Archive for February 25th, 2009

Why the market continues to sink …

February 25, 2009

Excerpted from IBD, “Is It Any Wonder The Market Continues To Sink?”,  February 20, 2009

* * * * *

Last Oct. 13, in trying to explain why the market had sold off 30% in six weeks, we acknowledged that the freeze-up of the financial system was a big concern. But we cited three other factors as well:

• The imminent election of “the most anti-capitalist politician ever nominated by a major party.”

• The possibility of “a filibuster-proof Congress led by politicians who are almost as liberal.”

• A “media establishment dedicated to the implementation of a liberal agenda, and the smothering of dissent wherever it arises.”

No wonder, we said then, that panic had set in.

* * * * *

Today, as the market continues to sell off , we wish we had a different explanation. But it still looks, as we said four months ago, “like the U.S., which built the mightiest, most prosperous economy the world has ever known, is about to turn its back on the free-enterprise system that made it all possible.”

How else would you explain all that’s happened in a few short weeks? How else would you expect the stock market, where millions cast daily votes and which is still the best indicator of what the future holds, to act when:

• Newsweek blares from its cover “We Are All Socialists Now

• A $700 billion bank bailout, $75 billion to refinance bad mortgages, $50 billion for the automakers, and as much as $2 trillion in loans from the Fed and the Treasury fail to build confidence in our free-enterprise system.

Talk of “nationalizing” U.S.’ troubled major banks comes not just from tarnished Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd,  from Republicans like Sen. Lindsey Graham , and former Fed chief Alan Greenspan.

• A stimulus bill laden with huge amounts of spending on pork and special interests is the best our Congress can come up with to get the economy back on track. Economists broadly agree that the legislation has little stimulative power, and in fact will be a drag on economic growth for years to come. Throwing hundreds of billions of dollars at profligate state governments and programs — such as $4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities” and $740 million to help viewers switch from analog to digital TV— has investors shaking their heads.

• A $75 billion bailout for 9 million Americans who face foreclosure, regardless of how they got into financial trouble, is the government’s answer to the housing crunch. Many Americans who have scrupulously kept up with payments are steaming at the thought of subsidizing those who’ve been profligate or irresponsible. And. recent data shows that as much as 55% of those who get foreclosure aid end up defaulting anyway

Energy solutions ranging from the expansion of offshore drilling and the development of Alaska’s bountiful arctic oil reserves to developing shale oil in America’s Big Sky country, tar-sands crude in Canada and coal that provides half the nation’s electric power, are taken off the table.

•• Trade protectionism passes as policy, even amid the administration’s lip service to free trade. Congress’ vast stimulus bill and its “Buy American” provisions limit spending to U.S.-made products and will drive up costs, limit choices and alienate key allies. Already, several European partners have begun raising barriers.

• A 1,000-plus page stimulus bill is bulled through Congress with not a single member of Congress reading it before passage.

Business leaders are demonized. Yes, there are bad eggs out there like the Madoffs and Stanfords. But most CEOs are hugely talented, driven, highly intelligent people who make our corporations the most productive in the world and add trillions of dollars of value to our economy.

• Words like “catastrophe,” “crisis” and “depression” are coming from the mouth of the newly elected president, rather than words of hope and optimism. Instead of talking up America’s capabilities and prospects, he talks them down — the exact opposite of our most successful recent president, Ronald Reagan, who came in vowing to restore that “shining city on a hill.”

* * * * *

All this in barely a month’s time. And to think that more of the same is on the way seems to be sinking in. Investors are watching closely and not caring for what they see. Sooner or later, the market will rally — but not without good reason to do so.

Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=320027936229029

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

If you make less than $250,000 your taxes won’t go up! … yeah, right.

February 25, 2009

The two parts of Obama’s speech that struck a chord with me were (1) he promised a cure for cancer and (2) “not a dime” of additional taxes if you make less than $250,000. 

Since most of my Homa ancestors had cancer of one mode or another, I’m all for eradicating it.  The sooner the better. I’m a bit skeptical, but what the heck.

Since I now rake in about $8.75 per hour teaching, I can slide comfortably under the “tax the rich” threshhold.  But, I’m even more skeptical of this one.

Last summer, I posted several pre-election tax analyses (mostly drawn from work at the Heritage Foundation) that drew two fundamental conclusions:

(1) The Obama tax plan would create a new voting majority in America: people who pay zero income taxes (or less) but draw mucho resources from the system. That train has left the station. The largest item in the stimulus package was the across-the-board $400 low income tax cut. 

Though it’s only about a buck a day, it’s enough to swing income tax payers from a majority to a minority.  The Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that 62.4 million will have a 0% income tax rate. That’s not good. 

Now they (non-tax payers) can vote for any program — beneficial to the common good or just plain whacky — and simply order the dwindling number of tax payers to up their ante.

(2) The Obama tax plan was essentially a tax revenue breakeven — simply redistributing about $135 billion each year from the top earners to low income earners.

Here’s the rub: last night, Obama indicated that the $400 credits that were billed as “temporary stimulus” last week will become permanent — and I assume, bumped up to $500.  And, the “Bush tax cuts for the wealthy” would be allowed to expire — bumping the top marginal tax rates.

OK, but that’s essentially budget neutral, and Obama said he’d be cutting the deficit (while spending more).  Hmmm.

Answer: go get even more from the folks in the top tax bracket … the really rich.

But, the Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that 1.1 million income tax filers will have $733.3 billion in income taxed at the top marginal rate of 35% rate this year. Taxed at the 35% rate, the $733 billion currently produces about $250 billion in federal revenues … leaving them with about $500 billion. 

That’s just the right amount to hit Obama’s deficit reduction target.  All it requires is a 100% marginal rate for earnings over $350,000 (where the top bracket starts).  Not likely, right?

So, how will the deficit be cut?  By “scrubbing the budget line-by-line” to eliminate wasteful spending.  A cynic might say: yeah, just like he did on the pork-laden, non-stimulative plan.  Maybe he’ll pick up some loose change there.  (In fact, maybe that’s the change he’s been talking about)

Kidding aside, the inescapable conclusion is that tax hikes will start hitting everybody who currently pays taxes.  It would be political suicide for Obama to re-institute taxes on the free-riders — that train doesn’t have a reverse gear. 

The top bracket doesn’t have enough income to fund Obama’s wish list — even at a 100% marginal rate.  So, he’ll have no choice but to pare the shopping list  or break the “not a single dime” promise.

My money’s on the latter.

* * * * *

Some facts sourced from:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=320369763494616

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Listen Up … Better Yet – Watch Those Cell Phone Bills

February 25, 2009

Excerpted from Marketing Daily, “Group Cautions on Cell Phone Contracts,” by Aaron Barr, Jan 30, 2009

* * * * *

As family budgets tighten and the recession deepens, watchdog group Consumer Action is encouraging consumers to watch out for hidden fees and penalties when it comes to cell phone contracts.

“As more and more Americans shift their phone use to cell phones, the costs and pitfalls associated with contract-based cell phones become clearer and clearer … In this new year, consumers … need to be more careful than ever about avoiding paying more than is necessary for cell phone service.”

According to the group, consumers should watch out for five issues in particular over the course of 2009. At the top of the list are early termination fees that occur when someone tries to break a pre-determined contract … 

A second issue comes from mandatory contract extensions that come when one tries to replace a lost or broken phone, which can be an increasingly significant issue as teen and tween cell phone use continues to rise. “Many consumers learn the hard way that there’s a catch when you try to replace a lost or broken cell phone–your contract may start all over again from scratch on the phone–even if you’ve been paying faithfully each month for replacement insurance” …

The group also advised consumers to watch out for overage fees when exceeding monthly limits on contracts and texting fees associated with their cell phone accounts. And the group warned immigrants to pay close attention to the rules on international calling cards. Many of the fees are not disclosed or are only disclosed in very small print on the back of the card.

“Even though limited progress has been made on some contract-based cell phone billing and disclosure issues, there are still many problems that will continue to confuse and mislead consumers in 2009 … Our goal here is to help shine a spotlight on some of the least understood problem areas” … 

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=99369

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog