Both threw much money at education with disappointing results.
========
Two related reports hit over the weekend.
The first announced that the Gates Foundation would spend more than $1.7 billion over the next five years to pay for new initiatives in K-12 public education. The plan is a “redirection” of prior initiatives. More on that later.
As the Washington Post observed, Gates’ prior mega-contributions to improve K-12 education “didn’t go so well, but the man, if anything, is persistent.”
The second story dealt with Mark Zuckerberg’s $100 million donation to improving Newark NJ’s schools. A report was released indicating disappointing results. More on that later, too.
========
I commend both Gates and Zuckerberg for throwing a massive amount of money at improving education. Their intentions seem good and the amounts of money are, as we say in academia, statistically significant.
That said, what’s going on?
=========
Let’s deal with Zuckerberg and Newark first.
Mark Z. threw his money into a political maelstrom stirred by Christie, Booker and the teacher’s unions.
So, odds were stacked against the initiative from the get-go.
Much of the money went down the rabbit hole of teacher and administrator pay raises.
Hoped-for gains from “within school reforms” – efforts to improve existing schools by replacing principals, redesigning accountability, and focusing on Common Core standards – generated equivocal improvements.
The most significant gains came when students transferred from bad schools to better schools – largely when low-performing schools closed (partially funded by the Zuckerberg money) and students were moved to better-performing schools … or when students voluntarily moved to charter schools.
The biggest takeaway: throwing well-intended money at improving under-performing schools just didn’t work … but closing them did.
========
The Gates initiative was more substantial – over $1 billion – and more controversial.
Much of the money went to supporting implementation of the politically-charged Common Core.
So far, gains from the Common Core are equivocal, so the pay-off from the Gates’ boost is, too.
Another chunk of money was dedicated to improving teacher effectiveness by implementing data-driven metrics.
English translation: paying and promoting teachers based on students’ standardized test scores.
Teachers haven’t bought in to that idea and data-driven evaluations are largely being shelved.
The third major thrust was supporting charter schools and smaller-sized public schools.
Bottom line: Gates concluded that these initiatives yielded equivocal results … and, even when they worked, they couldn’t be scaled.
So, the new Gate’s money infusion is being directed to “data-driven continuous improvement in networks of public schools.”
Translation: business as usual with no expectation of noticeable near-term improvement.
Ouch.
=====
Again, I laud Gates and Zuckerberg for trying … and for putting their money where their mouths are.
But, their experiences reconfirm that getting the US education system up to a higher performance level is a major challenge … impeded, not speeded by political forces.
=========
#HomaFiles
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma >> Latest Posts=========
October 24, 2017 at 11:54 am |
The equation in the US public school system is simple: better socio-economic demographics = better parenting = better students = better schools.
It is demand what drives quality and not the educational supply. Conclusion: stop the war on the family stemming from the “Great Society” programs if you want to improve student performance.