Archive for April 14th, 2010

Panic in Washington: Congress might get a dose of its own ObamaCare medicine … oops

April 14, 2010

Punchline:  More proof that Congress is populated by morons …

A report from the Congressional Research Service found that — because of imprecise language and a possible drafting error in the ObamaCare bill — senators, representatives, and their staffers may end up having their ‘Cadillac’ coverage replaced by everyman’s ObamaCare.

A provision in the bill inadvertently bars members of Congress and congressional staff from taking part in the current federal health employee plan. 

Watch for a legislative fix … via the 51 vote reconciliation process, of course.

* * * * * 

Excerpted from NY Times: Baffled by Health Plan? So Are Some Lawmakers, April 12, 2010

The new health care law will affect almost every American in some way. And, perhaps fittingly if unintentionally, no one may be more affected than members of Congress themselves.

The Congressional Research Service says the law may have significant unintended consequences for the “personal health insurance coverage” of senators, representatives and their staff members.

For example, it says, the law may “remove members of Congress and Congressional staff” from their current coverage, in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

The confusion raises the inevitable question: If they did not know exactly what they were doing to themselves, did lawmakers who wrote and passed the bill fully grasp the details of how it would influence the lives of other Americans?

Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah, said lawmakers were in the same boat as many Americans, trying to figure out what the new law meant for them. “If members of Congress cannot explain how it’s going to work for them and their staff, how will they explain it to the rest of America?”

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/us/politics/13health.html?hp

I slept better last nite knowing that Canada is de-nuking.

April 14, 2010

I never have trusted the Canadians … I figure that if you’re willing to toss off your hockey gloves and wail on an opponent at mid-rink, then you’re probaably willing to lob nukes at a neighboring country.

So, I was pleased to hear of Obama’s nuclear coup — getting Canada to scale back its nuclear ambitions.

According to USA Today, in the marquee deal of  Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit,  Canada agreed to a plan to send spent nuclear fuel back to the U.S.
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/04/obama-strikes-nuke-deals-with-mexico-canada-others/1

Let me make sure I understand, we still don’t have agreement in the US where to stash our nuclear waste (not in my backyard, please), but now we’re going to take Canada’s radioactive garbage … and that’s a good deal that will make us safer ?

BTW: Canada doesn’t do nuke weapons.  According to Wikipedia — the Homa Files ultimate reference source — Canada is listed as a nation with the capability (infrastructure, material and experts) to quickly make nuclear weapons … but hasn’t and has never intended to do so.

* * * * *

Is it just me, or does the Nuclear Summit seem like US gun control on steroids?  The good guys agree to restraints … so that the only deadly strike capability rests in the hands of rogue states and terrorists.  I must be missing something …

Japanese food companies look to spice up sales overseas

April 14, 2010

Takeaway: When you’re bored with the game at home, take your show on the road.

This strategy has worked well for Japanese companies for decades. However, foreign markets typically expect high tech products from Japan.

Recently, Japanese food companies have focused their efforts outward as their domestic consumer market stagnates.

As is expected in Japan, these companies face relatively high labor costs, and limited agricultural resources, so will this strategy bring home the bacon, or be put out to pasture?
 

* * * * *

Excerpt from New York Times, “Japanese Food Companies Seek Growth Abroad” by Miki Tanikawa, April 2, 2010.

As birth rates and the consumer market shrink at home, food companies in Japan are increasing the pace of their overseas expansions and trying to improve promotion of their brands.

Analysts say that increasing sales abroad is crucial for manufacturers. To do so, the companies are combining, undertaking joint ventures, cutting production costs and creating strategies for new markets.

“The domestic market is shrinking, deflation is cutting into sales and the sense of crisis is looming stronger and stronger,” said a senior economist at Norinchukin Research Institute in Tokyo.

The sector’s strategy has been twofold. First, Japanese companies have been infiltrating the health food and condiment categories overseas with soy-based products like tofu in countries where few domestic companies can compete.

Second, Japanese producers capitalize on cute Asian-themed characters like koalas and pandas and apply technology to make amusingly shaped treats to attract snack-happy consumers.

The Japanese confectioner Ezaki Glico says its Sofyl yogurts and Yakult fermented-milk drinks contain bacteria that aid digestion, now draws 25.7 percent of its 293 billion yen in annual revenue from overseas units, thanks to 38,000 “Yakult women” who sell the products door to door in Asia and Latin America.

The company says it sells 6.5 billion units of Yakult and Sofyl a year outside Japan. “We want our product to be available virtually everywhere, like Coca-Cola, and make a contribution to the health of people around the world,” said the director for the international department.

Ajinomoto, a leading Japanese food company, with about 1.2 trillion yen in annual revenue, has increased its overseas sales ratio to 31.8 percent, from 22.8 percent, in eight years.

In terms of expansion, Japan’s Asian neighbors offer the biggest opportunities. Countries like Thailand already embrace a Japanese food subculture, and in China, growing numbers of upwardly mobile workers are increasingly inclined to purchase prepared foods and snacks.

The international survey firm Euromonitor says that the Lotte Group, a company in Tokyo that sells products in more than 70 countries, is the leading Asian-owned confectioner, with a 10.3 percent market share. The company, maker of Koala’s March — chocolate-filled koala-shaped cookies — ranks fourth in terms of sales among global companies in the Asian sector excluding Japan — ahead of Nestlé but behind Mars, Perfetti Van Melle and Cadbury.

Despite quality concerns raised by the recent recalls by Toyota Motor, a scandal caused by the sale of expired dairy products and eggs at Fujiya confectionery in 2007 and the Snow Brand food-poisoning fiasco in 2000, Japanese food manufacturers express pride in the country’s technological expertise.

In fact, the sales and marketing strengths of Western food companies far outweigh those of the Japanese. Kraft, for example, has gross sales of $50 billion a year, nearly 10 times as much as Lotte, which grossed about $5 billion in sales in its 2008 financial year.

Analysts and management consultants said that the struggle of the Japanese food companies to keep up with their Western rivals in overseas territories sounded familiar: Japanese companies that have higher-quality products are still sometimes hampered by weak marketing and brand strategies.
 

Managing director in Tokyo for the Boston Consulting Group, said: “Japanese firms may say, ‘We have superior products.’ That alone won’t do. You need sales and personnel who understand the trends of the local market, developers who will take the local taste into account and marketers who can explain the product to the locals on their terms.”

“You need the whole package in order to win,” he said.

Edit by BHC

* * * * *

Full Article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/global/03food.html?pagewanted=2&ref=business