Archive for April 29th, 2009

Easy come, easy go … about that buck-a-day "Making Work Pay" program.

April 29, 2009

Obama’s signature tax cut to “95% of families” was supposed to be a $500 refundable credit (per worker) and $1,000 per household (with more than 1 worker).

Congress pared the plan to $400 per worker — a whopping buck-a-day — and stuck it in the stimulus package.

As recently as yesterday, Obama economist Austan Goolsbee was touting it as “a generous tax break for 95% of workers”.

Uh-oh.

As part of the budget blueprint that will be passed this week (on a party line vote, for sure), Congress will let Obama’s “Making Work Pay” tax credit expire at the end of next year — along with the evil Bush tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans.

Let’s see: a couple of weeks ago, a buck-a-day was a generous tax break that would stimulate the economy; now, according to some Dems, it’s a pittance that will barely be missed.  Which is it ?

* * * * *
Reported on many sources, including:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/24/senate-democrats-let-obamas-tax-credit-expire-budget-blueprint/

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Worked then, so it should work now. Right? … Big Brands Go for “Nostalgia Marketing”

April 29, 2009

Excerpted from New York Times, “Warm and Fuzzy Makes a Comeback”, by Stuart Elliott, April 7, 2009

* * * * *

As the recession continues taking its toll, marketers are trying to tap into fond memories to help sell what few products shoppers are still buying. The time-machine tactics are primarily evoking four decades — the 1950s through the 1980s.

For instance, on April 20 a beverage unit of PepsiCo will begin an eight-week campaign for “throwback” versions of two soft drinks, Pepsi-Cola and Mountain Dew. The packages and formulas, along with advertising and promotions, will evoke the ’60s and ’70s.

The hope is that warm, fuzzy feelings about the past will help make people feel better about the present and future.

“In a time of anxiety, people are seeking out brands they’re comfortable with and they can trust.”

Those taking part in the trend acknowledge a potential pitfall of nostalgic pitches: They could lead consumers to believe a brand or product is outdated and therefore not for them.

* * * * *

Hard times have frequently inspired fond looks in the rear-view mirror. There was a nostalgia boom during World War II, as evidenced by movies like “Meet Me in St. Louis” and songs like “Long Ago and Far Away.”

In the ’60s, the American Tobacco Company, now part of Reynolds American, introduced a filtered version of one of its first national cigarette brands, Sweet Caporal.

In the economic turbulence of the ’70s, there was a fad for nostalgia for the ’50s. The ’60s made a comeback in the ’80s and the ’70s were revived in the ’90s.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/business/media/07adco.html?ref=media&pagewanted=print

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Getting Readers to Pay for Online News: A New Business Model for a Battered Industry

April 29, 2009

Ken’s Take: Didn’t AOL live (and die) by trying to charge folks for largely undifferentiated content?  Didn’t work for them, and won’t work for these guys.

* * * * *

Excerpted from New York Times, “They Pay for Cable, Music and Extra Bags. How About News?”, by Richard Perez-Pena and Tim Arango, April 8, 2009

Just a year ago, most media companies believed the formula for Internet success was to offer free content, build an audience and rake in advertising dollars. Now, with the recession battering advertising online, in print and on television, media executives are contemplating a tougher trick: making the consumer pay.

Publishers like Hearst Newspapers, The New York Times and Time Inc.are drawing up plans for possible Internet fees.

“People reading news for free on the Web, that’s got to change,” Rupert Murdoch said last week at a cable industry conference in Washington.

Only a few publishers have tried such a transition, with mixed results. The Los Angeles Times and The New York Times each tried charging for access to some content online, then dropped the requirement because it cost them audience and advertising revenue.

But from networks selling downloads of TV shows, to music companies trying to curb file-sharing, to struggling newspapers and magazines, the make-or-break question is this: How do you get consumers to pay for something they have grown used to getting free?

* * * * *

Some industries have pulled it off. Coca-Cola took tap water, filtered it and called it Dasani, and makes millions of dollars a year. People who used to ask why anyone would pay for television now subscribe to cable and TiVo. Airlines charge for luggage, meals, even pillows. And some music fans who have downloaded pirated songs are also patrons of iTunes.

All of these success stories offered the consumer something extra, even if it was just convenience.

* * * * *

“With newspapers and magazines, there have to be features you can’t get anywhere else, and maybe part of what you would pay for is the privilege of helping the business survive, but that is more of a difficult sell.”

By adding free features like e-mail alerts, blogs, discussion forums and video, news organizations are trying to persuade readers that they provide something more valuable than the aggregators and blogs that attract news readers online.

“You have to expect that at first, most of your customers won’t go along,” said a professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. “You have to train people — the academic word is ‘educate’ — to expect to pay, and unfortunately for media companies, they’ve trained people to expect the opposite.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/business/media/08pay.html?ref=media&pagewanted=print

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *