Archive for October 17th, 2012

Bam’s puny $6+ million pension …

October 17, 2012

President Obama drew guffaws during the date by jabbing Romney for having a bigger pension.

You know, kind of a reverse guy’s  “big thing” contest.

According to CNBC, Obama’s pension isn’t exactly teeny-weeny … and, we tax payers get to pay for it.

Pension Envy: Who Has More — Obama or Romney? 

When it comes to the presidential candidates’ pensions, size matters in more ways than one.

As president, he will receive $191,300 annually for life — win or lose in next month’s election — and receives a travel allotment as well as mailing privileges. Should Obama lose, his presidential pension kicks in immediately after leaving office.

Given that the president enjoys a normal life span, the pension allotment would be worth upwards of $6 million.

In addition, Obama may be due a nice pension for the eight years he served in the Illinois Legislature as a state senator.

Kick back, Barack

>> Latest Posts

The debate …

October 17, 2012

My morning-after thoughts, for what they’re worth …

  1. First, I didn’t learn anything … except that Obama’s 401-K has some mutual funds with foreign stocks … who cares?
  2. The town hall format was a sham … Crowley picked the questions … people were used as props — then ignored  … wonder what questions didn’t get asked?
  3. I scored the overall to Obama … but not by much … so, I wasn’t surprised by the 46 to 39 CNN instapoll
  4. Great question by one of the anchors: “did either guy help himself with the confrontational stuff?”
  5. The CNN & Fox focus groups did surprise me … CNN had undecideds in Ohio – they went 18 to 17 for Mitt … Fox had undecideds in Nevada … they went something like 24 to 4 for Mitt … logic: it’s all about the economy and Mitt won that issue.
  6. Obama neutralized the “does he want the job?” question and scored big on Libya … his team’s Libya debate strategy was well crafted and and well executed … especially when Crowley jumped in to help him … re: debate strategy”: “I’m responsible for everything that happens in my administration” – took responsibility without taking specific responsibility – that was a good play … “alQarda leadership has been decimated” – nice word-smithing – not “alQarda is on its heels” … made the Libya cover-up sound like word parsing … nicely done.
  7. My bet: the Crowley intervention will end up hurting Obama … it’s be the focus of discussion on the issue today, rather than his strong play on the issue.
  8. I agree with the focus groups that it’s all about he economy … Mitt’s riff re: “23 million looking for work, 47 million on food stamps, etc.” is damning … I thought Mitt made his economic plan sound credible (“listen, I’ve been putting together balanced budgets for decades … this guy hasn’t had a budget for 4 years”… net-net: Obama’s plan is simply tax the rich …
  9. In the CBS Instant Poll, 65% say Romney won on the issue of the economy. 34% say Obama won on the economy … that may be the story of the night.
  10. I also thought Mitt won big on energy … Obama just isn’t credible on the issue … comes across as literally tilting at windmills.
  11. Medicare-ObamaCare & Social Security are among the biggest issues … practically no discussion of them … nice job, Candy
  12.  I don’t get why such a big issue is being made of China … I can’t believe that men on the street understand the issue or care much about it.
  13. I though Mitt did a nice job re: “How are you different from Bush?” … wish Crowley had asked Obama “How are you different from Carter?”
  14. Obama’s shot re: Mitt’s taxes missed … as did Mitt’s shot at Obama for having mutual funds that invest in China …  one Nevada guy said: “whether Romney pays half as much or twice as much in taxes won’t impact my life” … that sums it up
  15. At the margins, I thought Mitt did the best he could re: immigration … the Univision line is strong “you didn’t keep your promise” … won’t move any big numbers, but may shift a point or two
  16. Obama got contraception on the table again … and, Crowley cut off Mitt’s response … so, issue will get some “war on women traction” … if this election hinges on whether law students get free condoms, we’re in big trouble.
  17. I’m curious re: why Mitt slipped in the marriage and family stuff … wasn’t accidental since it was forced in … must be something that tests well.
  18. The key number to watch is shift among the independents … both bases are revved up again.

Bottom line: no structural change in the race, Mitt’s momentum will slow some, but Mitt will still move up some in the polls.

>> Latest Posts

Electronic medical records cut costs … oops, make that raise costs.

October 17, 2012

Interesting expose In the NY Times of all places.

