Archive for August 3rd, 2008

That Giant Sucking Sound – 2008

August 3, 2008

In 1992, according to then presidential candidate Ross Perot, “the giant sucking sound” was the flow of U.S. jobs to Mexico under NAFTA.  Arguably, the 2008 sucking sound is the flow of capital and corporate ownership out of the U.S.  The latest: InBev’s purchase of Anheuser-Busch

Excerpted from the WSJ, “This Bud’s for Belgium”, August 3, 2008

Politicians and Wall Streeters are starting to ask why the Belgian beer company InBev purchased Anheuser-Busch and not the other way around … though shareholders were the big winners here with a $50 billion-plus takeaway.

But here’s the real question: Was the takeover basically financed by the savings … from escaping America’s increasingly uncompetitive corporate tax system? …  Bottom line: InBev (pays Belgium) around 20% of its profits in corporate taxes … (versus) Anheuser-Busch’s U.S. rate 38.4%.

The country will continue to see its competitive edge wither away without a corporate tax rate cut. Mr. McCain … wants to cut the corporate tax rate to 25%, close to the global average. Senator Obama is more interested in raising tax rates than cutting them.

Wall Street dealmakers tell us to expect more sales of U.S. companies to European rivals thanks to the combination of America’s higher corporate taxes and the weak dollar … the U.S. is pricing itself out of the market as a corporate headquarters. “America’s 35% corporate tax rate is … just bad economics”.

For full editorial:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121770579562707543.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

* * * * *

Observations

1.  Compounding the weak dollar and high corporate tax rates is the massive transfer of wealth to the oil producing nations and their sovereign wealth funds.

2.  Rhetorical question: what’s the likely impact of a windfall profits tax on U.S. based oil companies?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Goliath vs. Goliath – Walmart vs Obama

August 3, 2008

Excerpted from the WSJ, “Wal-Mart Warns of Democratic Win”, August 1, 2008

Through almost all of its 48-year history, Wal-Mart has fought hard to keep unions out of its stores …  (When) a small number of butchers (unionized) in early 2000 … the company phased out butchers in all of its stores and began stocking prepackaged meat. When a store in Canada voted to unionize …  the company closed the store, saying it had been unprofitable for years.

(Now) Wal-Mart is … warning that if Democrats win power in November, they’ll likely change federal law to make it easier for workers to unionize companies.

Wal-Mart executives claim that … unionization could mean fewer jobs as … payroll and health costs (rise) for companies already being hurt by rising fuel and commodities costs and the tough economic climate.

Wal-Mart’s worries center on a piece of legislation known as the Employee Free Choice Act … the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has made defeat of the legislation a top priority.

Wal-Mart makes it clear that voting for Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama would be tantamount to inviting unions in (since) Sen. Obama co-sponsored the legislation … known as “card check,” …  Sen. John McCain, the opposes the Employee Free Choice Act and voted against it last year.

The Employee Free Choice Act  … would simplify and speed labor’s ability to unionize companies. Currently, companies can demand a secret-ballot election to determine union representation.

The proposed legislation,  would let unions form if more than 50% of workers simply sign a card saying they want to join. It is far easier for unions to get workers to sign cards because the organizers can approach workers repeatedly, over a period of weeks or months, until the union garners enough support.

Employers argue that the card system could lead to workers being pressured to sign by pro-union colleagues and organizers.

Unions consider the Employee Free Choice Act as vital to the survival of the labor movement, which currently represents 7.5% of private-sector workers, half the percentage it did 25 years ago. (see chart below)

Business-backed lobbying groups are running ads … using  an actor from the “Sopranos” TV series about mob life to hammer home their point.

For full article (worth reading):
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB121755649066303381.html

* * * * *

My POV

1.  I was surprised to see how low the private sector unionization rate had fallen.

2.  The Sopranos ad — which was playing on news shows over the weekend — is quite effective. It plays off historical sterotyping to make a strong visceral point.

4.  The argument that secret ballots are a bad thing seems to have some holes  …  should we eliminate the secret ballot for presidential elections, too?

* * * * *

From the WSJ article:

 * * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
 
Click link =>  The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *