Let’s all say good riddance to 2020, count our blessings
and do our part to make 2021 a joyous year.
Archive for December, 2020
Happy New Year!
December 31, 2020Dec. 30: GA Senate Polls & Odds
December 31, 2020RCP Poll-of-Polls
Ossoff leading by 1 point.
=============
PredictIt Betting Market
Betting markets indicating 63-37 chance that at least one of the GOP candidates will win …. down from 73-29 two weeks ago
What will be the balance of power in
Congress after the 2020 election?
Will Democrats win the White House,
Senate and House in 2020?
Dec. 31: COVID Data Dashboard
December 31, 2020Most Admired: Trump edges Obama … trounces Biden
December 30, 2020Gallup has released its annual “Admired Man” results…
What man that you have heard or read about, living today in any part of the world, do you admire most?
Trump edges Obama 18% to 15% … and triples Biden’s 6%.
Hmmm.
Of course, left-leaners minimize the results:
- Gallup mentions that incumbent presidents often top the list
- Some pundits point out that Dems split votes between Obama & Biden … and, their sum edges Trump 21% to 18%
Note that political scientist Anthony Fauci edged out Pope Francis for 4th place.
Double hmmm.
Dec. 30: COVID Data Dashboard
December 30, 2020Still more on the COVID vaccines’ 95% effectiveness rate…
December 29, 2020WHO says “no evidence that vaccines prevent people from getting infected”
=============
True, but no reason to go anti-vax.
Bias alert: I’m pro-vax and plan to get vaccinated as soon as I can.
In a prior post, we parsed the Pfizer study results … honing in on one of the study’s limitations: it only counted the number of participants who exhibited at least one COVID symptom.
Said differently, the study was silent on the number of participants who might have been infected but asymptomatic.
So, I wasn’t surprised when the WHO’s chief scientist quipped:
“At the moment, I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines, to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from getting the infection and passing it on,”
Based on the study’s design and results, I think that it’s reasonable to conclude:
1. The vaccines substantially decrease the probability of catching COVID and developing any symptoms … probably not by 95%, but by a very high number (say, 70%)
2. But, there is an undetermined (or unreported) chance of catching COVID but not developing any symptoms.
3. And, “the science” is still fuzzy on the likelihood of asymptomatic COVID infectees transmitting the virus to other people.
On the last point, some scientists say that asymptomatics are the primary transmitters of the virus.
Others argue that asymptomatics don’t develop symptoms because they have a low “viral load” … and, if their viral load is low, their contagiousness is low … so they’re not transmission threats.
=============
Bottom line: There’s little news in the headline that has gone viral … an no reason to fret.
I still plan to get vaccinated as soon as I can.
Dec. 29: COVID Data Dashboard
December 29, 2020Dec. 28: COVID Data Dashboard
December 28, 2020Merry Christmas … 45 Lessons in Life
December 24, 2020Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah and HAPPY NEW YEAR to all !
This short video was sent to me by a friend a couple of years ago
It really resonated with me, so continuing a tradition, I like to share it at Christmas time.
… back with you after the New Year
* * * * *
click to view (best with audio on)

* * * * *
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma >> Latest Posts
Rove: Hostility as powerful as enthusiasm…
December 24, 2020In today’s WSJ, Karl Rove opined that in the Presidential election:
Hostility proved as powerful as enthusiasm in motivating voters
Trump supporters said their vote was more for Mr. Trump than against Mr. Biden while Mr. Biden’s supporters said their vote was more against the incumbent than for the challenger.
We said that weeks ago , citing our “principle” that:
Hate is a much stronger emotion than love … and that Trump-haters would overwhelm Trump-lovers (and Trump-tolerators).
==============
Rove also pointed out that:
Mr. Biden won decisively (in the Electoral College), but enough battleground states were close that it could easily have gone the other way.
The combined margin in Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin was 42,918 votes.
The election would have been a 269-269 tie if those states were in Mr. Trump’s column.
Imagine the circus if that has occurred.
Dec. 24: COVID Data Dashboard
December 24, 2020Does Fauci think before he speaks?
December 23, 2020Loyal readers know that I’m no fan of Dr. Fauci.
It continues to amaze me that, despite all of his errant pronouncements and advice, that the MSM and half of America hangs on his every word.
This week, the media ubiquitous pop-doc went on CNN to reassure children that Santa is safe … that he (Fauci) personally vaccinated Santa and made sure that he was good to go.
All right, I understand that it was all intended to be in good fun, but…
Dec. 23: COVID Data Dashboard
December 23, 2020What if the COVID vaccine had been launched sooner?
December 22, 2020Bias alert: I’m pro-vax and plan to get vaccinated as soon as I can.
=============
On one hand, Trump has been justifiably basking in the success of his Operation Warp Speed program that encouraged and enabled pharma to speed up the development process.
It has been a sheer delight seeing the video loops of media pundits and “experts” looking ridiculous when previously dismissing the possibility of a vaccine by now.
Even Sen. Dickie Durbin — to his credit — stepped to the podium on the Senate floor to give Trump a shout-out for a job well done.
And yesterday, Biden conceded that “the Trump administration deserves some of the credit”.
But, headlines the past couple of days seem to be highlighting the logistical challenges, priority controversies and possible negative consequences of the COVID vaccines: “Man in Alaska Suffers Serious Side Effects”, “40% of Chicago Medical Staff Refuses the Vaccine”, etc.
So, I realize that I may be swimming upstream today, channeling a very provocative point-of-view that I saw offered up by Holman Jenkins in the WSJ:
Science triumphed but shouldn’t we have cut corners and moved faster?
Let’s drill down that…
Dec. 22: COVID Data Dashboard
December 22, 2020So, how will the Georgia elections turn out?
December 21, 2020Yesterday, we posted a summary of the polls & odds re: Georgia’s Senate runoff elections.
In a nutshell: Polls have Perdue & Loeffler up by a couple of points; betting markets have GOP odds of avoiding a Dem sweep at 75-25; stock market has been “melting up”
A couple of loyal readers have asked me — given the data — how do I think the election will turn out?
Keeping in mind that I’m nothing more than a curious, analytical guy with no particular political expertise or inside info …
My answer: I’m scoring the odds at 60-40 that the Dems sweep both seats.
Here’s my logic…
Dec. 21: COVID Data Dashboard
December 21, 2020GA Senate Races – Odds & Polls
December 20, 2020RCP Poll-of-Polls
Purdue leading by 2 in prior week’s polls
Loeffler leading by 3 in prior week’s polls
=============
PredictIt Betting Market
Betting markets indicating 73-29 chance that
at least one of the GOP candidates will win.
What will be the balance of power in
Congress after the 2020 election?
Will Democrats win the White House,
Senate and House in 2020?
Dec. 20: COVID Data Dashboard
December 20, 2020Dec. 19: COVID Data Dashboard
December 19, 2020More on the COVID vaccines’ 95% effectiveness rate…
December 18, 2020Probably overstated but, nonetheless, I’ll get vaccinated as soon as I can!
==============
It’s undeniable that Operation Warp Speed’s financial support and streamlined regulatory processes motivated rapid development of COVID vaccines,
That was largely predictable.
What wasn’t so predictable was the apparent sky high effectiveness of the early-launch vaccines.
Both Pfizer and Moderna report about 95% effectiveness.
Gotta ask: Are these effectiveness rates too good to be true?
In a prior post, we noted that the 95% effectiveness is, indeed, sky high compared to previous flu and pandemic virus vaccines.
Today, let’s drill down on the 95% number…
Dec.18: COVID Dashboard
December 18, 2020How do COVID vaccines’ effectiveness stack up against prior vaccines?
December 17, 2020Answer: 95% is sky high compared to previous flu and pandemic virus vaccines.
=============
Today, let’s put the current COVID vaccines into perspective.
A September 2019 White House report looked specifically at flu and coronavirus vaccines, noting that….
There is considerable variation from year to year in how much the flu vaccine reduces the risk of contracting the seasonal flu and flu-related illnesses.
Over the past 14 years, influenza vaccine effectiveness has ranged between 10% and 60%.
Much of the variability depends on which viral strains predominate in a given year and, more specifically, whether the vaccine matches the viral strain that is circulating in a given flu season.
Although a mismatch between the vaccine and the virus circulating during a flu season reduces efficacy, vaccines still provide some protection against flu illness and decrease the severity of the illness, due to immunologic similarity between the viruses.
=============
When it comes to pandemic viruses …
Dec. 17: COVID Data Dashboard
December 17, 2020In dissent, Wisconsin’s Supreme Court’s Chief Justice says…
December 16, 2020“There are numerous (election) problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them.”
===============
Save for the headline “Wisconsin Supreme Court puts final nail in Trump’s election coffin” … this story isn’t getting much coverage.
That’s too bad because, in the details, the ruling and its dissents hit more nails than the headlined one on the head.
Here’s the essence of the case, the ruling and the dissents ….
Dec. 16: COVID Data Dashboard
December 16, 2020It’s official: Fauci whiffs, again!
December 15, 2020How many times can a media-proclaimed “leading expert” miss the mark and still hold the title?
By my count:
- He originally said that the COVID risk to Americans was miniscule
- He opposed the Chinese travel ban as unnecessary or, at least, premature
- He illogically told people not to wear masks since they won’t help and would deplete PPE stockpiles. Only the latter was true.
- He grossly misled Congress regarding the COVID death rate (by an order of magnitude!), conflating the conflation of the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) and Case Fatality Rate (CFR). The CFR (of which Fauci was likely referring) is about 10 times the IFR. Source
- He championed the “15 days to stop the spread” … using the widely discredited projection of 2 million “do nothing” deaths to seal the deal with Trump. (Note: the 15 day program is approaching day #300).
- He lauded Cuomo’s “Gold Standard” response to COVID … despite highest death count (over 35,000), 2nd highest fatality rate (NJ is #1), wasted resources (think: a hospital ship, field hospitals and ventilators), an economic disaster in NYC and, oh yeah, a crushing 2nd wave of COVIID.
- He admitted to boosting his estimate of the herd immunity threshold “partly based on new science and partly on his gut feeling that the country is finally ready to hear what he really thinks.” Source
- He led the charge to close the schools (but now says to close the bars, but open the schools)
- And, back in March, he proclaimed that “it will take a year or more to develop a Coronavirus vaccine.”
Flashback to March 3, 2020:
Well, Dr. Leading Expert, the first shots of vaccine were administered yesterday… thanks to Trump’s Operation Warp Speed.
Perhaps, Fauci will rush to CNN today to say “Trump was right, I was wrong.”
I won’t hold my breath …
=============
P.S. Biden announced Fauci as his chief medical adviser. Say, what?
That’s not following “the science”, it’s following the “political science”.
Dec. 15: COVID Data Dashboard
December 15, 2020So, who is social distancing and who isn’t?
December 14, 2020The “Covid States Project” recently published their most recent survey of how Americans are (or are not) complying with the CDC’s COVID mitigation guidance (e.g. wash hands, disinfect surfaces, wear masks, socially distance)
In a prior post, we noted that mask wearing compliance has steadily increased to over 75% (the light yellow diagonal line running from the lower left to upper right corners).
But, “socially distancing” behaviors are declining … both the percentage of people avoiding contact with people outside their home (red line) and those avoiding crowded or public places (green line).
More specifically, the survey indicates:
- Education: Mask-wearing and social distancing is statistically unrelated to level of education
- Gender: Women wear masks and socially distance more than men
- Race: Proportionately fewer Whites wear masks than other racial groups; Whites and Hispanics tend to socially distance less than Blacks and Asians.
But, the differences among education levels, gender and race are relatively modest … probably within the margin of error.
There are a couple of identity characteristics that do show significant differences…
Dec. 14: COVID Data Dashboard
December 14, 2020SCOTUS cowers: “Too hot to handle”
December 13, 2020Rather than ruling on the merits of the case, Justices run for the hills.
=============
OK, the WSJ had it right … and we had it wrong.
Recognizing that they would be caught between a rock and a hard place, the SCOTUS channeled Sgt. Shultz claim (“I hear nothing, I see nothing”) to stay out of the election dispute.
For the record, here’s the first part of the official SCOTUS statement:
ORDER IN PENDING CASE (155, ORIG.) TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.
Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.
All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
The key point: This isn’t a ruling on the merits of the case, i.e. whether there was election fraud and rigging … or not.
The Court just decided to rule on procedural technicalities and leave the merits of the case open for all of us to decide.
Let’s parse the courts statement….
Dec. 13: COVID Data Dashboard
December 13, 2020WSJ: “A political earthquake if SCOTUS takes the Texas law suit”
December 11, 2020To be fair & balanced …
Yesterday, we argued that SCOTUS is caught between a rock and a hard place… and would create a legal nightmare if they didn’t rule the actions of the 4 “defendant states” to be unconstitutional.
Today, the WSJ editorializes that the SCOTUS shouldn’t even take the Texas law suit.
Here’s an excerpt from the editorial:
Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General, launched an implausible appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn state presidential election results.
It would be a legal and political earthquake if the Court took the case.
The first issue is whether Texas has the legal standing to sue.
To have standing, a plaintiff must point to a specific injury and there must be some possibility of a remedy.
In this case, what is the injury?
Mr. Paxton argues that the four states have harmed his state and violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution by holding elections with major procedural irregularities. He’s saying Texas can be harmed by the way another state manages its elections.
But if Texas can sue on these grounds, then some unhappy state will sue another state after every close election whose outcome it doesn’t like.
Then there’s the problem of remedy. Mr. Paxton wants the Court to intervene and order the four state legislatures to deny Mr. Biden their electoral votes. He claims, with some justification, that the Constitution gives state legislatures the power to choose electors.
But that is what they have done already in certifying their votes.
In other words, Mr. Paxton’s claim is essentially moot as the states have certified their results and chosen electors.
There’s no doubt that Democrats used the pandemic as an excuse to expand mail-in voting that created more opportunities for fraud.
But the GOP should have fought those changes more competently before the election.
To take Mr. Paxton’s case the Court would have to set a new standard for standing to sue in election cases and essentially overturn the election results in four states and disenfranchise millions of voters.
The Justices would be opening an historic constitutional thicket if they take it.
What do you think?
Dec. 11: COVOD Data Dashboard
December 11, 2020SCOTUS is caught between a rock and a hard place…
December 10, 2020Having put the Texas case on its docket, SCOTUS faces very hard decisions
==============
First, some essential background…
The complaint goes directly at the the Court’s constitutional fortitude and sovereignty.
Either the Constitution matters and must be followed, even when some officials consider it inconvenient or out of date, or it is simply a piece of parchment on display at the National Archives.
The fundamental decision that the Court must make is whether or not the “defendant states” (PA, GA, MI, WI) — specifically, their election officials and state courts — acted unconstitutionally when they — not their respective legislatures — changed election laws in the run-up to the 2020 election.
This case presents a question of law:
Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking— or allowing — non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?
The crux of the argument:
Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states … usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes.
The defendant states accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.
These same government officials flooded the defendant states with millions of ballots to be sent through the mails, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, weakened the strongest security measures protecting the integrity of the vote — signature verification and witness requirements.
The complaint goes into detail (with numerous precedent cases cited) to establish the venue (why SCOTUS must decide), their standing (in effect, their states constitutional votes were nullified) and the constitutional rationale.
OK so let’s cut to the chase…
Dec. 10: COVID Data Dashboard
December 10, 2020Mask wearing up, cases up, deaths up … huh?
December 9, 2020A team of northeastern academic researchers, doing a “Covid States Project”, recently published their most recent survey of how “the human behaviors that have been shown to inhibit the spread of COVID-19 have evolved across the US since April, 2020.”
Said differently, they were evaluating whether or not people were complying with the CDC’s COVID mitigation guidance.
The researchers found that, since Spring, mask wearing compliance has increased from slightly over 50% to over 75% (the light yellow diagonal line running from the lower left to upper right corners).
Hmmm.
Mask wearing has increased to a relatively high level, yet the number of confirmed cases are spiking to record highs.
Seems counter-intuitive, doesn’t it?
Dec. 9: COVID Data Dashboard
December 9, 2020Georgia counting controversy is now getting surreal…
December 8, 2020Unless your TV only gets CNN, you’ve probably seen the election night CCTV video from Fulton County Georgia’s the central counting room at Sate Farm Arena.
The video shows (or as the Washington Post says “appears to show”) media & observers leaving the room en masse around 10:30 … then ballot-laden suitcases being rolled out from under some tables by the handful of remaining counters who spend the next couple of hours scanning the suitcases’ contents.
The video was presented to GOP-run State Senate Committee by Trump operatives and looped on right-leaning stations and sites.
Immediately, there was pushback by liberal media and fact-checkers … and by Georgia State election officials.
OK, with that as background, let’s unpack the story…
Dec. 8: COVID Data Dashboard
December 8, 2020Some serious efforts at ID verification…
December 7, 2020May offer some ideas for upping election integrity.
=============
Regular readers know that I’ve been attentive to to issues surrounding election integrity … especially voter registration lists and ballot verification.
With those issues top-of-mind, I had a couple of relevant experiences in the past couple of days.
First, I got a carpet-bomb email from a friend who was updating his Christmas card list.
He was reaching out to make sure that everybody on the list was still alive and that he had current addresses.
Obviously, he didn’t want to waste postage sending cards to former addresses … and, he didn’t want to inadvertently send cards to anybody who has successfully concluded their earthly tours of duty.
I suggested that he might want to start helping election boards clean up their registration lists.
He politely, but emphatically declined.
So, I’m left with his idea: Why not mail out verification letters to everybody on the voter registration list … to their address of record … mark them “do not forward … include a postage-free return postcard … require them to send the signed postcard back … if they don’t send it back (signed) flag them on the voter rolls.
Then, if or when they try to vote (or request an absentee ballot), make them re-register to vote — with some legit forms of ID, of course.
================
The 2nd experience was a real life case of identity verification done right.
Dec. 7: COVID Data Dashboard
December 7, 2020Dec. 6: COVID Data Dashboard
December 6, 2020Dec. 5: COVID Data Dashboard
December 5, 2020Carter-Baker Commission: “Building Confidence in U.S. Elections”
December 4, 2020Perhaps President Trump should convene still another Commission on Election Integrity… or better yet, nudge Barr to name another Special Counsel to investigate election “irregularities”.
=============
Anybody remember Bush versus Gore?
There was understandable concern when Florida vote-counting labored on for more than a month after the election and Bush ended up winning by a couple of hundred votes when the SCOTUS ruled “no mas”.
Eventually, in 2005, a Commission on Election Reform was convened, led by former President Jimmy Carter and former GOP Secretary of State James Baker.
The Carter-Baker Commission Report covered many of the election issues that have arisen in the 2020 election…
Dec. 4: C-19 Data Dashboard
December 4, 2020If there was widespread fraud, how could the GOP flip so many congressional seats?
December 3, 2020That’s a question that liberal pundits (and some of my left-leaning friends) are posing to “prove” that there was no widespread fraud … and there’s a simple answer
===============
The first time I was asked the question, I was stumped, so I did some quick fact-finding.
The answer should have been obvious (to me) from the get-go:
The seats that the GOP flipped weren’t in the notorious metro cheat-spots that tanked Trump, i.e. Philly, Detroit, Milwaukee, Vegas.
Specifically, RCP is currently reporting that the GOP flipped 11 seats; 2 each in FL & CA; 1 each in UT, SC, IA, OK, NM, MI, NY.
With the exception of Michigan, there are no allegations of game-changing cheating in any of the flipped-states … most were red states undoing 2018 blue-flips or landslide Biden states that didn’t need cheating to win (NY, CA).
In Michigan, the flipped congressional district (CD 3) covers Grand Rapids and Battle Creek … far away from the reach of the Detroit machine.
Note: GOP Senate Candidate — John James — lost narrowly. He was leading until the Detroit votes were counted.
According to RCP, the Dems only flipped 1 congressional seat – Georgia’s 7th CD — just north of Atlanta in Gwinnett County.
Need I say more on that one?
============
Bottom line: GOP flips are hardly evidence that the election was fraud-free in the suspected cheat-spots.
Dec. 3: C-19 Data Dashboard
December 3, 2020Uh-oh: Bookies think the election was fixed..
December 2, 2020And, since these bad boys take things like that very personally, they may provide the strongest impetus for election reforms.
============
Yesterday, we reported a Rasmussen survey finding that almost half of American voters think that that Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win.
Among those “believers” are some of America’s biggest bookies.
Speaking on behalf of them is a Las Vegas legend named Wayne Allyn Root.
I’m Wayne Allyn Root.
I was a Las Vegas odds maker and sports gaming expert for four decades — long before I became known as a nationally syndicated talk show host.
I understand odds and gambling.
And I can tell you something is very wrong with this presidential election.
It reminds me of a fixed football game.
As an odds maker, when a football game is fixed, even if you can’t prove it, you know.
Gamblers feel that same way about this presidential election.
Let me give you the details of this election- from a gambler’s perspective.

