Archive for the ‘Executive Compensation’ Category

MBA Pay: European & Asian schools catch the U.S. …

February 17, 2014

According to research reported in BusinessWeek

MBA grads pay at business schools in Europe and Asia increased dramatically in the past couple of years.

Adjusted for local purchasing power, European and Asian MBAs have essentially caught up to U.S. MBAs.

To avoid distortions between countries, the pay levels are stated in “international dollars” that have been adjusted for purchasing power parity.

image

The researchers attributed the pay growth in Europe to the growing demand for MBAs in Europe and the geographic proximity of highly ranked European programs to the key labor markets they serve.

Why has MBA pay in the U.S. apparently stalled?

(more…)

MBA Pay: European & Asian schools catch the U.S. …

February 21, 2013

According to research reported in BusinessWeek

MBA grads pay at business schools in Europe and Asia increased dramatically in the past couple of years.

Adjusted for local purchasing power, European and Asian MBAs have essentially caught up to U.S. MBAs.

To avoid distortions between countries, the pay levels are stated in “international dollars” that have been adjusted for purchasing power parity.

image

The researchers attributed the pay growth in Europe to the growing demand for MBAs in Europe and the geographic proximity of highly ranked European programs to the key labor markets they serve.

Why has MBA pay in the U.S. apparently stalled?

(more…)

Want to curb outrageous compensation? … Here’s how!

January 30, 2009

There was broadscale outrage yesterday with the revelation that Wall Street bankers collectively walked off with almost $20 billion in bonuses — associated with their stellar 2008 performance.  Barack-O even chided them for gross irresponsibility — sucking money from taxpayer and digging our nation’s financial hole deeper.

It is ironic that Obama’s criticism comes at a time that he’s planning to dig our financial hole deeper by taking current and future taxpayer money and throwing it irresponsibly into a trillion dollar, pork-laden grab bag of whacky, non-stimulating social programs.  Nonetheless, he has a point.

Now, if he really wants to fix the problem, here’s some free advice

First, require all companies to publish — as an appendix to their proxy statements — a list of all employees who get annualized W-2 compensation over, say $250,000.  Companies are already reporting their 5 most highly compensated execs. It would be easy to expand the list since the numbers are already compiled and reported to the IRS.  If companies push back on the idea, then — privacy be damned — simply post the information to a government web site.

Hopefully, sheer embarrassment and activist shareholder pressure would dampen some of the excesses.    Failing that, the transparency would at least provide a centralized target list  for outrage and  “clawbacks”.   At an absolute minimum,  these publicly identified, highly compensated folks would get “punished” by being hounded endlessly by annoying boiler room investment hawkers.

More substantively, change the income tax codes.  For corporations, eliminate the tax deductibility of any annualized compensation exceeding $250,000 per individual.  If companies feel the need to pay people more, that’s fine.  They just do so on their own dime — not on the back of other tax payers.

For individuals, go pre-Reagan and re-introduce a couple of very high income tax brackets with draconian marginal rates.  For example, leave the current brackets where they are (35% starts at $357,700), but add a bracket that starts at $500,000 with a marginal rate of 40%, a million dollar bracket at 50%, and a $5 million bracket at 75%. Business incomes — like family farms  — could be exempted, and individuals could continue to income average so they don’t get blasted in isolated windfall years.  While individuals might clamor for still higher compensation to cover their added tax burden, their claims would likely be throttled by the corporate provisions which would disallow corporate tax deductibility.

This multi-part plan has a couple of related benefits: (1) Obama fulfills his pledge to fill the tax coffers bysoaking the rich, (2) it becomes very expensive for companies to over-compensate employees, (3) it makes uber-compensation less valuable — at the margin — to individuals, and  (4) it can be implemented Monday morning.

* * * * *
Related point: Wall Streeters argue that they have to pay high levels of compensation to retain their talent pool.  Aren’t these the smart men and ladies that cratered firms and threatened our entire economy? I say: let ’em walk.  Try recruiting randomly from the jury pool. Results can’t be worse.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Dirty Dozen … there must be a special spot in hell for these greedy lowlifes

November 20, 2008

Excerpted from WSJ, “Before the Bust, These CEOs Took Money Off the Table”, Nov. 20, 2008

* * * * * *

Fifteen corporate chieftains of large home-building and financial-services firms each reaped more than $100 million in cash compensation and proceeds from stock sales during the past five years, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.

Four of those executives, including the heads of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos., ran companies that have filed for bankruptcy protection or seen their share prices fall more than 90% from their peak

Charles R. Schwab                                    $816,606,046
Dwight C. Schar (NVR)                              $626,322,372
Angelo R. Mozilo (Countrywide)               $470,686,861
Robert I. Toll (Toll Brothers)                     $427,768,300
Richard D. Fairbank (Capital One)            $245,344,205
Richard S. Fuld Jr. (Lehman Bros)             $184,613,049 
James E. Cayne (Bear Stearns)                  $163,240,403
Bruce Karatz (KB Home)                           $191,806,999
R. Chad Dreier (Ryland Group)                 $181,420,943
Maurice R. Greenberg (AIG)                      $132,833,450
Paul C. Saville (NVR)                                $130,460,697
Lloyd C. Blankfein (Goldman Sachs)         $130,116,843

Full details, full list:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_ceos_20081111.html

* * * * *

Ken’s Take: How about some speedy action in Congress to pass a windfall profits tax: say, 95% on any income over $50 million … retroactive to January 1, 2008. 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog