Archive for October 6th, 2010

The uber-rich speak: Gates (the father) says rich should pay more taxes …

October 6, 2010

I’ve often expressed my chagrin over Warren Buffet’s pontificating that his taxes are too low and so all high earners should pay more taxes.

Now Bill Gates’s father has jumped on the bandwagon and is helping fund support for a new millionaire’s tax in Washington state.

He riles me more than Buffet.  At least Buffet created his pile of gold.  This guy’s major claim to fame is providing young Bill with some DNA.  Now, he lives a lavish life as part of young Bill’s live-in posse. 

Give me a break …

And, oh yeah, before you tell me how philanthropic Buffet and Gates are, remember (1) most of their gifts are forthcoming when they die — allowing to retain the the power of their wealth until they’re long gone, and (2) all of their giving is specifically directed to causes they care about, and managed by members of their posse. 

Why don’t they just turn over their accumulated wealth to the the government right now?

Answer: they’d lose their power as super-rich guys … and even they know that most of the money would be wasted on wacky, ineffective programs.

* * * * *

According to Art Laffer in the WSJ …

It’s one thing to believe in bad policy. It’s quite another to push it on others.

But Mr. Gates Sr.— a retired lawyer— is now trying to have his way with the people of the state of Washington.

Mr. Gates Sr. has personally contributed $500,000 to promote a statewide proposition on Washington’s November ballot that would impose a brand new 5% tax on individuals earning over $200,000 per year and couples earning over $400,000 per year. An additional 4% surcharge would be levied on individuals and couples earning more than $500,000 and $1 million, respectively.

If Mr. Gates Sr. and his son feel so strongly about taxing the rich, they should simply give the state a chunk of their own money and be done with it. Leave the rest of Washington’s taxpayers alone.

The 11 states where income taxes were adopted over the past 50 years are: Connecticut (1991), New Jersey (1976), Ohio (1971), Rhode Island (1971), Pennsylvania (1971), Maine (1969), Illinois (1969), Nebraska (1967), Michigan (1967), Indiana (1963) and West Virginia (1961).

Each and every state that introduced an income tax saw its share of total U.S. output decline. Some of the states, like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio, have become fiscal basket cases. As the nearby chart shows, even West Virginia, which was poor to begin with, got relatively poorer after adopting a state income tax.

WSJ, The Bill Gates Income Tax,  OCTOBER 5, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703882404575520241519315372.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

Lululemon’s Ambassadors wear their loyalty on their sleeves … literally !

October 6, 2010

TakeAway: Upstart retailer Lululemon Athletica, a Vancouver-based maker and retailer of athletic wear, enlists fitness instructors as “ambassadors” to distinguish itself from sportswear giants who typically hire high-priced sports celebrities to model their outfits. 

Lululemon spends almost nothing on advertising beyond occasional print ads in yoga and running magazines; instead, ambassadors receive up to $1,000 of free apparel in return for modeling it for their clients. 

Word of mouth is certainly powerful.

I* * * * *

Excerpted from The Wall Street Journal, “Lululemon Grows Fast on a Slim Budget” By Kevin Helliker, September 13, 2010

Lululemon belongs to an emerging class of retailers focused primarily on designing, making and selling athletic wear to women—and grabbing growing shares of the estimated $15 billion market for women’s fitness attire. 

The companies’ believe that traditional sportswear giants have treated female athletes as an afterthought resonates with many women.

Even amid the recession, Lululemon’s high-priced apparel is selling briskly.

The company has expanded its roster of ambassadors to include running, spinning and resistance-training gurus, including some men.

In keeping with the peace-and-love ethos of yoga, Lululemon publicly describes its primary purpose as promoting good health and well-being rather than making profit.

The company says it offers free yoga classes in its stores to introduce people to yoga’s stress-relieving benefits, not to sell clothes.

Similarly, the company says its ambassador program offers vital feedback on new apparel from fitness experts.

 

Edit by AMW

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703960004575481890366935552.html#printMode

* * * * *