Archive for the ‘MARKETING’ Category

Starbucks: Grinding to a halt ?

January 26, 2009

Excerpted from BrandWeek, “Why Starbucks Has Ground To A Halt” by Robert Passikoff, Nov 10, 2008

* * * * *

Maybe you haven’t read Moby-Dick, but you’ve surely read about a character named Starbucks. It’s not a happy tale…most of its brand awareness is based not on the perfect brew, but on ill-considered breakfast sandwiches, falling stock prices, store shutterings and various attempts to boost sagging profits. Of course, Starbucks has by no means disappeared…but the Starbucks brand is facing the danger of obsolescence

The reason for the troubles is that management ignored all the things that made customers loyal to the brand…How could the brand masters in Seattle have let this happen?…Starbucks stores were popular—and packed. So, out went those cool, comfy couches (how better to make way for lines of loyal customers?).

And of course, the service had to get faster, so why take time to grind all those annoying coffee beans? Hand-pulled shots also held up the clock, so they went bye-bye, too…the grinders stopped grinding, the shops lost that nice coffee smell…Vanished along with it was the reward of the custom experience…

In an internal company memo leaked in 2007…Howard Schultz himself admitted the streamlining that enabled the chain to grow to 13,000 units had “watered down” the brand. “Stores no longer have the soul of the past,” Schultz wrote…

Starbucks … had walked away from a successful brand position and a differentiating recreational experience and toward a door marked “Lifestyle Brand”…

Neither categories nor consumers are constant. Reasons for customers’ loyalty change, as do customers themselves. Starbucks failed to remember than the interaction that takes place between customers and categories is not static, but sophisticated and evolutionary. Not only did Starbucks help to create its category, it was responsible for educating the public about using it. Yet as…customers grew more sophisticated, the category morphed…Competition increased. Soon, a Starbucks-comparable mocha latte could be had most anywhere in the United States.

What had once been a treat is now an expectation. That’s exactly why, now, people won’t think twice about walking in for a really swell morning brew—at McDonald’s.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Customer satisfaction drives customer loyalty and customer loyalty drives profits.  Starbucks attempts to increase revenue simultaneously had a negative impact on customer satisfaction.  The result? Starbucks profit was down 97% for the most recent quarter vs. 2007 and began closing stores in 2008.  The chain has recently introduced rewards programs to promote customer loyalty and combat this decline. 

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://www.brandweek.com/bw/content_display/current-issue/e3i431ca797a370fbb20c4f3afe57081788?imw=Y

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

A Tough Sell: McDonald’s Targets Moms

January 23, 2009

Excerpted from Washington Post, “McDonald’s Courts Moms As Fast-Food Emissaries: Chain Enlists Its Toughest Customers to Talk Up Menu’s Healthful Side “, by Michael S. Rosenwald, November 20, 2008

* * * * *

The only obstacle between kids and their french fries: Mom.  “They are probably one of the most victimized foods,” says McDonald’s nutrition director.

Plausible reason: A medium order of fries at McDonald’s, besides the delectable taste, includes 380 calories, 270 milligrams of sodium and a color preservative called sodium acid pyrophosphate. But McDonalds points out that fries are rich in potassium and are “a really good source of fiber.”

One mom replies, “Once you throw them in grease, you kind of ruin it.”

Another says, “Potassium is good in bananas.”

* * * * *

But McDonald’s thinks it has a positive case to make and has recruited mothers to go behind the scenes of the company’s operations, meet senior executives and then communicate what they see via the Web, along with appearing in video of their travels.

The idea behind the company’s Quality Correspondents program: If McDonald’s can win over moms by showcasing food quality (the eggs in Egg McMuffins are real) and highlighting healthful options, the company can brighten its image at a crucial time in the arc of the fast-food industry. Customers, bombarded with news about food recalls, are paying more attention to safety, quality and ingredients — despite still not wanting to wait very long for their lunch. The message takes on heightened importance now, as strapped parents bargain in their heads over whether a McDonald’s meal can take the place of higher-priced options.

McDonald’s executives are betting that if they can shatter myths about the company’s food — a slaughterhouse visit shows chickens being handled humanely but also proves McNuggets contain chicken — and display an obsessiveness with food safety and quality to a select group of moms, the message will trickle through society.

“When people are asked to define who they trust and who they believe, the answer is people like themselves, not journalists and not academics.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/19/AR2008111903618_2.html?sid=ST2008111903624&s_pos

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

From Becks to ‘Benz … Quality Drives German Brands

January 22, 2009

Excerpted from BrandChannel “German Engineering Drives Global Brand Success” by Barry Silverstein, November 24, 2008

* * * * *

Of Interbrand’s Top 100 Global Brands in 2008, ten were German brands…Germany itself was ranked the best overall “country brand” in the 2008 Anholt-GfK Roper Nation Brands Index, which measures the world’s perception of each nation as if it were a public brand….The United States, the world’s leading branding powerhouse, ranked seventh…

So what is it about German brands…that is so special? Two words might be all the explanation that’s required: discipline and quality.

German companies are highly disciplined in their approach to creating, introducing and selling brands. They have the ability to consistently produce exceptional-quality products that are of lasting value…Makers of German brands are less interested in competing on price and more on making products of superior quality…

Germany’s brand exports have a long, celebrated history of excellence, regardless of industry segment. The country’s automobile brands are the ones consumers most closely associate with the country’s branding acumen…

There is ample evidence that Germany’s branding power extends beyond automobiles. NIVEA…was voted the most trusted skin care brand in 15 countries… Adidas…is an 80-year-old company that today is a global leader in sports footwear, apparel and accessories…SAP is the world’s largest business software company…

Other well-known global brands, from Bayer to Becks to Boss to Braun are a testament to the fact that Germany is, and will continue to be, a prolific producer of some of the world’s finest products. It’s Germany’s disciplined approach to quality that inspires consumer loyalty to German brands.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Whether it is beer or automobiles German brands are perceived to deliver a superior level of quality.  The real strength of German brands however is the consistency in which the brands have deliver on this promise of quality.  Establishing credibility through consistency is essential not only for country brands, but for brands in general.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=451

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

How much of a discount? Depends on how much you're worth.

January 22, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ “Marketers Reach Out to Loyal Customers” by Emily Steel, November 26, 2008

* * * * *

With the critical holiday-sales season at hand, there’s a new character joining Santa and his elves on the advertising circuit: the analytics geek…Marketers…are mining their customer databases and reaching out to loyal consumers with targeted ads, instead of relying on the traditional yuletide blitz.

Rather than create one TV commercial or send out a single, shotgun email promotion, uneasy retailers…are tapping statistical models and other technologies to send specific consumers promotions based on what is potentially on their shopping lists…

Persuading a satisfied customer to return is cheaper than attracting a new one…in the struggle to do more with less, that concept is becoming even more important. Acquiring a new customer costs about five to seven times as much as maintaining a profitable relationship with an existing customer…

Sears and Ogilvy have developed a system to identify the categories of merchandise Sears customers have purchased in the past and to measure the chance that they will buy those sorts of items again this season. That helps Sears determine the type of emails and point-of-sale offers to aim at individual customers. When customers buy an item online, Sears confirms the purchase with an email including a promotion tied to that product. A person who buys a new appliance at Sears.com might get an email offering a deal on the store’s extended-warranty program.

Sears is even offering customers differing discounts based on its predictions about the value those customers will bring to the company in the long term.

Companies have long tracked the habits of their consumers, but they have been overwhelmed by the reams of data they collect. Only fairly recently has the technology become sophisticated enough to allow marketers to link all the data points together — and work effectively with their advertising partners to leverage that data in ad campaigns…

Even if marketers get closer to predicting what’s on consumers’ wish lists, it’s going to be a tough sell, with people strapped for cash. Growth in e-commerce sales has already slowed significantly this year…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

It is clear that marketers can benefit from targeting customers based on Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV).    This is especially important for retailers facing a challenging economic situation with trimmed advertising budgets and customers who are cutting their spending.  The retailers that take advantage of the technology available to more accurately calculate CLTV and then target the more profitable customers have a better chance at a profitable holiday season. 

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122766322705958805.html?mod=article-outset-box

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Simpler shades show big savings for Unilever

January 21, 2009

Excerpted from AdAge “Unilever Sees Green With Pared-Down Color Palette” By Jack Neff, December 01, 2008

* * * * *

Somewhere over the rainbow lies $5 billion in savings for the package-goods industry.

Using a color-harmonization program Unilever is reducing the more than 100 hues it uses on its spreads and dressings packaging in Europe to six. Unilever’s hope is to save tens or eventually even hundreds of millions of dollars a yearthe initial savings for Unilever in Europe amount to $13 million to $26 million…

Advancements in printing, which have added as many as four additional colors to the old four-color process, have helped make such moves possible, reducing the need for specialized or “spot” colors to get the right look — or close to it.

There’s even a potential environmental benefit…Cost savings and waste reduction come from buying inks on a greater scale, creating far less ink and packaging waste in the process of doing changeovers, and from producing final packaging because reduced complexity can improve quality and consistency…

“Basically, eight out of 10 marketers couldn’t tell the difference between their old packaging and the new packaging once we converted it…The team was, quite frankly, blown away with the results…”

But the approach isn’t for everyone. Savings are much bigger for the largest, most diverse package-goods companies with the most complexity in their packaging lineups.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Unilever’s efforts to reduce color hues will likely go unnoticed by consumers, but will certainly be noticed by brand managers looking to cut costs.  The effort is a great example of a small, yet significant change that is friendly to both the environment and the corporate wallet.  

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=132885

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Private Labels Paying Off

January 20, 2009

Excerpted from the Chicago Tribune, “Shopper Pick Up Store Brands” and “Private Labels Part of Grocer’s Strategy”, both  by Mike Hughlett, November 21, 2008

* * * * *

The economy—a roiling caldron of evaporating jobs and soaring food prices—has caused shoppers to migrate to cheaper store brands at rates not seen since the last recession in 2001 … Back then, they shifted right back to name brands when the economy perked up.

But this time, the shift may be more permanent, potentially benefiting food retailers at the expense of packaged-food manufacturers. Since the last recession, supermarket chains have poured millions into beefing up their private labels, launching new brands, improving packaging and bolstering quality.

* * * * *

Shoppers increasingly find little difference between name brands and store brands, which typically cost 25 percent less. The upshot: When shoppers switch, they may be more likely to leave a name brand behind permanently.

And a successful store brand can lure customers from one chain to another, experts said. The O brand, which Safeway has put on more than 300 organic items, from fresh produce to cookies to frozen pizza, has changed some consumer’s shopping behaviors — giving them less incentive to shop at chains that focus on organic. Says one, “Now I don’t have to go to Whole Foods or Trader Joe’s.”

* * * * *

Store brands are looking and functioning more like name-brand products and are becoming more important to conventional grocery chains as a tool to help battle tough competition from both discounters.

There are myriad reasons for the store-brand offensive. First, supermarkets reap higher gross profit margins on their own brands compared with name brands—about 8 to 10 percentage points higher.

Then, there’s the Wal-Mart factor. The grocery behemoth and other discount grocery concepts continue to snatch market share from higher-price conventional chains. But because private-label products are less expensive, a robust private-label program can improve a traditional grocer’s “price image” to cost-conscious shoppers.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full articles:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-private-labels-consumersnov21,0,3045032.story

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-private-labels-stores-nov21,0,7919897.story

 

* * * * *

The Numbers Don’t Lie: Competing on Analytics

January 20, 2009

Excerpted from Knowledge@Emory, “The Value and Benefits of Competing on Analytics”, November 13, 2008

* * * * * 

A lot of companies collect data. But it’s the ability to analyze and strategically act on that data that matters, notes Thomas Davenport, the author of the best-seller Competing on Analytics: The Science of Winning.. Most companies use data in a supporting role—not as the strategic weapon it can be.

At a time when competing companies offer similar products and have access to the same technologies analytical customer-facing processes are some of the only areas where businesses can differentiate themselves. “Analytical competitors” mine their data for every sliver of information it offers and then utilize that information in strategic ways. Firms like Harrah’s, Marriott  and Google that use analytical tools in a strategic manner are raising the bar in their industries when it comes to things like customer service, supply chain management and marketing.

* * * * *

Companies are taking their metrics—marketing metrics, sales metrics and service metrics—and using them, among other things, to segment, cross-sell, forecast, target and study drivers of satisfaction. Rather than looking at what happened, companies are able to predict more precisely what will happen and to better understand how and why it happened. Decisions are based on facts, not hunches or incomplete information.

Historically there’s been as much “art” in advertising and marketing as there has been “science.” Davenport argues that science is more likely to be correct than “art,” and adds that science enables a company to experiment on a small scale before committing a slew of resources to a huge marketing campaign or program.

* * * * *

Example: Harrah’s

In order to attract and retain customers, Harrah’s uses analytical tools not only to identify profitable customers, but to pinpoint its customers most likely to be wooed by competitors. Through well-designed marketing campaigns—created around information the analytical tools delivered—Harrah’s marketing methods can be strategically aimed at keeping those customers.

Analytical tools allowed the entertainment company to create a well-defined profile of its best customer, developing a beefed-up customer relationship management system anchored by a centralized data warehouse filled with pertinent information about how Harrah’s customers interact with the company. And given this information, Harrah’s marketing efforts are tailored to attract its different constituencies.

For instance, Harrah’s customers who live within driving distance of a casino receive different offers than those who do not. Frequent visitors to the casino in New Orleans are likely to receive different offers than frequent customers in Las Vegas or St. Louis. Harrah’s only targets customers likely to respond to such offers and it has more than 80 different segments for each marketing campaign.

One of the reasons Harrah’s has been so successful, notes Davenport, is because they focused on “one thing early” when it came to analytics. In Harrah’s case that “one thing” was customer loyalty. “In terms of marketing, companies need to think about target areas and about what they’re trying to accomplish,” adds Davenport. According to information available on Harrah’s website, nearly 50 percent of the company’s revenue is driven by marketing and the company’s analytical efforts have helped boost the company’s bottom line.

* * * * *

In studying companies that use analytics successfully, Davenport crafted what he calls “The Ladder of Analytical Marketing Targets”—essentially a best practice guide. First up, build a centralized customer database so that the company can get a comprehensive idea about its customers. The company can then treat “different customers differently” and respond appropriately to a customer’s activity. Companies can keep track of who got what and better manage their marketing campaigns—to the point of personalizing them. Via predictive modeling, companies can answer with much more certainty what customers are likely to do next given what they’ve already done. As a result, companies can make real time, customized offers that make sense to their customers.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://knowledge.emory.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1193#

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

No Downturn for Designer Denim

January 19, 2009

Excerpted from BusinessWeek, “Selling $300 Jeans in a Down Economy”, by Stacy Perman, November 18, 2008

* * * * *

Denim is an $11 billion industry in the U.S. and has been growing at around a 5% to 7% clip in recent years. Premium labels such as Rock & Republic now account for a 7% chunk of the total market. “Consumers will pay $300 for the right pair of jeans. They see it as an investment.”

Moreover, “certain denim brands have made it their focus to be a game-changer. They make you feel really great and you will pay twice as much for those. What they are able to do is get the consumer of many different age segments and deliver on the implied promise that these jeans will make your life better, you will feel better.”

Even in an economic downturn, Cohen calls denim “recession-resistant.” “People are going to make significant changes,” he says. “They don’t have a lot of money in their pockets. They may not buy three pairs, but they will buy one pair and it has to be about who has the right message.”

* * * * *

At the time of Rock & Republic’s debut in 2002, premium jeans (those with price tags that start at $75) were on the rise, and the company acknowledges that their timing was spot on. 

The rest of their success came down to branding and marketing. Following a strategy to create a niche label within a tight space of niche labels, the line was unveiled at fashion shows primed to grab attention. Models careen down the runway drinking beer, flipping the bird at photographers, and lifting their skirts.

At the same time, Rock & Republic worked to heighten interest among consumers and retailers by creating scarcity. When Barneys wanted an exclusive deal to sell his line, they turned the luxury department store down. In the beginning they also turned away Bloomingdale’s. “The ability to say no made our brand.  We had a twofold strategy about where we placed the brand and leverag[ed] its exclusivity.”

* * * * *

If any luxury brand has a shot at staying aloft during this downturn it very well might just be Rock & Republic. “We know very well from our data that strong brands hold up better than weak ones … strong ones have a distinctive position and a real perceived differentiation in the market. Rock & Republic seems to fit that bill even in a fairly competitive market.”

Moreover, one should not underestimate the cachet that Rock & Republic jeans continues to confer on its wearers. “Yacht manufacturers are suffering,” he says. “But let’s face it, someone that is willing to shell out $200 to $300 on jeans is not going to run out to the Gap for their next pair. There is tremendous badge value in this sort of luxury and if Rock & Republic has it, that is what people will buy.”

Edit  by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/nov2008/sb20081118_392896.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_small+business

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

Online ads … customized on the fly

January 16, 2009

Excerpted from the New York Times, “Web Marketing That Hopes to Learn What Attracts a Click”, by Stephanie Clifford, December 3, 2008

* * * * 
Online advertisers are not lacking in choices: They can display their ads in any color, on any site, with any message, to any audience, with any image.

Now, a new breed of companies is trying to tackle all of those options and determine what ad works for a specific audience. They are creating hundreds of versions of clients’ online ads, changing elements like color, type font, message, and image to see what combination draws clicks on a particular site or from a specific audience.

It is technology that could cause a shift in the advertising world. The creators and designers of ads have long believed that a clever idea or emotional resonance drives an ad’s success. But that argument may be difficult to make when analysis suggests that it is not an ad’s brilliant tagline but its pale-yellow background and sans serif font that attracts customers.

Adisn, based in Long Beach, and Tumri, based in Mountain View, are working both sides of the ad equation. On one, they are trying to figure out who is looking at a page by using a mix of behavioral targeting and content analysis. On the other side, they are assembling an ad on the fly that is meant to appeal to that person.

* * * * *

Adisn’s approach has been to build a database of related words so it can assess the content of a Web site or blog based on the words on its pages.

Adisn then buys space on Web sites, and uses its information to find an appropriate ad to show visitors to those sites. If a visitor views pages about beaches, weather and Hawaii, it might suggest that the visitor is interested in Hawaiian travel.

Based on that analysis, Adisn’s system pulls different components — actors, fonts, background images — to make an ad. For example, it might show an ad with a blue background, an image of a beach, and a text about tickets to Hawaii.

Simple Green, the cleaning brand, began working with Adisn this year to advertise a new line of products called Simple Green Naturals.

“If it’s a woman looking at a kitchen with a stainless steel refrigerator, they can show a stainless steel product.”

* * * * *

Tumri’s approach is slightly different. It creates a template for ads, including slots for the message, the color, the image and other elements.

Unlike Adisn, it does not buy ad space, but lets clients choose and buy space on sites themselves. And rather than building a contextual database, Tumri uses whatever targeting approach advertisers are already using, whether it is behavioral or contextual or demographic, and assembles an ad on the fly based on that information.

“It’s reporting back to the advertiser and agency saying, ‘Guess what? The soccer mom in Indiana likes background three, which was pink, likes image four, which was the S.U.V., and likes marketing message 12, about room, safety and comfort.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/business/media/03adco.html?_r=1&ref=media&pagewanted=print

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

So, what happens when a luxury brand drops its prices ?

January 16, 2009

Excerpted from the WSJ, “In Rare Move, Luxury Goods Makers Trim Their Prices in the US”, by R. Dodes and C. Passariello, November 14, 2008

* * * * *

For the first time in recent memory, luxury-goods makers are cutting prices on designer apparel, shoes and handbags in the U.S. market.

With even the biggest spenders starting to scrimp, luxury companies are reversing the industry’s maxim that luxury prices only move up. The cuts range from 8% to 10% on most products sold in the U.S.

But the move isn’t likely to dent the profit margins…because the value of the dollar has increased 28% against the euro since April. Luxury-goods companies don’t disclose margins, but Louis Vuitton is estimated to have a margin of 45 cents on every dollar…The strengthening of the dollar means luxury-goods companies are earning more than they had budgeted on every handbag or piece of clothing sold in dollars.

Luxury-goods executives must walk a fine line when cutting prices… if prices drop precipitously, the perception of a label’s value may also drop… During the recent years, luxury companies often assumed that money was no object for their fans…But luxury makers have acknowledged that a ceiling exists even for exclusive goods…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

This article is a follow-up to a previous post on marketing luxury brands in lean times. It confirms that even high-end consumers are cutting back spending and likely avoiding conspicuous consumption. As a result, marketers are faced with the challenge of maintaining their premiums and exclusivity while also making sure their brands are accessible and acceptable to purchase in the eyes of the high-end consumer.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122662444379126865.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Consumer choice modeling … how people decide to buy

January 15, 2009

Excerpted from Strategy+Business, “Tracking the Elusive Consumer”, by John Jullens and Gregor Harter, Novermber 11, 2008

* * * * *
Consumer choice modeling … offers a better understanding of consumer preferences:
 
  • What does the consumer want?
  • Why do individuals prefer one product or service over another?
  • How, precisely, do most consumers make their purchasing decisions?

Recent work on the art and science of consumer behavior has refined, updated, and strengthened an analytical tool known as consumer choice modeling, initially developed in the 1960s by Daniel McFadden, a winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize in economics.

Simply put, this model examines the personal reasons for individual choices and provides techniques researchers can use to measure and predict those choices. By exploring why individuals make specific trade-offs among various product options, consumer choice modeling can determine the features that people in different economic and demographic strata are looking for and how much they are willing to pay.

* * * * *

Originally, this technique suffered from a lack of sophistication. A typical implementation involved asking respondents to react to lengthy paper-and-pencil surveys offering a series of preconfigured and static product or service possibilities. Although some insight about consumer preferences was typically evinced, it was often shallow, limited by researchers’ inability to dynamically change the direction of the questioning on the basis of the responses.

However, advances in experimental designs and information technology now allow researchers to better approximate the shopping experience when asking questions by adjusting product choices in reaction to a person’s answers. By analyzing the responses from a representative sample of consumers (or potential future customers), researchers can produce econometric models that depict the relative weighting of specific product features and price points.

* * * * *

Early in 2007, Booz & Co.applied consumer choice modeling to identify and measure the drivers of demand for mobile phones. One example::  Apple’s iPhone.

Long before the iPhone’s launch,  the Booz  model correctly predicted that it would be the most attractive overall offering to consumers despite its high price tag. 

Booz  surveyed more than 1,800 consumers by simulating the actual mobile phone purchasing process and asking people to compare their existing package with alternatives.

For example, owners of low-cost Sharp handsets running on pay-as-you-go carriers such as Virgin Mobile or Boost Mobile were offered a U$100-plus Samsung phone with Nextel service and a $250-plus LG phone with Verizon’s network. Respondents were asked, “If these two packages were your only alternatives, which one would you choose: Samsung/Nextel, LG/ Verizon, or neither?” and “If Samsung/Nextel were your only option, would you purchase it or continue to use your current package?”

The majority of the low-end and midlevel consumers were highly commodity driven. Other than by offering an attractive handset price, it is almost impossible to convince an individual to change his or her current mobile phone package. In fact, further analyses revealed that one-third of U.S. consumers are unwilling to change their wireless package, no matter how much the handset price is lowered.

* * * * *

Of all phone users, owners of low-end handsets made by the Nokia  value their phone package the least. Consequently, these consumers are the most willing to switch to another carrier and handset — an opportunity for competitors to attack Nokia’s base by producing a low-cost package with a function or two that outpaces the relatively plain Nokia product.

The consumer choice model also revealed that owners of handsets made by Sony Ericsson , which tend to be highly designed, full-featured products, care much more than Nokia users about functionality, usage range, and purchase location (they prefer to buy their packages at stores that offer personal attention, rather than at Costco or Circuit City, for example). And although these customers, too, are price conscious, they’re willing to pay a premium to have their preferences met. A service provider could use these findings to target Sony Ericsson owners with a slightly less expensive offering that in all other ways matches their current package.

* * * * *

Consumer choice modeling also has the ability to predict the impact of future products and services on the market. Booz  simulated the characteristics of “the ideal high-end phone” as consumers viewed it. From this, the survey gleaned that three primary factors — feature, design, and brand — are of paramount value to consumers considering a higher-priced model. These factors, of course, were exactly what Apple focused on in developing its blockbuster iPhone, launched in July 2007.

Significantly, as the model predicted, Apple stumbled when it came to price, which the survey showed matters at all levels of cell phone purchases.

At a price point of $599 for an eight-gigabyte phone, the research forecasted that Apple would have difficulty reaching a significant portion of the high-end market. But the same research suggested that performance would improve quickly as soon as Apple cut prices. In fact, that is precisely what happened: In September 2007, Apple discounted the phone by $200, and sales rose well over 1,000 percent in the succeeding quarter from sales in the prior three-month period. And in June 2008, CEO Steve Jobs announced a much faster eight-gigabyte iPhone — using AT&T’s state-of-the-art 3G network — for only $199, a move that further aligned Apple’s pricing with that of its peers and that will almost certainly improve the product’s market share.

* * * * *

Consumer choice modeling yields valuable insights for demand-driven strategy development by providing customer value segmentation maps, measuring market share impact of new product–service combinations, and assessing overall brand equity. Perhaps most important, choice modeling can reveal sa­lient differences between managers’ beliefs about customers’ needs and preferences and customers’ actual needs and preferences. For managers seeking reliable feedback on how customers view their products and services, consumer choice modeling provides a rigorous way to turn customer-driven feedback into profitable and sustainable tactics for retaining or capturing market share.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.strategy-business.com/resiliencereport/resilience/rr00064?pg=2

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

What value an acquired brand? It depends …

January 15, 2009

Excerpted from Knowledge @ Emory “The Mystery and Motivation of Valuing Brands in M&A“, November 13, 2008

* * * * *

in 2000 Cadbury Schweppes bought the Snapple brand of drinks, justifying the purchase to its board by saying that Snapple would be a wonderful addition to its product line and could be sold through its established distribution channels. Cadbury could successfully launch this small-town brand into the big time.

Quaker Oats, a previous owner of the Snapple brand, had given the same reasons for wanting to buy the brand—and yet, Quaker had failed to build the Snapple brand to any measure of its aspirations.

Brand valuation takes on a special significance in M&A, when both acquirer and target contribute inherent qualities that fuel brand value. “For example, Procter & Gamble (P&G) acquired Gillette and about 49% of the acquisition was attributed to the Gillette brand.”

Emory researchers. … set out to study the contributing traits of both the target firms and acquiring firms to explain the value given to a brand…They were able to determine the capabilities of both the acquirer and the target and how those, in turn, influence brand value…

Study results show that both acquirer and target marketing capabilities, as well as brand portfolio diversity have positive effects on a target firm’s brand value. Both parties’ capabilities are critical. 

Regarding brand portfolios: “If there’s redundancy in your portfolio, then your valuation is likely to be lower…if you’re acquiring a brand that allows you to get into a whole new market, then your valuation would be much higher.”

“Target firms need to recognize the significance of a firm’s marketing capabilities as well as its brand portfolio diversity…Targets with strong marketing capabilities can negotiate higher prices for their brands because the target’s marketing capabilities provide assurance to the acquirer firms in terms of the future performance of its brand portfolios. Targets with diverse brand portfolios can charge higher prices for their brands because diverse portfolios provide strategic options for the acquirer”…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full article:
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2091
* * * * *
Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Go green or go broke… your choice !

January 14, 2009

Excerpted from Brandweek, “Go Green Or Else!” By Elaine Wong, Dec 2, 2008

* * * * *

Environmental legislation and climate changes could eat up as much as 47% of packaged goods companies’ profits by 2018 if they don’t adopt long-term sustainability measures  …

A report, Rattling Supply Chains … addresses long-term profitability of the packaged goods industry. The findings are based on “future analysis” of how much certain commodities will go up, including oil, cereal, soy and palm oil, and how they will fare under certain environmental, governmental policy and climate situations. The term used to describe these hypothetical scenarios is “ecoflation.”

Companies that can reduce their reliance on materials like plastic or paper, through sustainability initiatives, can cut costs when economic pressures cause price increases…Companies can expect a reduction of anywhere from 13 to 31 percent in earnings by 2013… if adequate sustainability measures are not taken….

Companies like P&G and Nestle have already implemented sustainability strategies. Nestle is placing more emphasis on sourcing materials locally to cut down on transportation. Meanwhile, P&G is cross-leveraging research and design teams across different brand categories…

These are just a few examples of the extent to which many companies have considered going green. Oftentimes, retooling a supply chain to be more sustainable involves “rethinking the product itself … It has as much to do with improving business practices as it does with improving environmental practices. In fact, the two go hand-in-hand.”

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Investing in sustainability reduces costs, but it can also have the added benefit of encouraging consumers to buy your product.  According to a recent IRI report, 50% of consumers consider sustainability efforts when purchasing consumer product goods.  Indicating that neither the product, nor the people (consumer) can be separated from the sustainability process.

* * * * *
Full Article:
http://www.brandweek.com/bw/content_display/news-and-features/packaged-goods/e3i726f0f4961487c61bd28d01ac0630121?imw=Y

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Uncertainty Fuels Airline Price Cuts

January 14, 2009

Excerpted from the Miami Herald, “Airlines cutting prices to stay aloft during recession, ” By Harry Weber, Jan 7, 2009


* * * * *  

A wave of fare sales has spread across the airline industry…as the weak economy continues to put pressure on carriers to fill seats even after they drastically reduced capacity and some expressed willingness to cut more.

Many experts and even executives at some airlines had expected that after deep capacity cuts went into effect starting in September, the number of fare sales going forward would be fewer and farther between. But fuel prices have come down significantly, and the weak economy has eroded demand for air travel…

It’s not unusual for airlines to announce fare sales in January…but what’s different for several carriers this year is that the discounts are for travel extending as late as April, May or June..The sales last January were typically for travel through March, he said.

Seaney said he believes uncertainty in the economy is the reason for the change…A handful of major carriers and discount carriers have launched fare sales since Dec. 31. Others are expected to follow with sales of their own, or to at least match discounts offered by rivals on competitive routes…

Discount carrier AirTran Airways said Tuesday it was offering a nationwide sale with one-way fares starting as low as $39…”We are uncertain about the economy and we are trying to build business on the books for the winter and spring,’

Edit by SAC


Full Article:
http://www.miamiherald.com/business/nation/story/840842.html
* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?

Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Selling power, speed, and sex … (to utilitarians)

January 13, 2009

Excerpted from Marketing Daily, “Mintel To Mad Ave: Can The Sexy Car Ads” by Karl Greenberg, December 4, 2008

* * * * *
Most consumers don’t see their cars as a chariot of the gods, a freedom machine, a wheeled camel for Lawrence of Arabia, an automatic chick/hunk magnet, or portable fountain of youth.
Instead, they view their vehicles simply as functional and safe for getting around…

Mintel says its survey of car owners suggests that what most people actually feel behind the wheel, regardless of the name on the sheet metal is: responsible and practical, not sexy or powerful…Mintel asked consumers: “How do you feel when you are driving?” Three of the top four feelings chosen by respondents had to do with utility and security, per the firm, with 46% saying they felt “responsible”; 40% saying “safe”; and 37% saying they felt “practical.”

The more amorphous sentiments started further down, with 39% saying “happy” was the thing they felt behind the wheel…near the bottom of the list landed “powerful,” “fast,” and “sexy.” The bottom of the list was “rich”…60% believe the main purpose of a vehicle is to get from point A to point B…

“We found that for most people, driving a car or truck does not make them feel sexy, fast or powerful…The problem is that the auto industry is built on selling power, speed and sex. Those images are dynamic, but they don’t necessarily resonate with the majority of utilitarian, safety-focused drivers.”

Mintel also found that the top information sources that people use when researching new vehicles are word-of-mouth, car dealer brochures, consumer buying guides and the Internet.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

If car ads are meant to convey the “behind the wheel feeling,” they are missing the mark according to Mintel’s new study.  Most ads feature fast, sexy cars gliding around winding roads rather than practical, responsible drivers running daily errands safely.  However it is not clear from this study whether the “feeling behind the wheel” is motivating purchase.  While a driver may seek to feel safe and responsible behind the wheel ,the same driver may want the exterior of the car to scream fast, sexy and powerful.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=96019

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Some brands die … and some dead ones come back to life

January 13, 2009

Excerpted from Brandchannel, “Brand Darwinism: When & Why Brands Falter & Die” By Barry Silverstein, Dec 22, 2008
* * * * *

Much like living organisms, brands have a lifecycle…While some brands stand the test of time, others fade away soon after they come to market. What happens when it’s time for brands to die, and why?

A primary reason for brand fragility is the very nature of the brand world. Consider this: in 2006, over 20,000 new products were introduced just in the food and beverage category…While many new products may be extensions of an existing brand, imagine the number of new brand names embedded in that statistic… Fewer than 10% of all new products and services produce enough return on a company’s investment to survive past the third year

Despite these enormous challenges, there are timeless brands that not only survive but thrive for decades. These brands remain relevant to consumers, and they consistently capture enough market share to prosper, even in tough economic times. But what about the brands that falter?

Some companies intentionally kill off older or weaker brands as part of their brand strategy. Ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s is a case in point…the company regularly discontinues ice cream flavors in an effort to keep their stable of brands fresh and relevantBen & Jerry’s may treat the brand lifecycle with irreverence, but marketing managers at other companies who are forced to kill off a brand are likely not amused. After all, they invest considerable corporate resources in the brand launch. And their budgets—or maybe even their jobs—could become vulnerable when a brand dies…

The same kinds of painful decisions will soon by made by recently bailed-out American automobile manufacturers. The Big Three currently market over 100 different car and truck models through 15 different brands in the US…The problem for G.M. and other companies that must eliminate popular, long-standing brands is complex. While consumers may intellectually understand that brands don’t last forever, they get emotionally attached to them…

Another major reason brands die is the continuous upheaval that occurs in the brand world…when business conditions change. One of the most notorious contributors to brand mortality is business mergers and acquisitions…Each time a merger or acquisition occurs, a brand with a history, a significant market presence and a loyal following may disappear…

Whether it is declining sales, poor economic conditions or corporate mergers, brands will continue to die off, and some consumers will grieve their loss.

A recent he latest branding wrinkle is the marketing opportunity dead brands represent. In 2008, for example, Kellogg reintroduced a cookie brand called Hydrox, a competitor to Oreo that was discontinued in 2003…Kellogg may have decided it was less expensive to revive an old cookie brand with name recognition than launch one anew.

Apparently, reintroducing dead brands is a legitimate business…So don’t be surprised if, when a brand dies, you see it come to life again someday.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full Article:
http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=455

* * * * *
Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Marketing 101 … for Web 2.0

January 12, 2009

Excerpted from WSJ, “The Secrets of Marketing in Web 2.0” By S. Parise, P. Guinan, and B. Weinberg, Dec 15, 2008

* * * * *

For marketers, Web 2.0 offers a remarkable new opportunity to engage consumers…But most companies still don’t appear to be well versed in this area. So here’s a look at the principles we arrived at — and how marketers can use them to get the best results.

Don’t just talk at consumers — work with them throughout the marketing process. A leading greeting-card company…set up an online community — a site where it can talk to consumers and the consumers can talk to each other. The company solicits opinions on aspects of card design and on ideas for gifts and their pricing. It also asks the consumers to talk about their lifestyles and even upload photos of themselves, so that it can better understand its market…the online community is much faster and cheaper than the traditional focus groups and surveys used in the past…

Give consumers a reason to participate. Consumers have to have some incentive to share their thoughts, opinions and experiences…One lure is to make sure consumers can use the online community to network among themselves on topics of their own choosing. That way the site isn’t all about the company, it’s also about them…Other companies provide more-direct incentives: cash rewards or products…Still others offer consumers peer recognition…recognition not only encourages participation, but also has the benefit of allowing both the company and the other members of the community to identify experts on various topics…

Listen to — and join — the conversation outside your site. Consumers tend to trust one another’s opinions more than a company’s marketing pitch. And there is no shortage of opinions online. The managers we interviewed accept that this content is here to stay and are aware of its potential impact — positive or negative — on consumers’ buying decisions. So they monitor relevant online conversations among consumers and, when appropriate, look for opportunities to inject themselves into a conversation or initiate a potential collaboration…

Resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell. Many marketers have been trained to bludgeon consumers with advertising — to sell, sell, sell anytime and anywhere consumers can be found. In an online community, it pays to resist that temptation. When consumers are invited to participate in online communities, they expect marketers to listen and to consider their ideas. They don’t want to feel like they’re simply a captive audience for advertising, and if they do they’re likely to abandon the community…

Don’t control, let it go. In an online community, every company needs balance between trying to steer the conversation about its products and allowing the conversation to flow freely. In general, though, managers believe that companies are better off giving consumers the opportunity to say whatever is on their minds, positive or negative…The more that consumers talk freely, the more a company can learn about how it can improve its products and its marketing.

Find a ‘marketing technopologist.’ So who should direct a company’s forays into Web 2.0 marketing?…We coined the term marketing technopologist for a person who brings together strengths in marketing, technology and social interaction…”someone with the usual M.B.A. consultant’s background, strong interest in psychology and sociology, and good social-networking skills throughout the organization.”

Embrace experimentation. One Web 2.0 strategy does not fit all…Blogs, wikis and online communities are among the tools that companies are most commonly using for marketing, but there are other ways to reach consumers…For instance, many companies have long used instant messaging on their Web sites to allow shoppers to chat with customer-service representatives…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

While the Marketing 101 principles are sure to evolve for Web 2.0 the above mentioned principles provide a good foundation for marketers looking to take advantage ever changing world of the web.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122884677205091919.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Give me a jolt of Reb-A … but please, no calories

January 12, 2009

Excerpted from Ad Age, “Coke, Pepsi Jump on Zero-Cal Sweetener Reb-A” By Natalie Zmuda, Dec 18, 2008

* * * * *

A new zero-calorie sweetener could boost the beverage industry — if only it can figure out how to market products containing the ingredient.

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are rolling out products this month that will feature proprietary versions of Rebaudioside A, known as Reb-A.

Advertising messages are almost certain to take a variety of forms, and the products themselves could lead to confusion among consumers.

While consumers are accustomed to “diet” drinks containing a single calorie or none at all — and some of these new Reb-A products are likely to fill that bill — other products will have some calories …

In addition, there are two brand benefits to consider for marketing…some of the new beverages will likely be marketed as lower calorie, while others will be promoted as all natural. “The marketing and messaging is probably not going to be uniform…There’s not one single way of marketing these new beverages.”

Marketing efforts are likely to focus on education and sampling efforts to hook consumers…”In this case, because the ingredient is the differentiation of the product, it will be important to educate consumers about the value and the benefit of the sweetener…The key is to get people to get out and try these products and see for themselves that the products have a superior taste”…

It is unlikely Reb-A will find its way into flagship brands such as Diet Coke or Diet Pepsi…

A survey found that 22% of consumers are extremely interested in trying beverages using the sweetener…42% of those surveyed said they are not interested in trying beverages with Reb-A. Those consumers cited a myriad of issues ranging from safety and health concerns to taste to a preference for sugar…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

Beverage marketers would be wise to consider the same factors for Reb-A that technology innovations must overcome to ensure product adoption. 

These factors outlined by Everret Roger in Diffusion of Innovations are:

  • Relative advantage over existing options,
  • Compatibility with existing values, simplicity in being understood,
  • Simplicity — easy to understand and to use
  • Trialability on a low risk basis, and 
  • Observability —  the degree to which the innovation is conspicuous to others. 

The biggest hurdle for beverage marketers may be in Reb-A’s simplicity.  While it’s relative advantage in being all-natural is clear, consumers must understand this benefit for it to have value. 

* * * * *
Full Article:
http://adage.com/print?article_id=133410

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Audi on the Big Screen … a (relatively) cheap way to promote

January 9, 2009

Excerpted from BusinessWeek, “Audi: Putting Its Models in Movie Roles”, by Ron Grover, November 27, 2008

* * * * *

These are rough times for car companies.  So what’s a car company to do? Hit the movies, that’s what. 

The hot car in Hollywood, these days, is an Audi. In the past few years, it’s hard to go to your local multiplex without seeing that four-ring insignia staring back at you. In this spring’s blockbuster Iron Man, the carmaker had three vehicles in starring roles, including the superhot Audi R8 speedster. And when the action film Transporter 3 opens on Nov. 26, car chase fans will get to see a nearly two-hour commercial for the Audi luxury sedan A8 as it outruns police, outmaneuvers a truck by riding on two wheels, and flies through the air to land on a speeding train—all without so much as losing a hubcap.

* * * * *

Product placement isn’t exactly new in Hollywood, but you have to hand it to the automaker, which has gone into overdrive to go gear-shift to gear-shift with better-known brands that for years have hogged much of the screen time. Audi has done its best to crash just about every awards party in town. They have a fleet of sleek cars at the ready to lend to stars and directors.

It’s all part of the Audi plan to target mega-events, especially as traditional media splinters and audiences dissipate. Earlier this year, the carmaker spent the requisite $2.7 million for a Godfather-spoofing Super Bowl spot, which shows a man waking up in his bed to find the sawed-off grille of a rival luxury car—and ends with the apparent perpetrator speeding off in an R8.

* * * * *

Rumors have always abounded that companies pay hefty sums to get their cell phones, soft drinks, computers, and cars onto the screen. As for money changing hands, Audi steadfastly denies it pays for script time but acknowledges it will occasionally spend hefty amounts to “help promote any flick with which it’s associated.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2008/tc20081126_092112.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_companies

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Sony cuts consumers' stress by banning discounting … say, what ?

January 9, 2009

Excerpted from the New York Times, “For Sony, No Discounts Means Stress-Free Shopping”, by Saul Hansell, November 20, 2008

* * * * *

Eliminating price competition among retailers for high-end cameras and TVs is a great benefit for consumers — so say Sony executives .

Sony bans retailers from discounting Sony’s Alpha digital camera line, its more expensive televisions and some other high-end products. They claim that by having the price for these products be the same at all retailers, they eliminate stress for buyers.

“Consumers don’t have to worry about whether I can get a better deal at retailer A or retailer B. Everybody gets the best deal.” Stores can now compete on other attributes, like education and support.

* * * * *

A quick scan of photography blogs does not find much gratitude for all the stress that Sony has saved camera buyers. On a blog dedicated to Sony’s cameras, some posters complain about the price of cameras and accessories increasing by hundreds of dollars. The program has been controversial, even among electronics dealers

* * * * *

Sony is increasing promotions in retail stores, but was not cutting the prices it planned for the holiday season. “There was value planned in the product,” said Sony execs, “That value is there. Whether consumers will take advantage of it is another question. But we don’t think that dropping the price alone will add traffic.”

Edit by DAF

Sony cuts consumers’ stress by banning discounting … say, what ?

January 9, 2009

Excerpted from the New York Times, “For Sony, No Discounts Means Stress-Free Shopping”, by Saul Hansell, November 20, 2008

* * * * *

Eliminating price competition among retailers for high-end cameras and TVs is a great benefit for consumers — so say Sony executives .

Sony bans retailers from discounting Sony’s Alpha digital camera line, its more expensive televisions and some other high-end products. They claim that by having the price for these products be the same at all retailers, they eliminate stress for buyers.

“Consumers don’t have to worry about whether I can get a better deal at retailer A or retailer B. Everybody gets the best deal.” Stores can now compete on other attributes, like education and support.

* * * * *

A quick scan of photography blogs does not find much gratitude for all the stress that Sony has saved camera buyers. On a blog dedicated to Sony’s cameras, some posters complain about the price of cameras and accessories increasing by hundreds of dollars. The program has been controversial, even among electronics dealers

* * * * *

Sony is increasing promotions in retail stores, but was not cutting the prices it planned for the holiday season. “There was value planned in the product,” said Sony execs, “That value is there. Whether consumers will take advantage of it is another question. But we don’t think that dropping the price alone will add traffic.”

Edit by DAF

Disguising price increases … Is it just me, or is that package smaller than it used to be ?

January 9, 2009

Excerpted from the Minneapolis Star Tribune, “Freshly squeezed: The ever shrinking box and carton” by Chris Serres, December 2, 2008

* * * * *

In the past year, thousands of small, almost imperceptible changes swept through the grocery aisles where American families shop each day.

The indented bottom of a Skippy peanut butter jar got more indented, turning an 18-ounce jar into a 16.3-ounce one. Ice cream containers shrank by one-quarter of a quart. And for breakfast, a jug of Tropicana orange juice got 7 ounces lighter while that box of Froot Loops lost more than 2 ounces.

Shoppers without a keen eye and a willingness to read the fine print on labels might have missed what has happened: Food manufacturers were downsizing packages, while keeping prices the same, as they passed on higher food costs to consumers.

According to a recent analysis by Nielsen Co., about 30 percent of all packaged goods have “lost content” over the past year. This at a time when U.S. grocery bills are rising — up 7.5 percent in October vs. the same month a year ago — at the fastest rate in 18 years.

What began as a response to rising fuel and ingredient costs has become institutionalized at many companies. At General Mills, for example, cost-cutting is so embedded that the company even has its own intimidating term for it: “Holistic Margin Management.”

It’s not always about shrinking packages, which can account for as much as 75 percent of a product’s cost. Even seemingly small changes in a package’s design can mean millions of dollars in annual savings — lessening pressure to raise prices to cover costs.

There is an entire science behind packaging reductions, enlightened by a long list of unsuccessful changes.  

For instance, food manufacturers know consumers react more to changes in height than width, so cereal boxes often get thinner before they get shorter.

Once a product changes, buyers often forget the previous size, creating a new standard.

When PepsiCo reduced the size of its Tropicana orange juice jug by 7 ounces, it touted the container’s “new ergonomic design” and easy-to-open snap cap. Yet consumer advocates argued the new features were really meant to distract from the reduced weight.

“This is the packaging equivalent of three-card monte … by changing several factors at the same time, food companies disguise the fact that you’re getting less for the same price.”

One reason food companies have gotten away with downsizing without alienating shoppers is that over the decades fewer people are preparing meals at home. So they pay less attention to measurements on packages, said John Gourville, a marketing professor at Harvard Business School.

“The reality is, people pay more attention to prices than sizes … and the food companies know it.”

“You can take an ounce out here and an ounce out there, and maybe people won’t notice,” he said. “But if you do it repeatedly, and people are only getting three servings per cereal box, then people are much more likely to say, ‘What’s going on here?’ And it gets harder and harder to do.”  

Edit by NRV

Full article:
http://www.startribune.com/business/35343634.html 

* * * * *

Ken’s Take: You have to sort this marketing approach into 3 parts: (1) more effective packaging — e.g. more merchandising impact, better ergonomics (2) cost-cutting — e.g. more efficient use of volume and space, and (3) higher prices — e.g. on a per ounce basis.  Re: the latter — it is usually easier to raise “unit prices”  by resizing than by changing the price “per package” 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => The Homa Files Blog

Price Wars on the Web

January 8, 2009

Excerpted from the New York Times, “Web Sites Wage Holiday Price Wars,” by Claire Cain Miller and Brad Stone, November 20, 2008

* * * * *

Internet retailers, trying to navigate the first truly dreary holiday shopping season ever on the Web, are engaged in price-cutting and discounting so aggressive that it threatens their profit margins and, in some cases, their very survival.

Traditional retailers faced the same problem, of course, but the price-cutting is fiercest on the Web, where customers can easily shop for the best price with a quick search on Google or on specialized shopping engines like Shopping.com. Online, the competition is only a click away. For many Web sites, the discounts and price cuts are the only way to hold on to customers as online buying unexpectedly plummets.

The research firm comScore reported that sales growth on e-commerce sites slowed to a meager 1 percent in October compared with the previous year — the lowest rate ever for online retail and well down from the industry’s typical 20 percent gains.

* * * * *

To preserve the sanctity of their brands and some level of pricing control, some Web companies are promoting discount sites separately from their main brands. Zappos.com, a shoe retailer never runs promotions on its site. Instead, it quietly moves shoes that do not sell in six months to 6pm.com, a clearance site it acquired last year, but runs separately. 

* * * * *

Free shipping is also becoming a painful imperative for all e-commerce sites. Three-quarters of online shoppers say that they would shop elsewhere if a site did not offer free shipping. E-commerce giants like Amazon.com can easily absorb shipping costs, but small online vendors struggle. 

To exacerbate matters, a major expense for online retailers seems to be rising: the cost to advertise products on the search engine Google, the source of considerable traffic and visibility for most e-commerce sites.

Over the last year and a half, prices for text ads related to women’s fashion have quadrupled, say apparel retailers. In the popular gifts category, the price to advertise alongside results for common search queries like “gift baskets” jumped 50 percent from the 2006 holidays to 2007 and is expected to climb again this year.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/technology/internet/20slashing.html?ref=technology

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Hey, Mr. Retailer: Don't even think about discounting that hot product !

January 7, 2009

Manufacturers Set Price Minimums That Retailers Must Follow or Risk Getting Cut Off

Excerpted from  WSJ, “Why Some Toys Don’t Get Discounted”, Dec. 24, 2008 

At a time when retailers are slashing prices to attract last-minute Christmas shoppers, many stores aren’t marking down certain popular gift items at all.

That’s because of little-known manufacturer agreements that require retailers to refrain from discounting, especially in any advertising. If retailers don’t comply, manufacturers sometimes stop subsidizing ads or cut off supplies altogether.

The companies say that they enforce MAPs (minimum advertised prices)To maintain the company’s “integrity and high standards of manufacturing, we must maintain the price integrity of our products,” the letter said.

This season’s products affected by pricing agreements include The latest James Bond game and Guitar Hero World Tour Band Kit from Activision.

Minimum-price agreements between manufacturers and retailers were once deemed automatically anticompetitive and thus illegal under a 1911 Supreme Court ruling. Pricing agreements related to advertising — which critics say are used to discourage any discounting at all — also have run into legal trouble in the past when federal officials found they resulted in higher prices for consumers.

But in a controversial decision last year, the Supreme Court opened the door for manufacturers to set minimum prices as a means to enhance a brand’s image and for retailers to make enough profit on their merchandise to provide better customer service. The 5-4 ruling reversed a 96-year-old precedent and said cases should now be considered on a case-by-case basis, weighing the impact of pricing policies against free-market principles. In the wake of the decision, many manufacturers have instituted pricing minimums for advertising or sales.

Opponents of the ruling, including eBay Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corp., are hoping the decision will be reversed … arguing  that minimum-pricing agreements violate the Sherman Act, the law that prohibits price fixing and bid rigging.

“However you want to dress up these policies with fancy legal language, these policies are obviously in the interest of business and not the consumer.”

Many traditional retailers favor minimum-pricing agreements because they help put a stop to what the stores view as unfair competition from online sellers, which can charge less because they have lower overhead costs.

* * * * *

Markups are the difference in percentage between the wholesale price a retailer pays to a manufacturer and the retail price charged to consumers.

Retail markups generally have been around 50% “for the last 10 to 15 years, but recently they’ve fallen to about 42%.”  Catalog companies “like their markups at about 50%” because of their added expense of printing, postage and shipping.

Markup percentages among toy mass merchants are generally in the high 30s to low 40s.”Minimum-pricing policies level the playing field” by keeping every retailer’s markups the same.

* * * * *
Sony Computer sets minimum-advertised prices for nearly two dozen products, including $499 for the PlayStation 3 with 80 gigabytes of memory and $49 for a wireless keypad, a PS3 accessory.

A survey stores — online and offline —  that sell Sony videogame products found that nearly all of them were advertising and charging the minimum prices.

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123007559680631543.html

Want more from the Homa Files?
     Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

GM: 3 brands have targets on their backs …

January 6, 2009

Excerpted from BusinessWeek;, “Brand New Day”, November 28, 2008
* * * * *

General Motors is looking at killing off three brands—Pontiac, Saab and Hummer.

Everyone knows that GM is over-branded. The problem has long been that the company does not want to have to pay dealers to fold the brands it does not need as it did with Oldsmobile in 2001. State franchise laws prevent a car company from simply ending a brand. Closing down Oldsmobile cost the company around $2 billion.

Saab is not thought to have any hot buyers. According to past conversations with GM execs, Saab Cars has never turned an annual profit for GM. It has, at times, made money in Europe. But those gains have always been off-set by losses in the U.S.

Saab is one of two Swedish car companies with limited interest from both consumers and investors. Ford, too, tried to sell Volvo earlier this year, and found no takers willing to pay Ford’s asking price.

Both Saab and Volvo are premium brands that have long had followings of people who place safety above all other vehicle characteristics. Saab has also attracted some performance-oriented buyers as the company has long offered turbo chargers in some of its models.

[Note: As previously posted, green buyers typically sort performance and safety down the list of buying criteria]

Volvo is on track to sell about 82,000 vehicles this year. Sales through October were down 28%. Saab is on track to sell about 20,000 vehicles this year. Sales were down 32% through October.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/brandnewday/

* * * * *
Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Now, it’s the phone, not the carrier calling the shots …

January 5, 2009

Excerpted from Business Week, “How Apple’s iPhone Reshaped the Industry”, December 11, 2008

Today, apps are where the action is, and consumers are reaping the benefits

A few years ago, if someone asked what sort of cell phone you had, your response would probably be to name a network, like Sprint or Cingular. Wireless carriers so completely controlled the business, especially in the U.S., that many manufacturers weren’t even allowed to put their brand names on handsets. Now this relationship is changing in ways that will reduce the power of carriers and, with luck, increase consumers’ choices.

The relationship started to shift when people began using phones for more than voice calls and text messages. As browsers and e-mail systems became important, it mattered more whether you had a Palm Treo or a BlackBerry than whether your phone ran on the Verizon Wireless or AT&T network. Then along came Apple’s iPhone to rewrite the rules completely.

The conventional wisdom holds that AT&T scored a coup when it signed on as the exclusive U.S. iPhone carrier. The company reported that it activated 2.4 million of the new 3G iPhones in the third quarter, that 40% of those customers came to AT&T from rival operators, and that their average monthly bill was 1.6 times that of other subscribers.

But the impact on AT&T’s bottom line is another story. Mostly because of the fat subsidy it pays Apple for each iPhone, AT&T’s third-quarter earnings of $3.2 billion were $900 million less than they would otherwise have been.

More importantly, the carrier has probably lost forever its ownership of the customer, through a process economists call “disintermediation.”

Before the iPhone, relatively few owners of any phones—smart or dumb—downloaded applications. The carriers had a nice business selling ringtones and the odd game. But with iTunes and the App Store, Apple became the exclusive supplier of applications as well as music and videos. The content suppliers got about two-thirds of the revenue, Apple kept about a third, and the carriers were frozen out.

A key test of the new relationship between handset makers and smartphone software publishers, carriers, and customers will arrive when turn-by-turn driving instructions come to the iPhone. Apple seems to have created the phone with navigation in mind. Rumors are flying that Apple plans a navigation offering that leaves carriers in the cold.

This shift in power is a bad thing for wireless carriers, whose nightmares of being turned into commodity sellers of bandwidth are coming true. But it may be a win for everyone else.

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_51/b4113078121012.htm 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Now, it's the phone, not the carrier calling the shots …

January 5, 2009

Excerpted from Business Week, “How Apple’s iPhone Reshaped the Industry”, December 11, 2008

Today, apps are where the action is, and consumers are reaping the benefits

A few years ago, if someone asked what sort of cell phone you had, your response would probably be to name a network, like Sprint or Cingular. Wireless carriers so completely controlled the business, especially in the U.S., that many manufacturers weren’t even allowed to put their brand names on handsets. Now this relationship is changing in ways that will reduce the power of carriers and, with luck, increase consumers’ choices.

The relationship started to shift when people began using phones for more than voice calls and text messages. As browsers and e-mail systems became important, it mattered more whether you had a Palm Treo or a BlackBerry than whether your phone ran on the Verizon Wireless or AT&T network. Then along came Apple’s iPhone to rewrite the rules completely.

The conventional wisdom holds that AT&T scored a coup when it signed on as the exclusive U.S. iPhone carrier. The company reported that it activated 2.4 million of the new 3G iPhones in the third quarter, that 40% of those customers came to AT&T from rival operators, and that their average monthly bill was 1.6 times that of other subscribers.

But the impact on AT&T’s bottom line is another story. Mostly because of the fat subsidy it pays Apple for each iPhone, AT&T’s third-quarter earnings of $3.2 billion were $900 million less than they would otherwise have been.

More importantly, the carrier has probably lost forever its ownership of the customer, through a process economists call “disintermediation.”

Before the iPhone, relatively few owners of any phones—smart or dumb—downloaded applications. The carriers had a nice business selling ringtones and the odd game. But with iTunes and the App Store, Apple became the exclusive supplier of applications as well as music and videos. The content suppliers got about two-thirds of the revenue, Apple kept about a third, and the carriers were frozen out.

A key test of the new relationship between handset makers and smartphone software publishers, carriers, and customers will arrive when turn-by-turn driving instructions come to the iPhone. Apple seems to have created the phone with navigation in mind. Rumors are flying that Apple plans a navigation offering that leaves carriers in the cold.

This shift in power is a bad thing for wireless carriers, whose nightmares of being turned into commodity sellers of bandwidth are coming true. But it may be a win for everyone else.

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/08_51/b4113078121012.htm 

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

Starbucks’ (un)happy Baristas unionizing … uh-oh !

January 2, 2009

Excerpted from Business Week, “Starbucks’ Union Blues”, December 31, 2008

Starbucks’ legal wrangles with a union that wants to organize its baristas is tarnishing the coffee chain’s reputation for social responsibility

Starbucks, once the undisputed leader in premium-price caffeine fixes, has long cultivated a corporate image for social responsibility, environmental awareness, and sensitivity to workers’ rights. Now that carefully crafted reputation is under assault, thanks to a messy legal dispute with a group called the Starbucks Workers Union (SWU).

The NLRB found that Starbucks had illegally fired three New York City baristas as it tried to squelch the union organizing effort …. the company broke the law by giving negative job evaluations to other union supporters and prohibiting employees from discussing union issues at work.

The judge ordered that the three baristas be reinstated and receive back wages. The judge also called on Starbucks to end discriminatory treatment of other pro-union workers.

The timing isn’t ideal for Starbucks, which faces lower demand from the recession, an overall loss of panache for the brand, and a sliding stock price.

The company’s shares more than halved in value in 2008, while Dunkin Donuts and McDonald’s continued to grab market share among coffee drinkers.

Starbucks has been the target of numerous National Labor Relations Board complaints over unlawful violations of workers’ rights.

The SWU is especially keen on tarnishing Starbucks’ image as a “socially responsible” company. Union reps say that Starbucks has a systematic problem with low wages, irregular working hours, and a lack of reliable health care. Starbucks maintains that it pays competitive wages and is among the first large employers to offer health insurance to part-time employees, who make up 100% of its workforce.

Starbuck’s carefully cultivated reputation for social responsibility, may be vulnerable. “The image of the brand that it is wonderful being green, promoting free trade, and helping people, and not being an oppressor of labor.”

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_02/b4115026911242.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_news+%2B+analysis

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Sam’s new carton has some folks crying over spilt milk …

December 30, 2008

Excerpted from Fortune, “How Sam’s Club sees the future”, October 16, 2008

Of all the things you might think you could innovate on, the milk jug might not be at the top of your list. But, it is at the top of the Sam’s Club list.

Traditional milk jugs don’t stack, and they were coming in (to Sam’s) on metal carts that were being shipped back to the dairy, cleaned, and then sent back to the stores and clubs, and recycled, which created a lot of energy drain.

sams_club_milk.03.jpgSam’s developed a new milk jug that is stackable, so Sam’s can get 400 additional jugs in a trailer,  eliminating 11,000 delivery trips to the stores.  And,  there are no carts to send back to the dairy.

Trucks are  loaded in a way that reduces bacteria, which gives additional 6 days shelf life.

So, the new package provides a better-quality product, and costs a dime to 20 cents less.

The one big challenge has been that it’s different to pour. If you tip it and put it into the glass, it works fine, but if you pick it up and pour it like the old jug, you’ll miss. Which has some people crying over spilled milk.

Full article:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/15/news/companies/Wal-Marts_rising_star_colvin.fortune/index.htm

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
  The Homa Files Blog

GM’s Marketing Missteps

December 23, 2008

Excerpted from Harvard Business Online, “How General Motors Violated Your Trust”, by John Quelch, December 11, 2008

* * * * *

The top eight reasons why GM has failed as a marketer:

1. Focus on products, not customers. For years, Detroit wrongly viewed product types as market segments. Cars were classified as subcompacts, compacts, intermediates etc. But no consumer ever left home passionate to buy an “intermediate car.” Segments are groups of customers, not products.

2. Too many products, too many brands. The Toyota and BMW product lines are very simple, easy for a salesperson to explain and easy for the consumer to understand. There is a logic to the product lineup. Desperate to retain share in the US, GM continues to add to its already confusing array of 60 models under 8 different brand names. The positioning of each brand has long been unclear, a problem magnified by look-alike models built on common production platforms with frequent model changeovers adding complexity costs to production. Buying a car is an infrequent purchase; the consumer needs a clear roadmap of what is on offer.

3. Too many dealers. GM did not reduce its dealerships as it lost share. As a result, dealers began competing on price against each other rather than external competitors. Slipping sales caused dealers to consolidate two or more GM brands on a single lot, further undermining any pretense at distinctive positioning for each marque. And the need to keep sales up at each dealership limited GM’s enthusiasm for embracing new ways of taking new car orders from consumers over the internet.

4. Losing market control. You know you are the market leader when the other players in the value chain – producers, dealers, consumers – all look to your product line as the bellwether alongside which they organize theirs. Today, GM is correctly trying to regain control of the middle with the new Chevrolet Malibu. But will it be able to displace the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord?

5. Bigger is better. Higher wage and benefit costs make it harder for GM to make money on small cars. But the real reason for the migration of the product mix to SUVs and trucks is that the “petrolheads” who run Detroit are all big, tall men. They would rather go down in Detroit history as the guys who brought you the Escalade, not the Prius. They are Jack Palance, not Billy Crystal. Over half the cars bought in the USA are purchased by women; would you know that from the lineup of senior executives at GM?

6. No global brand. Here Ford has a clear advantage over GM. Ford is a global brand. The company name is the brand name. Sure, they have Lincoln and Mercury but the vast bulk of Ford’s marketing dollars worldwide back the mother brand. GM, by contrast, is a house of brands, none of which is global. Marketing resources at GM are inevitably dissipated.

7. Not invented here. Smaller than GM, Ford has been prompted by necessity to better integrate its worldwide operations. In a well-run multinational, this involves US headquarters learning from its subsidiaries, not just telling them what to do or letting them run independently. For decades, Detroit has spurned US launches of high quality vehicles conceived and made in its own European factories.

8. Finance focus. GM has not been run by marketers. It has been run by accountants. The cost focus has crowded out needed emphasis on consumer insight and marketing. Instead of obsessing over the $1,500 per car labor and benefits cost differential separating the big three and the foreign transplant brands, GM should have exploited its market access to develop brilliant new designs that the American consumer would gladly have paid more for. Instead, the Toyota Prius has trumped Detroit and GM’s belated answer is the $40,000 electric Volt.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/quelch/2008/12/how_general_motors_violated_yo.html

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

New Domain Names, New Costs to Brands

December 22, 2008
Excerpted from WSJ “New Domain Names Put Name Brands in a Bind” by Emily Steel, November 5, 2008
* * * * *
Worried about having to shell out millions of dollars to protect their brands, several major companies are protesting the launch of a slew of new top-level domains — the suffixes like “.com” that appear at the end of Web-site names.

Verizon Communications, Marriott, and New York Life Insurance are among the companies arguing that the new domains could open the flood gates to Internet fraud and drastically increase their costs of doing business online…

The organization that oversees the Internet, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, plans to start selling the rights to an unlimited number of top-level domains next year. These domains are likely to take their names from popular subjects, types of businesses, geographic locations or even brand names, such as .bank, .hotel, .nyc or .verizon.

Companies fear that if they don’t register their trademarks at the new domains, their brand names could be hijacked, leading to mistrust of their brands, as well as Internet scams.

“Companies are in a difficult position. In one sense, they may feel compelled to register their crown jewels in all these locations because if they don’t, an infringer will come along, and you will have to deal with the consequences. But at the same time, it’s a huge waste of corporate resources,” says Sarah Deutsch, vice president and associate general counsel at Verizon.

ICANN, a not-for-profit organization whose members include the registrars who operate the top-level domains, says…current domains are too crowded. The crowding makes it difficult for newcomers to buy a domain that suits their business…

Companies are debating whether they should buy up the rights to operate their own brand-specific domains, such as .marriott or .nylife. They also are looking at registering their trademarks for more generic domains. For example, Marriott is considering acquiring the rights to Marriott.nyc, Marriott.travel or Marriott.vacations…

A typical company might register 20 sites within each new top-level domain, making the total cost to participate in all 200 of them $2 million, says Josh Bourne, managing partner of FairWinds Partners, an Internet-strategy consulting firm.

There currently are 21 generic top-level domains, such as .org, .info and .biz…Companies already spend a significant sum each year to buy up domain names connected to their brand…

Companies say they have been through this before, pointing to earlier launches of such domains as .asia or .eu. They bought up hundreds of thousands of domains pre-emptively but say these sites either sit dormant or fail to generate traffic.

 Edit by SAC

Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122583938093998683.html

 Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

From Band-Aid to K-Y: The Power of Green Packaging

December 19, 2008

Excerpted from Ad Age “J&J’s Green-Packaging Rebirth Proves Power of Smart Design” by Teressa Iezzi, November 3, 2008 

* * * * *

AIGA, “the professional association for design,” held a conference bringing together an interesting range of voices from design, branding and culture…One of the featured speakers was Chris Hacker…design officer at Johnson & Johnson…

Hacker’s…presentation took a look at the reinvention of the design process at the package-goods giant and how design has resulted in a major win for J&J’s bottom line as well as for the environment.

J&J had acknowledged over the years that while the company did a lot of things very well, product design was not one of them. That bit of reality was thrown into alarming relief one day when during a meeting with Target, Goggins was told that if J&J didn’t “get its design act together,” it would lose position in stores…

The company didn’t have in-house designers in the consumer-products group. All design decisions were made by “the left hand”…typically by the most junior marketing people…who tended to move around every 18 months or so. They worked with outside design consultants, and all projects were handled separately, without a unifying vision.

When Hacker joined, he set up a design office…The new design discipline (which includes working with outside designers) has resulted in a number of successful product rebirths and a new focus on sustainability for the company.

Among the product stories: a sales-inducing facelift for the iconic Baby Shampoo packaging, new Band-Aid packaging and a streamlined first-aid kit, and an all-out redesign of K-Y, with more intimately oriented packaging and the addition of the K-Y Yours & Mine…

Hacker described sustainability at a company J&J’s size as “a journey.” It starts with packaging-weight reduction and the use of recyclable and certified materials; biodegradability and reusability are the next step. He says, for example, when he joined the company, Band-Aid packaging was made mostly in Brazil from “unknown source” material. He moved to Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper; post-consumer recycled paper will follow. The Aveeno brand has also moved in part to post-consumer materials and will continue to do so.

Will the design and sustainability journey be slowed by the current economic conditions? “Recession is exactly the reason we need to be doing what we’re doing,” he said. “It’s cutting through the chaos of everything that’s going on.”

Edit by SAC  

Full article:
http://adage.com/columns/article?article_id=132145

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Soup Isn’t Sexy, Its Effective

December 18, 2008

Excerpted from Brand Channel “Campbell’s Soup un-canny” by Adam Sauer, November 10, 2008

* * * * *  

Even before Warhol pointed out the obvious, Campbell’s was an iconic brand. From its humble beginnings as Joseph Campbell’s cannery of tomatoes, soups, condiments, vegetables, and mincemeat in 1869, it grew into a brand that identifies Americana as much as it identifies America.

While the popularity of the brand’s profile fluctuates over time—often depending on the economic health of its consumers—Campbell’s enjoys extraordinary brand recognition and an envy-inducing level of respect. For example, despite being the oldest of old-economy brands, a 2008 survey…found that Campbell’s was second on a list of the most socially responsible companies in the US, behind only Google.

Campbell’s owes a great deal of its success to technological innovation. Its turn-of-the-century breakthrough of halving water content to create a condensed soup helped to expand its wide popularity.

But just how does the brand fair online in the new economy?

Campbellsoup.com is the brand’s online gateway representing and linking to the brand’s stable of sites…

Much of Campbell’s online success can be attributed to what the brand hasn’t attempted to do. The brand, for example, understands the reasons to visit a soup website do not include Flash-based video games or social networking based on a love for chicken soup. (It should be noted that many similar consumer brands, or those brands’ agencies, are convinced otherwise.)

Also, Campbell’s realizes its brand’s place on the sex appeal spectrum; it knows it is not a high fashion label and it opts, wisely, to avoid flamboyance both online and on the shelf…

A final paradox of the brand is that while Campbell’s is known for the simplicity of its design and product (soup), the label is actually an umbrella for a conglomerate of products ranging from juice to seeds. The challenge is to differentiate the site enough to represent this family of brands without losing that simple Campbell’s iconography that captured Warhol’s attention.

Campbell’s likewise accomplishes this with links to its Pepperidge Farms, Prego and Swanson brand offerings… So, soup to nuts, Campbell’s online does all it should and none of what it shouldn’t. Simple. Effective. Just like the soup.

Edit by SAC 

* * * * *
Full article:
http://brandchannel.com/features_webwatch.asp?ww_id=406

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

The Nike Network

December 17, 2008

Excerpted from BusinessWeek, “How Nike’s Social Network Sells to Runners”, by Jay Greene, November 6, 2008

* * * * *
Nike is winning a new game that other corporations, from Coca-Cola to Verizon to General Motors, have tried unsuccessfully to play: building brand loyalty via online social networking.

In the two years since it launched Nike+, a technology that tracks data of every run and connects runners around the world at a Web site, nikeplus.com, Nike has built a legion of fans. In August, for instance, 800,000 runners logged on and signed up to run a 10K race sponsored by Nike simultaneously in 25 cities, from Chicago to São Paulo. Now the company is testing a social network to promote its basketball shoes.

Some analysts back up Nike’s claims that the site is renewing the popularity of its running shoes. SportsOneSource, a Princeton (N.J.) market research firm, says Nike accounted for 48% of all running-shoe sales in the U.S in 2006. Today, its share is 61%. “A significant amount of the growth comes from Nike+,” says Matt Powell, a SportsOneSource analyst.

* * * * *

Nike’s online strategy differs from those of other companies. Most have tried to create virtual communities through a build-it-and-they-will-come approach centered on a brand or specific product. Originally, the Beaverton (Ore.) company envisioned Nike+ simply as a clever way to combine music and running, not as a prototype for a new kind of marketing.

The key to bringing runners onto the Web was the development in 2006 of a $29 Sport Kit sensor that, when synched with an iPod touch or nano, tracks runners’ speed, mileage, and calories burned. When those runners dock their iPods, nikeplus.com launches, and the run data get uploaded. More important, the site is a virtual gathering place. Runners have collectively logged 93 million miles on nikeplus.com.

* * * * *

Nike now hopes to score with another group of jocks: basketballers. The company is beta-testing Ballers Network, a Facebook application that lets players organize real-world games and manage their teams online.

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_46/b4108074443945.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_news+%2B+analysis

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Consumers Go Cheap as Brand Loyalty Suffers

December 11, 2008

Excerpted from WSJ “At the Supermarket Checkout, Frugality Trumps Brand Loyalty” by Ellen Byron, November 6, 2008 

* * * * *

When Summer Mills visited her local CVS drugstore recently, to save a few dollars she bought the store-brand facial scrub rather than the Olay she normally uses.

“I thought I’d be able to tell the difference, but I couldn’t — I looked at the ingredients and they seemed almost the same,” says Ms. Mills…On her next shopping trip, “I’m going to buy the store-brand moisturizer and cleanser — it’s less money.”

Many Americans are changing their everyday purchases and abandoning brand loyalty, prompted by the persistent financial pressure of rising food, gasoline and electricity prices. Over the past 24 months, consumer prices have risen 7.8%…From coloring hair at home instead of at the salon to trying cheaper laundry detergents, new evidence indicates that Americans are modifying even minor household habits to save money.

Kimberly-Clark’s CEO noted that sales of the company’s potty-training pants, once one of the biggest sales-growth products in the baby aisle, have fallen off in recent months. “You’re seeing consumers leaving children in diapers longer…the diaper is less expensive per piece than a training pant”...Shoppers are even buying toilet paper differently. “When they get to the end of the month, and they’re out of paycheck, they may buy a smaller-count pack”…

To be sure, overall sales of name-brand goods are still higher than those of store brands. Still, about 40% of primary HH shoppers said they started buying store-brand paper products because “they are cheaper than national brands”…Store brands on average cost 46% less than name-brand versions, Mintel found…

Paper napkins suffered the steepest declines over the past year, followed by facial tissue and paper towels. “Not surprisingly, toilet tissue is holding up the best,” Mr. Lockwood says.  Laundry habits are changing, too. Early signs indicate shoppers are switching to cheaper detergents and softeners, a rare shift in one of the most brand-loyal product categories…

Though low-income consumers have been cutting back for the past several months, now upper-income shoppers — those with household incomes of $100,000 or more — also are making significant changes…

“This isn’t belt-tightening, it’s belt-notching…These ritual changes are much deeper and happening much faster than we expected”…

Shoppers’ changing behavior prompted P&G to alter its marketing approach and focus on in-store promotions. “More decisions are made in the store, and we have to be competitive,” CEO A.G. Lafley said…

[Household Spending Habits]
Edit by SAC
Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122592835021203025.html

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

They’d rather play than eat … huh??

December 10, 2008

Excerpted from Marketing Daily “How We Cut: Restaurants First, Video Games Last” by Sarah Mahoney, November 12, 2008

* * * * *

While there’s no shortage of consumers who are dialing down their spending-.  Guess what consumers axe first when they are worried.

When asked how they planned to trim the fat, dining out is in the hot seat–with 57% of respondents saying they plan to spend less.

Clothes were the next casualty, with 54% cutting back–followed by entertainment, with 50%.

Somewhat safer were beauty products and music, both identified as categories to cut by 44% of the survey, and movies at 43%.

Only 39% say they plan to spend less on toys, and 35% on video games…

How long consumers will continue to tweak their purchasing habits is anyone’s guess, but as far as people are concerned right now, the changes are for the long haul…

Younger consumers are the least hopeful…Those in the 65-plus category come in second in the pessimism parade, with only 7% saying they believe that recovery in less than a year is possible.

Overall, men tend to be less likely to believe we are in a recession, and more likely to believe the economy will bounce back fast.

Edit by SAC 

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=94580

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

What Downturn? Luxury Brands Keep Consumers Dreaming

December 10, 2008

Excerpted from Knowledge @ Wharton “Luxury Brands: Marketing the Upscale During a Downturn“, November 12, 2008

* * * * *

As 2009 shapes up to be the most challenging year in more than a generation for luxury items such as high-end apparel and fragrances, marketers’ plans for targeting aspirational 16-year-olds and expanding rapidly into the new money hubs of Russia or the United Arab Emirates are suddenly “out.”  What’s now “in” for marketing luxury in this difficult era is pampering the wealthiest and most loyal customers…

In a recession in which even upscale consumers may find themselves strapped for disposable cash, it is a bad strategy to chase customers too far down the economic ladder. “We don’t want to see huge price cuts that will create a lower-priced brand…you don’t want to tarnish your brand…you still have your brand reputation to uphold”…

Many experts believe that the economic pain of the deepening recession could fall disproportionally on these marketers of high-end perfumes, trendy clothing or sleek fashion accessories…Conspicuous consumption seems practically un-American in these troubled times…As a result of the hard times, consumers are likely to see some moves aimed at selling high-end products at a slightly lower cost.

The key is not to make any move that will diminish the value of a brand with a well-established name for luxury…For luxury goods, the business plan places trust in the artistic vision of a designer — and hopes that will lure customers.

Because of the luxurious image they must portray, these marketers said they also need to guard their brands in ways that mass-market companies do not…That does not mean, however, that luxury firms do not want their products to reach a fairly broad audience… But to boost the bottom line, fashion firms are likely to focus now on pampering their best and most loyal consumers, using computer technology to increasingly customize upscale products that will be designed or tailored especially to their needs.

The success of individualized luxury goods — such as designer clothes or eyewear — is a development that could keep a customer repeatedly coming back for more, according to the panelists…Among the designer trends in customization are monogrammed handbags, personalized options for a color or a fabric in accessories, or a wider array of fragrances that are “personalized”…

Ironically, while the panelists were not particularly enthusiastic about the short-term prospects for emerging overseas markets, their companies continue to position themselves for when the time is right…

Still, regardless of where the global economy winds up, luxury marketers say their principle mission will remain the same: Selling a more glamorous way of life to aspiring consumers. “You’re buying into that dream…And you’re buying into that grand theme, which is our job.” 

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full article:
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2091

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Brands Battle as Man Grooming Grows

December 8, 2008

Excerpted from Advertising Age, “The Battle of the Brands: Old Spice Vs. Axe” by Jack Neff, November 17, 2008

* * * * *

One of the crowning achievements of…P&G…has been the rebound of Old Spice in the battle for hearts and minds of men…

“Old Spice was in decline. They’ve now turned that around. It’s growing. Axe has not only stopped growing. Axe is in decline.”

Unilever, of course, begs to differ.

Needless to say, there’s some controversy about that in a battle that’s been a flashpoint in the global struggle between package-goods behemoths. Unilever says Axe continues to grow in body spray and beyond, most recently with the launch of Dark Temptation body spray…

Rather than trying to run away from its grandfatherliness, Old Spice instead embraced a big-brother persona and a purpose…described as “helping guys navigate the seas of manhood” by offering experience…

In practical terms, that’s involved a lot of funny ads from offering campy voices of experience…As a result, Old Spice is no longer declining. Sort of. The publicly available numbers don’t quite make a forceful case for an actual rebound. They do show Axe slowing across most of its business, which had been until the past year or so one of the biggest marketing success stories of package goods, or anything, of the decade…

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

While these two brands battle it out in deodorants and body spray, the market for men’s grooming products continues to grow.  P&G’s Gillette extended its brand this year with a line of body washes, shampoos and conditioners earlier this year.  Unilever’s Vaseline also recently entered men’s grooming with Body & Face and Hand Lotions specifically for men.  As the market grows Old Spice and Axe are sure to face increasing competition from one another and new entrants.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=132559

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Hot-Wired Hotels

December 5, 2008

 

Excerpted from the New York Times, “Hotels Offer Guests the Latest Technology Tools”, by Susan Stellin, November 11, 2008

* * * * *

Hotels are under such pressure to keep up with their gadget-obsessed guests that they are working with technology companies to regain their edge.

Sheraton teamed with Microsoft to create its new Link@Sheraton lounges, as part of an overhaul of the brand that includes carving out spaces in lobbies where guests can use public computers to check their e-mail, print boarding passes and record video greetings to send to family and friends.

Westin struck a deal with Nintendo to outfit some of its fitness centers with Wii consoles and games like Wii Fit, a game that uses a balance board to guide players through exercises and yoga poses.

Even smaller brands are turning to technology leaders to equip their public spaces and guestrooms with the latest electronics. The Gansevoort Hotel Group is working with Sony to develop a lounge at its new Gansevoort South property in Miami Beach. The goal is to relocate the traditional business center to a more social setting near the lobby. The lounge will have Sony computers and PlayStation 3 game consoles as well as digital book readers and cameras.

“What we’re trying to do is give people the chance to experience firsthand the latest in technology,” said Elon Kenchington, Gansevoort’s chief operating officer, explaining that choosing the right technology has become as critical as other elements of a hotel’s design.

“It’s an integral part of not only the success of an operation, but also what makes one brand better than another or more interesting to travelers than other brands,” he said.

* * * * *

Technology companies, in turn, have a chance to show off their wares to a desirable demographic. “The same guests that walk through the hotel lobby are the same consumers Microsoft targets,” said Sandra Andrews, hospitality industry solutions director for Microsoft.

* * * * *

One challenge for hotels is making sure guests are comfortable using the technology and not being forced to wrestle with products that are too complex. 

“If you need your neighbor’s teenage kid to help you figure out how to use something,” said Henry H. Harteveldt, a travel analyst with Forrester Research, “it’s probably too complex for a hotel to implement.”

That is why the James hotel in Chicago has been spending the last few months testing technology made by Control4, known for its home automation systems. On trial in one guestroom, the system allows guests to operate the lights, the blinds, the thermostat and the television using one remote. It can even be used to set a more customized wake-up experience, in which, for example, the TV turns on and gradually increases in volume.

Another company working with Control4 is the Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group, which plans to use the system to create a welcome experience at its Las Vegas property, scheduled to open in late 2009. Guests arriving in their room after checking in will be greeted by the drapes opening, the lights automatically turning on and the television displaying a customized message with the guest’s name.

* * * * *

Given the economic climate, Mr. Harteveldt cautioned that hotels ought to focus on Internet access and other essential technologies that either help justify a higher room rate or attract more guests.

Hotels have to make sure they address the basics before they think about the fanciful,” he said. “This is not a time for the fanciful.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/business/11technology.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=technology&pagewanted=print

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Detroit's fuzzy strategy reflected in its brands …

December 4, 2008

Excerpted from AdAge, “If GM Has a Brand, It’s General Misery” by Al Ries, December 02, 2008

* * * * *

Of the 100 most valuable brands in the world, according to Interbrand, 52 are owned by U.S. companies. And how many of the 52 are U.S. automobile brands? Just one: Ford. None of GM’s eight automobile brands made the list…however, 10 automobile brands from outside the U.S…

Part of the fundamental nature of Detroit’s Japanese competition is its ability to build brands. Toyota stands for reliability, Scion for youth, Prius for hybrid, Lexus for luxury.

But what does Saturn stand for? Or Chevrolet? Or Pontiac? Or Buick? Or Cadillac?…

The conventional wisdom is that General Motors has too many (eight).

Over the years, Gillette, has marketed seven different brands…Gillette has an astounding 71% of the world’s wet-shaving market, in part due to its multiple brands.

The difference between Gillette and GM is that each of the seven Gillette brands stands for something specific and each of the eight GM brands does not… 

To build a brand, you generally need to “contract” the brand.  Instead,  GM has introduced expensive Saturns and cheap Cadillacs.

GM’s brands themselves are practically worthless.. 

Edit by SAC

* * * * *

To make matters worse GM’s plan to Congress slash its marketing spending by $600 million by 2012.  The bright side of this significant reduction in advertising and promotions is that GM will focus its efforts on Chevy, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC, which according to its restructuring plan, account for 83% of its business.  While the tighter budget may prompt focused efforts it does not guarantee improved branding.  GM will need both to compete.

* * * * *

Full Article:
http://adage.com/columns/article?article_id=132938

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

AMS: Cutting Cell Phone Churn

December 3, 2008

Excerpted from the McKinsey Quarterly, “New ideas for customer segmentation”

* * * * *

Customer life-cycle management, though a likely and proven strategy, presents a vexing challenge to prepaid mobile operators. They often resort to blanket promotions that risk destroying value by needlessly cutting prices or offering free services.

One alternate way is for marketers to look more closely at their billing systems, which contain a wealth of information; to create segments, often as small as 100,000 subscribers; and to plan tailored promotions for each group.

The exhibit below illustrates one prepaid mobile operator’s strategy to reduce churn rates by segmenting subscribers through their usage patterns. Tracking the number of days before a customer is “lost” helped the company to introduce promotions most likely to increase usage and retention while minimizing revenue lost to scattershot offers and unnecessary discounts.

* * * * *

image

image

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/newsletters/chartfocus/2008_11.htm

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *

Catalina Coupons Customized for You

December 3, 2008

Excerpted from The Wall Street Journal “Personalized Store Ads Take Off” by David Kesmodel, October 23, 2008

* * * * *

For years, supermarket cashiers have handed shoppers coupons as they left the checkout aisle. These days, shoppers often get narrow paper strips printed with something else: ads related to the shopper’s own buying habits.

Recently, Stouffer’s has used such ads to encourage buyers of its single-serve frozen entrées to join its Dinner Club. Joining the club allows consumers to earn points for buying the Nestlé unit’s products. The points can be used to bid for rewards like TV sets and magazine subscriptions.

Targeted ads like these began appearing in some of the nation’s major grocery stores about two years ago, but big consumer-product companies like Nestlé, Coca-Cola and Kraft Foods are just starting to buy them in significant numbers, as they and other marketers put more emphasis on reaching the right consumer at the right time…

The company behind the ads is Catalina Marketing, a closely held marketing-services firm…Catalina, armed with data provided by retailers about shoppers’ buying habits, showed Stouffer’s that 6.7% of all shoppers accounted for 80% of its single-serve volume. So, Stouffer’s targeted ads at many of these regular buyers, bypassing those who hadn’t bought its products.

Catalina learns which shoppers buy a particular product by tapping into the vast reservoir of data retailers collect from customers who use loyalty cards. Stores offer such cards to their customers as a way of tracking their purchases, typically in return for discounts or access to special promotions…

GlaxoSmithKline has bought ads for its Tums antacid to target shoppers around holidays like the Fourth of July and Thanksgiving, when they tend to eat more heavily. Catalina serves up the ads to shoppers who have bought Tums in the past…

Still, the strategy isn’t foolproof.  Catalina says 80% of consumers read its coupons “most of the time.”

The service tends to be most effective in driving customers to buy more of a product or try a newly launched product.

It is less effective at getting shoppers to cross categories, buying a beverage, for example, from a manufacturer whose cereal they like. 

Edit by SAC 

* * * * *
Full article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122472576115361225.html

 

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

CPG’s ask: What are they thinking?

December 2, 2008

Excerpted from Marketing Daily “Understanding, Leveraging Consumers’ Five CPG Mindsets” by Karlene Lukovitz, October 16, 2008

* * * * *

Consumers approach different categories of consumer packaged goods with different mindsets, and marketers that understand and leverage these can enhance their products’ performance.

CPG marketers “don’t want to get it wrong in the fleeting nano-second of purchase decision  … Marketers need to know what buttons to press to influence their shoppers and win on the ultimate marketing battleground–the store aisle.”

Here’s a summary of the five CPG mindsets and how marketers can best exploit these. The insights apply across all retail channels where CPG’s are sold, including grocery, drug stores, convenience stores, mass merchandisers and club stores.

Indifferent auto-pilot and blinkered auto-pilot mindsets: When it comes to products like bathroom cleaners, bar soaps, dishwashing soap and cotton swabs, consumers’ pilot buttons are set to “indifferent.” Rather than spend time on decisions, they automatically reach for the brands they usually buy, generally without comparing prices. Since there’s low brand-attachment, consumers have no problem switching if their usual brands aren’t available.

To avoid such switches, marketers of leading brands in these CPG categories need to ensure against out-of-stocks or visibility and distribution issues The overall key to influencing consumers on auto pilot lies in knowing when and how that mindset can be disrupted by external stimuli, so that they are ready to consider alternatives and new offers…

Browser mindset: Consumers are more engaged with products such as shampoo and conditioner, body washes, and toothpaste and brushes–they check out labels and packaging, sniff and test these. This means that marketers need to provide a wide product assortment and realize that packaging innovations can be persuasive in decisions.

Buzz mindset: Hand and body lotions, air fresheners and baby toiletries are among the product categories that are “buzz-activated.” Shoppers actively seek out information about these.

Constant innovation in packaging and new product attributes–introduction of attention-grabbers such as “age-defying,” “shimmering,” tanning and aromatherapy, for example–combined with exciting advertising and new product introductions, are the keys for these categories.

Bargain-activated mindset: Unless there’s hot news about some brand, shoppers tend to switch brands on toilet paper, laundry detergent, paper towels, facial tissues, liquid hand soaps and batteries based on which are on sale or appear to be bargains.

Edit by SAC

* * * * *
Full article:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=92836

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Boost your ROI by building your brand ..

November 25, 2008

Excerpted from Brand Channel “Trust as a Tangible Brand Attribute” by Mary Weisnewski, November 3, 2008

* * * * *

How do you transform your company’s core values into a business asset you can see and feel?

Investing in branding is a good start.  Unfortunately, too many companies slow their efforts to a grinding halt after the rollout party to unveil the new website design and hand out pens embossed with the new logo..

.“Investing in brand development is increasingly important to build credibility and differentiate…People are making purchasing decisions based on how closely aligned their values are with an organization and how much they trust what that organization is providing. This is as true whether people are making donations to nonprofits, buying consumer products, or hiring consultants.”

Revealing your organization’s core values by developing an authentic brand platform, then consistently walking the talk of those core values, is the foundation of employee and customer trust and loyalty—both of which directly affect your bottom line.

 * * * * *

Trust is the engine that powers your brand. When a brand delivers consistently on what it says it will do there are tangible results. When the visual brand is aligned consistently with the experience it communicates an honest, reliable organization and there are tangible results. It’s all about building loyalty and long-lasting relationships…

Trust results from a reliable cache of perceptions and experiences, built over time. We think of organizations just like we do people we know. If I have heard of you I am more likely to trust you. If you do what you say you are going to do, my level of trust will increase…

You have to survey, or audit, everyone involved with your organization to find out what they really think and feel about what you’re offering, and listen to their concerns and desires…

What every company really wants, regardless of its size or market niche, is brand equity: tangible results that show a return on investment. When United Way underwent a rigorous brand evaluation in 2003, they discovered that the strong brand was 67 percent of the reason why people chose to invest in the organization.

* * * * *

Making your brand tangible leads to: ongoing affirmation of purpose, organizational alignment, differentiation, stronger relationships and connections, increased recognition; stronger recruitment, and increased ROI.

The bottom line is that a tangible brand is a win-win for your company and your customers…When a brand delivers consistently on its promise there are tangible results. This is true whether your company is just starting out or has a well-known national or international presence….People will pay more for, and choose faster, the experience and peace of mind a healthy brand promises.  

Edit by SAC 

* * * * *
Full article:
http://brandchannel.com/brand_speak.asp?bs_id=205

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Boost your ROI by building your brand ..

November 25, 2008

Excerpted from Brand Channel “Trust as a Tangible Brand Attribute” by Mary Weisnewski, November 3, 2008

* * * * *

How do you transform your company’s core values into a business asset you can see and feel?

Investing in branding is a good start.  Unfortunately, too many companies slow their efforts to a grinding halt after the rollout party to unveil the new website design and hand out pens embossed with the new logo..

.“Investing in brand development is increasingly important to build credibility and differentiate…People are making purchasing decisions based on how closely aligned their values are with an organization and how much they trust what that organization is providing. This is as true whether people are making donations to nonprofits, buying consumer products, or hiring consultants.”

Revealing your organization’s core values by developing an authentic brand platform, then consistently walking the talk of those core values, is the foundation of employee and customer trust and loyalty—both of which directly affect your bottom line.

 * * * * *

Trust is the engine that powers your brand. When a brand delivers consistently on what it says it will do there are tangible results. When the visual brand is aligned consistently with the experience it communicates an honest, reliable organization and there are tangible results. It’s all about building loyalty and long-lasting relationships…

Trust results from a reliable cache of perceptions and experiences, built over time. We think of organizations just like we do people we know. If I have heard of you I am more likely to trust you. If you do what you say you are going to do, my level of trust will increase…

You have to survey, or audit, everyone involved with your organization to find out what they really think and feel about what you’re offering, and listen to their concerns and desires…

What every company really wants, regardless of its size or market niche, is brand equity: tangible results that show a return on investment. When United Way underwent a rigorous brand evaluation in 2003, they discovered that the strong brand was 67 percent of the reason why people chose to invest in the organization.

* * * * *

Making your brand tangible leads to: ongoing affirmation of purpose, organizational alignment, differentiation, stronger relationships and connections, increased recognition; stronger recruitment, and increased ROI.

The bottom line is that a tangible brand is a win-win for your company and your customers…When a brand delivers consistently on its promise there are tangible results. This is true whether your company is just starting out or has a well-known national or international presence….People will pay more for, and choose faster, the experience and peace of mind a healthy brand promises.  

Edit by SAC 

* * * * *
Full article:
http://brandchannel.com/brand_speak.asp?bs_id=205

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Purina Joins "Marley & Me" in Hollywood

November 20, 2008
Excerpted from Brandweek “Pet-Friendly Purina Pounces on ‘Marley & Me'” by T.L.Stanley, November 2, 2008
* * * * *
Before there’s a script, or A-list stars or name brand director, what’s to love about a feature film in its most nascent stages?

Answer: A big, goofy, trouble-making dog.
 
Nearly as soon as 20th Century Fox secured the movie rights to Marley & Me: Life and Love with the World’s Worst Dog, Nestlé’s Purina was ready to pounce.
 
That was long before Jennifer Aniston and Owen Wilson made deals to star in the comedy, and Oscar-winning director David Frankel was hired.
 
The pet products marketer signed on as a promotional partner for the all-family comedy…worked with Frankel for product integration, designed a national contest and agreed to hype the DVD as aggressively as the feature release. The details are noteworthy because Purina is a newbie to Hollywood tie-ins..
 
Frankel…will serve as the spokesman and top judge for Purina’s “send us your Marley moments” contest, asking consumers to submit videos of their rascally mutts. In what could be a first for the medium, the Marley DVD will contain some of those consumer-generated videos as bonus features.
 
Marley & Me fit seamlessly into the existing Purina ad campaign that focuses on the endearing qualities of man’s best friend under the tagline, “Long Live Your Dog.”
 
The contest, via longliveyourdog.com, will get its first national TV boost during the Thanksgiving airing of The National Dog Show, a Purina-sponsored event on NBC..
.
The brand will appear in key mischief-making scenes in the movie where Marley is ripping into a bag of Puppy Chow and being bribed with Dog Chow by a hapless pet sitter..
.
“We know we really need to stand out,” said Rita Drucker, Fox’s senior vp-feature film promotions. “We can’t bank solely on the awareness and popularity of the book. So we put together deals that would help convey the big broad appeal of the movie.”
The PG-rated comedy will be positioned as perhaps the one choice at the multiplex that everybody in the family can agree on, Drucker said. With the success of Beverly Hills Chihuahua and another Disney dog picture, Bolt, on deck, could there be canine overload at the box office? It’s doubtful, said Paul Dergarabedian, president of tracking firm Media by Numbers. “They’re thematically different enough that it likely won’t matter that they’re coming close together. Besides, dogs are hot right now.”
 
Edit by SAC

Full article:
httphttp://www.brandweek.com/bw/content_display/news-and-features/licensing/e3i397aa99d2932d77d4691144ef42c8dbe

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

 

 

 

Excerpted from Brandweek “Pet-Friendly Purina Pounces on ‘Marley & Me'” by T.L.Stanley, November 2, 2008

Head to Japan, Not China for New Product Launches

November 20, 2008

Excerpted from Ad Age “Want to Know Where to Launch a New Product?” by Marissa Miley, October 28, 2008 

* * * * *

The best place to introduce a new product: Japan. The worst place: China.

Those are among the findings of a new study…called “Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth or Vanishing Differences,” which claims to be the first global analysis of its kind…

The study…looked at data for consumer household products over 50 years and across 31 developed and developing countries. To rank the countries, they created an “innovativeness metric” based on the time it takes for new products to take off in a particular country.

A product “takes off” in a country…when it has started to grow rapidly, moving from being used by a few people to being used by the mass market. The time it takes depends on a number of variables: the economic strength and cultural mores of the country, as well as the price and category of the product. Nations with the shortest time to new-product takeoff landed at the top of the list.

Japan, Norway and Sweden came in first, second and third, respectively. The U.S. came in sixth…Oddly, two of the countries normally considered fast-growing, India and China, were on the bottom…

The study can save marketers “a lot of time [and] get quick results…This ranking of countries tells you which to launch in first.” The authors recommend a “waterfall” approach to launches, staggering them from one country to the next, and they created a hazard model for the study to determine how many years it will be before products “take off” in a national market.

For the study, the co-authors analyzed two different kinds of consumer household products: “fun” products that provide entertainment, such as MP3 players and cellphones; and “work” products that improve work efficiency, such as microwaves and washing machines…”fun” products take off far more quickly than “work” products (7 yrs vs. 12 yrs), and therefore require different marketing strategies.

Fun products take off more quickly because they are “more glamorous, more visible…We don’t go house to house boasting about our vacuum cleaner, but we do for our cellphones.” In these cases, the authors suggest that marketers might benefit from using the “sprinkler” strategy, launching products in several countries at once.

Edit by SAC  

* * * * *
Full article:
http://adage.com/cmostrategy/article?article_id=132082

 

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Pepsi Overhaul: Cutting Jobs & Changing Logos

November 19, 2008

Excerpted from AdAge “PepsiCo Launches Massive Overhaul” by Natalie Zmuda, October 14, 2008

* * * * *

PepsiCo said it will pour some $1.2 billion over three years into a push that will include sweeping changes to its brands, including …  a revamp of “every aspect of the brand proposition for our key [carbonated soft drink] brands. How they look, how they’re packaged, how they will be merchandised on the shelves, and how they connect with consumers.”

Included is the redesign of many of the brands’ packaging graphics, as well as a redesign of the Pepsi globe logo. The white band in the middle of the logo will now loosely form a series of smiles. A “smile” will characterize brand Pepsi, while a “grin” is used for Diet Pepsi and a “laugh” is used for Pepsi Max. Also, Mountain Dew will be rebranded as Mtn Dew…

Time for strong action
It is our belief that, especially, in this economic downturn, we should be investing in the category to get consumers to stay with and some to return to the packaged liquid refreshment beverage category and to our brands, in particular.”

PepsiCo said the $1.2 billion will come from its “Productivity for Growth” program, which involves the elimination of 3,300 positions, as well as the closing of six plants… “The majority of the savings will be invested in our businesses. A primary focus will be restoring growth to our North American beverage business. At the same time, we will increase our investment in developing markets, make selective investments to continue growing our global snacks business and accelerate our global R&D initiatives to help secure our future innovation pipeline.”

During the third quarter, PepsiCo Americas Beverages reported a 2.5% volume decline, with a 4% decline in North America, specifically. North American carbonated soft-drink volume dropped 3%, while non-carbonated beverages declined 5%. Unflavored water and Propel saw double-digit declines during the quarter…

Gatorade in for a facelift
.”We’re initiating similar upgrades for the entire Gatorade line, which will have an entirely new contemporary identity, and there will be exciting innovations for both G2 and Tiger and a renewed Propel platform.” 

Beverages are more affected than snacks in this economy, because there is a free substitute: tap water. The last 12 to 18 months mark the first time the category is seeing a decline. “We’re saying goal one is to stem that decline . … It’s a critical source of profitability,”

 “Once we have a breakthrough on a natural low-calorie sweetener that can be used in colas, we have a reason to talk about this category growing again.” 

Edit by SAC
* * * * *
Full article:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=131733

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

Not Lovin’ It – McDonald’s Quality Push Hits Packaging

November 18, 2008

Excerpted from Ad Age “McDonald’s Gives Packaging a Flashy Update” by Emily Bryson Yor, October 29, 2008

* * * * *

McDonald’s is scrapping its package design across 118 countries and 56 languages in …. the “biggest packaging initiative in the history of the brand.” The new look puts more emphasis on product and less on the brand’s iconic “I’m lovin’ it” tagline…McDonald’s is “putting the focus on food.” Each new package focuses on the item enclosed, with pictures of the sandwich or nuggets and a rallying cry, such as “There is only one” for Big Mac; “Full steam ahead” for the Filet-O-Fish; or “Share me nots” for chicken nuggets…
Nutrition information, pictures of ingredients and “I’m lovin’ it” are printed on the sides — de-emphasizing the tagline, which earlier was featured prominently at the top of each package. To subtly indicate freshness and quality ingredients, the new food bags have pictures of potatoes, lettuce, wheat, eggs and even farm machinery…a move from “100% I’m lovin’ it lifestyle,” to something that also assured consumers of product quality in a “young tonality”…
The redesign “is pretty inventive for the category,” said Ron Romanik…”I haven’t seen anything like it in the fast-food category, for sure. It’s almost Nike-ish.” Mr. Romanik estimated that McDonald’s may have paid as much as eight figures for the redesign. But the cost of implementation, he said, “would be almost impossible to calculate.”

The real cost would have to take into account that McDonald’s is “probably changing suppliers, printers, who they’re using for sourcing for their packaging,” he said. “One thing companies don’t like to do is switch suppliers. They try to get designers to design within the capabilities they already have so they don’t want to give anything on those margins.”

Ms. Dillon described the graphic-heavy look as an investment. “It will increase the perceptions about the quality of our food,” she said.

Edit by SAC  

* * * * *

The packaging change appears to be a part of a larger effort that McDonald’s has undergone to connect its food with high-quality ingredients. As part of these efforts McDonald’s has hired “Moms’ Quality Correspondents”.  These are real life moms that are given high-level access to McDonald’s facilities.  The moms keep journals of their experiences and the questions they ask of McDonald’s and then communicate with other mom’s online. 

McDonald’s also has put up billboards emphasizing product quality and devoted a separate website (http://cep.mcdonalds.com/qualityfood/index.jsp) for consumers to go inside a McDonald’s kitchen and meet McDonald’s suppliers.  After getting sucked into the website and watching both an Egg McMuffin and Big Mac being made I am no more likely to eat at McDonalds, but was left with a better understanding of how these products are made.

* * * * *
Full article:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=132111

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link =>
The Homa Files Blog

 

 

 

AT&T’s iPhone – The cost to acquire customers … lots of them

November 17, 2008

Excerpted from the New York Times, “Even AT&T Is Startled by Cost of iPhone Partnership”, by Laura M. Holson, October 22, 2008

* * * * *

AT&T’s successful relationship with Apple comes at a price: $900 million.

That is the amount of money AT&T paid to Apple for the 2.4 million iPhones the phone company sold in the third quarter. It is a number that surprised even AT&T, which did not anticipate such huge demand for the smartphone.

The company said that it expected to make up the difference in iPhone-related revenue over the two-year contracts of the iPhone buyers. Users of smartphones, like the iPhone, are heavy users of the Internet and text messaging, which are more profitable for AT&T than voice calls. Those customers also tend to spend more than customers who use their telephones just to make calls.

“We are winning share at the high end,” Ralph de la Vega, the executive overseeing AT&T’s wireless operations, said in a conference call with analysts. Same-store traffic to AT&T retail centers has increased 15 percent, largely because of interest in Apple’s phone, he said. With the iPhone, he said, “there is a significant halo effect.”

Investors, though, might be forgiven if they missed any halo after watching AT&T’s shares drop Wednesday by $1.95, or 7.6 percent, to close at $23.78. Analysts said the iPhone’s negative impact on earnings caught them and investors off guard.

There is also uncertainty — if sales of the iPhone continue at this pace — about how much more AT&T will have to pay Apple next quarter.

But Roger Entner, a senior vice president at IAG Research, which studies market trends, said iPhone sales made now would pay off in the long term because they provide AT&T with more predictable earnings.

“That is a short-sighted view,” Mr. Entner said of concerns about iPhone sales. “It is a nice problem to have.”

Edit by DAF

* * * * *

Full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/technology/companies/23phone.html?ref=business

* * * * *

Want more from the Homa Files?
Click link => 
The Homa Files Blog

* * * * *