Archive for the ‘Gov’t Spending’ Category

Bailing out government pension plans …

June 23, 2010

There has been mucho chatter recently about gov’t pay levels which exceed comparable private industry rates and gov’t pension plans that make the UAW envious.

Bottom line: Many states have crafted gov’t pension plans that are going to implode in the not too distant future.

So, tax payers in fiscally responsible states will be forced to ante more into the pot to bail out the free-promising, overspending states.

Think about it next time you’re standing in line at the DMV.

* * * * *

Bloomberg: Pension Plans Go Broke as Public Payrolls Expand, June 11, 2010

Seven states will run out of money to pay public pensions by 2020.

That hasn’t stopped them from hiring new employees.

The seven are Illinois, Connecticut, Indiana, New Jersey, Hawaii, Louisiana and Oklahoma.

Combined, these states added 9,700 workers to both state and local government payrolls between December 2007 and April of this year.

Companies started firing more employees than they hired in January 2008.

Employment peaked in December 2007 at 115.6 million. During the subsequent two years, companies shed 8.5 million workers, or 7.3 percent.

By contrast,  from a peak of 19.8 million, state and local governments have reduced headcount by 231,000, or 1.2 percent.

What our politicians are telling us is that state and local governments are optimally sized — just right.

If tax revenue declines, well, then we’ll just have to find more taxes and fees to replace it.

We couldn’t possibly look at the cost-of-labor side of the equation.

If you really want to provoke outrage, you have to take into consideration public pensions.

Generous and bloated are the terms that have been used to describe them … What’s clear is that such pensions and benefits now seem unaffordable, because those responsible — state and, sometimes, local governments — didn’t put away enough, or haven’t invested wisely enough, to pay for them.

Full article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=awW.rqJzAad4

Your tax dollars at work …

February 8, 2010

In case you missed it last nite, our government spent $2.5 million of our tax dollars (the equivalent of 50 firefighters for a year)on a ridiculous 30 second spot for the 2010 census … part of a $340 million ad campaign.  Ouch.

Click below to view.

For more details: Super Bowl spot kicks off debate over spending on 2010 Census ad campaign
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/80113-super-bowl-spot-kicks-off-debate-about-census-ad-campaign

image

http://www.youtube.com/user/paytonschlewitt

Anybody concerned about the national debt ?

May 19, 2009

Ken’s Take: Next to the government just flat out wasting money, my worry is the burgeoning debt.  Some debt – ok.  But, staggering levels not ok.

When I ask students why they’re unfazed, they admit that the sums are so large that “it’s more like Monopoly money” or”payback is so far off that’s it’s not worth worrying about”.

Somebody is eventually going to have to pay the piper …

* * * * *

Excerpted from IBD, “Why No Focus On Huge Ongoing Debt?”,
May 15, 2009

Since 1961 the federal budget has run deficits in all but five years. But the resulting government debt has consistently remained below 50% of GDP; that’s the equivalent of a household with $100,000 of income having a $50,000 debt. Adverse economic effects, if any, were modest.

From 2010 to 2019, Team Obama projects deficits totaling $7.1 trillion; that’s atop the $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009.

By 2019, the ratio of publicly held federal debt to gross domestic product (GDP, or the economy) would reach 70%, up from 41% in 2008.

The CBO, using less optimistic economic forecasts, raises these estimates. The 2010-19 deficits would total $9.3 trillion; the debt-to-GDP ratio in 2019 would be 82%.

By CBO’s estimates, interest on the debt as a share of federal spending will double between 2008 and 2019, from 8% of the total to 16%.

One reason Obama is so popular is that he has promised almost everyone lower taxes and higher spending. The president doesn’t want to confront Americans with choices between lower spending and higher taxes — or, given the existing deficits, perhaps less spending and more taxes.

Closing future deficits with either tax increases or spending cuts would require gigantic changes.

Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=327285979616580

* * * * *
Want more from the Homa Files?
     Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

It’s simple arithmetic … your taxes going up

April 9, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ, “Obama Plans Sound Fiscally Responsible But Don’t Add Up”, April 9, 2009

For years, the American people have been told they could have it all: costly wars, expansion of Medicare to cover drugs, health insurance for those without, more money for schools — and tax cuts for practically everybody. They deserve to be told that they can’t have it all in the future.

In the 1930s and the 1960s, the government began popular programs to support the sick and the elderly. The cost of treating the sick is rising, and the number of old people climbing. Since 1970, the government has paid for that by cutting defense spending.  But going forward, defense spending will not fall as much as it has, even if the Iraq war ends and the Pentagon is forced to be more efficient.  

image

Pres. Obama envisions a federal government that taxes the American economy somewhat more than the historical average and spends significantly more. The president’s own projections show a deficit equal to 3% of gross domestic product well into the next decade, and that assumes all goes well.

image

The bottom line:  either taxes as a share of GDP rise or spending on those popular benefit programs (or everything else) is throttled back.

It’s simple arithmetic.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123921904349802157.html?mod=djemalert

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Turning around the economy on a dollar-a-day …

April 7, 2009

Well, the “middle class tax cut for 95% of workers” has officially started hitting paychecks.

So, if you work but earn less than a couple of hundred grand per year, your paycheck is now about a buck-a-day higher — the $400 tax rebate spread across 365 days.

For perspective, the total stimulus bill was about $800 billion.  The Congressional Budget office estimates that about 1/4 of it  (~ $200 billion) will hit in the first year.  The $400 program is about 1/2 of the $200 billion.

In other words, about half of this year’s stimulus is in place. Yipes.

I hope you’re feeling better about this plan than I am.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

The real Obama …

February 12, 2009

During the campaign, anti-Obama legions cautioned that candidate Obama was an inexperienced, rhetorically muscled purveyor of political bromides with no record of performance or provable sustained beliefs.  Even the notorious Rev. Wright warned that “Barack’s a politician and politicians say and do things to get elected.”

Understandably, many voters were frustrated by President Bush’s well-recognized performance and personality shortfalls, unswayed by John McCain’s erratic campaigning and unnerved with his controversial “long balls” (think Palin and “suspending the campaign”), and vulnerable to Obama’s messianic symbolism, historical breakthrough, and his “cooler than cool” promise of hope and change.

Swing voter’s bought in.  Even though hard evidence was sorely lacking, they concluded that maybe, just maybe, Obama was the real deal and that he would  usher in a new era of cooperation, high sprits, and progress.

The first 20 days of the Obama administration — arguably 20 “dog days” given the economic challenges and the fast-paced, high-pressure  legislative turmoil — have provided the answers to questions regarding Obama’s character, positions and executive style.  The real Barack Obama has revealed himself — for better and for worse.

First, President Obama has stayed true to his stated support for abortion rights, terrorist rights, unions, and community organizations.  And, he has been consistent in his suspicion and disdain for businesses and the people who run them.  Nobody should be surprised by any executive orders and bully pulpit proclamations on those topics.  On those counts, the voting majority got what they should have expected, and apparently, what they wanted.

But, there have been serious — and much forewarned — contradictions revealed, too.

The spirit of post-partisan cooperation was initially showcased in jaunts to “the Hill” and one-on-one meetings with weak-kneed Republicans at the White House, but quickly replaced by “We won. We trump.”

The promise of “line by line scrubbing of waste in the budget” was immediately discarded for “about the right size and scope” and “no time to wait for perfection”.

The “no special interests” promise was modified to allow unions and machine politicos to get seats at the table.

The “new faces, well-vetted outsiders” became a parade of recycled Clintonites, and tax-dodgers.

Obama’s discipline, “Mr. Cool” demeanor, and rhetorical splendor quickly denigrated to an amateurish lack of legislative control, and un-presidential sarcasm and attack-dogging.

The politics of “hope and change” were shelved in favor of the politics of catastrophe-mongering and political monkey business as usual.

President Obama has dutifully heeded Rahm Emmanuel’s advice to “never let a good crisis go to waste.  While the legislative process has been sloppy, the President ended up getting what he wanted in his stimulus package.

Unfortunately, the expensive grab bag of pork and paybacks is unlikely to have any perceptible stimulative effect on the economy.  For the next year or two, we’ll be hearing that Bush’s failed policies left the economy in even worse shape than anyone imagined and we’ll get bombarded with TARP-like claims that things would have been even worse without the added spending.  Jobs will continue to evaporate, but at a slower rate than some made up “what if” number.

The President has deftly managed to move his social agenda forward at warp speed.  His refundable tax credits are now in place, and a voting majority of Americans will pay no income taxes.  Healthcare is officially on the track to nationalization, Alternative energy gets a boost with government rules and spending.

In November, the majority of Americans were willing to bet on the come for hope and change.  Now, President Obama keeps reminding us that he won, so he — along with Pelosi and Reid — set the rules.  The rules are becoming clearer by the day.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Stimulus tax breaks: going for the capillaries instead of the jugular

February 11, 2009

The tax cuts included in the current version of the stimulus bill deserve the resounding “thud” that they’ve been getting.

Setting ideology aside and just resorting to basic arithmetic reveals the plan’s glowing deficiency: it is so “in the box” and marginal that it is unlikely to have any measurable effect on the economy.  Rather than slashing at the economy’s jugular, the tax cuts barely scratch the capillaries.

For example, take President Obama’s pride and joy, the $500 refundable tax credit.  Does anybody really believe that $1.37 per taxpayer per day is going to jump start the economy?    Or, will an extra $40 per month save many struggling mortgage holders from foreclosure? 

Similarly, take the GOP’s idea of a $15,000 tax credit on the purchase of a new home.  Somebody buying a $150,000 home with a 5%, 30 year mortgage would save about $80 on their monthly mortgage payment (getting it down to about $750) and provide a $15,000 equity cushion, just in case home values fall further.  Is that really enough incentive to pull job-threatened folks off the sidelines? 

The annual AMT adjustment would have happened later in the year anyway, especially since its greatest impact is in Democratic strongholds with high state income taxes (think NY, CA. NJ, and CT). That said, its average impact is about $2,400 for affected taxpayers.  These folks earn enough to have an AMT problem, so an extra $200 per month isn’t likely to change their shopping behavior, let alone their life style.

The biggest business tax break is the tax loss carry backward which allows retroactive tax credits (refundable I assume) for companies that made money during the boom but are tanking during the bust.  Again, the extra money may keep some marginal companies on life support for awhile, but isn’t likely to turn a struggling company into a jobs creator.

Congressional thinking has been trapped in partisan boxes.  Many ideas have been death-branded as either old and tired, or as favoring the rich.  No big ideas have been proposed that could realistically get the economy moving again.

There are big ideas for the politicos to consider if they are really serious about moving the economy forward.

First, there is the tried and true investment tax credit.  Give companies a 15% ITC for investment spending in 2009, and a 10% ITC for investment spending in 2010.  If necessary, sweeten the pot by allowing 2009-2010 investments to be written off on a very accelerated basis (say, over 3 or 5 years).

Second, give multi-nationals a tax holiday on repatriated earnings.  Cut the 2009 rate from 35% to 5% or 10%.  Such a move could bring over $500 billion back into the U.S. from foreign stashes, and generate $25 to $50 billion incremental tax revenue.  Otherwise, companies will use the money in their foreign operations and the U.S. tax take will be zero.

Third, give companies that maintain or grow their workforce a payroll tax rebate.  For example, a company that contributes the same amount of payroll taxes in 2009 as it did in 2008 might get 25% of its aggregate contributions rebated; a company that pays in10% more payroll taxes year-to-year might get a 50% rebate. A company that shrinks its workforce gets no rebate.

Fourth, since a depressed housing market is the root cause of the economic turmoil, adjust the standard income tax deduction a bit and allow the two-thirds of all taxpayers who use it to deduct their home mortgage interest payments.  This move alone would put money into more than 35 million pockets, might save a few people from foreclosure, and could coax some new buyers into the market.

Fifth, eliminate capital gains taxes on all residential real estate purchased in 2009 that is held at least 18 months. This initiative would certainly get investor-landlords back into the market.  They could buy some of the existing excess homes’ inventory, and deploy it as affordable rental housing.

Sixth, eliminate capital gains on all stocks bought in 2009 and held for at least 18 months.  Doing so would jolt the stock market upwards.  Would it favor the rich? Sure.  But it would also help restore the value of soon-to-retire baby boomer’s IRAs.

These ideas are representative of the pool of big ideas that have been overlooked in the stimulus package. It is time for Congress and the President stop playing small ball and go for the fences.  Give us something that we can believe will work.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

“Up to 4 million jobs created or saved”

February 10, 2009

Call me cynical, but Pres Obama’s promise of  “up to 4 million jobs created or saved” sounds like a pretty soft metric to me.

First, there’s the “up to” part.  So, if the final answer is, say 2 million, the metric is made.

But, the real weasle room is in the “created or saved”.  What exactly is a saved job?  How do you know one when you see it?

My bet: For the next year or two, we’ll be hearing that Bush’s failed policies left the economy in even worse shape than anyone imagined and we’ll get bombarded with TARP-like claims that things would have been even worse without the added spending.  Jobs will continue to evaporate, but at a slower rate than some made up “what if” number.

For sure, we’ll have saved up to 4 million jobs.

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

What’s magic about one stimulus bill? … Answer: nothing … so bite size it

February 5, 2009

Pres Obama and his surrogates have taken to repeating a mantra: the stimulus bill must be big and must be enacted quickly or else we’ll face an economic catastrophe.  The logic: we’re already taking a shelling and economists say $1 trillion is about the right number.

I’m struck that the emphasis is on big and quick … not right and effective.

There are parts of the proposed bill that make sense and seem to have consensus — e.g. extending unemployment benefits.  Others are debatable philosophically but can probably pass the “does it stimulate” criteria — e.g. Barack O’s $500 refundable tax credits.  Many (most ?) are outright pork and pay-offs.

Why not break the bill into parts?  Pass the stuff that’s on target and relatively non-contentious now … then debate the marginal and flakey stuff in due course.  Since most of that stuff won’t make a bit of difference to the economy, delaying won’t matter.

Even if $1 trillion is the right number, we can roll up to it … it’s not necessary to swallow it in one huge gulp.

What am I missing?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

What's magic about one stimulus bill? … Answer: nothing … so bite size it

February 5, 2009

Pres Obama and his surrogates have taken to repeating a mantra: the stimulus bill must be big and must be enacted quickly or else we’ll face an economic catastrophe.  The logic: we’re already taking a shelling and economists say $1 trillion is about the right number.

I’m struck that the emphasis is on big and quick … not right and effective.

There are parts of the proposed bill that make sense and seem to have consensus — e.g. extending unemployment benefits.  Others are debatable philosophically but can probably pass the “does it stimulate” criteria — e.g. Barack O’s $500 refundable tax credits.  Many (most ?) are outright pork and pay-offs.

Why not break the bill into parts?  Pass the stuff that’s on target and relatively non-contentious now … then debate the marginal and flakey stuff in due course.  Since most of that stuff won’t make a bit of difference to the economy, delaying won’t matter.

Even if $1 trillion is the right number, we can roll up to it … it’s not necessary to swallow it in one huge gulp.

What am I missing?

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Did the Social Security crisis just go away ?

February 4, 2009

A couple of years ago, the hot socio-economic topic was the projected insolvency of Social Security. 

Remember how Al Gore wanted a “lock box” to insulate FICA contributions from Congressional money grabbers?  Or, how Bush wanted to privatize Social Security so folks could earn higher returns?

Now, pundits (e.g. Robert Reich, Larry Lindsay) are calling for payroll tax holidays.

President Obama is bound and determined to give payroll tax rebates to low income folks who don’t pay income taxes.  That is, to reduce their Social Security contributions … by about $135 billion annually.

Does that mean that Social Security has miraculously found strong financial footing?

Hardly.

Social Security is a trust fund (currently over $2 trillion).  Workers make contributions to the trust and draw benefits from it when they retire or become disabled.  In concept, the contributed inflows and trust earnings (i.e. interest) are supposed to cover the benefit outflows. (Think Ponzi and Bernie Madoff … see excerpted article “Social Security: National Ponzi Scheme ” below)

Currently, about $785 billion in Social Security taxes are collected annually  from about 163 million workers and $585 billion in benefit checks are sent out  to 50 million Social Security recipients.

Well, according to the Social Security trustees, because of demographic shifts (i.e. more retirees, fewer workers), outflows will exceed inflows somewhere around 2020 — a little earlier if interest on the trust isn’t counted, a little later if it is.  And, they project that the trust fund will be completely exhausted by around 2040.

With t-bill rates now hovering slightly over zero, earnings on the Social Security trust must be minimal (and less than considered in the projections).

So, if the Feds cut contribution inflows to the trust by over $100 billion annually, won’t Social Security be in a world of hurt — sooner rather than later?

I haven’t heard any of Obama’s smart guys in the room talking about this part of the problem … and it’s a big part !

* * * * *

Excerpted from IBD, “Social Security: National Ponzi Scheme”, Williams, February 02, 2009

Congress collects about $785 billion in Social Security taxes from about 163 million workers to send out $585 billion to 50 million Social Security recipients.

Social Security’s trustees tell us that the surplus goes into a $2.2 trillion trust fund to meet future obligations.

The problem is that whatever the difference between Social Security taxes taken in and benefits paid out, Congress spends it.

What the Treasury Department does is give the Social Security Trust Fund non-marketable “special issue government securities” that are simply bookkeeping entries that are IOUs.

According to Social Security trustee estimates, around 2016 the amount of Social Security benefits paid will exceed taxes collected.

That means one of two things, or both, must happen: Congress will raise taxes and/or slash promised Social Security benefits.

Each year the situation will get worse since the number of retirees is predicted to increase relative to the number in the work force paying taxes.

In 1940, there were 42 workers per retiree, in 1950 there were 16, today there are three and in 20 or 30 years there will be two or fewer workers per retiree.

Full article:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=318470763456742

* * * * * 

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

“Page by page, line by line” … oh, just kidding.

February 3, 2009

Ken’s Take:

Candidate Obama promised that waste and special interests would be clinically scrubbed from the entire Federal budget. 

So, I wonder:  why didn’t his crack team scrub the pork-laden, non-stimulating $819 BILLION  “stimulus” package? 

Said differently, why should we expect that they’ll do a better job on the full $10 trillion Federal budget ? 

Dire prediction: For the record, if the stimulus package is passed in its current form — or a similar pork-laden variant — the Dow will go to 5,000.

* * * * *

Excerpted from Boston.com, ” Obama vows line-by-line budget review”, November 25, 2008

President-elect Barack Obama vowed today to get rid of federal programs that no longer make sense and run others in a more frugal way to make Washington work in tough economic times.

Obama said that to make the needed investments to create jobs, “we also have to shed the spending we don’t need.”

“In these challenging times, when we are facing both rising deficits and a sinking economy, budget reform is not an option. It is an imperative,” Obama said.

“We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politicians, lobbyists, or interest groups. We simply cannot afford it. This isn’t about big government or small government. It’s about building a smarter government that focuses on what works. We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.”

Full source post:
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/11/obama_vows_line.html 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Doubts on stimulus plan mount … combo of bad fundamentals and bad marketing

January 28, 2009

Below is a summary of the proposed stimulus plan.

Ken’s Take: (1) No question but that a stimulus is needed to kick the economy back into gear (2) But, a stimulus should stimulate, not be used as a trojan horse to advance a socio-political agenda (3) the Dems made a mistake throwing everything — including the kitchen sink — into the plan — especially controversial stuff like abortion aid and global warming studies and  (4) the Dems make a mistake everyday letting Reid & Pelosi out in public to explain the plan (5) If I were a GOP rep, I’d vote no on the plan — it’s going to pass anyway — conspicuous benefits are unlikely (it’ll be more TARP-talk: “would have been worse without it) — so, let Obama-Reid-Pelosi own it (“we won – we write the laws now”)  — and let them get the credit in the unlikely event that it does work.

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ, ” Doubts on Obama Plan Mount” & “Stimulus Bill Near $900 Billion”, Jan. 27, 2009 

The economic stimulus package proposed by Democratic House leaders totals $825 billion and includes three broad pieces: a $365.6 billion spending measure for such brick-and-mortar projects as highways and bridges; a $180 billion measure to boost jobless benefits and Medicaid, and a $275 billion tax-relief package, which includes a plan to give a $500 payroll tax holiday to all workers (a proposal from Mr. Obama’s presidential campaign).

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that $169 billion (~ 20%) of the $825 billion in stimulus will hit the economy before the end of September and that the bulk of it will show up in 2010 and 2011.

CBO also said that government borrowing prompted by enactment of the plan would add another $347 billion, pushing the estimated cost of the stimulus plan to more than $1 trillion, including interest.

* * * * *

The estimates point to one of the challenges of formulating an effective plan. Tax cuts can be implemented quickly, but many economists think they wouldn’t stimulate much new spending because consumers and businesses are so keen on saving. Government spending would generate economic activity more quickly, but it is hard to ramp up right away.

The one thing that is certain to flow from the stimulus is a large increase in the federal debt. Large government budget deficits are showing signs of starting to nudge interest rates on government debt higher, from very low levels.

If that persists, it could eventually damp some of the stimulus-plan’s benefits. Higher government rates raise the cost of borrowing not only for the Treasury, but also for many private-sector borrowers, since corporate bonds and mortgage bonds are often benchmarked to Treasury yields.

Bond markets have been hit by a flood of new supply of Treasury debt in the past few weeks, a factor that some traders say has pushed up rates. The yield on a 10-year note hit 2.519% Tuesday, up from a little over 2.00% at the end of 2008.

* * * * *

It’s projected that deficits in 2009 and 2010 will reach between 10% and 12% of gross domestic product, respectively, roughly double the previous peacetime records set in the Reagan years. It added that federal debt will soar from about 70% of GDP to more than 90% of GDP.

Economists say that the rise in debt will eventually lead to slower economic growth and diminished standards of living in the U.S.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123311521129023245.html?mod=article-outset-box 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Let’s get some accountability … Ask your Congressman to put his "you-know-whats" on the table if he votes for the bailout … Better yet, demand it !

December 9, 2008

Ken’s Take: All of these bailouts are flat out nuts.  The worst is the seemingly inevitable tossing of money down the Detroit sink hole.  There is no chance whatsoever that Detroit get on the road to prosperity.  They can’t compete with a $1,500 or more cost disadvantage on every car sold, and the politicos are determined to patronize the UAW. Getting rid of senior management bonuses and corporate planes doesn’t even qualify as rounding error.  A fundamental restructuring of overhead costs (i.e. massive white collar layoffs) and a competitive labor agreement are required.  Neither will happen. If ever there were a case of putting good money after bad, this is it.  No government loans will ever be repaid — either the companies won’t have the wherewithal to repay or the loans will be forgiven by Congress if the companies act like they’re doing something green.

To vent my frustrations, I emailed my Congressman — asking him to make a simple pledge to the dwindling number of taxpayers.  I know it won’t change anything, but I felt better.  You should try it.

* * * * *

Congressional Accountabilty Pledge 

Dear Mr. Congressman:

Stop wasting my tax dollars.

There is no chance that the Detroit 3 will repay bailout loans made to them.

If you vote affirmatively to approve any bailout loans, in any form, to any or all of the Detroit 3 automakers, you should accept personal accountability for your vote and make a binding, irrevocable public commitment to resign your government position on January 1, 2011 if the loans have not been repaid to the government in full by then, regardless of circumstances.

Period.

Your’s truly,

One of a dwindling number of taxpayers

* * * * *

To email your Congressional Representative:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

From the folks who want to micro-manage Detroit: 3 years late and 134% over budget … geez.

December 9, 2008

Three years behind schedule and almost $360 million above budget, the Capitol Visitor Center  is to open to the public on Dec. 2.

The final cost of the project is put at $621 million, more than double the $265 million estimated cost had the center been completed on schedule in December, 2005.

Security was a key factor in the cost overruns. Congress decided to add two tunnels, one for truck deliveries and one linking the Capitol with the Library of Congress, that could also serve as emergency evacuation routes.

Then there were the usual overruns associated with a project where 9,000 workers set more than 400,000 pieces of stone, some weighing as much as 500 pounds. The excavation phase required the removal of 65,000 truckloads of dirt.Congress also approved the addition of House and Senate office space.

* * * * *

Excerpted from MSNBC, “Capitol Visitor Center opens after delay, cost overrun”, Nov. 10, 2008

Full article:
 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27648214/ 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Of drunken and sober sailors …

September 25, 2008

According to the non-partisan Concerned Citizens Against Goverment Waste ….

Note: A high score means the Senator voted often against wasteful spending; a low means that a Senator voted often for bills that include wasteful spending provisions.

Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) 2007 rating was 10 percent, making his lifetime score 18 percent. The 2008 Congressional Pig Book contained 53 earmarks worth $97.4 million for Sen. Obama, including $1,648,850 for the Shedd Aquarium.

Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) received the worst possible rating in 2007 with 0 percent, while his lifetime rating is 22 percent. According to the Pig Book, Sen. Biden had 70 earmarks for a total of $119.7 million in fiscal year 2008, including $246,100 for the Grand Opera House in Wilmington.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) received a score of 100* percent and has a lifetime rating of 88, has never requested nor received a single earmark, and has pledged to veto any spending bill that contains any earmarks.

Source: http://swineline.org/2008/08/28/pork-in-the-presidential-race/

Full report, including specific tax votes and rankings:
http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3282
 

Summary data below, sorted from high (voted against) to low (voted for)

image

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog