Archive for April 15th, 2010

News Flash: Nearly half of US households escape fed income tax … psst, I told you so (July 31, 2008)

April 15, 2010

Last week, there was a flurry of news activity over a report that nearly half of all U.S. households will pay no federal income taxes for 2009.

It was treated as new news.  Geez.

Homa Files were all over this as far back as July 31, 2008. 

For all the wonky facts & a complete analysis see:
Under Obama, Tax Payers Will be a Minority !
https://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/under-obama-tax-payers-will-be-a-minority/

Note: This is the Homa Files post with all-time record for most hits.

 I hate to be an “I told you so” (yeah, right) … but hears the AP report … almost 2 years later.

As President Obama likesto say “Elections have consequences”.

* * * * *

Excerpted from AP: Nearly half of US households escape fed income tax, April 9, 2010

The federal income tax is the government’s largest source of revenue, raising more than $900 billion — or a little less than half of all government receipts .

So, Tax Day is a dreaded deadline for millions, but for nearly half of U.S. households it’s simply somebody else’s problem.

About 47 percent will pay no federal income taxes at all for 2009 … up from 38% in 2007.

Either their incomes were too low, or they qualified for enough credits, deductions and exemptions to eliminate their liability.

In recent years, credits for low- and middle-income families have grown so much that a family of four making as much as $50,000 will owe no federal income tax.

Tax cuts enacted in the past decade have been generous to wealthy taxpayers making them a target for President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress.

Less noticed were tax cuts for low- and middle-income families, which were expanded when Obama signed the massive economic recovery package last year.

The result is a tax system that exempts almost half the country from paying for programs that benefit everyone, including national defense, public safety, infrastructure and education. It is a system in which the top 10 percent of earners paid about 73 percent of the income taxes collected by the federal government.

The bottom 40 percent, on average, make a profit from the federal income tax … the government sends them a payment. Not just a refund of of excess withholding — so-called “refundable credits”.

“We have almost 50 percent of families who are getting something for nothing.”

Some of the blame goes to former President George Bush.  In 2008, he signed a law providing most families with rebate checks of $300 to $1,200.

Last year, Obama signed the economic recovery law that expanded some tax credits and created others.

Obama’s Making Work Pay credit provides as much as $800 to couples and $400 to individuals. The expanded child tax credit provides $1,000 for each child under 17. The Earned Income Tax Credit provides up to $5,657 to low-income families with at least three children.

There are also tax credits for college expenses, buying a new home and upgrading an existing home with energy-efficient doors, windows, furnaces and other appliances.

Many of the credits are refundable, meaning if the credits exceed the amount of income taxes owed, the taxpayer gets a payment from the government for the difference.

Obama has pushed tax cuts for low- and middle-income families and tax increases for the wealthy, arguing that wealthier taxpayers fared well in the past decade, so it’s time to pay up. The nation’s wealthiest taxpayers did get big tax breaks under Bush, with the top marginal tax rate reduced from 39.6 percent to 35 percent, and the second-highest rate reduced from 36 percent to 33 percent.

But income tax rates were lowered at every income level. The changes made it relatively easy for families of four making $50,000 to eliminate their income tax liability.

Here’s how they do it, according to Deloitte Tax:

The family was entitled to a standard deduction of $11,400 and four personal exemptions of $3,650 apiece, leaving a taxable income of $24,000. The federal income tax on $24,000 is $2,769.

With two children younger than 17, the family qualified for two $1,000 child tax credits. Its Making Work Pay credit was $800 because the parents were married filing jointly.

The $2,800 in credits exceeds the $2,769 in taxes, so the family makes a $31 profit from the federal income tax. That ought to take the sting out of April 15.

Full article:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Nearly-half-of-US-households-apf-1105567323.html?x=0&.v=1

* * * * *

Why it matters 

The Tax Foundation — a nonpartisan tax research group – has repeatedly warned that 

“While some may applaud the fact that millions of low- and middle-income families pay no income taxes, there is a threat to the fabric of our democracy when so many Americans are not only disconnected from the costs of government but are net consumers of government benefits.

The conditions are ripe for social conflict if these voters begin to demand more government benefits because they know others will bear the costs.” 

 http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1111.html

Bummer:Waxman melts …

April 15, 2010

I’d cleared my calendar next Wednesday to watch Henry Waxman and his fellow Congressional nitwits grill a blue-ribbon group of uber-CEO’s on FASB rules and how they apply to the increased costs that companies will incur under Obama’s cost-saving healthcare plan. (Yeah, you read that right.)

I wanted to see Waxman order the CEOs to release fraudulent financial statements and “book” some of the pie-in-the-sky cost savings that ObamaCare promises to deliver …

The hearings would have made great theater …

* * * * **

Excerpted from Washington Examiner: Waxman cancels Obamacare CEO hearing, 04/14/10

Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., has cancelled the April 21 subcommittee hearing in which CEOs were to testify about Obamacare.

Waxman had called the hearing in reaction to public statements by several companies — including Verizon, AT&T, and John Deere, among others — that Obamacare would cost them hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars because it laid a new tax on their retiree health benefit payments.

Ever since the passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit, the payments had been subsidized, tax-free, as a way of preventing these companies from dropping enrollees onto the Medicare rolls, where they would cost the government far more.

When Obamacare changed the tax rules, it was quite clear that this would result in huge losses, but President Obama and Democrats had failed to heed warnings to this effect in the run up to Obamacare’s passage last month.

The CEOs, required by law to be honest about earnings projections, re-stated their bottom lines in reaction to Obamacare’s passage, earning the ire of Waxman and other Democrats.

Hearings on this matter would likely have proved an embarrassment to the Democrats and helped drag out discussion of Obamacare’s unexpected ill effects.

Full article:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Waxman-cancels-health-care-CEO-hearing-90853384.html#ixzz0l7OIE29c

LVHM’s luxury house of brands expands to include hotels

April 15, 2010

TakeAway:   LVMH made an interesting business decision when it decided that opening hotels was the best option to continue its corporate growth. 

Yes, it said that there were no good acquisition targets left in its core business area. 

Yes, it observed that other high-end brands had opened hotels. 

But, the hospitality business is very different from the luxury consumer goods business. 

Although hotels may be a good way for LVMH to expand its presence in the luxury market and provide a new point of sale for its luxury goods, this strategy could require LVMH to devote enormous marketing funds to gain customers in the already-crowded luxury hotel market and could backfire if the hotel experience does not meet customers’ expectations of the LVMH brand.

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ, “LVMH Extends Posh Label To New Luxury Resorts,” By Christina Passariello, April 9, 2010

… LVHM, the world’s largest luxury-goods company, said Thursday it will develop resorts using the name of its Bordeaux winery, Cheval Blanc. 

LVMH tested the concept with a first location that opened in the French ski resort Courchevel in 2006. Two more hotels are scheduled to join the chain by 2012 in Oman and Egypt …

The project is “a natural extension of activities in luxury hospitality with Cheval Blanc,” LVMH said in a statement.

Like many top hotel operators, LVMH is limiting its exposure to the volatile hotel industry. It won’t own the real estate or finance construction, but will instead run the resorts under management contract, a similar model to other high-end chains such as The Ritz-Carlton …

 

The move shows how LVMH is trying to grow without resorting to costly acquisitions. Two years ago, the company pushed the boundaries of its luxury-goods universe to include yachts when it bought Dutch ship builder Royal Van Lent. A few years earlier, LVMH developed a new high-end rum, 10 Cane, instead of buying an existing brand.

LVMH grew throughout the 1990s and until 2001 thanks to expensive acquisitions. But many purchases … haven’t turned into major successes. Now, as the industry leader, there are few targets for LVMH that would have a significant impact on its growth.

LVMH’s hotels will be a showcase for many of its brands. The Cheval Blanc in Courchevel has a Givenchy spa, and visitors can buy its Louis Vuitton and Dior goods in the hotel.

Luxury brands have moved into the hotel business in recent years, looking for new ways to increase their presence …

Edit by TJS

* * * * *

Full Article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052702304198004575171680599417158.html#mod=todays_us_marketplace

* * * * *