Archive for the ‘Corporate Governence’ Category

From the folks who want to micro-manage Detroit: 3 years late and 134% over budget … geez.

December 9, 2008

Three years behind schedule and almost $360 million above budget, the Capitol Visitor Center  is to open to the public on Dec. 2.

The final cost of the project is put at $621 million, more than double the $265 million estimated cost had the center been completed on schedule in December, 2005.

Security was a key factor in the cost overruns. Congress decided to add two tunnels, one for truck deliveries and one linking the Capitol with the Library of Congress, that could also serve as emergency evacuation routes.

Then there were the usual overruns associated with a project where 9,000 workers set more than 400,000 pieces of stone, some weighing as much as 500 pounds. The excavation phase required the removal of 65,000 truckloads of dirt.Congress also approved the addition of House and Senate office space.

* * * * *

Excerpted from MSNBC, “Capitol Visitor Center opens after delay, cost overrun”, Nov. 10, 2008

Full article:
 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27648214/ 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Congressional oversight of the Detroit 3 … That’s a joke, right?

December 7, 2008

Ken’s Take: There is zero chance that the Detroit 3 will pay back any bailout loans.  Period.

Restoring competitiveness against the “foreign transplants” requires substantial restructuring than won’t be done under the ever watchful eyes of a business-ignorant Congress (how many Reps and Senators have ever run a ‘for-profit’ company — or for that matter — even held a real job?) or until the labor contract is seriously renegotiated (no company can afford to pay factory laborers $150,000 per year in wages & benefits).

Bankruptcy is inevitable,  Let’s bite the bullet and get it over with …

* * * * *

Excerpted from IBD, “Prepackaged Failure”, December 05, 2008 

Sentiment running 62% against a bailout for the automakers.

But, Congressional Democrats are desperate to bail out the Big Three — but even more desperate to bail out the automakers’ unions. After all,the UAW spent more than $11 million in the last election cycle to elect Democrats.

Even a “prepackaged” bankruptcy  … doesn’t stand a chance because the unions reject it out of hand. As UAW President Ron Gettelfinger put it, prepackaged bankruptcy is “not a viable option.” Translation: Unions would have to make big, and permanent, concessions.

That leaves the latest bright idea:  Congress would in essence become the Big Three’s uber-manager, telling them how to become profitable again.

Excuse us, but are we supposed to believe that the same Congress responsible for next year’s estimated $1 trillion deficit can profitably run a market-sensitive company like a car manufacturer?

Or that the same Congress that sat on its hands as the financial meltdown unfolded and helped create the mess will know how to financially restructure America’s highly complex auto business?

Or that the people who just last year imposed $85 billion in new “efficiency” standards on a teetering industry will be savvy enough to run them anywhere but further into the ground?

Does Congress have the know-how to do this? Of the 11 Democrat members on the Senate Banking Committee who grilled Big Three CEOs last Thursday, and who will decide the outlines of any bailout plan, just one Senator — Montana’s Jon Tester, a farmer and former manager of a butcher shop — had any real business experience.

None of the rest, from committee chairman Chris Dodd on down, has any private-sector experience to speak of, apart from brief stints at law firms. Fact is, Congress isn’t equipped to run anything.

The Big Three are burning through $6 billion a month, so $34 billion won’t last long. Chapter 11 bankruptcy, or something like it, would at least let them get out from under costly union contracts.

Given union opposition, this is highly unlikely, even though about 77% of all billion-dollar companies survive bankruptcy. 

Those are better odds than congressional mismanagement would offer.

Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=313373158944445

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Better Behavior, Better for Business

October 27, 2008

Excerpted from BusinessWeek, “Outperforming by ‘Outbehaving'”, by Dov Seidman, October 7, 2008

* * * * *

Previously in business, finding advantage meant differentiating ourselves from the rest of the herd based on the products we produced, the supply chains we used to get our products to market quicker than the competition, and the service we provided to customers. If we outproduced, outsped, and outhustled rival companies, we also outsold them and “overpowered” the marketplace. This advantage was sustainable for longer periods of time in a less connected world, one in which it took competitors longer to catch up.

Today, we live in a hyperconnected world thanks to the explosion of communications technology in the late 20th century. Since hyper-connectivity breeds hyper-transparency, everyone can instantly see what we do and how we do it. As a result, everyone has grown much more interested in how we do what we do. This is especially true of our competitors, who can quickly see, study, and reverse-engineer our best-in-class supply-chain management processes, innovative product designs, and lightning-quick customer response times.

Hyperconnectivity and hypertransparency explain why so-called competitive advantage now lasts only weeks and months when it once endured for years and decades. We’re running out of areas in which we can stand out because previous forms of competitive differentiation are quickly becoming commodities.

What can’t be copied is how the company pursues these strategies.

* * * * *

How a company approaches its decisions and how it executes them is as important as the decisions and actions themselves. It is defined by the extent to which it pursues its aspirations with authenticity, openness, consistency, and with fidelity to its values and principles.

The emergence of how—or behavior as a source of competitive differentiation is evident in the humanization business is experiencing.

On the marketing front, a growing number of companies assert that they are about much more than their products or services—that “much more” translates to people. For example, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) asserts that “Tylenol is different because of the people who make it.” The product’s site contains video testimonials of workers responsible for the product, who make promises about the care and commitment they pour into their production and quality-assurance processes. Johnson & Johnson seeks to differentiate Tylenol from competing companies not only on the quality of its product, but more so based on the quality of its employees’ behaviors.

The entire “customer experience” movement reflects a similar desire, and it has been embraced by products and services companies alike. Business leaders have realized that customer service no longer suffices as a competitive differentiator, so they focus more time, energy, and investment in the human interaction their employees develop with customers.

Customer service is about how quickly an employee can connect with a customer. Customer experience is about the quality of that connection over time. Customer service is growing increasingly automated thanks to ATMs, interactive voice response (IVR) systems, and online self-service. Customer experience, which is designed to enhance the long-term loyalty of the most valuable customers, requires companies to outbehave their competitors.

* * * * *

Adopting behavior as a governing principle of human endeavor and business can also be difficult because our previous habits of thought and action—all the outs (outmuscle, outfox, outscheme, etc.)—are deeply engrained.

These old habits of behavior allowed us to accumulate power over people through leverage. Our hyperconnectivity has greatly reduced the leverage we can exert over other people, however. In today’s flat and hyperconnected world, power increasingly is derived through people—through relationships, authenticity, transparency, and openness.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/oct2008/ca2008107_857241.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_managing

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *