Archive for March 11th, 2009

Here’s a plan: Give California to Mexico … works for me!

March 11, 2009

Excerpted from IBD, “Home A Loan”,  March 06, 2009

A revealing study by researchers at the University of Virginia took a look at foreclosures in all 50 states, 35 metropolitan areas and 236 counties. They found that 66% of potential housing value losses in 2008 and subsequent years may be in California, with another 21% in Florida, Nevada and Arizona, for a total of 87% of national declines.”

What do they have in common? They are Sun Belt states, the location of second homes, investment properties and the playground of flippers who invested in properties hoping to ride the housing bubble to a quick profit. Nevada, California, Arizona and Florida rank first, second, third and fourth in foreclosure activity, together accounting for 55% of foreclosure activity.

One out of 76 homes in Nevada went into foreclosure in January. The figure for California was one out of 173, with Arizona and Florida close behind. In New York state, by contrast, only one out of 2,271 homes went into foreclosure in January.

California had only 10% of the nation’s housing units, but it had 34% of foreclosures in 2008.”

California was vulnerable to foreclosures because the median value of owner-occupied housing in 2007 was 8.3 times the median family income. The national average was only 3.2 times higher than the median family income.

Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=321237777275418 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

A declaration of war ?

March 11, 2009

Excerpted from NY Post, ” Obama’s search for an enemy”, March 8, 2009 

He hasn’t called anyone an “evildoer” or denounced an “axis of evil.” But make no mistake: President Obama is putting together an enemies list.

Strangely, though, those on it are not terrorists or foreign dictators. They are mostly Americans lucky enough to have succeeded through capitalism and democracy.

is criminal, as when he defended his plan for an expanded government push into health insurance as necessary “to keep the private sector honest.”

The Obama administration is on a war footing. Make that a class-war footing.

Obama’s class-war language, most of it written into prepared speeches, looks like selective anger, calculated to stoke public emotion to build support for his expansive agenda.  That agenda, which revolves around a dramatic increase in Washington power, relies on tax hikes on the same successful businesses and individuals he denounces.  First he demonizes them, then he taxes them.

And always, he makes liberal use of bogeymen. On Friday, as he stood before a class of 25 police cadets in Columbus, Ohio, hired with federal stimulus money, the President delivered a standard attack line against unnamed dissenters. “They opposed the very notion that government has a role in ending the cycle of job loss at the heart of this recession,” he said.

Actually, few if any critics advocated doing nothing. But never mind. Being President means you don’t have to let the facts get in the way of a plan to divide and conquer.

* * * * *

The President dismisses the growing perception he is adding to the economic pain. Asked about the markets, Obama waved them off as like a “tracking poll in politics” that “bobs up and down day to day.”

It was a telling moment, for the markets on his watch have moved almost exclusively down. And the 55 million households that hold mutual funds are watching their savings and retirements vanish in great gobs.

Most are decidedly middle class, making them collateral damage of this war.

* * * * *

Full column:
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/columnists/goodwin/index.html

* * * * *

Ken’s Take:

(1) Does Obama really think it’s a good idea to alienate the folks who are paying for his programs?  My sense: they’re already starting to fight back — just watch capital outflows from the US in next year or so.

(2) There is a lot of collateral damage …

(3) Wouldn’t you like to see Obama unplugged from the teleprompter for a week or so — just so we could see the real deal in operation?  As son Scott points out to me — the most powerful man in America now is a 27 year old speechwriter …

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

The “Li-ion’s” Share of the Battery Business

March 11, 2009

Excerpted from Strategy & Business, “The Future Is Lithium”, by William J. Holstein, February 3, 2009

* * * * *

The lithium ion battery, which is already widely used in consumer products, is viewed by the auto industry as the next great hope to power future-generation, energy-conscious extended-range electric cars and hybrids. Automakers and their suppliers on three continents are gearing up to determine who will dominate what could be a US$150 billion a year industry by 2030

Companies in Europe, Japan, South Korea, and China have clear leads in perfecting the battery, which can hold far more power for longer periods of time than the nickel metal hydride batteries now in use in hybrids. Whether the United States stays in the race largely depends on the future of the General Motors Corporation and its Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric vehicle. If GM, already on life support from the federal government, is forced into Chapter 11 bankruptcy or liquidation, U.S. prospects for securing a piece of the lithium ion industry could fall by the wayside.

* * * * *

Toyota and GM are eyeing each other’s lithium ion intentions warily. GM was stung by Toyota’s success in the late 1990s with the Prius and is determined to leapfrog that generation of battery technology with a six-foot long, 400-pound lithium ion battery built to last 10 years.

As recently as a year ago, Toyota argued that it was too soon to consider using lithium ion because it was an unproven technology. Some experts believe that Toyota’s conclusion was in part motivated by its huge investment in three factories in Japan that made nickel batteries. “There is only one company that has a stranded cost in nickel and that’s Toyota.”

* * * * *

Lithium ion industry advocates say that the U.S. government could play a pivotal role in determining how much of the battery business will be domestic by allocating to lithium suppliers a chunk of the $25 billion Congress approved for automobile alternative energy research and development. 

However, if the Obama administration spreads the $25 billion throughout the auto industry to the dozens of companies currently involved in alternative propulsion projects, “there’s the potential for the [money] to be so diffused that it wouldn’t do that much good in any one area. As large as that sum sounds, it could become ineffective.”

* * * * *

Of course, any U.S. hopes for securing a chunk of the lithium ion industry would be dashed if GM’s Volt project were to fizzle out because of the automaker’s financial problems.

But even if the Americans don’t make the train, a future with more and more powerful lithium ion batteries is inevitable; after all, the rest of the world is already on board.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.strategy-business.com/li/leadingideas/li00110?tid=230&pg=all

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Consumers Trade Down, At Least For Now

March 11, 2009

Ken’s Take: Insightful article re: how consumers are (and will) react to the economic downturn.

Key ideas: downward mobility, cautionary spending, renter mentality.

 * * * *

Excerpted from Knowledge @ Wharton, “The Shopper of Tomorrow: Trading Down”, Feb 18, 2009

Attention Shoppers: We no longer have the following items — “a sense of entitlement,” “conspicuous consumption” and “a golden period of luxury.” At least that is the word from Wharton faculty and other experts who point to a new logic that is defining not just what U.S. consumers buy, but how they view the shopping experience.

While shoppers typically pull back during the downward phase of any economic cycle, the severity and uncertainty of today’s crisis is likely to have longer-lasting effects on their attitudes than most slumps, these experts note. Consumers, they suggest, will eventually start spending again, but without the vigor enabled by easy credit in the Roaring 2000s …

Over the next 18 months … consumers will learn to become more frugal and are likely to carry those skills over once the economy recovers. “At some level, everybody has now been schooled about financial markets and overextending one’s credit — something American consumers have been notoriously bad at. We had a habit of not paying a lot of attention to the cost of using borrowed money” …

In the future, shoppers will learn to focus on the value of goods and services … [the] “crazy mindset” is over and shoppers are only willing to pay for what they absolutely need or items that present extraordinary value. … As for the pre-meltdown “go-go times, we will never go back to that, at least not anytime soon.”

According to consumer consultant Paco Underhill … [there] are three consumer segments now, divided not by income levels, but by income security. One group is made up of those who have lost their jobs and are downwardly mobile. For the wife of a Wall Street banker, that could result in the elimination of weekly hair and nail appointments … Those in the second group are not at immediate risk of losing their jobs, but they have friends or family who are out of work. These consumers, he says, are cutting back as a cautionary measureA third group is relatively untouched by the downturn. The individuals in this group have paid off their mortgages and, while their investment portfolios may be down sharply, they still have an adequate cushion. Nonetheless this group is also cutting back because engaging in conspicuous consumption seems like bad manners …

Armendinger points to another impact on shopping patterns — having enough space to store all one’s purchases. U.S. shoppers do seem to lead the world in consumerism, in part because they have enough land to build huge homes and storage units to house all their belongings … In Europe and emerging economies such as India … “You don’t see the Costco mentality of stockpiling toilet paper or huge vats of ketchup, simply because [people] physically don’t have the space.”

Carl Steidtmann, chief economist and director of Deloitte Research emphasizes that the Great Depression, combined with World War II, amounted to a 15-year period of consumer constraint, first because of the economic contraction and then because of rationing for the war effort. He predicts that the current downturn, which began in December 2007, will start to abate by the end of this year, and is not likely to have as great a long-term impact on consumers as the Great Depression.

He also suggests that the most lasting impact of the current downturn may be on homeowners who are severely stressed by mortgage debt. Going forward, he expects more of a “renter mentality” in the housing market, with less emphasis on homeownership as an investment vehicle …

 

Wharton marketing professor David Reibstein says the current angst about consumer spending reminds him of the periods of recession in 2001 and 1991. At both extremes of any economic cycle — the highs and the lows — conventional wisdom holds that during the highs, everyone feels the status quo will continue, while during the lows, everyone feels that life as we know it has forever changed. “While we’re in the midst of it, there’s always that concern … What’s amazing to me is how resilient we are.”

Reibstein points to the … terror attacks on September 11, 2001, when it seemed no one would ever have the courage to board an aircraft again. By the time the current financial crisis reduced demand, air travel volume had recovered. “It’s going to take a long time for us to get through this because of the severity and depth of this cycle … but once we do, it will be amazing how quickly people do rebound.”

Gradually, he adds, as the recent shocks to the economy are absorbed, people will begin to reinvest and cautiously step up purchases. Confidence will improve even more as job losses stabilize and hiring begins again, he says. “It’s only going to take time.”

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full Article:
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2161

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Charities Lose As Airlines Grasp For Profits From Unused Tickets

March 11, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ “Why Fliers Can’t Donate Unused Tickets” By Scott McCartney, Feb 10, 2009

* * * * *

“I was absolutely flabbergasted” by Delta’s response, said Mr. Zizzo … He had the unused tickets after canceling a trip because he and his wife suddenly had to care for an elderly relative.

Delta, like other airlines, says it doesn’t allow name changes on tickets …  Most airlines make their tickets “nontransferable” to protect their fare structures and maintain control of their inventory. Otherwise, entrepreneurs might hoard cheap tickets and then resell them at higher prices closer to departure …

Travelers can fly later on their unused tickets by applying the value of the ticket to another trip to any destination after deducting change fees. But most airlines require the new ticket to be in the original passenger’s name … The restriction means that when plans change, consumers are often left holding nonrefundable tickets they can’t use … many end up getting thrown away.

How many? Airlines won’t say. Airlines don’t break out revenue from “spoiled” tickets and won’t publicly estimate how many tickets are never used … One thing is clear: Spoilage is big enough to allow overbooking of flights — selling more tickets than there are seats on a plane because some customers typically don’t show up.

Industry insiders … suggested that about 2% of all tickets expire unused. One official put the figure as high as 3% of an airline’s revenue … Based on 2007 passenger revenue …  $1.8 billion to $2.7 billion worth of tickets are thrown away each year. Even after change fees, that’s enough to make a major difference for charities.

Organizations such as Make-A-Wish say they would be thrilled to make use of some of those tickets … Airline customers donated millions of frequent-flier miles to Make-A-Wish, resulting in about $3.6 million worth of tickets for 880 families. But the organization had to purchase tickets for 7,790 other wishes granted …

Carriers say they won’t make exceptions for charities, and don’t have any mechanism to convert donated tickets to miles, gift cards or airline vouchers that could be transferred to approved charities … Some carriers said they didn’t have the technology to allow donations; others said that even though they charge change fees, the cost of allowing donations is the main hurdle …

Making airline tickets transferable isn’t a security issue. The TSA says the airline simply has to check passenger manifests against extra-security screening criteria and no-fly watch lists before departure. “TSA does not have a rule directly forbidding the transfer of airline tickets,” a spokesman said …

To Mr. Zizzo, the airline policy doesn’t make sense. “If I don’t use the tickets, they get to put $700 in their pocket,” he said. “With the economy the way it is, it makes sense to use everything available, especially for someone in need.”

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123422727266065699.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog