Archive for November 12th, 2008

Quick: Close your eyes and picture somebody in the top 5%

November 12, 2008

From the Tax Foundation:

“Throughout this year, rhetoric regarding cutting taxes for the “middle class” and raising taxes on “the wealthy” reached an unprecedented level as the economy took a turn for the worse, and the candidates focused more intently on the economic debate.

But, what remains unanswered is who are “the wealthy” and who comprises “the middle class”?

Currently, the top 5% of taxpayers already pay 60% of the income taxes in this country.  And the top 10% pays 70% of taxes. 

But, who makes up the top 5% and top 10%?

• They are largely dual-income married couples;

• They live in high-cost metropolitan areas and have average living standards;

• They are older workers, at or nearing their peak earning years;

• They are college educated; and

• They have business income.

They are the picture of most any suburban family.”

* * * * *
Full report:
http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/dba37618d9c2d2df02f24766ac4cc39d.pdf

* * * * *

Ken’s Take: I bet most folks picture Dick Fuld, Warren Buffett, or some sleazy-looking hedge funder …

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Long Tail ? No way. Give me Blockbusters.

November 12, 2008

Excerpted from HBS Online, “Long-Tail Economics? Give Me Blockbusters!”, John Quelch
September 10, 2008

* * * * *

The importance of blockbusters has been challenged recently by Chris Anderson’s long tail theory that you can make money in many creative industries by selling specialized products to niche markets identified via the Internet.

For example, the new CEO of GlaxoSmithKline, the pharmaceuticals giant …  worries that a company is at risk if sales depend too much on one or two megabrands that could run into lawsuits from generic competitors or regulatory challenges.

On the other hand, the president of Warner Bros. (think Batman) aims “to take advantage of what has become a very global market by focusing on bigger films that require a bigger commitment.”

The pharmaceutical and entertainment industries are similar. R&D costs in both are high. Results are unpredictable. Drug research initiatives often result in dead ends but occasionally lead in an unexpected direction to a blockbuster result. Some big budget movies are flops, others are sleepers, still others meet expectations.

Of course, any company needs a portfolio of development projects, some with predictable sales results, others more risky. The former pay for the company’s daily bread and butter and fund R&D on future blockbusters.

More risky than pursuing blockbusters is not to pursue them, to condemn your enterprise to a lifetime of slave labor harvesting the long tail of micro-opportunities rather than imagining, pursuing, and marketing the global solution to an important, widely shared problem.

* * * * *

What then makes a blockbuster? Here are the Five S’s, the five defining characteristics of blockbusters.

Sheer size. A blockbuster has a transformational impact on a company and an industry, often opening up new markets worldwide. Blockbusters break sales records and exceed expectations. Around 100 pharmaceutical brands exceed $1 billion in annual sales. Procter & Gamble has 23 such brands.

Speed. It’s not just the sales volume; it’s the speed of the sales trajectory. Remember that the original blockbuster was a bomb that could destroy an entire city block. Blockbuster brands address pressing consumer needs so well that they often enjoy vertical sales liftoff.

Scarcity. A blockbuster brand is often in such high demand that stock-outs and shortages occur in the market. Remember the consumer lines to buy the new iPhone?

Sustainability. A blockbuster brand is not a one hit wonder. It is a gift that keeps on giving. Look at the seven Harry Potter books and five companion movies. Adding DVD and merchandise sales, theme parks, etc., Advertising Age valued the Potter economy at $15 billion.

Sizzle. A blockbuster does not just address an important need. It does so in an exciting and accessible way. Pfizer’s Lipitor was not the first cholesterol reducer but superior marketing and sales made Lipitor number one.

* * * * *

Full article:
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/cgi-bin/print?id=6014

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Sirius XM reports subscriber gains (and big losses)

November 12, 2008

Excerpted from AP, “Sirius XM Radio posts $4.88B loss”,  11.11.08

* * * * *

Sirius XM Radio Inc. said its losses totaled $4.88 billion in the third quarter …  revenue gained 16 percent to $612.8 million, from $529.2 million last year.

“Sirius XM third quarter results demonstrate strong revenue growth, solid cost control and most importantly a clear path to positive cash flow,” said Chief Executive Mel Karmazin. He noted that self-pay monthly customer churn remained flat from last year at 1.7 percent.

“In the first 60 days following the merger, Sirius XM is operationally very close to breakeven,” he said.

Sirius ended the quarter with 18.9 million subscribers, a 17 percent gain over its 16.2 million subscribers at the end of last year’s third quarter … and projected that it will end 2008 with 19.1 million subscribers and end 2009 with 20.6 million subscribers.

Sirius XM said the difficult economic environment, particularly a dramatic slowdown in auto sales, have hurt subscriber growth for 2008 and 2009. The company generates many of its new customers through sales of cars that have its radios installed at the factory.

Full article:
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/11/11/ap5676861.html?partner=alerts

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

The biggest real estate blunders ever …

November 12, 2008

Excerpted from Forbes.com, “Worst Business Blunders” Nov. 11, 2008

* * * * *

Ken’s Take: As we all lick our wounds with home prices down, consider these …

* * * * *

Blunder: The sale of Manhattan island
Blunderer: The Canarsees
Size Of Blunder: $1 trillion

In 1626, Canarsee natives traded for trinkets a now rather stylish plot: Manhattan (then called New Amsterdam). The 23 square miles many New Yorkers consider “the center of the universe” is now valued at a cool $1 trillion.

* * * * *

Blunderer: Napoleon, On Behalf Of France
Blunder: The sale of the Louisiana Territory
Size Of Blunder: $750 billion

In 1803, Napoleon was struggling to defend all the land France had acquired in the New World, specifically Haiti, which was in the midst of a slave revolt. With his army stretched thin, and unwilling to relinquish Haiti, Napoleon offered to sell the entire territory of Louisiana, rather than just the port of New Orleans, as had previously been discussed. The offer: $15 million–3 cents per acre–or about $284 million today. The current value of that land (now including portions of 15 U.S. states and two Canadian provinces): around $750 billion.

* * * * *

Blunder: Sale of Alaska
Blunderer: Czar Alexander II, On Behalf Of Russia
Size Of Blunder: $100 billion 

Fearing he would lose Alaska by force, Czar Alexander II advised Russian minister Eduard de Stoeckl to offer a 586,412 square mile ice block–Alaska–for sale to the U.S. Following an all-night negotiation, the agreement was signed March 30, 1867. The U.S. paid $7.2 million–1.9 cents per acre–for a land rich in oil and gold, currently valued at $100 billion, At the time of the sale, famed journalist Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune called the purchase both “inconvenient” and “dangerous” for the U.S., as the territory offered “nothing of value but furbearing animals.”

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/10/ford-microsoft-xerox-ent-manage-cx_ml_0310blunder_slide.html?thisSpeed=20000

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog