Heavy dependence on Russian oil.
============
NATO’s primary mission is to keep it’s member countries safe … mostly from Russia, right?
But, as we posted yesterday, key NATO nations (think: Germany) are hesitant to spend 2% of their GDP on defense … and are largely dependent on U.S. troops to protect NATO’s eastern flank and police the rest of the world.
Given that Russia is a lot closer to Europe than to the U.S. … why aren’t European nations more energized to defend themselves more aggressively and more visibly against the Russians?
===========
The answer can be summed up in one word…
===========
OIL !
The EU — which is comprised most of NATO – imports over 90% of its oil needs. Source
The other 10% is North Sea oil coming from the UK and Norway.
Note: Despite being oil-rich, Norway doesn’t meet the 2% NATO spending guideline for defense.
And, about 30% of of the 90% imported oils comes from where?
You guessed it: RUSSIA.
So, if the European NATO nations take too strong of a defensive stance against Russia, the Ruskies need only shut down the Trans-Siberian pipeline to cripple European economies.
But, wouldn’t that also cripple the Russian economy?
Maybe not, given the increase in Russian exports to China.
Hmmm.
Lie relatively low vis-a-vis Russia … and lean on the U.S. to wear the black hat.
Not a bad strategy … unless President Trump pulls the plug.
============
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma
#HomaFiles
July 11, 2018 at 7:45 am |
Gee, I had no idea NATO was in charge of the pipelines. We can always count of Prof. Homa to muddy the waters