Archive for October 15th, 2008

Keep your toxic securities, we’ll take preferred stock …

October 15, 2008

Excerpted from WSJ: “‘Distasteful’ Capital”, Oct. 15, 2008

* * * * * 

The government’s rescue plan moved into a new phase with the announcement that Treasury is injecting $125 billion into the country’s nine largest banks  … as much as $25 billion each for the biggest. Another $125 billion is on the table for other banks that need capital on the same terms offered to the big boys.

Despite the risks, directly recapitalizing the banks is likely to prove a better tool than buying up “troubled assets.” 

Giving banks this additional capital cushion should give them some leeway to sell those assets at market prices without risking insolvency. At the same time, it avoids the vexing problem of how to price securities that the smartest minds in finance are having trouble assigning a value to.

And unlike buying dodgy mortgage paper, recapitalizing banks is something the government has done before and knows how to do, more or less. The FDIC has done so from time to time via open-bank interventions, and the Depression-era Reconstruction Finance Corp. recapitalized thousands of banks in the 1930s.

Under the program, banks that participate will pay 5% interest annually on nonvoting, senior preferred shares issued to Treasury. Treasury will also receive warrants to buy bank stock at the market price at the time of the capital injection. The warrants, equal to 15% of the face value of the preferred shares issued by the bank, offer some possibility of profit for the Treasury without being so dilutive to existing shareholders as to scare away private capital.

* * * * *

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122402721776634391.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Putting the stock market (and capital gains) in perspective …

October 15, 2008

Historical Perspective

Like most folks, I’ve gotten hammered by the recent market declines.  But yesterday —when Obama said “McCain’s capital gains tax cut won’t have any effect … not even the best investors have to worry about capital gains these days” — it got me thinking “how bad are things, and is Obama right?”  Answer: “not that bad”, and “no”.

Below is historical data for the S&P 500 Index — right off Yahoo Finance.  Since the plot is logarithmic, the straight line represents a constant rate of increase — across 33 years.  Pretty remarkable, right ?  Even considering the past couple of weeks’ battering.  The chart really puts things in perspective. If you compare where we are to 2 artificially high periods — the internet -bubble and the housing bubble — things look pretty bleak.  If you compare where we are to the long run historical trend — we’re only slightly below the trend line.  In other words, right on track.

image

* * * * * *

Capital Gains

What about Obama’s assertion that not even the savviest investors will benefit from a halving of the capital gains rate?

Well, that might or might not be true. It depends on when stocks were bought.  Using the S&P 500 as a proxy for an average stock, if a stock  was bought near the peak of the internet or housing bubbles, it’s probably “under water” with no unrealized capital gains (i.e. capital losses).  McCain’s proposal to allow deductibility of up to $15,000 of losses (up from $3,000) would offset some of the pain.  The average tax benefit of the step-up would be about $2,400 [$12,000 step-up times 20% average effective tax rate equals $2,400].

But, note that a stock that’s been held for about 10 years — e.g. the portfolios of diehard “buy & hold” folks — are “in the money” and have capital gains.  Or, folks who bought into the market after the internet bubble burst may have capital gains.  For example, if somebody bought the S&P Index in Sept. 2002 at 815, they’d be sitting down from the housing bubble peak of 1,500 but — at 1,000 — they’d still have 185 of capital gains.  After McCains 7.5% capital gains tax, that nets to 171; after Obama’s 20%, that nets to 148 — a 16% difference. Hmmm.  I guess the cut in the capital gains tax rate could matter.

More important, McCain’s capital gains tax rate cut is intended to attract capital into the market now — with the prospects of favorable tax treatment when prospective gains are realized.  The increased flow of capital should boost the stock market — which is good for all investors, big and small — and should provide growth capital to businesses — which should help employment.  Win-win.

image

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Kumbaya ? I don’t think so …

October 15, 2008

Excerpted from WSJ: “Hopes Quickly Fade For a Postpartisan Era”, Seib, Oct. 14, 2008

* * * * *
Idealists once looked at this presidential campaign, between two candidates who fancy themselves as free of conventional party ties, and thought it might produce the election that finally pulls Washington out of the deep rut of partisan divisiveness it fell into in the 1990s … Instead, partisan animosity is growing rather than waning.

