Rather than ruling on the merits of the case, Justices run for the hills.
=============
OK, the WSJ had it right … and we had it wrong.
Recognizing that they would be caught between a rock and a hard place, the SCOTUS channeled Sgt. Shultz claim (“I hear nothing, I see nothing”) to stay out of the election dispute.
For the record, here’s the first part of the official SCOTUS statement:
ORDER IN PENDING CASE (155, ORIG.) TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.
Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.
All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
The key point: This isn’t a ruling on the merits of the case, i.e. whether there was election fraud and rigging … or not.
The Court just decided to rule on procedural technicalities and leave the merits of the case open for all of us to decide.
Let’s parse the courts statement….
