Archive for November 4th, 2010

Uh-oh for California and New York …

November 4, 2010

Here’s an implication of yesterday’s landslide that I haven’t heard any of the pundits pick-up on yet …

Both CA and NY stayed comfortably in the hands of spend and tax Dems.

Both states are rapidly approaching bankruptcy … largely due to the gov’t payrolls — bloated with public union employees … and subject to inefficient work rules, high pay, life-time job security and ridiculous pensions.

None of the elected Dems will pull a Chris Christie and go after the public employee unions — in part because the don’t want to, and part because the they can’t — the unions carried them to victory.

These states were bailed out by Obama’s save-the-states stimulus program.

Well, well, well.

Now, what are the chances that a GOP House will pass bills to bail out CA & NY ?

I think the chances range from slim to none.

So, Brown and Cuomo will be stuck facing up to their state’s problems.

It’ll be interesting to see what they do  …

“Americans split on health care repeal” … gotta love AP’s headline bias.

November 4, 2010

What inference would you draw from the headline: “Americans split on health care repeal”.

Most folks would probably conclude that there’s a 50/50 split between people who want to keep ObamaCare and people who want to trash it.

Not so fast.

The numbers …

37% said they want to repeal it completely.

36% said they want to revise the law so it does more to change the health care system.

10 % wanted modifications to narrow its scope

15% said they would leave the overhaul as it is.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101022/ap_on_bi_ge/us_ap_poll_health_care

I guess the  “even split” is between folks who want to repeal the bill entirely and those who want to substantially change it.

Strikes me as a releatively narrow difference.

I think the headline should have read “Only 15% favor ObamaCare”.

But — unlike the AP — I’m biased.

Starbucks: “Hold your pants on, your latte is coming"

November 4, 2010

TakeAway: Starbucks is telling its harried baristas to slow down, which may result in longer lines.

Amid customer complaints that Starbucks has reduced the fine art of coffee making to a mechanized process, Starbucks baristas are being told to stop making multiple drinks at the same time and focus instead on no more than two drinks at a time.

Starbucks says the changes are part of its ongoing effort to make stores operate more efficiently.

But some baristas worry it will create longer lines.

* * * * *

Excerpted from the Wall Street Journal, “At Starbucks, Baristas Told No More Than Two Drinks” By Julie Jargon, October 13, 2010

Starbucks insists the new procedures will eventually hasten the way drinks are made and lead to fresher, hotter drinks. Steaming milk for individual drinks, for example, “ensures the quality of the beverage in taste, temperature and appearance,” Starbucks documents state, while focusing on just two drinks at a time “reduces possibility for errors.”

Customers have indicated that the quality of espresso drinks at Starbucks is “average” and that the beverages are inconsistently prepared from barista to barista and from store to store, the documents say.

Over the last few years, Starbucks has been applying to the coffee counter the kind of “lean” manufacturing techniques car makers have long used as a way to streamline production, eliminate wasteful activity and speed up service. The company has deployed a “lean team” to study every move its baristas make in order to shave seconds off each order.

The company has made numerous changes to its business amid the economic downturn, including closing underperforming stores, trimming its number of bakery suppliers, boosting the perks of its loyalty-card program and introducing new varieties of its Via instant coffee. The cost-cutting and customer-improvement paid off in the company’s last quarter.

Edit by AMW

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704164004575548403514060736.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews

* * * * *