Pollster Peter Hart has found some startling new evidence of high tensions. In surveying voters over the weekend, Mr. Hart found that more than a third of each candidate’s supporters say they have grown to “detest (the other candidate) so deeply that they would have a hard time accepting the one they don’t support as president.

* * * * *

It’s starting to appear that the only way for Washington to overcome partisan divides may be if one party — the Democrats, in this case — wins by such commanding margins that it can overpower the other party.
That might be good for efficiency, but it would be bad for building the kind of national consensus that’s desirable to overcome the enormous economic challenges the nation will face after Nov. 4.

(America will) again elect a president whom a sizable chunk of voters somehow consider illegitimate. That may make for good autumn sport, but it’s discouraging for anyone who thought Washington was about to pull out of its divisive partisan ditch.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122393387064230201.html 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

More lessons from the financial crisis …

October 15, 2008

Excerpted from Harvard Business Online, “6 Lessons We Should Have Learned Already”, by Paul B. Carroll and Chunka Mui, September 30, 2008

* * * * *

The collapse of Washington Mutual, Wachovia, Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and others soon to fall stem from discredited strategies that should have been avoided.

Here are six lessons that, had they been learned a decade ago, would have kept us from being in our current mess:

* * * * *

1. It doesn’t work to let dealmakers make all their money up front.

Whether it’s lenders hawking mortgages, bankers pushing bonds, or salespeople closing contracts before the end of the quarter, dealmakers have to have responsibility for the health of those decisions years down the road. Where possible, the individuals who make the deals should also have their compensation depend on the long-term performance of those deals.

Green Tree Financial showed how dangerous it can be to separate up-front fees from long-term responsibility. In the 1990s, Green Tree offered mortgages on mobile homes that made no long-term sense — the mortgages lasted 30 years, while the underlying assets had a useful life of just 10 to 15 years. Yet, because Green Tree employees from the CEO on down had so much of their pay tied to the growth in the number of mortgages, the company churned out flawed loans at an ever-accelerating pace. When problems started to surface, Green Tree actually managed to sell itself to Conseco for almost $6 billion in 1999. Conseco subsequently wrote off all the profits that Green Tree ever recorded and went into bankruptcy proceedings.

Subprime lenders, having missed the Green Tree lesson, likewise became addicted to up-front fees and generated an astonishing number of bad loans that were turned into securities and sold.

2. Risks may correlate more than you think. In other words, a single problem can take you down if it’s severe enough.

Long Term Capital Management thought it had diversified its risks in the 1990s but found its whole portfolio turning sour simultaneously and collapsed in 1998. Having missed that lesson, this time around companies such as Merrill Lynch and WaMu built huge portfolios of mortgage-related securities that relied on historical data suggesting that housing markets were localized — in other words, the market in Denver was independent of the market in Sacramento, which was independent of the market in Pittsburgh. In fact, the credit crunch has clobbered all markets and all classes of lenders.

3. In a crisis, liquidity can disappear overnight.

LTCM thought that, in the event of problems, it could always unwind its positions in orderly fashion. In fact, all buyers disappeared. The same thing happened to Merrill, WaMu and others. The market got so scared so fast that nobody would buy their debt portfolios at almost any price. While Bank of America might have bought Merrill at a bargain for $50B, they also acquired $64B of toxic debt that will eventually mushroom the true cost of the acquisition.

4. It’s incredibly dangerous to buy a business unless you understand it in excruciating detail.

Conseco showed the danger. It had a great record of buying and integrating companies, but they were all in insurance. Conseco didn’t know anything about mortgages. It was so clueless about the problems with Green Tree’s business model that it actually stepped up the mortgage business, right to the point where it collapsed. AIG repeated the mistake when it started offering credit-default insurance on mortgage-backed securities that it didn’t understand. Merrill made this mistake when it decided it could copy Goldman Sachs and invest its own capital in what turned out to be toxic loans. (And Bank of America may have made this mistake when it agreed to buy Merrill, whose retail brokerage operation, investment banking unit and investment portfolio are outside its expertise.) As a colleague of ours says: Don’t assume someone smarter than you will understand the risks you’re taking on.

