Last week, we analyzed Pres Obama’s new target: corporate jet owners.
We said that the “loophole” was that corporate jets get depreciated over 5 years, whereas commercial aircraft (like Southwest’s) get depreciated over 7 years. So, the “loophole” is 2 years of accelerated depreciation … which is monetarily equivalent to about a 1% discount on the purchase price of of the jet. See the original post for the analysis.
But. a loyal HomaFiles reader quickly corrected my tax facts.
Turns out that in December, HR 4853 — the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 – was passed.
HR4853 allows businesses 100 percent accelerated depreciation of investments in capital assets — including new aircraft — through December 31, 2011, retroactive to September 4, 2010.
That changes the numbers …
The difference between depreciating a jet 100% in the first year and depreciating it over 7 years is monetarily equivalent to about a 3.3% discount on the purchase price of of the jet.
Example (table below): Assuming a million dollar capital expenditure, the NPV of the tax benefit of 100% accelerated depreciation is about $250,000 (@ an average corporate tax rate of 25%) … the NPV of the tax benefit depreciating the capital asset over 7 years is $214,489 … the difference is $33,011, which is 3.3% of the purchase price.
* * * * *
Here’s the irony …
HR 4853– the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 – was initiated in the lame duck Pelosi-controlled Democratic House, passed by the Reid-controlled Democratic lame duck Senate, and signed by President Obama – ostensibly to create J-O-B-S.
Six months later, the President turns around and starts attacking a tax law that he and fellow Democrats enacted.
Then, they wonder why corporate America is sitting on $2 trillion in cash.
It goes beyond corporate jets.
They can’t keep changing the rules every couple of months just to score some cheap political points.
* * * * *
* * * * *
July 5, 2011 at 12:30 pm |
A tax break is not a loophole. HR4853 purposely included this incentive to produce an outcome. Only unintended tax outcomes that reduce taxes are loopholes. It is amazing to see the amount of misinformation provided by the press and believed by democrats.