Archive for July 30th, 2010

Smackdown: Obama versus business …

July 30, 2010

At a recent cocktail party, in a lightning strike occurrence, I brushed up to a real, live CEO. 

He’s a member of the Business Roundtable, so I said “glad to see you guys speaking out on Obama’s policies”.

He said “yeah, we figured he’s going to screw us any way, so we might as well speak out”.

He also said Obama sent some communications flunky to address the group – she said “you gotta understand, it’s good politics for us to beat up on you guys.”

She should have added “now, go out there and save or create some jobs for us.”

Might work …

* * * * *

Excerpted from FT: Obama needs to stop baiting business, Mort Zuckerman, July 26 2010

The growing tension between the Obama administration and business is a cause for national concern.

The president has lost the confidence of employers, whose worries over taxes and the increased costs of new regulation are holding back investment and growth. The government must appreciate that confidence is an imperative if business is to invest, take risks and put the millions of unemployed back to productive work.

One unfortunate pattern that has emerged in the past 18 months is to lay all the blame for our difficulties on the business community and the financial world. This quite ignores the role of Congress in many areas, most glaringly in forcing Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration to make loans to people who could not afford them. Then there is the Securities and Exchange Commission, which raised acceptable levels of leverage for financial institutions.

The predilection to blame business was manifest in one of President Barack Obama’s recent speeches.

He was supposed to be seeking the support of the business community for a doubling of exports over the next five years. Instead he lashed out at “unscrupulous and underhanded businesses, who are unencumbered by any restriction on activities that might harm the environment, take advantage of middle-class families, or, as we’ve seen, threaten to bring down the entire financial system.”

This kind of gratuitous and overstated demonization – widely seen in the business community as a resort to economic populism on the part of Mr Obama to shore up the growing weakness in his political standing – is exactly the wrong approach.

It ignores his disappointing stimulus program, which was ill-designed to produce the jobs the president promised. It also undermines the confidence that business needs to find if it is to invest in the face of a new generation of regulations, increased bureaucracy and higher taxes.

Disillusion has spread to the Business Roundtable, the US Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business, which represents small businesses.

The chief economist of the NFIB recently wrote: “Business owners do not trust the economic policies in place or proposed … the US economy faces hurricane-force headwinds and the government is at the center of the storm, making an economic recovery very difficult.”

Full article:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a18bd9a2-98e6-11df-9418-00144feab49a.html

German idea: Don’t tax the rich … tax the fat.

July 30, 2010

Excerpted from AOL News: Germany Weighs Tax on the Obese, July 23, 2010

Germany, famed for its beer, pork and chocolates, is one of the fattest countries in Europe. Twenty-one percent of German adults were obese in 2007, and the  cost of treating obesity-related illnesses is about $21.7 billion, a year.

Germany’s health system is paid for by a series of mandatory health insurance funds, all of which are reporting serious deficits as the system is overused.

A conservative member of parliament said it is unfair and unsustainable for the taxpayer to carry the entire cost of treating obesity-related illnesses in the public health system.

“I think that it would be sensible if those who deliberately lead unhealthy lives would be held financially accountable for that.”

A health economist called for Germany to tackle the problem of fattening snacks in order to raise money and reduce obesity.

“One should, as with tobacco, tax the purchase of unhealthy consumer goods at a higher rate  … that applies to alcohol, chocolate or risky sporting equipment such as hang-gliders.”

The German teachers association recently called for school kids to be weighed each day,

The fat kids could then be reported to social services, who could send them to health clinics.

A professor of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, described the idea of a fat tax as “not humane … since lifestyle is not the only factor in obesity, with both genetics and urban environments playing major roles … Most people who are obese would prefer not to be so.”

Full article:
http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/germany-considers-tax-on-the-obese/19566425