5. Whenever anyone says they’ve managed to do away with risk, head for the hills.

LTCM said its portfolio was impervious to risk. AIG and others said the same thing about the securities that were built based on subprime mortgages. We’ve no doubt that yet others will be saying the same as they argue for ways to take advantage of others’ mistakes as the current crisis unfolds.

6. Perhaps the greatest lesson of all is that bad strategies can happen to great companies and smart people.

The humility that comes with this lesson should cause the smartest companies and managers to instill process and cultural mechanisms that absorb these lessons and avoid such mistakes in the future by creating a culture of constructive debate and deliberation.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Note: The authors researched 2,500 major failures and recently published both the Harvard Business Review article, “Seven Ways to Fail Big” and their book, “Billion-Dollar Lessons: What You Can Learn from the Most Inexcusable Business Failures of the Last 25 Years”.

* * * * *

Full article:
http://conversationstarter.hbsp.com/2008/09/six_lessons_we_should_have_lea.html?cm_mmc=npv-_-WEEKLY_HOTLIST-_-OCT_2008-_-HOTLIST1006

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Another Shift to Digital for P&G

October 15, 2008

Excerpt from Marketing Daily “P&G Eschews TV In Oral-B Pulsonic Intro ” September 12, 2008

* * * * * 

Procter & Gamble is introducing an ultrasonic toothbrush under its Oral-B brand, which includes manual and power toothbrushes for children and adults, oral irrigators, and products like dental floss…

The company will promote with ads and events touting it for its design and performance…Allisa Hammond, a spokesperson for P&G’s Oral Care division, says the marketing campaign for the Pulsonic is “very different than our typical marketing strategy.”

She says the campaign will include digital advertising, public relations, unique, targeted print and in-store displays. But, she says, “we will not be using TV advertising, which is something we normally use in our campaigns. Instead, we wanted to let the design of the toothbrush really stand out, and are relying on influencers such as magazine editors, bloggers, interior fashion designers and unique fashion and design sponsorships to reach this consumer”…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Oral-B was one of the surprising consumer product good brands to make an appearance at New York’s Fashion Week.  As the article goes on to note the product spokesperson is an interior designer from “Extreme Home Makeover” and was a feature in the the Kardashian sisters’ runway show.

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=90443

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Big Profits from "Inferior" Products

October 15, 2008

Excerpted from Strategy & Business, “A Breakaway Opportunity for “Inferior” Products”, by Leslie Moeller, James Ryan, and Juan Carlos Webster, September 16, 2008

* * * * *
As the difficult economy causes consumers to trade down in their purchases, companies need to adjust their offerings to their customers’ new behavior.

The current economic crisis is creating a “new normal” in consumer buying habits. Before the recent downturn, when consumers tried to save money, they traded down from branded products to private-label or so-called value brands. But they tended to keep buying some form of the product; they continued to pay for the convenience of, say, antibacterial throwaway wipes or gourmet frozen foods. In the current economy, they are not just trading down within a category, but switching to “inferior” products and services — paper towels instead of wipes, washcloths instead of paper towels. In the process, they are raising the value of the type of products and services economists call “inferior goods”: those that attract consumers more when purchasing power declines.

This will require a major shift of focus for many consumer-oriented companies. During the past decade or so, marketers have grown accustomed to the trend known as “premiumization”: Each year, consumers sought out higher-priced and more distinctive products.

Premiumization will never go away completely. But suddenly it has moved to the slow lane. The reason, of course, is the continuing economic downturn.

The impact has not been gentle on premium products, even the relatively inexpensive or everyday kinds. Retail sales figures for the second quarter of 2008 showed declines of 0.7 percent for Target Corporation (versus a gain of 2.7 percent for Wal-Mart Stores Inc., which has much less of a premium focus in its category) and a significant “mid-single-digit” decline for the Starbucks Corporation.

* * * * *

If you can attract consumers to your category from another, the era of inferior products may bring you superior opportunities. Consumer-oriented companies should consider the following options when facing the current economic slowdown:

1. Don’t blindly lower prices to regain volume. Simply reducing prices could well be financially disastrous; it already has been for several casual-dining restaurant chains. Across-the-board price-cutting may lower the price of a $12 meal to $9 or $10, and thus affect the perceived value of, say, Boston Market versus Chipotle, but it will not have any effect on a consumer who is opting for a $5 meal by eating at home.

2. Find the inferior products that will attract consumers as their purchasing power decreases. Introduce a new brand or sub-brand in the categories to which consumers are moving in this downturn. Of course, companies will run the risk of potential cannibalization, but that’s still better than losing customers altogether.

3. Cement consumers to your brand. Once you have attracted consumers to your inferior product, bind them to your brand. Give them an experience that merits repurchase. Think about the products you can trade them up to when the economy starts to recover — for example, the health-conscious, convenient, or premium products that will make them stick to your brand as their incomes increase.

4. Make the new normal feel better. You can help consumers feel good about migrating to inferior goods by enabling them to justify their decisions in terms other than affordability. Toyota Motor Company’s Prius is a great example: Consumers don’t feel bad about trading in their BMW or Escalade, because they are doing their part for the environment; it’s not simply that they can’t afford anything more expensive.

* * * * *

Brand owners and companies that offer products or services to customers across a broad range of price points, and that can manage the cycle, will fare better than those with more focused products and offerings that can’t adapt up- or downstream as consumer choices change.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.strategy-business.com/li/leadingideas/li00093?pg=all

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Credit Crunch Decaffeinates Coffee Push at McDonalds

October 15, 2008

Excerpted from AdAge “Credit Crunch Takes Bite Out of McDonalds” by Emily Bryson York , September 29, 2008 

* * * * * 

The banking crisis is threatening to take a rather surprising hostage: McDonald’s big-budget coffee rollout.

Tightening credit conditions, which are crimping plans for marketers as diverse as giant General Motors Corp. and relatively small household-products company Method, have prompted Bank of America to halt loans to McDonald’s franchisees. They need the capital to frantically build coffee bars in the chain’s 14,000 locations for what was planned to be an April coffee introduction.

And although it won’t derail the launch altogether, it is likely to delay it nearly into summer — hardly optimal timing for a hot-beverage introduction. It also could force the company to postpone a huge marketing push it’s been planning to support the java drive, as the company generally waits until 60% of its stores have been outfitted to undertake a national ad push. The fast feeder maintains that everything is on track…

Franchisees are spending about $100,000 per store to accommodate the “combined beverage business,” which includes lattes and cappuccinos. Most are seeking loans for the build-out. “As money remains tight, it’s going to be more difficult to get the loans to remodel for the combined beverage strategy,” one franchisee said…

The corporate memo additionally advised that “now is not the time to be shopping for loans based on interest rates,” or to refinance existing debt. It went on to suggest franchisees consider using cash on hand to cover new-equipment costs…

“I think it could very likely slow down the [rollout],” said Darren Tristano, exec VP of Technomic. “That plus the impact that Starbucks has seen in traffic and a decline in sales, I think it probably would be better to slow it down and continue to test it and see how the results are.”

McDonald’s spokesman Bill Whitman, however, said the beverage strategy is “on target and progressing as planned.”

“There continues to be more than sufficient liquidity available to our franchisees to fund capital improvements in their restaurants,” he said, adding that more than 50 national, regional and local lenders are providing financing to U.S. franchisees.

…it seems clear that the company is backpedaling. In July, McDonald’s was expecting the rollout to be completed by April. Earlier this month, Ralph Alvarez, chief operating officer, told analysts at a Bank of America conference that the specialty-coffee rollout should be complete by mid-2009.

Even if that date stays on track, the chain would likely miss the cold-weather window in which hot drinks are said to be the most popular…Another problem will be what to do with the ad calendar…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full article:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=131320

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog