Archive for August 4th, 2008

Mktg: Mickey D – How to Raise Prices (w/o Raising Prices)

August 4, 2008

Excerpted from WSJ: McDonald’s Tests Changes In $1 Burger As Costs Rise, 08-04-08

McDonald’s is testing modifications to its popular $1 double cheeseburger, and higher prices for the sandwich … selling it with one slice of cheese instead of two, and billing it as a “double hamburger with cheese ” …. or offering a double hamburger without (any) cheese …  or  selling the traditional double cheeseburger at prices ranging from $1.09 to $1.19.

Launched in 2003, the Dollar Menu has been a key driver of sales at McDonald’s 14,000 U.S. restaurants and has helped it ride out dips in consumer spending. But recently, franchisees have complained that the menu has brought too much unprofitable traffic into their restaurants.

* * * * *

As of late June, sales of the chain’s lattes, cappuccinos and other espresso drinks were off their peak … lower-priced beverages, including $1.89 iced coffee and a $1 … sweet-tea promotion, have pulled some sales away from the espresso drinks … 

McDonald’s overall beverage expansion, adding espresso drinks, smoothies, cold tea, bottled drinks and ice-blended coffee beverages at U.S. locations, is on track to exceed the company’s goal of adding $125,000 a year in sales per restaurant … and adding $1 billion a year to the company’s sales.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121780568775808337.html?mod=2_1567_topbox

* * * * *

Observations

1.  One way to increase price is to skinny back the product — put fewer cornflakes in the box.

2.  The $1 double cheeseburger is the heart of the menu — dropping it will be a big deal — no way I step up to $1.19 or buy a chesseburger with no cheese.

3.  Has the multi-dollar cup of coffee market peaked ?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

What Exactly Is a ‘Windfall’ Profit?

August 4, 2008

Excerpted from a WSJ editorial, Aug4, 2008

The “windfall profits” tax is back …  What is a “windfall” profit anyway? How does it differ from your everyday, run of the mill profit? Is it some absolute number, a matter of return on equity or sales — or does it merely depend on who earns it?

Senator Obama says government would take “a reasonable share” of oil company profits …  Senator Durbin says “The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy.”

Take Exxon Mobil, which … is the main target of any “windfall” tax surcharge …   Between 2003 and 2007, Exxon paid $64.7 billion in U.S. taxes, exceeding its after-tax U.S. earnings by more than $19 billion.

Exxon’s profit margin stood at 10% for 2007, which is hardly out of line with …  the 8.9% for U.S. manufacturing (excluding the sputtering auto makers) … Chemicals had an average margin of 12.7%. Computers: 13.7%. Electronics and appliances: 14.5%. Pharmaceuticals (18.4%) and beverages and tobacco (19.1%)

If Senator Obama is as exercised about “outrageous” profits as he says he is, he might also have to turn on a few liberal darlings. Oh, say, Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffett’s outfit pulled in $11 billion last year, up 29% from 2006. Its profit margin — if that’s the relevant figure — was 11.47%, which beats out the American oil majors.

Or consider Google, which earned a mere $4.2 billion but at a whopping 25.3% margin. Google earns far more from each of its sales dollars than does Exxon, but why doesn’t Mr. Obama consider its advertising-search windfall worthy of special taxation?

The point is that what constitutes an abnormal profit is entirely arbitrary. It is in the eye of the political beholder …  a windfall is nothing more than a profit earned by a business that some politician dislikes. 

* * * * *

Full editorial (worth reading):
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121780636275808495.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

** * * * *

For hard numbers, see prior post:
https://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/numbers-price-gouging-windfall-profits/

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Exxon — Another Windfall ?

August 4, 2008

Excerpted from IBD, August 1, 2008

Exxon Mobil reported record second-quarter income — indeed, the highest quarterly profit for any corporation ever … and, a massive (tax) windfall for the US Treasury.

In the first half, Exxon Mobil’s after-tax income rose 15% to $22.6 billion. A lot of money, to be sure, until you consider that Exxon Mobil paid (almost 3 times as much) — $61.7 billion — in taxes — also a record.

As economist Mark Perry has noted, Exxon Mobil will pay more taxes this year to the U.S. Treasury than the bottom 50% of all taxpayers — combined.

* * * * *

Note: Jimmy Carter’s windfall profits tax led to a 6% drop in domestic oil output and as much as a 15% surge in oil imports, according to the Congressional Research Service.

* * * * *

For full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=302483718997031

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Obama leads McCain among low-wage workers

August 4, 2008

Excerpted from Reuters,  08-04-08

Obama holds a two-to-one lead over McCain among low-wage workers (nearly a quarter of U.S. adults, earning $27,000 or less) … Obama’s advantage is due largely to overwhelming support from African Americans and Hispanics.

The group views Obama as the more empathetic candidate and the one who most closely shares their values …  92% of African Americans chose Obama as the candidate most concerned with their problems; not a single black respondent said that about McCain, the Post said.

Most of the respondents were pessimistic about the impact of the November 4 election. A majority of those polled, both white and minority, said that no matter who won their personal financial situation would be unlikely to change, it said.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *