Archive for March 4th, 2009

Maybe the glass is, say, 90% full …

March 4, 2009

Ken’s Take: The financial crisis is serious, and is hurting all of us — some more than others.  But, do we really need to panic and throw trillions of dollars against the problem without much forethought re: unintended future consequences?  Time to step back and take a deep breath. This article is on target …

* * * * *

Excerpted from IBD, “Depression Or Just An End To Affluence?”, Hanson, February 26, 2009

Given all the bad financial news, we are in a funny sort of way.

Our spiraling national deficit is being financed by China, Japan and other overseas concerns at almost no interest — saving the U.S. trillions of dollars in debt-service costs.

Nearly 93% of those Americans in the work force are still employed. The difference between what the banks pay out in interest on depositors’ savings and what they charge borrowers for loans is one of the most profitable in recent memory.

The sudden crash in energy prices may be hurting Iran, the Gulf monarchies, Russia and Venezuela. Yet Americans, who import 60% of their transportation fuel, along with natural gas, have been given about a half-trillion-dollar annual reprieve.

The reduced price of energy could translate into more than $1,500 in annual savings for the average driver, and hundreds of dollars off the heating and cooling bills for the homeowner.

For the vast majority of Americans with jobs, the fall in prices for almost everything from food to cars has, in real dollars, meant an actual increase in purchasing power.

The loss in value of home equity is serious for those who need to relocate for work or want to downsize and move to an apartment or a retirement community. But when averaged over the last decade, real estate still shows a substantial annual increase in value.

Moreover, the vast majority of American homeowners — well over 90% — meet their mortgage payments. They have no plans to flip their homes for profit. For them, the fact that they have lost paper equity, or even owe more than their homes are currently appraised at, is scary — but not equivalent to a depression.

Most are confident that after a few years their houses will appreciate again. As for now, working young couples have a chance to buy a house that they couldn’t have just two years ago.

The same holds true for many retirement accounts whose decline is terrible for those retirees who count on drawing out each month what they put away or must cash out their depleted accounts at vastly reduced value.

But the majority of working Americans are not yet pulling out their sinking retirement funds. Most are still putting away pretax money each month, apparently confident that within a few years their portfolios will return to their former value.

Some are even consoled that they are now buying mutual funds at rock-bottom prices rather than investing in sky-high investments at the peak of a bull market.

Many people are hurting. Yet to go to the local Wal-Mart is to see late-model cars in the parking lots and plenty of cell phones, iPods and BlackBerrys among the shoppers. Carts are stuffed with consumer goods, lots of food and Easter confections.

So are we in a depression that justifies a vast redefinition of government and a massive takeover of the private sector? Not quite.

What we are witnessing instead is a sharp downturn from the most affluent era in the history of civilization. For the last two decades, we borrowed and spent as if there were no tomorrow. Now we are living in that tomorrow of cutting back and making do.

Full article – worth reading:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=320545175132723* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

As the Dow keeps dropping, O is running out of people to blame.

March 4, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ, “The Obama Economy”, March 3, 2009
  
As 2009 opened, three weeks before Barack Obama took office, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 9034 on January 2, its highest level since the autumn panic. Yesterday the Dow fell another 4.24% to 6763, for an overall decline of 25% in two months and to its lowest level since 1997. The dismaying message here is that President Obama’s policies have become part of the economy’s problem.

It’s become clear that Mr. Obama’s policies are slowing, if not stopping, what would otherwise be the normal process of economic recovery. From punishing business to squandering scarce national public resources, Team Obama is creating more uncertainty and less confidence — and thus a longer period of recession or subpar growth.

In the last two months … the economy has received no great new outside shock.

What is new is the unveiling of Mr. Obama’s agenda and his approach to governance. 

One negative revelation has been the way he has chosen to spend his scarce resources on income transfers rather than growth promotion. Most of his “stimulus” spending was devoted to social programs, rather than public works, and nearly all of the tax cuts were devoted to income maintenance rather than to improving incentives to work or invest.

The market has notably plunged since Mr. Obama introduced his budget last week, and that should be no surprise. The document was a declaration of hostility toward capitalists across the economy. 

His assault on business and investors is delaying a recovery and ensuring that the expansion will be weaker than it should be when it finally does arrive.  The result has been a capital strike.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123604419092515347.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Closing the hedge fund barn door … after the hedgers escape with the loot

March 4, 2009

Finally, something out of the Obama brain trust that I agree with …

“Managers at private-equity firms, real-estate investment trusts and other investment partnerships (e.g. hedge funds) would pay an additional $24 billion in taxes over the next decade. Currently, most pay taxes at the 15% capital-gains rates on the bulk of their compensation, which comes in the form of something called “carried interest,” which entitles them to a share of the firm’s profits. Because it isn’t a return on an investment they actually made, many tax experts argue it is more akin to a fee or salary for their services. Mr. Obama’s budget would require most investment managers to pay ordinary income taxes on that income.”

Note: Larry Kudlow, conservative economist (with whom I usually agree), said on CNBC: “Worst possible action he can imagine”

* * * * *

Source: WSJ, “Business Braces for a Big Hit”, Feb 27, 2009
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123569739787189001.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Question: What happens when there’s no wealth to redistribute?

March 4, 2009

Obama’s grand plan is centered on taking money  from the rich and either spending it like a drunken sailor or giving it away to folks unburdened by work.

Well, the financial crisis has vaporized mucho wealth and cut the number of mega-earners. 

Anybody with any serious money and a brain must be plotting how to shelter earnings and wealth from taxes — either because they loath taxes in general, or because they’re not fans of the Obama-Reid-Pelosi spending spree.

Question: So, if there are fewer rich people, and if the remaining rich people shelter their dough or pull a Geithner and just forget to pay taxes …  what will Obama redistribute ?

My bet: The definition of rich will start sliding down the scale.  We’ll all be rich — at least in the eyes of the tax collector.  Hide your wallet.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Charities take another hit … a big hit

March 4, 2009

Charitable giving is down because of the bad economy and tanked stock market.

Now, President Obama’s proposed budget cuts the income tax deduction for charitable contributions.

But, only for rich people — those who do the lion’s share of charitable giving.

Sounds anti-social, so why’s he doing it?

Simple, Obama believes that government can do a better job than individuals channeling money to the “right” causes.  You can’t trust individuals to give to the right causes, can you?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

No Saturn? … What about the owner picnics in Tennessee ?

March 4, 2009

Ken’s Take: Talk about blowing a great franchise.  In the 1990s, Saturn had growing cult-like following, often being praised as a brand in the league of  Harley-Davidson.  GM squandered a valuable asset. 

My bet: there’s enough residual brand equity for Saturn to rise from the ashes.  In fact, if I were running GM, Saturn would be the nameplate I’d slap on all hybrid electrics.

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ, ” Era Ends as GM Snubs Saturn”, Feb 19, 2009

For years, analysts have urged GM to pare its brands. But GM executives insisted it would be too expensive after spending an estimated $2 billion to wind down Oldsmobile earlier this decade. Yet cutting brands shaves operating costs because each brand requires a certain amount of spending on product development advertising, dealer support and other expenses.

Now, GM is turning its back on Saturn, Pontiac, Saab and Hummer, General Motors Corp. is abandoning a decades-old product strategy that once helped ensure its dominance.

Saturn, Hummer, Saab and Pontiac have all struggled to attract customers. That prompted GM to sell large numbers of them to car-rental concerns, corporate fleet buyers and GM’s own employees. Of the 504,000 vehicles sold under the four brands in 2008, 40% went to fleets and employees. Such sales generally are less profitable than those to consumer buyers.

Of the four brands being cut off, Saturn once held the most promise. GM created the line in 1985 as a completely separate company offering small cars that aimed to compete head-on with Toyota and Honda Motor Co.

Saturns featured dent-resistant plastic bodies, its dealers promised friendly, no-haggling sales and customers were invited to an annual “homecoming” cookout at the Saturn plant in Spring Hill, Tenn. For some customers, buying a Saturn was like joining a club.

But in the 1990s, GM starved Saturn for new products as it tried to revive Oldsmobile. After GM killed Olds, it turned to neglected Saturn. It spent billions to produce a range of new vehicles, many of them derivations of its Opel models from Europe. Some were hits; the Aura sedan was praised by many car reviewers.

* * * * *

Some Saturn dealers now hope that instead of closing the brand, GM will spin it off as a separate company. A team of Saturn dealers is spending 60 days working with GM to evaluate the possibility. These dealers would sell vehicles under the Saturn brand made by other manufacturers, possibly from overseas.

“This is going to be somebody’s low-cost entry to the world’s largest car market.”

* * * * *

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123500373416017943.html?mod=article-outset-box 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Is That Ad Targeting You? Web Ad Aim Improves

March 4, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ, “More Web Ads Improve Their Aim” By J. Vascellaro and E. Steel, Feb 5, 2009

* * * * *

As marketers scale back their ad budgets, some new technologies that make it easier for marketers to track the impact of their online advertising are gaining ground.

Products based on these technologies — such as customized ads that show different products to different users, Web ads hidden inside links in text, and online coupons — are part of what is called “performance-driven advertising.” That’s because the products aim to improve and more precisely measure how a particular ad performs.

While no one format is likely to emerge as a silver bullet for marketers seeking to use their ad dollars more efficiently, the advertising industry is betting on these technologies to increase online advertising spending …

Internet retailer Overstock.com is becoming a big user of performance-driven ad products. The company is planning to spend about 20% of its overall marketing budget for this year, on personalized ads from Choicestream, which makes product-recommendation software, says Overstock Chief Executive Patrick Byrne.

To devise the personalized ads … Choicestream relies on data the retailer provides about what customers browse and purchase on its site. Choicestream uses the data to select what personalized products and offers to insert into Overstock ads as they appear to potential customers browsing the Web … While Overstock hasn’t had much luck with online display advertising in the past, the new, personalized ads drove a sevenfold increase in clicks on the ads and a threefold increase in sales relative to other display ads

Internet giant Yahoo and Teracent … offer customized ad products similar to Choicestream’s … Companies like Choicestream, Yahoo and Teracent hope to steal some thunder from search advertising, which remains one of the biggest and fastest-growing ad formats. Since search ads are related to what a person is searching for on the Web, consumers often find them more relevant than other ads, and advertisers typically find them more cost effective.

But as budgets tighten, other formats that can prove they are worth their price are gaining momentum too. Coupons Inc., which makes software to help companies create and distribute online coupons … has seen a recent surge in interest from advertisers looking for more cost-effective online marketing options …

Committed revenue for the year at Vibrant, which creates in-text ads, has doubled from a year ago … In-text ads appear when a computer user hover a mouse over links that appear in the text on a Web page.

The new ad formats are winning over some big marketers. Over the past year, auto maker Chrysler, whose brands include Dodge and Jeep, has shifted its online-ad spending away from lifestyle sites to sites … toward performance-driven products like Vibrant’s in-text ads. Chrysler is also continuing to spend on search ads …

Chrysler says the shift has paid off: The percentage of total retail sales attributed to online leads rose two percentage points in 2008 from the prior year.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123379182761749823.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog