pre-merger quarter, with 87% of new subs coming from new vehicle sales…

The company is counting on continuing vehicle sales to bring in an equivalent proportion in 2009, in part by installing radios in a higher proportion of vehicles than before…Beneath the positive outlook, the satcaster has moved aggressively to limit costs since its merger…the merged company cut 22% of its total workforce…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Despite an increase in revenues Sirius is still expected to post a loss of around $200 million this year.  While it will see temporary gains from merger efficiencies Sirius’ future success depends more on its ability to retain new subscribers and find channels outside of automobile sales to attract new subscriptions.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog