President Obama is pushing to raise the minimum wage to $9 per hour.
The rationale is well-intended: get low-earners closer to a “living wage”
The major argument against the move is econ 101 … and empirical evidence.
The below chart – from AEI’s Mark Perry — cuts to the chase.
The chart plots the level of the Federal minimum wage against the number of percentage points that the teenage unemployment rate is over the all-inclusive unemployment rate.
Implicitly, the analysis assumes that the bulk of minimum wage jobs go to teens … and, measuring the differential (instead of the gross rate) normalizes to the overall state of the economy.
The conclusion is stark: when you raise the minimum wage you lose jobs.
Period.
But, some folks argue that economic life is better for the minimum wagers who retain their jobs.
Not so fast …
