The Stimulus did stimulate … it stimulated job-switching.

Garett Jones & Daniel Rothschild — George Mason economists — surveyed employers to determine the impacts of Obama’s trillion dollar Stimulus.

Their report “Did Stimulus Dollars Hire the Unemployed?” presents several interesting conclusions.

Most noteworthy:

Just 42.1 percent of the workers hired at Stimulus-receiving organizations, were unemployed at the time they were hired.

More were hired directly from other organizations (47.3 percent)

A handful of hires came from school (6.5%) or from outside the labor force (4.1%)

Thus, there was an almost even split between “job creating” and “job switching.”

Bottom line: Hiring isn’t the same as net job creation.

image

Technical note: To be fair, there are 2nd and 3rd order effectc.  That is, firms that get poached may need to hire replacement workers — who may be drawn from the unemployment roles.  So, the Stimulus may have reduced unemployment more than the survey indicates.

>> Latest Posts

One Response to “The Stimulus did stimulate … it stimulated job-switching.”

  1. TK's avatar TK Says:

    Is it fair to only look at organizations that directly received stimulus money? If that is the case, should tax cuts be judged by the direct hiring done by its beneficiaries?

Leave a reply to TK Cancel reply