Archive for January 17th, 2011

Should gov’t employees get pay cuts?

January 17, 2011

That’s the question, and a recent Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that:

  • 40% of Adults favor a 10% pay cut for all state employees to help reduce state spending
  • 41% oppose a 10% across-the-board pay cut
  • 19% are not sure

A pretty even split, but digging deeper:

  • 60% of entrepreneurs favor a 10% pay cut for public employees
  • A plurality (45%) of private company workers favor a 10% pay cut
  • 75% of those employed by the government do not favor a pay cut.

Flipping the numbers: 1 in 4 government employees think their pay should be cut.

Hmmm.

P.S. Note that they’re called government “employees”, not “government workers”.

Double hmmm.

Exceprted from:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/jobs_employment/january_2011/many_favor_cutting_pay_benefits_of_state_employees

When it comes to Under Armour bet ‘over’ …

January 17, 2011

TakeAway: Under Armour started slowly, but wants “to be a legitimate number two [after Nike] in the basketball market, and that may take time.” 

To get there, CEO Plank focuses on a set of principles for success – “Passion,” “Vision” and “People.”  He also abides by what he calls the “four pillars of greatness:

  1. Build a great product
  2. Tell a great story
  3. Service the business
  4. Build a great team.

* * * * *

Excerpted from Knowledge@Wharton, “Under Armour’s Kevin Plank: Creating ‘the Biggest, Baddest Brand on the Planet’” By Suzanne Vranica, January 5, 2011  

Plank says: “Great companies have to manage the cadence of what they do.  Every great brand is like a great story. Every commercial we run, every product we make, is like a chapter in that book. If we don’t manage the cadence, though, we will get too far ahead of ourselves.”

“Organic growth is happening everywhere,” Plank noted. “Our object cannot be to try to convince 25-year-olds to change brands, though that is always something good. But now 8-, 9- and 10-year-olds have a relationship with Under Armour [and say] it is their brand. I tell them that their great-great grandfather [bought products from] the guys from Germany [Adidas] and their grandfather grew up with the guys from Oregon [Nike]. But you will grow up with Under Armour.”  Accordingly, Plank has gone after young athletes to become the faces of Under Armour because they have great potential for marketing into the futurePlank also likes his team young. He said the average age of his more than 3,000 employees is 32, “and we want to keep [the work environment] young and fresh.” Under Armour’s advertisements tend to include young athletes in action – competing in extreme sports “X Games” events, snowboarding, soccer, wall-climbing, ultimate fighting and beach volleyball.

Plank plans to solidify the company’s growth in the women’s sports apparel market, which he said now accounts for about 30% of sales. He is also looking to create more of a presence for the brand in Europe and Asia – an effort that will take time because the company has to break into the soccer and, to a lesser extent, basketball markets.

Under Armour’s advertising makes full use of two of Plank’s favorite slogans – often together: “We must protect this house” and “We will.”  Protecting the brand ensures consumer respect, and Plank believes the company must work hard to continually improve.  In fact, he says “we have not yet built our defining product at Under Armour. We are not living in the past. Our larger competitors are 20 times our size. There is running room all over.”

Edit by AMW

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2665

* * * * *

When is insurance not insurance ?

January 17, 2011

According to conservative economist Thomas Sowell:

Insurance is, at it’s core, a pooling of risk.

“But, political Incentives make it rational to mandate insurance coverage on things they would not be covered by insurance on purely economic grounds, since those things are not a matter of risk.

For example, the cost of an annual medical checkup is not a risk, since is known in advance that these checkups occur once a year.

To have health insurance covers annual checkups is like having automobile insurance cover annual state inspection checks or routine oil changes.

But, because of the stronger emotions involved in medical issues, annual health checkups are more readily depicted as a good thing — and therefore justified as part of a government mandate.”

Source:Applied Economics, Basic Books, 2009