Punch line:

When the federal government began providing billions of dollars in incentives to push hospitals and physicians to use electronic medical and billing records, the goal was not only to improve efficiency and patient safety, but also to reduce health care costs.

But, in reality, the move to electronic health records may be contributing to billions of dollars in higher costs for Medicare, private insurers and patients by making it easier for hospitals and physicians to bill more for their services.

image

How can this be?

Simple, Watson.

First, a system can provide docs with a checklist of separately billable procedures that they might perform … ensuring a complete check-up and making sure that no billing stone is left unturned.

Second, an e-system can make it easier for doctors to “upcode” a procedure in a way to maximize reimbursement rates.

For example, when a doctor enters a billing code, the system can present him with alternative codes for very similar procedures that get higher reimbursement payments … and tell the doctor what addition work needs to be done to qualify for the higher paying code.

So, maybe just asking the patient a couple of more specific questions  may upgrade an examination from ‘simple’ to ‘ complex.  The doc can then ask the questions (or not) and check the higher paying box.

Third, an e-system makes it easy for docs to “clone” common ‘boiierplate’ findings from one patients chart to another patient’s chart … saving time and, perhaps, implying a more detailed examination.

The Times says:

As software vendors race to sell their systems to physician groups and hospitals, many are straightforward in extolling the benefits  of those systems in helping doctors increase their revenue.

In an online demonstration, one vendor promises that it “plays the level-of-service game on your behalf and beats them at their own game using their own rules.”

An expert says “What’s happening is just the problem we feared” … unintended consequences.

For the record, I think that cutting healthcare costs by reducing doctors’ pay is nuts … there is lots of waste, fraud and unnecessary expense in a grossly inefficient system.

>> Latest Posts

New from Puma: biodegradable kicks … put your $$$ where your mouth is.

October 17, 2012

Punch line: In the last few years, many companies have worked a sustainability message into their corporate mission and values statement.  For many, that’s as far as the initiative goes, but Puma is living up to the promise, and launching a new line of biodegradable shoes and apparel.

* * * * *
Excerpted from psfk.com’s, “Puma Launches Biodegradable Shoes & Apparel”

Puma has announced that it will launch a line of shoes, apparel, and accessories that are biodegradable or recyclable. Available in 2013, consumers will be able to return the products to stores for processing through the brand’s ‘Bring Me Back Program’ when they’re finished with them.

puma-biodegradable

The Puma InCycle collection shows the brand’s commitment to the environment, as it tries to help consumers reduce waste and mitigate their personal environmental footprints.

It includes:

  • Lifestyle sneaker Basket (biodegradable)
  • Puma Track Jacket (recyclable)
  • Shirts (biodegradable)
  • Backpack (recyclable)

PUMA InCycle will use biodegradable polymers, recycled polyester, and organic cotton in order to eliminate pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and other hazardous chemicals.

Puma’s CEO, Franz Koch, said, “The PUMA InCycle collection is the first step to help reduce the amounts of garbage that consumer products cause at the end of their lives. We feel that we are responsible for the environmental impact our products cause and this innovative concept in sustainability is a first step towards our long-term vision.”

Edit by BJP
>> Latest Posts

Amex offers co-branded Wal-mart prepaid card … say, what?

October 17, 2012

Punch line: Wal-Mart and American Express take aim at the traditional credit card model to offer an alternative to lower-income consumers.

The new card will expand AmEx’s customer base while offering Wal-Mart another foray into financial services.

Blubird today, platinum tomorrow … I guess.

* * * * *
Excerpted from Reuters’, “Wal-Mart, Amex team up on card for lower-income shoppers”

Walmart_bluebird-card

Wal-Mart Stores Inc and American Express Co. have teamed up to provide financial services to customers who often do not have traditional bank accounts by offering a prepaid debit card called Bluebird.

The move will give American Express … a 4,000-store gateway to tens of millions of so-called “underbanked” households and … Walmart will get to extend its mantra of “every day low prices” to yet another sphere and come closer to achieving its years-long goal of offering banking services.

The Bluebird will allow for deposits by smartphone and mobile bill paying, with no minimum balance or monthly, annual or overdraft fees, the companies said on Monday.

“Bluebird is our solution to help consumers who currently may be poorly served by traditional banking products,” said Dan Schulman of American Express. “In an era where it is increasingly ‘expensive to be poor,’ we have worked with Wal-Mart to create a financial services product that rights many of the wrongs that plague the market today.”

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts