“Why do we have to have symptoms to get tested?”
=============
The Senate (but not the Congress) is scheduled to get back on the job this week.
Roughly half the senators are 65 or older … and, thus, officially in the coronavirus’ “vulnerable” group.
So, it’s understandable that they’re eager that all colleagues have a clean bill of health before returning to the Senate chambers.
Here’s the rub…
=============
The Capitol’s attending physician, Dr. Brian Monahan, said that only senators who “present with” coronavirus symptoms qualify for coronavirus testing … and that “quick tests” aren’t available, so getting test results will take two to seven days. Source
Said differently:
No tests to ID the hidden carriers … the contagious asymptomatics who are infected but don’t exhibit the virus’ symptoms … and, who make up the vast majority of coronavirus infectees.
Non-immediate test results … requiring “testees” to self-quarantine until the test results are available (or risk infecting others during the test-to-results period)
============
Soon, the senators may even recognize some of the other holes in the current testing strategy and methods:
Point-in-time diagnoses … Given the high contagiousness of the coronavirus, you can test negative today and be infected tomorrow (maybe even before your test results are returned) … an initial across-the-board testing is necessary, but not sufficient … regular, periodic testing is required “surveille” the environment.
False negatives … A couple of weeks ago, the WSJ estimated that as many as 1/3 of symptomatic people who tested negative turned out to be infected (and were put back in circulation, potentially spreading the virus) … so far, the gov’t scientists haven’t provided evidence to the contrary
WSJ Shocker: 1 in 3 infected patients gets a ’false negative’ test result.
============
The above is the situation that every company is facing as it tries to ramp back up.
Welcome to our world, Senators.
Leave a Reply