Archive for November 30th, 2009

The healthcare bills … get out your wallets !

November 30, 2009

There are so many numbers being thrown around re: healthcare costs and the proposed ObamaCare proposals that’s it’s easy to lose the forest in the trees.

Here’s what you need to know … in round numbers.

First, U.S. healthcare expenditures average a bit over $7,000 per capita.

There are roughly 47 million uninsureds – but that number includes, for example, illegal immigrants who Pres. Obama says won’t be covered.  The proposed Senate bill covers 30 million uninsureds.

So, by simple arithmetic, the annual gross cost to cover the 30 million is about $210 billion – 30 million times $7,000.

Now, it starts to get tricky.

Reid proposes a $848 bullion increase in government healthcare spending over 10 years; Pelosi passed a bill north of $1 trillion across 10 years. (See chart below)

But, both bills delay the start of benefits for 4 years, so there are only 6 years of benefits in the 10 year projections.

The implication: Reid’s bill costs about $140 billion per year once it’s up & running;  Pelosi’s bill costs about $165 billion. For simplicity, we’ll strike an average and round down to $150 billion.

Now, $150 billion is less than the $210 billion it costs to cover 30 million uninsureds ar $7,000 a pop.  How can that be?

Well, some of the newly covered uninsureds will be paying their own way — in total or in part.   For example, some healthy young folks who can afford health insurance but make an economically rational choice to self-insure.  They’ll be “mandated” to buy insurance – and fined or jailed if they don’t.  Other folks will get taxpayer subsidized insurance but – based on means tests – will have to pay part of the premiums. 

My take: the spending estimates are probably reflective of what the bills say – the projections “haircut” the costs of the 30 million uninsureds and add in the costs of building and running the forthcoming government bureaucracy (think electronic medical records and thousands of watchdogs and claims processors pirated from the DMV and IRS).

That’s the spending.  How will it be paid for?

In round numbers, they’re talking about $1 Trillion of new spending … financed about 1/2 from heathcare cuts (mostly MediCare) – and about 1/2 from higher taxes. 

Taxes are projected to go up about $50 to $75 billion per year.  Healthcare cuts are estimated to be about $50 billion per year. (Keep in mind that the tax increases and healthcare cuts start immediately, benefits are delayed until year 5).

So, over the first 10 years, the early-starting cuts and taxes balance out against the late-starting benefits to the uninsureds … and even provide some excess taxes to pay down the deficit. (yeah, right !)

But, what happens each year, starting in year 5 when the benefits begin?

Well, based on the above calculations, the are $150 billion per year in increased spending, but only $100 billion per year in compensating healthcare cuts and tax increases.

Oops.

Looks like another $50 billion in healthcare cuts (i.e. rationing) and tax increases are coming down the pike.

That, my friends is all you need to know.

* * * * *

Here’s a simple “sources & uses” statement.  All numbers in billions.  Read ‘em and weep …

             Click to enlarge
image
http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/25527.html

Support for healthcare plans drops below 40% …

November 30, 2009

Based on Pollster.com’s “poll of polls”, almost half the country opposes the proposed healthcare plan(s) … and fewer than 4 in 10 folks favor it (or “them”).

Still, our elected representatives in DC keep pushing forward any way, to legislate “the will of the people”.

Anybody see a contradiction in there ?

image
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/healthplan.php

Netflix: What happens when DVDs meet 8-tracks in the junk heap?

November 30, 2009

TakeAway:  Through effective consumer management and distribution strategies, Netflix has changed the rules of the movie rental business and managed to fend off competitors along the way. 

However, as the game continues to evolve and Netflix’s distribution advantages become obsolete, will its subscription/information-based consumer loyalty model enable sustained success?

* * * * *

Excerpted from Knowledge@Wharton, “Netflix: One Eye on the Present and Another on the Future,” October 28, 2009

In a year when DVD sales are falling and studios are facing major shakeups … Hollywood is beginning to look a lot like one of its own slasher films … however, there is at least one success story in the movie industry: Netflix.

… Netflix made a splash in the movie rental business by offering an online subscription model with a flat monthly fee for unlimited rentals and no late charges. Since then, despite a recession, fierce competition and the emergence of online video delivery, the company continues to thrive … Netflix is now in a race to transition to a business model focused on streaming content online …

In 2008 Netflix introduced a “Watch Instantly” service that allows consumers to stream movies on their home computers. Since then, the company has forged a bevy of partnerships to embed its Watch Instantly service in television sets and game consoles …

Netflix CEO said the company’s goals were simple: Grow revenue, subscribers and earnings while expanding into streaming content … 

However, Netflix’s DVD business faces intense competition from companies ranging from Apple (iTunes) to Blockbuster to Redbox … and … Netflix’s video streaming model is under fire from powerful rivals … YouTube … But it’s not as though competition is anything new for Netflix. So-called “Netflix killers” have surfaced repeatedly in the last decade … but they haven’t been able to stop Netflix’s momentum …

Netflix has proven its doubters wrong repeatedly, but it is unclear how the balancing act between the company’s old and new business models will play out …

For now movie rental sales figures are playing to Netflix’s advantage … DVD rentals have held up well as consumers opt for cheaper forms of entertainment … Particular strategies have helped Netflix maintain its lead, including:  1) Keeping one eye on the road and one eye on the turn ahead … 2) Employing a subscription model … 3) Moving quickly to stay ahead …

The longer Netflix can maintain its old model while investing in its digital streaming business, the better off it will be. Rivals can’t easily emulate the company’s distribution centers and information systems that allow it to deliver DVDs within one business day to 97% of its subscribers … And, the company’s physical assets have created a “moat” around the Netflix business model …

Digital distribution lowers the barriers to compete with Netflix …

Edit by TJS

* * * * *

Full Article
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2367

* * * * *