Archive for September 24th, 2009

Let’s play 20 questions … ok, how about 5 questions?

September 24, 2009

From Hugh Hewitt of the Washington Examiner …

Here are five questions every sponsor of any version of Obamacare ought to be obliged to answer — in detail:

1. Can you specify, at least to the level of tens of millions, exactly where will the $300 billion in cuts to Medicare proposed by president come from?

2. The president and his allies agree that the cost of Medicare Advantage programs will have to increase for seniors. By how much will Medicare Advantage premiums increase?

3. The president and his allies agree that some Medicare services will have to be cut. Which Medicare services will have to be cut?

4. Forty-five percent of doctors responding to a recent Investors Business Daily/TIPP poll responded that if Obamacare passed, they would consider quitting or retiring. Even if the number of disgruntled doctors is overstated — by a factor of 2 or or 5 —  wouldn’t the number of doctors who do retire early or quit out of disgust  make the delivery of health care much more difficult than it already is?

5. If the U.S. health system is so bad, how do you explain why the five-year survival rate of women with breast cancer in the United States is higher than that of women in Great Britain and the five-year survival rate for American men with any form of cancer is much higher than the same survival rate among all European men.

Hmmm.

Washington Examiner, “Obamacare is to Medicare what ACORN is to Children’s Protective Services”, September 21, 2009
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Obamacare-is-to-Medicare-what-ACORN-is-to-Children_s-Protective-Services-8268673-59983347.html

* * * * *

Ah-ha … How Big Bro will catch the willfully uninsureds.

September 24, 2009

Ken’s Take: I’ve been asking how the folks who choose voluntarily to self-insure and buy big screens instead of health insurance will be caught in the act.  Here’s the answer .  More “take” below”.

Heritage Foundation, The Policy Is The Problem. September 21, 2009

Individual Mandates:

Starting in 2013, almost everyone who does not have coverage would be required to purchase health insurance at a minimum level to be specified in the bill.

Any individual who fails to buy health insurance will be forced to pay a tax by the Internal Revenue Service. Depending on your income and family status the new tax would be as low as $750 per person and as high as $3,800 per family.

In order to enforce these provisions, the Baucus bill would require individuals, health insurers, employers, and government health agencies to report detailed health insurance information on all Americans to the IRS, adding significant administrative costs and reducing privacy protections.

Full article:
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/21/morning-bell-the-policy-is-the-problem/

* * * * *

More Ken’s Take: So, companies submit confirmations that a person (i.e. social security number) is insured.  The confirmations are matched against the IRS files (social security numbers with income) and exceptions are reported out to the health reform fine collectors who go knocking on doors to collect fines and / or repo the big screens.

Might work … yeah, right.

* * * * *

2009’s Best Global Brands

September 24, 2009

According to consultancy InterBrand …

 .  Top Ten Global Brands in 2009  . 
(and their estimated Brand Asset Value)

  1. Coca-Cola 68,734 ($m)
  2. IBM 60,211 ($m)
  3. Microsoft 56,647 ($m)
  4. GE 47,777 ($m)
  5. Nokia 34,864 ($m)
  6. McDonald’s 32,275 ($m)
  7. Google 31,980 ($m)
  8. Toyota 31,330 ($m)
  9. Intel 30,636 ($m)
  10. Disney 28,447 ($m)

For more, see …

Article:
http://www.interbrand.com/best_global_brands_intro.aspx?langid=1000

Full Report:
http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/-1_BGB2009_Magazine_Final.pdf

Cool poster with Logos:
http://www.interbrand.com/BGB09/BGB2_POSTER_FRONT.pdf

* * * * *