Archive for June 14th, 2010

Cutting healthcare costs by cutting the more effective programs … huh ?

June 14, 2010

Punch line: The trillion dollar cost of ObamaCare is reportedly funded 1/2 by tax increases and 1/2 by Medicare cuts.

Of the $500 billion in Medicare cuts, 1/2 is cuts in waste & fraud (yeah, right !) and 1/2 by program cuts — the majority of which comes from killing Medicare Advantage – an HMO option to Medicare run by private insurance companies.

The idiocy: Medicare Advantage is a cheaper alternative – about 2% lower cost than traditional Medicare.

Not the way we did it in the companies where I worked …

* * * * *

WSJ: Farewell, Medicare Advantage, June 11, 2010

Medicare Advantage gives almost one of four seniors private insurance options, and Democrats are about to cut its funding by some $136 billion over the next decade.

The Congressional Budget Office says these cuts will cause enrollment to drop by 35%, the Administration’s own Medicare actuaries predict 50%, and both outfits take for granted that benefits will also decline.

Dems loathe Medicare Advantage because it sanctions the private choices that might eventually liberate the U.S. health market from government control . They also want to raid Advantage to finance their new subsidies.

Here’s the rub.

According to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, the Advantage HMOs that serve 15% of all seniors in Medicare cost on average two percentage points less for the same benefits than the traditional Medicare program.

Using government data, the insurer trade group AHIP estimates that Advantage beneficiaries in California spend 30% fewer days in the hospital than fee for service, 23% fewer days in Nevada.

These successes and others have come about because Advantage allowed insurers and providers to collaborate, pay for value and coordinate care.

These successes are threatening to politicians because they are a model for true Medicare reform, which would reduce the health-care powers that Congress has exercised for nearly a half-century and let patients decide.

This terror explains why Democrats are so intent on killing Medicare Advantage, and on blaming someone else for destroying a program that millions of seniors prefer.

The President knows this, so he and his fellow Democrats are gearing up to blame these cuts on . . . insurers, rather than on their own policies.

They desperately want to dodge any near-term blame when seniors who use Advantage start to lose its benefits. Ergo, blame insurers first.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703302604575295021352835874.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop

Thanks to JJP for feeding the lead.

* * * * *
From the Homa Files archive:
Medicare Advantage saves money … so cut it to save money. Huh?
https://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/medicare-advantage-saves-money-so-cut-it-to-save-money-huh/

Those who can’t do, teach … those who can’t teach, blog … ouch !

June 14, 2010

A WSJ ‘Best of the Web’ caught my eye.

Title: “Those Who Can’t Teach, Blog”

For obvious reasons, it made me cringe a bit.

Turned out that it had nothing to do with folks like me. 

It was reporting on a Philly HS teacher who took a political disagreement with a student public on her blog.

Whew !

But it did make me think …

* * * * *

WSJ: Those Who Can’t Teach, Blog, June11, 2010  
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703509404575300600624245226.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion

Those who can’t do, teach … those who can’t teach, blog … ouch !

June 14, 2010

A WSJ ‘Best of the Web’ caught my eye.

Title: “Those Who Can’t Teach, Blog”

For obvious reasons, it made me cringe a bit.

Turned out that it had nothing to do with folks like me. 

It was reporting on a Philly HS teacher who took a political disagreement with a student public on her blog.

Whew !

But it did make me think …

* * * * *

WSJ: Those Who Can’t Teach, Blog, June11, 2010  
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703509404575300600624245226.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion

Going where no Starbucks coffee could go before.

June 14, 2010

TakeAway: The ubiquity of Starbucks stores, combined with management resistance to further de-value the Starbucks “experience,” has left few opportunities for continued domestic growth of the Starbucks brand. 

To provide growth opportunities for shareholders, Starbucks will roll out a second brand, Seattle’s Best Coffee, targeting the mass-market crowd. 

In addition to distribution in fast-food outlets, supermarkets and coffee houses, Seattle’s Best will be sold in c-stores, coffee carts, and vending machines, places Howard Schultz would never consider for the Starbucks brand.

If successful, the venture will put Starbucks on the offensive against its fast-food rivals while minimizing cannibalization of Starbucks-brand sales.

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ, “Starbucks Targets Regular Joes,” by Kevin Helliker, May 12, 2010 

In a counterattack against its lower-priced fast-food rivals, Starbucks Corp. plans to roll out a second coffee brand.

By autumn, Seattle’s Best Coffee … will be sold in about 30,000 fast-food outlets, supermarkets and coffee houses. … Eventually … the brand will also be sold in convenience stores, drive-through kiosks, coffee carts, vending machines and mobile trucks. …

The new push by Starbucks is a response to the invasion of the specialty-coffee market by McDonald’s Corp., Dunkin’ Donuts and other fast-food chains, which offer espresso-based drinks at lower prices than Starbucks.

Starbucks has struggled to expand beyond a limited menu and a largely morning clientele.

… executives unveiled a new logo for Seattle’s Best, along with a new motto: “Great Coffee Everywhere.” The motto reflects the Starbucks theory that the success of McDonald’s and others in selling coffee has created a fresh opportunity to sell a mass-market brand.

Associating Starbucks with a product sold from vending machines could … damage the brand’s upscale image. And it could cannibalize Starbucks customers. …

But Seattle’s Best is intended to appeal to just this sort of Starbucks critic. For those who find Starbucks coffee too strong-tasting, Seattle’s Best is promoting the “smoothness” of its blend …. For those turned off by the prices and ambiance at Starbucks stores, Seattle’s Best is touted as “unpretentious.” …  

Pricing will vary widely. … Seattle’s Best beans will cost consumers less than Starbucks-brand beans but more than conventional brands …

Seattle’s Best helped pioneer the specialty coffee-house concept when it opened its first store in Seattle 40 years ago. … When Starbucks acquired it in 2003, Seattle’s Best had about 50 stores and a sizable supermarket presence, particularly in flavored beans, a lucrative category that Starbucks never entered.

Perhaps the most radical feature of the Starbucks strategy calls for selling Seattle’s Best from vending machines. Vending-machine coffee has long been regarded as a last resort, … But Seattle’s Best engineers have developed a coffee-making machine that Starbucks predicts will improve that image. …

Edit by DMG

* * * * *

Full Article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703565804575238584204665378.html

* * * * *