Archive for November 4th, 2009

The elections: Checkbooks, Adult Supervision, Pookie, and Buyer's Remorse …

November 4, 2009

Last night, most pundits reduced the election results to an older, whiter group of voters  taking a stand.

Here’s my take (trying to avoid the usual pundit bromides) …

Checkbooks: I’ve whined often about tax policies that have more than half of adults paying no income taxes, but drawing from the system. My hunch: the mix of voters last nite was disproportionately tax payers who are fed up with the reckless spending and taxation without meaningful representation (think Harry Reid behind closed doors).

Adult Supervision: Some elected officials have to start acting like  adults.  Start showing some sense of fiscal responsibility and stop throwing hizzie fits every time they get challenged.  Recognize that implementation and execution matter.  One of my takes last nite: Bob McDonnell won because he came across as an adult — he carries himself like a governor.

The Pookie Factor:  At the risk of  political incorrectness … I know Pres Obama was just trying to be cute with his “get lazy cousin Pookie off the couch and get him to vote”.  I think there was some backlash to the comment.  I know a lot of folks who are repulsed by the thought of lazy cousin Pookie deciding the direction of the country.  Perhaps lazy cousin Pookie should get off the couch and get an education or get a job. 

Buyer’s Remorse: Many middle-of-the-roaders, frustrated by  or angry at Bush, bought into Obama’s charismatic appeal for change and “coming together”.  My sense: lots of buyer’s remorse.  They got Chicago thugery, expensive rad-left programs, and divisiveness-on- steroids.  Change – yes, but maybe not the the change everybody was hoping for.  This was the first chance for folks to register their views free of recriminations.

It’ll be fun to see how the parties spin the results …

The elections: Checkbooks, Adult Supervision, Pookie, and Buyer’s Remorse …

November 4, 2009

Last night, most pundits reduced the election results to an older, whiter group of voters  taking a stand.

Here’s my take (trying to avoid the usual pundit bromides) …

Checkbooks: I’ve whined often about tax policies that have more than half of adults paying no income taxes, but drawing from the system. My hunch: the mix of voters last nite was disproportionately tax payers who are fed up with the reckless spending and taxation without meaningful representation (think Harry Reid behind closed doors).

Adult Supervision: Some elected officials have to start acting like  adults.  Start showing some sense of fiscal responsibility and stop throwing hizzie fits every time they get challenged.  Recognize that implementation and execution matter.  One of my takes last nite: Bob McDonnell won because he came across as an adult — he carries himself like a governor.

The Pookie Factor:  At the risk of  political incorrectness … I know Pres Obama was just trying to be cute with his “get lazy cousin Pookie off the couch and get him to vote”.  I think there was some backlash to the comment.  I know a lot of folks who are repulsed by the thought of lazy cousin Pookie deciding the direction of the country.  Perhaps lazy cousin Pookie should get off the couch and get an education or get a job. 

Buyer’s Remorse: Many middle-of-the-roaders, frustrated by  or angry at Bush, bought into Obama’s charismatic appeal for change and “coming together”.  My sense: lots of buyer’s remorse.  They got Chicago thugery, expensive rad-left programs, and divisiveness-on- steroids.  Change – yes, but maybe not the the change everybody was hoping for.  This was the first chance for folks to register their views free of recriminations.

It’ll be fun to see how the parties spin the results …

Wine better watch its back

November 4, 2009

TakeAway:  Slowly but surely, historical barriers to entry into different food categories are crumbling. 

What was once seen as sacred pairing – wine and cheese – is now an optional pairing. 

Beer is determined to expand its usage occasions to include cheese, and consumers are buying in. 

By gaining support from industry organizations and restaurants, the beer/wine pairing is gaining credibility, creating awareness, and educating consumers.  Go beer.

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ, “Trouble Brews for Wine; Cheese Chooses Beer,” By Davide Berretta, September 25, 2009

After wrestling for a spot on the gourmet drink list, beer is trying to push deeper into wine territory: right by the cheese platter …

The beer and cheese combination has long been a staple in Belgian cuisine, but in recent years, the pairing of beer and cheese has gained legitimacy even in wine-obsessed Italy — where beer is hardly the default drink to accompany fine dining …

For brewers, teaming up with cheese is part of a campaign to show that beer is as sophisticated as Bordeaux, not just a tipple associated with student parties and sports bars. The idea is to “bring it up at the same level as wine” …

Slow Food, for one, is putting its clout behind the beer-and-cheese combo. At the nonprofit group’s Cheese 2009 — a biannual international fair held in the northern Italian region that shares a border with cheese superpower, France — cheese lovers and producers from around the world tasted dozens of varieties, with beer helping wash down the food in addition to the usual wine … Slow Food is eager to give more attention to artisanal brews, and has elevated beer’s role from bit player to supporting actor …

Part of the appeal comes from the fact that beer and cheese are part of a common farm cycle. In the 19th century, Belgian monks would brew beer, feeding their cows the leftover barley husks. The cows’ milk yielded cheese that the monks — many of them vegetarians — liked to munch while enjoying their beers …

The owner of New York’s Beer Table, a gourmet beer bar … has been serving beer and cheese since opening the bar a year and a half ago, says consumer palates have warmed quickly to the pairing, such as his proposed meeting of Swiss cheese with Swiss Rebetez beer … “A year ago, it was a new experience for everybody we presented it to,” Mr. Philips says. “Now just one in 10 are surprised.”

But beer fans still have a long way to go if they want to convince the public that suds are a worthy partner for cheese, especially in France …

Edit by TJS

* * * * *

Full Article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125383275067639085.html

* * * * *

Death taxes just won’t die …

November 4, 2009

Note:  This is intended primarily for Homa Files more “mature” readers.  But, may be relevant for younger folks with rich relatives who are on their last legs …

* * * * *
Source: WSJ: State Death Taxes Are the Latest Worry, Oct 31, 2009
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125694593227919879.html

With the federal estate tax disappearing for most people, state death taxes have emerged as a surprise new worry.

This year, the federal exemption rose to $3.5 million per individual, or as much as $7 million per married couple. At the current level, only 5,500 estates a year are federally taxable.

The problem is that most states with estate or inheritance taxes haven’t raised exemptions to match the federal limits. That means thousands of taxpayers who now escape the federal levy could still get hit with a state death tax.

As a result, tax advisers are tweaking bypass trusts that allow married couples to maximize exemptions from state taxes. They are advising taxpayers where to retire in order to pare or eliminate estate taxes.

“In the past, many people hardly gave state death taxes a thought … now they are shocked at how expensive mistakes can be.”

Adding insult to injury, Congress is talking about eliminating the federal deduction for state estate taxes. That would affect only wealthy taxpayers whose estates still exceed $3.5 million per individual.

“States are in such dire straits that most without these taxes would like to have one, and nobody who has one will let it go.”

Seventeen states and the District of Columbia currently impose estate taxes. Eight states have inheritance taxes, which are levied on heirs, not estates. Maryland and New Jersey have both.

Compared to the uniform federal tax, state taxes are a crazy quilt. In many states with inheritance taxes, rates are tied to how closely the heir is related to the late donor. Iowa and Kentucky exempt both spouses and children who inherit property, while Nebraska treats only transfers to spouses as tax-free.

Advisers say taxpayers are most likely to be tripped up by states that used to conform to the federal exemption but haven’t raised it at the same rate.

As a result, married couples in states with lower exemptions — such as New York, Oregon, Minnesota and Massachusetts (all $1 million) or Illinois ($2 million) — are setting up “bypass” trusts in wills even if they no longer need them for federal taxes.

Here’s how bypass trusts work: At the death of the first spouse, assets go into a trust that the survivor can draw on if necessary. When the second spouse dies, the remaining assets in the bypass trust pass tax-free to heirs, preserving the value of both individual exemptions.

Put another way, if a married couple lives in a state with a $1 million individual exemption, a bypass trust would let them to pass as much as $2 million tax-free to heirs.

“Without the proper trusts … a couple in New York with $2 million in assets might pay an unnecessary $100,000.”

* * * * *

The issue is figuring out the “domicile” of a taxpayer. Domicile is a much broader idea than the mere residency test that often determines where someone pays income tax.

Although one determinant of domicile is the amount of time spent in a state, it also may look at where a taxpayer votes, has church and club memberships, registers a car or even has a burial plot.

This means that a taxpayer could live in estate-tax-free Florida, California or Texas and even spend most of his time there. But if he keeps an apartment in New York or a summer home on Cape Cod and has other ties to the area, he might be considered to be domiciled there.

In the worst case, a taxpayer could be domiciled in more than one state and owe taxes to each.

 

image