* * * * *
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma
#HomaFiles
The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce recently published a study on the ROI of college educations.
Billed as a “first try”, the report estimates the Net Present Value of a college education — taking into account the “price” of a college’s degree, the interest on student debt incurred, likely future earnings and the time value of money.
Among the reports key conclusions….
Watching the Impeachment Inquiry last week I was struck by Dem witnesses’ hyperbolic concern about Russia.
Just a minute guys…
Remember the 2012 Presidential debates?
A key moment was when President Obama ridiculed Gov. Romney’s knowledge of foreign affairs.
Given the current hysteria over Russia, the clip is a classic … try to stay calm when you watch it
=====
Here’s more that’ll should make you scream …
Short answer: Yes … to Trump’s benefit.
=============
Let’s ignore the partisan punditry for a moment and take another look at the numbers.
As we’ve posted before, TV ratings for the hearings have been dismal.
That’s no surprise since 60% of voters say that they are less interested in impeachment than are the politicos and the media … since the hearings are generally dull and confusing to most people … and since the hearings are broadcast during the day — when most people are at work.
So, people who do have an interest, resort to their usual partisan sources of news.
OK, so how are the numbers moving?
==============
Let’s starts with opinions re: the inquiry proceedings themselves…
According to the RCP poll-of-polls, support for Schiff’s impeachment inquiry has slipped from 51% to 48% … and opposition to the inquisition (err, inquiry) has increased from 42% to about 45%.
So, support has gone from 9% net favorable to 3% net favorable.
Still, support is net favorable … but it’s less than a majority …marginally net favorable … and decreasingly so (i.e. the trend is unfavorable.
What about views on impeachment itself?
“What would you say exactly … you do here at Initech?”
=============
The hearings have been so predictable and dull that — when I’ve been watching — I’ve played the game “What would I ask?”.
Yesterday, I watched some of the testimony of Laura Cooper — the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia.
Ms. Cooper seems like a serious, well-intended government bureaucrat. I don’t have a beef with her specifically.
But, she prefaced several of her answers with a couple of recurring phrases: “My staff does that; “I’d have to ask my staff”; “that’s outside my purview”; etc.
Her answers flashed me back to a classic scene in the movie Office Space.
It’s only a minute long and worth the time … guaranteed: it’ll change the way you watch the hearings
When interviewing a “customer specifications analyst”, a pair of efficiency experts — the Bobs — laser in on the most fundamental question…
==============
“What would you say exactly … you do here at Initech?”
When watching the hearings, just substitute the words “the US government” for “Initech” and you’ll see what I’m getting at.
All of the witnesses:
May just be me, but the words “bloat”, “inefficiency” and “ineffectiveness” keep popping in my mind.
Where are the Bobs when you need them?
============
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma
#HomaFiles
And, there are remarkable similarities.
============
Recently, in one of her articulated streams of consciousness, AOC warned that we all would be toast in 12 years if global warming wasn’t arrested.
Time to metal-cube our SUVs and mass-slaughter the bovine-methane creatures, right?
Well, not so fast.
While AOC’s warning may come to fruition, I’m betting the over on the 12 years … in part, because it fits a pattern of hysterical unrealized doomsday predictions.
For example, circa. 1970, Prof. Paul Ehrlich (Stanford University) wrote Malthusian-inspired book: The Population Bomb. The book became a runaway “scientific” best-seller.
Ehrlich warned that because of unchecked population growth:
The battle to feed all of humanity is over.
Hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death.
All of us will face mass starvation on a dying planet.
While their were some deniers, demographers agreed almost unanimously with Ehrlich’s doomsday prediction ….
And, public support for impeachment continues to erode.
=============
Earlier this week, we posted re: the dismal viewership the Dems’ impeachment hearings are getting.
Want an unmistakable indicator?
Well, CBS became the first major network to face reality — that nobody was watching the tedious hearings — and switched back to its usual soap operas, i.e. from one soap opera to another.
More important, the Pelosi-dreamed groundswell of support for impeachment sure doesn’t seem to be materializing…
There was a part of Amb. Yovanovitch’s testimony that made my jaw drop.
When the Dem counsel was prying into her firing, he was obviously trying his level best to get her to cry … “how did you feel?”; “what was the impact on your family?”; “can you describe how distraught you were?”, etc.
Boo-hoo …
In my business career, I was sold twice to new owners … and “rationalized”, “synergized” and reassigned many times during internal regime changes.
So, I have zero sympathy when a “paying job for life” diplomat gets reassigned when a new sheriff comes to town.
But, that’s not what stopped me in my tracks …
In a word: NO!
=============
Pundits and politicos on the left are shouting BOMBSHELL! BOMBSHELL!! BOMBSHELL!!!
Those on the right are declaring: “nothingburger”.
So, what’s the answer?
Let’s look at some numbers…
==============
“Fan interest” for the televised hearings is pretty low.
Nielsen says that just under 14 million watched the first day of hearings.
That’s down from the 20 million that tuned into the Kavanaugh hearings … and only about 1% of the number of 2016 voters.
============
And, what impact are the hearings having on voters?
Well, according to left-leaning FiveThirtyEight, support for impeachment FELL a bit during week one of hearings. (See chart above)
Support for impeachment is now a mere 2 percentage points higher that opposition … but, at 47.7%, it’s less than a majority.
And, according to RCP, approval for the inquiry process itself slid during the week of hearings … dipping below 50% for the first time in weeks.
Bottom line: Pelosi said “no impeachment unless there was bipartisan Congressional support and widespread public sentiment.
Doesn’t look like Inquiry will meet those hurdles…
==============
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma
#HomaFiles
A survey of 700 schools answers the question.
===============
In a prior post, we outlined the criteria and method that the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) used to assess whether students are learning the “essential skills and knowledge” for work and for life.
In a nutshell, ACTA researchers culled through over 700 schools’ course catalogs and web sites to determine what courses were being offered and, more important, which courses were required of all students.
Specifically, they investigated whether undergraduates are gaining a reasonable college-level introduction in seven core subject areas:
Here’s what they found …
A survey seeks to answer that question.
=============
In a prior post, we reported that employers think that most college graduates are poorly prepared for the work force in such areas as critical thinking, communication and problem solving.
See A bigger college scandal than the recent admissions bruhaha…
Let’s dig a little deeper on that sentiment.
The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) conducted a survey of “Core Requirements at our Nation’s Colleges and Universities” to determine what students are really learning in college.
Specifically, the ACTA survey focused on the courses that a student is required to take outside the major.
These courses — commonly called general education classes or the school’s core curriculum — are, according to the ACTA, “ the foundation of a school’s academic program”.
They are the courses “generally designed to equip students with essential skills and knowledge” for work and for life.
Here is specifically what ACTA was looking for…
And, if you can, can you name its neighboring countries?
=============
OK, here’s a map of Eastern Europe.
Stick a pin in Ukraine…
And, the answer is …
That should be an easy question since its been in the news 24 x 7 recently.
But, I’ve heard friends, pundits and outraged Dem politicos say that he is the President of:
(a) The Ukraine (like The Philippines or The Ohio State University)
(b) Ukraine (like Canada or Smokey Bear)
(c) Ukrania (like Romania)
So, which is it?
A survey of 700 schools answers the question.
===============
In a prior post, we outlined the criteria and method that the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) used to assess whether students are learning the “essential skills and knowledge” for work and for life.
In a nutshell, ACTA researchers culled through over 700 schools’ course catalogs and web sites to determine what courses were being offered and, more important, which courses were required of all students.
Specifically, they investigated whether undergraduates are gaining a reasonable college-level introduction in seven core subject areas:
Here’s what they found …
Yesterday, we posted that men are 9 times more likely than women to be attacked by sharks … and 6 times more likely to be struck by lightning.
Continuing in that vein, here’s a test for you …
Rank the the following by the odds that somebody who is in the group or who is exposed to the risk is likely to die.
Make #1 the highest risk of dying in the next year; make #7 the lowest risk circumstance
And the answer is …
Some evidence says it is … by far in some situations.
=============
According to Prof. Walter E. Williams writing about Proportional Disparities…
Men are roughly half of the population, right?
But, sharks are nine times likelier to attack and kill men than they are women.
Men are struck by lightning six times as often as women.
And, 82% of people killed by lightning are men.
Why is that?
An interesting analysis done by economist Mark Perry concludes:
Since 1982, women have earned 13 million more college degrees than men.
Let’s drill down on those numbers…
Though I’ve retired from the practice, I’m still very engaged on education issues … especially whether our students (at all levels) are being adequately schooled to compete in the real world.
So, one of my summer reads is “What Schools Could Be” by Ted Dinterersmith – a well credentialed, experience-deep educator.
In a nutshell, author Ted Dintersmith spent a year visiting schools across the nation to identify outstanding teachers and catalog their secret sauces.
One of the anecdotes that he recounts in the book hit one of my longstanding questions: Do students really learn what they’re being taught?
… and, the gap is widening between highest achieving and lowest achieving students.
==============
Every 2 years, an organization called The Nation’s Report Card conducts an “Assessment of Educational Progress” being made in America’s school.
The overall conclusion: not much progress is being made.
Specifically…
That’s the gloomy prediction of disruption guru Clayton Christensen
===============
And, it’s not just the tidal wave of online programs or ballooning college tuitions.
Moreso, Christensen’s prediction is on track, according to a WSJ recap of economist Nathan Grawe’s “Demographics and the Demand for Higher Education.”
Grawe’s central thesis: Birthrates have plunged 13% since the Great Recession … and that “birth dearth” will cost America 450,000 fewer college applicants in the 2020s.
Here are some of the specifics….