Archive for February 5th, 2009

What's magic about one stimulus bill? … Answer: nothing … so bite size it

February 5, 2009

Pres Obama and his surrogates have taken to repeating a mantra: the stimulus bill must be big and must be enacted quickly or else we’ll face an economic catastrophe.  The logic: we’re already taking a shelling and economists say $1 trillion is about the right number.

I’m struck that the emphasis is on big and quick … not right and effective.

There are parts of the proposed bill that make sense and seem to have consensus — e.g. extending unemployment benefits.  Others are debatable philosophically but can probably pass the “does it stimulate” criteria — e.g. Barack O’s $500 refundable tax credits.  Many (most ?) are outright pork and pay-offs.

Why not break the bill into parts?  Pass the stuff that’s on target and relatively non-contentious now … then debate the marginal and flakey stuff in due course.  Since most of that stuff won’t make a bit of difference to the economy, delaying won’t matter.

Even if $1 trillion is the right number, we can roll up to it … it’s not necessary to swallow it in one huge gulp.

What am I missing?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

What’s magic about one stimulus bill? … Answer: nothing … so bite size it

February 5, 2009

Pres Obama and his surrogates have taken to repeating a mantra: the stimulus bill must be big and must be enacted quickly or else we’ll face an economic catastrophe.  The logic: we’re already taking a shelling and economists say $1 trillion is about the right number.

I’m struck that the emphasis is on big and quick … not right and effective.

There are parts of the proposed bill that make sense and seem to have consensus — e.g. extending unemployment benefits.  Others are debatable philosophically but can probably pass the “does it stimulate” criteria — e.g. Barack O’s $500 refundable tax credits.  Many (most ?) are outright pork and pay-offs.

Why not break the bill into parts?  Pass the stuff that’s on target and relatively non-contentious now … then debate the marginal and flakey stuff in due course.  Since most of that stuff won’t make a bit of difference to the economy, delaying won’t matter.

Even if $1 trillion is the right number, we can roll up to it … it’s not necessary to swallow it in one huge gulp.

What am I missing?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Now, it must be ok for the automaker’s to file for bankruptcy …

February 5, 2009

Back in December, the Detroit Three argued for a bailout because American consumers won’t buy General Motors and Chrysler cars if they are forced into bankruptcy. They would be tainted by a stigma and by worries that warranties and parts wouldn’t be available years down the road if the firms ran the risk of liquidation. They cited consumer surveys that support the view. One survey of 6000 consumers by CNW Research this summer found that 80% said they would abandon an auto maker if it were to file for bankruptcy.

At the time, I called out the automaker’s bankruptcy argument as completely specious.

As I said then, “the survey results are misleading.  Would somebody be more likely to buy a car from a financially healthy car maker?  Of course.  Would somebody prefer to by from one that is on the brink of financial collapse or one that is in bankruptcy proceedings?  I bet that would be a statistical tie.”  
https://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/the-automakers-specious-bankruptcy-argument/

Well, January sales results for the  automakers are in.

According to the Wall Street Journal: “Sales by the Big Three U.S. auto makers plunged in January to the lowest levels in decades, raising fresh questions about the future of the companies and the viability of the government’s bailout program.

Chrysler LLC’s U.S. sales fell 55% compared with January 2008 to 62,157 vehicles. General Motors Corp.’s sales slid 49% to 128,198. Ford Motor Co.’s dropped 40% to 93,041.”

* * * * *

Ken’s Mega-Take:  As predicted, cash strapped consumers decided not to buy cars from “non-bankrupt” automakers that are on government life support 

Is there anyone who doesn’t recognize that the Detroit automakers are hanging by financial threads?  The companies are bankrupt, they’re just not in legal bankruptcy proceedings. If they were, they’d at least stand some chance of restructuring themselves into healthy positions. The current government thinking stands no chance of doing that.

So why not simply have them file for bankruptcy proceedings?  Simple, bankruptcy proceedings would dismantle the high cost, work rules heavy UAW contract.  Politics trumps market forces and economic sense.

[Detroit Reels as Auto Sales Skid]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123367018137943377.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Scan It! Bag It! Save Time! … and, oh yeah, Spend More!

February 5, 2009

Excerpted from Mediaweek, “Stop & Shop Deploys Scan It! in 50 Stores” by Katy Bachman, January 8, 2009

* * * * *

Launched in Aug. 2007, Modiv Media’s Scan It! system is designed both to save shoppers time, and offer targeted promotions based on current shopping behavior and purchase history. Here’s how the system works: Shoppers pick up a hand-held device as they enter a store and scan their loyalty cards, allowing the system to track the shopper’s progress through the aisles.  They scan and bag their items as they make their way through the store. 

* * * * *

Coupon offers appears on the device for products in the area where they are shopping.  If the shopper scans the item, the offer is instantly redeemed and the new price is reflected in the total on their scanner.  Once they are ready to check out they scan their loyalty card and pay. 

* * * * *

A number of major brands have launched campaigns with Modiv Media, including Coca-Cola, Unilever, ConAgra and Procter & Gamble. Retailers—which get a share of the revenue from participating brands—pay for the installation of the system. “Our partnership with Modiv Media is helping us increase customer loyalty and sales by extending our ongoing effort to provide the fastest, easiest and most rewarding personal shopping experience possible,”

According to the CEO of Modiv Media, the Scan It! system saves shoppers as much as 10 to 15 minutes in the store and leads to an increased average spend of $7 more per basket, compared to shoppers that don’t use the system.  

Edit by NRV

* * * * *

For AMS students – past & present:: A Rogers’ Five Factors analysis of the new device:

The good news…

  • Observable: Yes, very.  Other shoppers notice and watch to see how it works.
  • Trialability: Good.  Store associate there to assist with “training” and answer questions and convince shoppers to give it a try. 

The bad news…

  • Relative advantage: Exclusive coupons may entice some shoppers to continue to use it.  Looking at how long self-scan lines have been in operation it is obvious that most shoppers prefer to use the traditional method of checking out.
  • Simplicity: Questionable.
  • Compatibility: This will likely be the biggest hurdle for most shoppers.  “Trusting” the technology and their ability to master it is likely to take time since it is very different than the current shopping experience. 

Possible vertical niche? 

(Patient) Moms shopping with kids.  Some blog comments from mothers shopping with little ones say that the device keeps their kids engaged and entertained while shopping.

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/out-there/place-based/e3i7463e6c2968d742bf50c4fcc2b357a09 

* * * * *Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => The Homa Files Blog

Are these things stripped down computers or phones on steroids?

February 5, 2009

An example of a disruptive innovation …

* * * * *

Excerpted from Knowledge@Wharton, “The Net Impact of Netbooks?”, November 26, 2008

PC makers Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Lenovo, Acer and Asus are increasingly thinking big about small netbooks — portable computing devices that can cost anywhere from $200 to $500 and depend on the Internet for many computing tasks.

Research firm IDC estimates that 10.8 million netbooks will ship in 2008, just about a year after Asus launched what is considered the first device in the category. Asus has a 46% share of the netbook market..

Netbooks are mobile computers with screens ranging from 5 inches to 10 inches. Originally intended principally for the education market, they typically run Linux or Windows XP and need to connect to the Internet for heavy computing tasks.

Analysts  agree that netbooks will be disruptive to the PC industry, but it’s not clear in what way.

  • Will netbooks poach sales of laptops?
  • Are netbooks replacements for smartphones?
  • Will netbooks increase the popularity of cloud computing in which users store files on the Internet and manage them with web-based applications?

It’s too early to know where netbooks fit or how well they will ultimately sell among consumers, who are projected to buy about 70% of these devices.

Gartner notes in a recent research report that it is also possible netbooks will be viewed as deficient by consumers, who expect the capabilities of a fully featured PC.

Meanwhile, these small devices are proliferating. Qualcomm, a wireless semiconductor company, announced plans in November to launch its own designs for a “PC alternative” that would compete with netbooks. Qualcomm’s device, code-named Kayak, is being tested in Southeast Asia in early 2009.

The success of netbooks may ultimately rely on always-on Internet connections. Since these small PCs lack significant storage, they largely depend on the Internet to access content and documents. “Once Internet connectivity gets to the point where it’s everywhere, these devices become more viable. Dark spots and dead zones in wireless coverage are a hindrance to the netbook market.”

“If you think of what people do with their computers, it includes a) storing data and b) installing and using applications. Cloud computing will reach the masses on both these dimensions, and netbooks go hand in hand [with this]. More consumer data will move online [or into the cloud]. Users are now more comfortable with their data living in the cloud. Having your data online lets you do things like sharing it easily with your friends and accessing it anywhere.”

While netbooks are showing early popularity, experts at Wharton stopped short of declaring these devices to be runaway hits. They point out many uncertainties.

The first worry is the economy. To be sure, netbooks are inexpensive, but they are also a largely discretionary purchase at a time when the global economy is struggling. In developed markets, like the U.S. and Japan, netbook purchases could be delayed.

Another question is whether netbooks are really suited for emerging markets, as early proponents contend. In the U.S., netbooks can find Internet connectivity through multiple means, but the emerging markets are different. Ubiquitous Internet access may be a fundamental concern.

“The real use of netbooks may be for the amusement of bored teenagers whose needs for connectivity and diversion cannot be satisfied with an iPhone, [which is] not exactly a market that I expect to see emerging in the developing world.”

One thing is certain: The netbook category is worth watching because it is growing and evolving on the fly…

Full article:
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2107#

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog