Archive for September, 2012

Dennis Miller: “Just quit !”

September 29, 2012

Dennis Miller – comedian & political commentator – does a regular Wednesday nite segment on O’Reilly.

image

This Wednesday, he was unusually provocative by commenting:

If you’ve got a family of 4 and you’re busting your hump 40 or 60 hours a week – maybe 2 jobs — to make $45 grand and make ends meet … if Obama gets re-elected, just quit. 

Kick back … take the handouts and enjoy life. 

You can make just as much just sitting around …

If you don’t, those who are just  riding the train will be laughing at you. 

Why keep hitting your head against the wall?

Paraphrased from O’Reilly 9-26-12

Struck me at the time as akin to Rick Santelli’s “We need a Tea Party” rant on CNBC.

O’Reilly tried to soften the blow by bloviating (his word) about the American work ethic and how “most Americans have too much pride to stop working … that being on the dole has a stigma attached to it”

O’Reilly’s words seemed quite hollow in comparison to Miller’s.

And, reminded me of the government government promotional campaign to counter the “pride and other beliefs” that keep people from signing up for the SNAP program and getting food stamps.

The USDA has adopted a range of strategies and programs designed to bring more people to SNAP, including taking on “pride.”

Local assistance offices have been rewarded for “counteracting” pride and pushing more people to sign up for benefits.

The Ashe County Department of Social Services in Jefferson, N.C., for example, received a “Gold” award for confronting “mountain pride” and increasing food stamp participation.

“Eventually, many accepted assistance from the Low Income Energy Assistance Program, the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary program, and others, in some cases doubling a household’s net income. In 1 year, SNAP participation increased over 10 percent.”

Overcoming “beliefs” is a stated method from the USDA to bring more people to the program.

A “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Community Outreach Partner Toolkit” details the importance of reaching people who … have beliefs that conflict with accepting food stamps.

Excerpted from the Daily Caller

Since the USDA has “mountain pride” in the win column, will “work pride” be the next to fall?

I think Miller is onto something.

>> Latest Posts

HITS: Effective problem-solving … the five key skills.

September 28, 2012

HITS: HomaFiles’ Ideas To Share

Earlier this week, I had the opportunity to kick-off the MSB Consulting Club’s pioneering extracurricular series on problem-solving.

My overall message was that there are 5 key problem-solving skills that consulting firms are looking for …

image

* * * * *

Here are some of  the Homa Quotes that set-up each of the skills …

(1) Identify core issues quickly

  • “Managers faced with a complex problem typically end up solving the wrong problem.”
  • “The number of core business problems is not infinite … though variants abound.”
  • “Answer the question that was asked, not the question that you want to answer.”
  • “Some people go for the the jugular, others go for the capillaries.”

(2) Generate testable hypotheses

  • “For analytical efficiency, it’s always best to try to validate (or refute) a hypothesis.”

(3) Gather and analyze facts efficiently

  • “There are two types of people in the world: simplifiers and complicators”
  • “Do analyses … not just calculations”

(4) Craft creative, practical solutions 

  • “More people seem able to identify problems than to solve them.”
  • “Better an imperfect solution that can be implemented than a perfect solution that can’t.”

(5) Syndicate support and mobilize

  • “Getting the answer is the easy part. The hard part is convincing people to do it.”
  • “In baseball, pitching is 80% of the game … the percentage is higher in business.”

* * * * *

In subsequent posts, we’ll dig a little deeper into each of the 5 essential skills.

>> Latest Posts

The last time that I talk about BLS reporting bias …

September 28, 2012

… certainly won’t be today

Unbelievable, they did it again this week.

I promise that I’ll stop writing about BLS reporting bias when the streak ends, but …

Now we’re up to 80 out of 81 weeks — and, at least 21 election season weeks in a row — that the BLS’s “headline number” has under-reported the number of initial unemployment claims … and cast the jobs situation as brighter than it really is.

Based on Thursday’s BLS report, the number for the week ending Sept. 22 was revised upward from 382,000 to 385,000.

In itself, the 2,000 isn’t a big deal.

But, in context it is

Again, I ask: statistical bias or political bias?

I’m now starting to conclude the latter.

The BLS has plenty of statisticians on payroll … and this is an elementary stats problem

* * * * * *

Let’s try a new way of reporting … here’s a picture.

Note that the preliminary estimate (the blue line) is ALWAYS low … by a couple of thousand.

Hint to BLS: just add 2k or 3k … or .8% to your prelim forecast !

image

* * * * *

Here are the nums … but the picture says it all.

image 

>> Latest Posts

Absolut takes customization to the extreme

September 28, 2012

Punch line: Absolut Vodka recently re-engineered a production plant in order to produce 4 million bottles – all of which are completely unique with no two bottles having the same design.

In a world where consumers are demanding more and more customization, where should companies draw the line?

* * * * *

Excerpted from PSFK’s, “Absolute Creates 4 Million Unique Vodka Bottles.”

Absolut-Unique

Absolut Vodka recently launched ‘Absolut Unique,’ a project in which the vodka makers will release 4 million limited-edition, unique bottles.

The project required a company’s production plant to be completely re-engineered; the ‘carefully orchestrated randomness’ to the bottle design involves using complex pattern programming alongside splash guns and color-generating machines to ensure that no two bottles come out the same.

The vodka bottles will be individually numbered and will be distributed globally in 80 markets.

“Absolut Unique feels a bit mad scientist, a bit street art. When the bottles first appeared on the conveyer belt, we cheered. By that point the production line looked more like an artist’s studio than a bottle factory.”

Take a look at this video for a behind-the-scenes look at the process.

Absolut Unique–Behind the Scenes

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

HOT – Can problem-solving be learned?

September 27, 2012

Here’s an encore HOT – Homa Online Tutorial – straight from the classroom to you via the HomaFiles.

* * * * *

I sometimes get asked: Can problem-solving be learned or is hardwired into people’s DNA?

My view: DNA can help (e.g. raw brainpower can help) but “ordinary” folks can become adept problem-solvers.

How?

By internalizing models  i.e. simplifying frameworks) and protocols (i.e. analytical methods) … and applying them in a variety of contexts.

In doing so, the “devices” can be stored sub-consciously and retrieved consciously to solve problems.

That’s called intuition.

click to view

image

>> Latest Posts

Back to the Clinton years? … Dems: Be careful what you wish for.

September 27, 2012

Lots of articles have been written about how the the bottom 50% pays no Federal income taxes and the very top tiers pay vast shares.

The usual cry from the Dems: what about payroll taxes?

Then, they holler: go back to the rates in effect during the glorious Clinton years.

Well, the Independent Review pulled together Federal tax burdens back to 1980 … including payroll taxes

The key findings:

Since 1980, the bottom 40%’s share of total Federal taxes has almost halved … from about 9% to to 5%.

The top 10%’s share has grown about 15% … from 40% to almost 55%.

Most of the top 10%’s share  increase has landed where?

You guessed it … among the evil 1-percenters.

Geez.

If we could only get the wealthy to pay their fair share, we’d be out of this fiscal mess, right?

image

>> Latest Posts

The new Kraft : the spirit of a start-up and soul of a powerhouse

September 27, 2012

Punch line: CEO Tony Vernon sets lofty goals for the new North American standalone business.

* * * * *

Excerpted from adage.com’s, “Kraft’s New Grocery Company Plans Marketing Boost in Search of Renaissance.”

kraft-net-revenue

Tony Vernon, the CEO of Kraft Foods’ new standalone North American grocery business  set lofty goals for the company, pledging to pour more advertising behind top “power” brands while slashing overhead to create a more nimble corporate culture.

Vernon said his goals are “nothing short of creating a renaissance in North American food and beverage.” He added:

“We will create a new Kraft, one with the spirit of a startup and the soul of a powerhouse.”

Mr. Vernon gave the most detailed look yet at his strategy for the $19 billion company. 

In a plan put in place last year, these grocery brands are being split from Kraft’s global snacking and candy products such as Trident and Oreo, which will become part of a company called Mondelez International.

Kraft is betting that the split will bring more focus to brands while creating two distinct investment choices for Wall Street.

Mondelez is positioned as a high-growth company with penetration in developing markets, such as Brazil and India, while Kraft Foods Group is full of category-dominant meat and cheese brands, which act as cash cows that will generate consistent dividends for investors.

The trick for Kraft Foods Group will be to differentiate its grocery brands in categories that risk becoming commoditized.

Vernon suggested that Kraft would spend more with marketing to catch up to peers.

Kraft Foods Group brand spent 2.9% of its net revenue on advertising in the latest fiscal year, compared to the 4.5% average spent by competitors, including 8.6% by Kellogg Co., 6.4% by Campbell Soup. Co. and 5.5% by General Mills.

family-guy-cool-whip-grab

As it puts more money in marketing, Kraft Foods Group will continue the strategy already underway in which top power brands, will get the lion’s share.

Those brands include Lunchables, Planters, Velveeta Shells & Cheese, Capri Sun, Jell-O, Philadelphia, Kraft Macaroni & Cheese, Kool-Aid, Miracle Whip, MiO and Gevalia.

Key non-power brands, such as A1, Athenos and Cool Whip, will be supported with more “entrepreneurial” methods,

Mr. Vernon said, including with digital advertising such as YouTube videos. Among the ads Mr. Vernon showed off to analysts is this YouTube spot for Cool Whip, featuring characters from TV show “Family Guy.”

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Crop shortfall starting to impact prices … at the grocery store and and at the pump

September 27, 2012

Punch line: Forecasts of U.S. corn and soybean yields are set to have a major impact on the prices we pay for everything from processed food to beef and poultry.

Crop forecase falls again - Image by flickr user nicora

* * * * *

Excerpted from NYT.com, “Government Lowers Crop Yield Forecast Again”

The Agriculture Department  lowered its forecast of corn and soybean yields as record heat continued to batter crops in the Midwest.

The new data suggested that customers would pay more at the grocery store next year as the prices of corn and soybeans — major ingredients in processed food, animal feed and biofuels — rise to record levels.

The United States is the world’s largest exporter of corn and soybeans.

The report said exports of both crops would be substantially lower than last year, which could have a devastating effect on countries like China and Mexico, which depend heavily on American exports.

The report said beef and poultry production was expected to increase this year as livestock producers culled or sold their herds because of higher feed costs.

But prices for beef and poultry are expected to rise 4 to 5 percent next year.

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

Who pays taxes? Who benefits? … Here are some nums.

September 26, 2012

As loyal readers know, I’ve been trying to get my arms around this question.

In a prior post, we drilled down on taxes … or, as my Dem friends would say government “revenues”.

We posted that in 2012 Americans will pay a tad over $5 trillion in taxes to the Feds, States and Local Governments.

Drilling down, the $5 trillion is split roughly 50%-30%-20% to the Feds, States and Locals, respectively. Note that the Federal portion is just under $2.5 trillion.

image

* * * * *
If these are “revenues” there must be matching services provided, right?

I found a study by the non-partisan Tax Foundation that analyzes taxes paid and benefits received.

The study is old – using 2004 data – but, in my opinion is a good starting point to calibrate the answer.

First, the easy part …

The Federal tax revenues in 2004 were a bit over $2 trillion … compared to our $2.5 trillion projection in 2012.

Here’s how the 2004 tax revenues were spent … i.e., the benefits received by citizens.

Note that the Federal spending is just under $20,000 per household.

image

* * * * *

The Tax Foundation analysts also sorted taxes paid by household income pentile against benefits received by the pentiles ….. and things got interesting.

The bottom pentile – households in the bottom 20% of income – pay about 2.5% of Federal taxes (including payroll taxes !) … and receive 1/3 of government benefits.

The top pentile pays over half of the Federal taxes and draws about 15% of government benefits.

The middle pentile comes close to breaking even – paying 14.1% of Federal taxes and getting 16% of government benefits.

image

* * * * *
Here’s another way to cut the data …

On average, households in the bottom pentile get $23,178 more in benefits than they pay in taxes; average households in top 20% run a deficit of almost $40,000 – that is, they pay about $40k in taxes than they receive in benefits; the breakeven point is somewhere around $50,000 in household income – that’s where taxes paid equal benefits received.

image

* * * * *
When state & local taxes and benefits are factored in, the surpluses and deficits grow even  larger.

The bottom 20% gets over $31,000 per household in net government benefits; the top 20% pays almost $50,000 per household more than it gets in government benefits.

The breakeven point is still somewhere around $50,000 in household income – that’s where taxes paid equal benefits received.

image

* * * * *

I’ll be hunting for more recent data.

Until I find it, chew on this!

Note: The Tax Foundation says it doesn’t have funding to update its study.

Nuts !

>> Latest Posts

Wipe that smile off your face … if you’re in New Jersey, that is.

September 26, 2012

Not in all instances, just for the picture on your driver’s license.

image

New Jersey has joined several other states in the use of facial recognition software … linked to driver’s license photos.

So, it’s all about facial recognition:

“The distance between someone’s mouth and their chin. The distance between their mouth and their nose. The distance between their eyes.

And when you make a bizarre or obscure facial expression, it prohibits the computer from conducting the measurements it needs to do,”

Couple of points;

1.  I’ve never heard accuse New Jersey folks of excessive smiling … scowling, yes … smiling, no.

2.  Who ever smiles when they’re at the DMV.

3.  NJ is at least 3 years behind Virginia … we posted about my wife’s smiling reprimand back in 2009.

>> Latest Posts

How much can a family with 2 kids earn and still pay zero Federal income taxes?

September 25, 2012

The  answer is about $45,000

Reminder: Median household income is just a tad over $50,000

* * * * *
Here’s an analytical walk-through from the non-partisan Tax Foundation

Start with the answer: assume  a family of four making $45,000 in adjusted gross income.

Subtract a standard deduction of $11,600 and personal exemptions of $14,800 (four times $3,700) and the family’s taxable income is reduced to $18,600.

The family is taxed at 10 percent on their first $17,000 of income and at 15 percent for their remaining $1,600 of income, giving them a total tax liability of $1,940.

But, they allowed to deduct two tax credits of $1,000 for each of their two children.

And, they’re allowed to deduct an additional $214 due to the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is a credit designed to financially assist low to
moderate income working families.

Subtracting these tax credits from the family’s tax liability brings their $1,940 liability below zero.

However, since the child credits and Earned Income Tax Credit are so-called refundable tax credits, the family ends up receiving a check for $274 from the IRS for the remaining value of their tax credits.

For families who are eligible for other credits such as the child care credit, education credit, or the tax credit for purchasing a hybrid vehicle….. AGI can go higher than $45,000 with no tax liability.

image

* * * * *
Ironic Twist

The same George Bush that the left demonizes is the President who signed the 10% marginal tax bracket, boosted the child credits, and introduced the refunable tax credits.

The irony: liberals should be praising him and conservatives should be dissing him.

If it weren’t for the evil Bush tax cuts, we wouldn’t be at the now famous 47% level of folks not paying Federal income taxes.

image

Tomorrow: Who pays taxes and who gets the benefits?

>> Latest Posts

Shocker: Profs shell out $$$ … got Obama.

September 25, 2012

No surprise that liberal university profs support Obama.

What may be surprising is that they’re throwing money into the pot … in a big way.

image

According to the Washington Times

Professors are stocking Obama’s campaign war chest.

The elite fundraising committee through which President Obama solicits his largest campaign donations relied overwhelmingly on professors from equally-elite universities last month.

The top donors, measured by frequency of donation, were Duke University, the University of Michigan, University of California, University of Washington and Stanford University, and Mr. Obama’s alma maters of Columbia and Harvard.

>> Latest Posts

Ask less, get more … keep your mouth shut when conducting interviews

September 25, 2012

Punch line: The more questions you ask, the more you learn about a job candidate, right?

Wrong.

Here is a better strategy.

image

* * * * *

Excerpted from Inc.com , “Best Interview Technique You Never Use”

Sometimes, instead of asking questions, the best interviewing technique is to listen slowly.

In Change-Friendly Leadership, management coach Rodger Dean Duncan describes how he learned about listening slowly from PBS NewsHour anchor Jim Lehrer:

“He urged me to ask a good question, listen attentively to the answer, and then count silently to five before asking another question … Giving other people sufficient psychological breathing room seemed to work wonders.”

Once you give candidates a silent hole to fill, they’ll fill it, often in unexpected and surprising ways.

A shy candidate may fill the silence by sharing positive information she wouldn’t have otherwise shared. A candidate who came prepared with “perfect” answers to typical interview questions may fill the silence with not-so-positive information he never intended to disclose.

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

Flashback: About those 47% who don’t pay income taxes …

September 24, 2012

Romney sure caused a stir with his remark that 47% don’t pay Federal income taxes.

Well, the Homa Files was on this case over 4 years ago !

This analysis was originally posted on July 31, 2008 during the run-up to the election. It proves the point (ahead of its time) that less than half of all voters pay any income taxes now that “Make Work Pay” has been enacted (as part of the stimulus program). Think about it: the majority gets to demand more government programs that they don’t pay a cent towards. I think that’s scary. Very scary..

It’s the HFs post that continues to get the most hits, and the topic is ‘hot’ this week because of Mitt’s smokin’ gun video.

So, here’s a flashback …complete with numbers and sources.

* * * * *

Despite the drumbeat of warnings from various sources, the prospects that a minority of voting age Americans will be paying Federal income taxes under the Obama tax plan doesn’t seem to arouse much visible public anxiety.

Why?

First, for those in the emerging majority that won’t pay any income taxes – or may even be getting government checks for tax credits due – the deal is almost too good to be true. To them, Obama’s plan must make perfect sense. So, why rock the boat?

Second, some people argue that low-earning people who don’t pay income taxes shoulder a regressive payroll tax burden to cover Medicare and Social Security. Yeah, but these programs – which are most akin to insurance or forced savings plans — offer specific individual benefits that are directly linked to each wage earner’s contributions.and the benefits phase down quickly as qualifying income increases. That is, they’re not as regressive as many people argue.

Third, most of the energetic criticism of Obama’s plan has centered on its redistribution intent — taking over $130 billion of “excess” income from undeserving rich people, and giving it directly to those who earn less and need it more.

Fourth, most folks just don’t believe that the numbers will really shift enough to create a voting majority of citizens who don’t pay income taxes. They’re wrong. Very wrong.

Here are the numbers … and why they should bother you.

* * * * *

Today, 41% of voting age adults don’t pay Federal income taxes

Based on the most recent IRS data, slightly more than 200 million out of 225 million voting age Americans filed tax returns. That means that 25 million adults – presumably low income ones – didn’t file returns and, of course, didn’t pay any income taxes. See notes [1] to [4] below

Of the 200 million voting age filers, approximately 68 million (33% of total filers) owed zero income taxes or qualified for refundable tax credits (i.e. paid negative income taxes). [5]

Add those 68 million to the 25 million non-filers, and non-payers already total 93 million – 41% of voting age adults.

* * * * *

Obama’s Estimates – Make that 49%
Not Paying Federal Income Taxes

Obama says (on his web site) that he will give tax credits up of $1,000 per family ($500 per individual) that will “completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans”. And, he says that he will “eliminate income taxes for 7 million seniors making less than $50,000 per year.” [6]

Taking Obama’s estimates at face value, the incremental 17 million that he intends to take off the income tax rolls will push the percentage of non-payers close to 49% of voting age Americans — within rounding distance to a majority. [7]

* * * * *

And, Obama’s estimates are probably low,
so make the number 55% (or higher)

Since Obama’s basic proposal is for tax credits ($500 per person or $1,000 per family) – not simply deductions from Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) — they will have a multiplier impact on the amount of AGI that tax filers can report and still owe no taxes.

For example, a childless married couple that files a joint return can currently report about $17,500 in Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) and owe no income taxes. [8]

Under the Obama Plan, that couple’s zero-tax AGI is bumped up to $27,500 since their new $1,000 tax credit covers the 10% tax liability on an additional $10,000 of AGI. And, married couples filing jointly can keep adding about $10,000 to their zero-tax AGI for each qualifying dependent child that they claim. [9]

click table to make it bigger

click table to make it bigger

Based on the 2006 IRS data, approximately 25 million tax returns were filed that reported AGI less than $27,500 (the post-Obama zero-tax AGI) and required that some income taxes be paid. [10]

Assuming that 45% of those were for couples filing jointly, they represent over 22 million adults. For sure, these 22 million will come off the tax rolls – and they alone will be enough to create a non-taxpayer majority (51% of voting age adults),

click to make table bigger

And, there are more folks being pushed off the tax rolls. About 4.7 million childless individuals earn less than $13,750 (the post-Obama zero-tax AGI for childless individuals), and currently pay some Federal income taxes. This group will shift to non-payer status.

So would several million joint filers who can take advantage of the Child Tax Credit to report more than $27,500 and not pay Federal income taxes.

And, some portion of the 7 million Seniors that Obama says will have their taxes eliminated — that is the Seniors couples earning more than $27,500 (but less than $50,000) — and Senior individuals earning more than $13,750 (but less than $50,000).

So, post-Obama, the percentage of non-taxpayers will easily exceed 55% of voting age adults — a solid majority. It won’t even be close.

* * * * *

The Bottom Line – Why You Should Worry

An income tax paying minority of voting age adults isn’t just a possibility. Under Obama’s plan, it’s a virtual certainty. Based on the hard numbers, Obama’s plan will create a new majority — a powerful voting block: non-tax payers. UH-OH.

Again, for those in the emerging majority that won’t pay any income taxes – or may even be getting government checks for tax credits due – the deal is almost too good to be true. To them, Obama’s plan must make perfect sense. Count on their perpetual support for the plan.

But for those in the new minority, watch out if the new majority decides that more government services are needed, or that $131 billion in income redistribution isn’t enough to balance the scales.

The Tax Foundation — a nonpartisan tax research group – has repeatedly warned that “While some may applaud the fact that millions of low- and middle-income families pay no income taxes, there is a threat to the fabric of our democracy when so many Americans are not only disconnected from the costs of government but are net consumers of government benefits. The conditions are ripe for social conflict if these voters begin to demand more government benefits because they know others will bear the costs.” http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1111.html

* * * * *

Sources & Notes

[1] The Census Bureau reported 217.8 million people age 18 and over; as of July 1, 2003.
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/001703.html

http://www.census.gov/popest/national/files/NST-EST2007-alldata.csv

[2] The IRS reported 138.4 million personal tax returns filed in 2006.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/06in11si.xls

[3] The IRS reported that in 2006, approximately 45% of filed returns were by married couples filing jointly (i.e. 2 adults per return); 55% for individual filers (including ‘married filing separately’ and ‘head of household’). http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/06in36tr.xls

[4] Calculation: 138.4 million returns times 1.45 (adults per return) equals 200.7 million adults represented on filed returns

[5] http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/06in01fg.xls http://ftp.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/06inplim.pdf

[6] http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/#tax-relief

[7] Analytical note: 93 million plus 17 million equals 110 million divided by 225 million equals 49%.

[8] Analytical note: $17,500 less a $10,700 standard deduction, less 2 exemptions at $3,400 each, equals taxable income of zero – so no federal income taxes are due.

[9] Analytical note: $27,500 less a $10,700 standard deduction, less 2 exemptions at $3,400 each, equals taxable income of $10,000, which at a 10% rate is a $1,000 tax liability that gets offset by the $1,000 Obama credit, reducing the tax liability to zero.

[10] http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/06in11si.xls

* * * * *

>> Latest Posts

Which Federal government agency is rated lowest?

September 24, 2012

Answer: the Department of Education

As Nick Cannon would say on AGT, “America has voted … via a Pew Research poll.

Despite spending hundreds of billions of dollars over the past couple of decades*, the Department of Education gets the fewest favorability nods for Americans …  only 40% give it a favorable rating … and its favorability rating is falling faster than any other agency.

The Education Dept’s low ratings aren’t that surprising since the U.S. is constantly reported to be trailing other developed nations in math, science and other basic skills … and since every politician lasers in on our need to fix public education (while protecting the sanctity of the teachers’ unions).

Second lowest is the IRS … also not surprising given its adversarial role versus citizens …  imagine the IRS rating once the 15,000 new agents start enforcing the ObamaCare mandates on companies and individuals.

I was surprised to see the low rating for the Social Security Administration … especially since its primary mission is handing out money.  Best hypothesis I can conjure is that the SSA is generally regarded as a hassle to deal with, and probably gets the brunt of ill-feelings when folks can’t make ends meet when on Social Security.

Initially, I was most surprised to see the comparatively high score for the oft-maligned Post Office … with an 89% favorability score, it’s 10 points higher than #3 – the Center for Disease Control.

Come to think of it, the Post Office hasn’t disappointed me often – especially given the number of transactions it handles.  In fact, our local Post Office and our neighborhood mail carrier provide really good service.  I guess that happens when people are customers not captives, and when there is some private enterprise competitors keeping the system somewhat on its toes.

image

* Source re: Dept. of Education Spending

>> Latest Posts

First Target, now Facebook … “Sweet, you’re having a baby!”

September 24, 2012

Punch line: Consumers and companies are confused as to how Facebook is using personal information to target individuals and their needs and preferences.  Facebook admits the company’s ability to pin point consumer interests based on online interests, but maintains that status updates are never used to target consumers.  Despite many users sharing everything on social networks, consumers are still fighting for privacy.

image

Excerpted from adage.com’s, “Does Facebook Know You’re Pregnant?  What It Knows Depends on Whom You Ask: Social Network Says One Thing, Its Advertisers Another.”

The pregnancy of 30-year-old Sally was announced to the world through her husband’s Facebook page, after he tagged her in a photograph showing a positive home pregnancy test.

Two months later, while Sally was browsing Facebook, she noticed a Huggies ad.  Sally had never “liked” Huggies or any baby-related posts or pages. Nor had she posted about her pregnancy, so she figured Facebook had connected the dots between her husband’s status update and his relationship with her.

Did Facebook and its client, Huggies, know she was pregnant?

According to Facebook and Huggies parent, Kimberly-Clark, Sally’s browsing experience resulted from blind luck.

The ad was the subject of a two-week test targeting parents of young children, Huggies fans and their friends — as well as a three-day subtest of women ages 18 to 34. 

Facebook, for its part, said it rarely uses the content of status updates as a signal for ad targeting.

But plenty of marketers that target pregnant women believe they’re identifying them, at least in part, by their status updates.

Some marketers say they have been told so by Facebook.

The confusion over what exactly Facebook is doing is indicative not only of the opacity of the social network’s ad-targeting algorithms but also the privacy tightrope it walks, offering marketers the precision they crave while assuaging users that their every utterance isn’t being mined for ad targeting.

Here’s what we know … Marketers can reach pregnant women on Facebook with near-surgical precision, mixing and matching a variety of targets, such as those interested in baby products and people who like children’s music, which taken together produce a high likelihood of hitting the mark. 

But Facebook is careful to note that it doesn’t use the content of status updates to target pregnant women.

Tech-savvy consumers may already assume that their status updates are a key part of the targeting recipe since Facebook’s own “data use policy” states that “key words from your stories” are used to deliver ads. But according to Facebook key words in status updates are used only rarely for real-time targeting. (A hypothetical example is a user who has posted “I could go for some pizza tonight” being served an ad with a coupon from Domino’s Pizza.)

Certainly there’s a gap between what marketers say they are being told and Facebook tells a journalist on the record.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Breaking news: Romney’s tax rate only 14.1% … but his all important GBSR is 43%

September 21, 2012

OK, Romney released his 2011 tax return.

  • In 2011, the Romneys paid $1,935,708 in taxes on $13,696,951 in mostly investment income.
  • The Romneys’ effective tax rate for 2011 was 14.1%.
  • The Romneys donated $4,020,772 to charity in 2011, amounting to nearly 30% of their income.

Holy Buffett, Mitt only paid 14.1% in Federal income taxes … a lower rate than Warren’s secretary.

Scoundrel.

Let’s re-write the tax code.

Not so fast.

Last fall, the Homa Files coined a new metric: the GBSR™ – “Give Back to Society Rate

We defined the GBSR™ as the sum of taxes paid plus charitable contributions – since those are all money that’s supposed to be going to the common good, albeit administered by different organizations – divided by AGI.

In Romney’s case, his release says that he made $13.7 million … paid $1.9 million in taxes … and donated a whopping $4.02 million to charities.

So, his tax rate may sound meager @ 14.1%, but his GBSR™ is about 43% – and that’s not counting state & local income taxes.

My bet: add S&L taxes in and Mitt‘s GBSR™ is way over 45%.

So, it just may be that the tax code is leading fat cats to do the right thing – it’s just that they’re giving much of their dough to private charities instead of the Feds.

Do you blame them?

* * * * *
Romney’s 20 year tax history

According to the Standard ,,,

  • In each year during the entire 20-year period, the Romneys owed both state and federal income taxes.
  • Over the entire 20-year period, the average annual effective federal tax rate was 20.20%.
  • Over the entire 20-year period, the lowest annual effective federal personal tax rate was 13.66%.
  • Over the entire 20-year period, the Romneys gave to charity an average of 13.45% of their adjusted gross income.
  • Over the entire 20-year period, Romney’s GBSR™ the total federal and state taxes owed plus the total charitable donations deducted represented 38.49% of total AGI.

* * * * *
For comparison …

Filers in Obama’s millionaire range ($200,000 to $250,000) donate about 2.5% of their income to charities.

image

>> Latest Posts

Picture of the week: Remember the Somalian pirates?

September 21, 2012

Well, apparently they’ve taken their game up a notch.

But, we can all relax … the President is dishing his charm to get the pirates under control.

image 
Photo courtesy of Obama-Biden 2012

You just can’t make this stuff up.

>> Latest Posts

Unemployment claims drop by 3,000 … well, not really.

September 21, 2012

Yesterday’s headline’s trumpeted a 3,000  drop in initial unemployment claims.

Hooray. Right?

Of course not, the BLS revised last week’s number up by 3.000 so that it could report this week as being down by 3,000.

Huh?

Now we’re up to 79 out of 80 weeks — and, at least 20 election season weeks in a row — that the BLS’s “headline number” has under-reported the number of initial unemployment claims … and cast the jobs situation as brighter than it really is.

Based on Thursday’s BLS report, the number for the week ending Sept. 8 was revised upward from 382,000 to 385,000.

In itself, the 3,000 isn’t a big deal.

But, in context it is

Again, I ask: statistical bias or political bias?

If the former: fix it already, BLS.

Hint to BLS: just add 2k or 3k … or .8% to your prelim forecast !

image

I promise that I’ll stop writing about BLS reporting bias when the streak ends.

>> Latest Posts

Factoids: The state of the economy …

September 21, 2012

The economic analyses done by Mort Zuckerman at US News are always laden with cold facts.

image

Read the article for the prose. Here are the factoids:

  • Annual wage increases have dropped to an average of 1.6 percent, the lowest in the past 30 years.
  • A Census Bureau analysis  indicates that median income in 2011 had fallen to $50,054, the fourth straight year of decline.
  • Layoff announcements have risen from a year ago and hiring plans have dropped dramatically.
  • 5 million people have now been out of work for 27 weeks or more. That’s roughly 40 percent of the unemployed.
  • The average period of unemployment is close to 40 weeks.
  • Fewer Americans are at work today than in April 2000, even though the population has grown by 30 million people since then.
  • Older people are not leaving the workforce at the same rate as in the past … employment in the age group of 55 and older is up 3.9 million, even as total employment is down by five million.
  • The so-called quit rate has sagged to the lowest rate in years.
  • Young workers now face double-digit unemployment and job prospects for young workers aren’t very good.
  • As a result, the birth rate has just hit a 25-year low of 1.87 births per woman. And
  • Of jobs that have been added, more than 40 percent of new private sector jobs are in low-paying categories such as leisure and hospitality, bars, and restaurants
  • Millions of people who had good private sector jobs are now dependent on the government for life support.
  • Roughly 15 percent of the population, a record, representing over 46 million Americans, are in the food stamp program, compared to the 7.9 percent participation from 1970 to 2000.
  • A record 11 million-plus Americans are now collecting federal disability checks. Half of them have come on board since President Barack Obama took office.

Sure doesn’t look like we’ve turned the corner yet.

>> Latest Posts

HOT: Why marketing is important (and cool) … and, certainly not dead !

September 20, 2012

Earlier this week, we posted the HBR article claiming that “Marketing is Dead”.

Fact is, many folks think that marketing is nothing more than a bunch of b.s. being dished by shysters.

And, some folks (think finance majors) regard marketing as unchallenging & touchy-feely … a discipline for folks who can’t cut it in finance.

Au contraire, mes amies.

This week at the annual Marketing 101 session for 1st year MBAs, I tried to convey that marketing plays a central role in most companies, is highly analytical, and – done right – is harder than it looks.

From the HomaFiles archives, here’s the HOT (Homa Online Tutorial) that pitches the case.

click to view
image

>> Latest Posts

Buffett Rule passes the House … now, you’re talking.

September 20, 2012

What gridlock in Washington?

Yesterday, the House of Reps passed a Buffett Rule that should put an end to Warren’s carping about how his taxes are too low.

According to the Washington Times:

The House passed Republicans’ own version of the Buffett Rule, which allows wealthy Americans to voluntarily pony up to reduce the deficit.

The bill, labeled the Buffett Rule Act, passed by voice vote, meaning Democrats and Republicans agreed with it.

Under the legislation, taxpayers can check a box on their taxes and send in a check for more than they owe to the IRS.

“If Warren Buffett and others like him truly feel they’re not paying enough in taxes, they can use the Buffett Rule Act to put their money where their mouth is and voluntarily send in more to pay down the national debt, rather than changing the entire tax code to inflict more job-killing tax hikes on hard-working Americans.”

Current law already allows taxpayers to send money to pay down the debt, but the process is a bit onerous.

Under their new plan, taxpayers would have an easy option on their tax returns allowing them to pay more.

Under the legislation, the money would go directly toward reducing the debt.

So, do you think Buffett will put his money where his mouth is?

I’m betting the under.

>> Latest Posts

Do Americans think that they can trust government?

September 20, 2012

Yes for state and local governments …  the Federal government: not so much.

According to Gallup, less than 1 in 5 Americans say that they trust the Federal government

… over 80% only trust the Federal government some of the time or never.

 

image

* * * * * *

According to Gallupa majority say that they trust state governments to handle their problems

…. about 2 in 3 think they can trust their local governments.

The lesson to politicos: keep it local … decentralized … closer (and more responsive) to the people.

 

image

>> Latest Posts

Better vision: Warby Parker eyeglasses.

September 20, 2012

Punch line: Warby Parker, a luxury eyeglass company with a social component, has grown 500 percent by following a few easy guidelines.

image

* * * * *

Excerpted from Inc., “How Warby Parker Grew So Fast: 3 Reasons”

Addressing a crowd of more than 550 entrepreneurs and business owners at the Growco conference, … the company’s co-founder, Neil Blumenthal, offered a bit of insight into how and why the company has grown so rapidly …

  1. Cut out the middle men: By working with a manufacturer in China, and designing the glasses themselves, Warby cut out the middle men and make the glasses far more affordable.
  2. Don’t overspend on unnecessary marketing: Instead of a five or six figure launch spend … Warby launched with two well-placed editorials in Vogue and GQ. The tactic was so effective that … within two weeks, they had sold out … and had a waitlist of 20,000 customers.
  3. It all comes down to company mission: When the company moved into its new offices a couple of months ago, it decided to knock down the walls of the office … “to institute mechanisms for people to learn on a regular basis.”

Edited by JDC
>> Latest Posts

Reprise: Who do income tax payers support – Obama or Romney?

September 19, 2012

We posted this last week, ahead of the curve …

Since the bruhaha erupted when Carter’s grandson leaked the pirated tape of Romney speaking to donors, I thought a repost was in order …

Bottom line: It’s not 100% taxpayers for Romey; 100% non-taxpayers for Obama … but there is a statistically significant difference.

* * * * *

Who do tax payers support – Obama or Romney?

That’s an easy one … but, the latest CNN poll was the first I spotted that divides the population along those lines … or, at least, sorta does.

CNN breaks the sample by those earning less than and more than $50,000 .

$50,000 is about the point where folks have to start paying Federal income taxes.*

No surprises in the data.

Romney has the edge among Federal tax payers.

Obama gets those who don’t pay Federal income taxes … by a whopping 57% to 42%.

Uh-oh.

image

* P.S. Yeah, yeah, yeah about payroll taxes … but they are “insurance” payments with directly associated benefits.

>> Latest Posts

Behavioral analytics … bad when Target does it … OK for political campaigns?

September 19, 2012

A couple of months ago Target got some bad press when it was revealed that the company was mining customers’ purchase histories to slot them into behavioral groups susceptible to tailored promotional pitches.

For example, Target identified purchases that mothers-to-be made early in their pregnancies – sometimes before they even knew they were pregnant.  Think bigger jeans, skin care lotions.

Many folks railed that it was an example of big brother invasion of privacy.

Well, guess what?

Political campaigns are using the same methods that Target was using

The modern science of politics is increasingly based on principles from behavioral psychology and data analytics.

image

Campaigns today mine large data bases with mathematical algorithms that slot folks into categories and provide the basis for how people should be approached (or ignored).

According to the WSJ:

Perhaps the most valuable data in modern campaigns comes from statistical “microtargeting” models—the political world’s version of credit scores.

Campaigns gather thousands of data points on voters, culled from what they put on their registration forms, what they have told canvassers who have visited their homes in the past, and information on their buying and lifestyle habits collected by commercial data warehouses.

The campaigns then run algorithms trawling for patterns linking those demographic characteristics to the political attitudes measured in their polling.

Financial institutions run such statistical models to generate predictions about whether a given individual will demonstrate a certain behavior, like paying a bill on time or defaulting on a loan.

Campaigns do the same, only they are interested in predicting political behavior.

So it’s typical now to generate individual scores, presented as a percentage likelihood, that a voter will cast a ballot, support one party or the other, be pro-choice or antiabortion, or respond to a request to volunteer.

These scores now stick to voters as indelibly as credit scores.

And just as a bank officer won’t sign off on a loan without requesting one, a field director for a campaign won’t send a volunteer to a voter’s door without knowing the relevant number.

BTW: It’s Team Obama that’s doing most of this stuff.

Bad for Target … but OK for Obama.

Hmmm

* * * * *

WSJ source: “The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns” by Sasha Issenberg

>> Latest Posts

Why do so many Americans hate paying income taxes?

September 19, 2012

It’s not simply about the money.

Researchers Jeff Kidder of Northern Illinois University and Isaac Martin from the University of California-San Diego have found that there are moral underpinnings that help explain why many hate paying taxes.

Rather than being associated with a free-market ideology or a person’s own economic interests, tax hostility is more linked with moral principles.

image

“Tax talk is about dollars, but it is also about a moral sense of what is right.”

Generally, respondents saw income taxes as violating the moral principle that hard work should be rewarded.

The respondents “portray taxation as a threat to the moral order because they believe taxes deprive deserving hardworking middle class people of dignity, while rewarding others who are undeserving (both rich and poor)”.

Entrepreneurs are particularly anti-tax.

In fact, a recent survey by payroll service provider Paychex found that tax codes, along with employment regulations and retirement security are the top three election issues for small business owners.

Source: LiveScience extract from the Journal Symbolic Interaction

10 qualities of successful entrepreneurs

September 19, 2012

Punch line: Not enough people understand who entrepreneurs are or how to develop them. Jim Clifton, Gallup Chairman and CEO, uncovers what propels these exceptional businesspeople.

Pensive businessman - Image by flickr user s_falkow

* * * * *

Excerpted fro Gallup Business Journal, “What Drives Entrepreneurs to Win”

In his book The Coming Jobs War, Gallup Chairman and CEO Jim Clifton calls entrepreneurship the “scarcest, rarest, hardest energy and talent in the world to find.”

So how do you rise above the challenges that entrepreneurship poses? Clifton offers some sage advice.

  1. Know your personal brand. Successful entrepreneurs know themselves well and can perceive others accurately.
  2. Take on challenges. Entrepreneurs [should] stretch themselves, raise the bar, face their fears, and [be] willing to experiment.
  3. Think through possibilities and practicalities. Entrepreneurs must be creative and think beyond the boundaries of what exists.
  4. Promote the business. Successful entrepreneurs are their own best spokespeople.
  5. Focus on business outcomes. Highly successful entrepreneurs judge decisions … based on their observed or anticipated effect on profit … [and they] set goals and live by their commitment to them.
  6. Be a perpetual student of the business. Continually gaining input and acquiring the knowledge and skills required to grow the business are essential to an entrepreneur’s success.
  7. Be self-reliant. Successful entrepreneurs are prepared to do whatever must be done to see the business succeed.
  8. Be a self-starter. Successful entrepreneurs are passionate doers who push to make things happen.
  9. Multiply yourself through delegation. Entrepreneurs who are successful … are willing and able to contemplate a shift in style and control.
  10. Build relationships. The ability to build strong relationships is crucial for survival and growth. Successful entrepreneurs are adept at building relationships, have strong social awareness and can attract and maintain a constituency.

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

Marketing is dead … HBR says so !

September 18, 2012

Punch line: According to a Harvard Business Review post, Marketing is dead.

Traditional marketing — including advertising, public relations, branding and corporate communications — is dead.

Many people in traditional marketing roles and organizations may not realize they’re operating within a dead paradigm.

But they are.

The evidence is clear.

image

Here’s the “evidence”:

Several studies have confirmed that in the “buyer’s decision journey,” traditional marketing communications just aren’t relevant. Buyers are checking out product and service information on the Internet, and often from … word-of-mouth or customer reviews.

CEOs have lost all patience with CMOs who lack business credibility, the ability to generate sufficient business growth, and evidence that …  brand equity can be linked to actual firm equity or any other recognized financial metric.

Third, in today’s increasingly social media-infused environment, traditional marketing and sales doesn’t work so well …and  doesn’t make sense.  When you try to extend traditional marketing logic into the world of social media, it simply doesn’t work.

The prescription: build communities, leverage “influencers”, be “authentic”,build social equity, etc.

Blah, blah blah.

Ken’s Take: As I often remind my students, marketing is more than sales and advertising !

Marketing is also about:

  • Identifying high potential (i.e. profitable) target markets
  • Designing products that meet real customer needs
  • Pricing products to deliver value to buyers and profits to shareholders.
  • Distributing through efficient, hassle-free channels
  • Communicating products’ benefits and value-to-customers
  • Measuring performance to efficiently allocate assets and spending.

Reports of marketing’s death are premature … unless you mistakenly think that marketing and advertising are synonymous.

>> Latest Posts

Are you angry with the Federal government?

September 18, 2012

According to a Pew Research poll, 1 in 5 Americans are angry with the Federal government

… another 56% say they’re frustrated with the Federal government

That leaves less than 1 in 5 who are basically content with the Federal government.

How are you feeling these days?

image

>> Latest Posts

Look for Mitt ads on the ‘Price is Right’ … and Dems on Springer.

September 18, 2012

The Washington Times did an analysis of Dem and GOP TV ad placements to reverse engineer their respective targets and strategies.

Here are some of the findings:

  • Republicans are at an extreme disadvantage when it comes to television advertising because Democrats watch more TV.
  • Every single genre of TV programming has a Democratic-leaning audience, with sports coming the closest to a partisan balance.
  • Sports and documentaries, have audiences that are far more inclined to vote.
  • Shark Tank,” a reality program about entrepreneurship, has only 18 percent Democratic ads, and the law-and-order favorite “Cops” is heavily Republican.
  • Venerable game shows, while barely registering as blips in modern pop culture, remain among the top destinations for political ads because of their largely older base of viewers who are likely to go to the polls.

  image

  • The Price Is Right” is second among all TV shows for Romney ads and third for spots for Obama.
  • Democrats are advertising during daytime shows watched by high numbers of unemployed people, including those who rely on welfare and other social services.
  • More generally, the unemployed watch whatever’s on at 3 a.m., or Jerry Springer’ or Maury Povich.
  • All “Jerry Springer” ads have been for Democrats. PAC Priorities USA has made 10 separate buys on Springer.
    image
  • Nearly every political ad during the adult cartoon series “Family Guy” is for a Democrat.
  • More than 80 percent of political spots during “The Young and the Restless,” the long-running soap opera, tout liberal candidates and causes.
  • Relatively inexpensive ads during daytime soap operas watched by stay-at-home moms are abundant, and are used primarily by Democrats.
  • Reality-dating programs have a skewed Democratic audience that’s below average in likelihood to vote.
  • Obama has advertised heavily on courtroom reality shows such as “Judge Judy”  whose viewers include large numbers of black voters.

The implicit Democratic strategy according to the Washington Times:

The more lowbrow the show, the better.

“People who are low in political information can be more persuadable,”

“If you get someone that’s watching ‘[Keeping Up With] the Kardashians,’ and they’re a swing voter, and see one or two ads,” that could make the difference because that ad may be the only political information they digest.

Sometimes I wonder if “1-man, 1-vote” is overrated …

>> Latest Posts

Give me a large pepperoni pizza … with a touch of ObamaCare

September 18, 2012

Punch line: Papa Johns CEO has taken a stand against Obamacare, and announced that the popular pizza delivery chain will pass the increased cost of doing business on to its customers, in order to protect its shareholders.

* * * * *

Excerpted from latimes.com’s, “Papa John’s to raise pizza prices if ‘Obamacare’ survives”

la-fi-mo-papa-johns-pizza-obamacare-20120808-001

Get ready to pay more for your Papa John’s pizza if “Obamacare” goes into full effect …  15 to 20 cents more.

John Schnatter, chief executive of the pizza chain, is bashing President Obama’s healthcare reform law as a policy that will force the company to choose between its customers and its investors.  And if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act rolls out as planned in 2014, Schnatter’s strategy is “of course … to pass that cost on the consumer in order to protect our shareholders’ best interest,” he said in a recent conference call.

Schnatter estimates that the legislation will cost Papa John’s about 11 cents to 14 cents per pizza, which equates to 15 cents to 20 cents per order.

“We’re not supportive of Obamacare like most businesses in our industry but our business model and unit economics are about as ideal as you can get for a food company to absorb Obamacare,” Schnatter said. “Ergo, we have a high ticket average with extremely high frequency of order counts, millions of pizzas per year.”

On Twitter, reactions were mostly negative.  “*switches to Pizza Hut*,” wrote one user. “*calls Dominoes*,” wrote another.  “I really wish businesses would stay out of politics,” tweeted user mikedavis824.

The National Restaurant Assn. has criticized the healthcare legislation for having a chilling effect on expansion and hiring in the industry, which tends to be labor-intensive and burdened with thin margins.  Chains such as White Castle and Burger King have predicted surging costs due to the new regulations, which require businesses with 50 or more full-time employees to offer healthcare to such workers and their dependents.

Unsurprisingly, Papa John’s chief is a big fan of Mitt Romney. Schnatter recently even hosted a private fundraiser for the Republican presidential candidate at his mansion in Anchorage, Ky.  Romney was dazzled by the grounds, declaring to guests: “Who would’ve imagined pizza could build this. This is really something. Don’t you love this country? What a home this is, what grounds these are, the pool, the golf course…. This is a real tribute to America, to entrepreneurship.”

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Re: Woodward’s book … save your $$$ … here’s my synopsis.

September 17, 2012

Given Woodward’s rep,  the pre-release hype, and anticipation of some good dirt on Obama …. I downloaded the Kindle version as soon as it became available.

image

I thought it was tedious with relatively little new news … reminded me of most movies: all the good parts are in the 2-minute trailer … rest of the movie is filler.

The broad theme – wisely reported —  is that Obama is clueless re: how big organizations run, what  a CEO does, how a CEO should act, and generally, how to implement ideas.

That shouldn’t surprise anybody since Obama  hadn’t run anything before becoming President, hadn’t been exposed to any effective big organization leaders and openly despises CEOS (except the late great Steve Jobs and Warren “Please Tax Me More” Buffett).

Verizon CEO Seidenberg “worried that Obama did not appreciate the importance of business. Sure, he understood it intellectually, but did he really admire the guts and instincts that made corporations succeed, hire workers, and grow America?” 

Here’s what caught my eye …

* * * * *

Obama is broadly disrespected by Congressional leaders (both House and Senate, both parities) … and his own staff.

  • Boehner ignored phone calls from Obama …  and hated “ …going down to the White House to listen to what amounted to presidential lectures.”
  • Pelosi hit the mute button and kept working when Obama would call and pontificate
  • Reid allowed a staffer to dress down the President for not having a plan … and confidentially encouraged GOPers
  • Staffers (e.g. Summers, Orzag) observed “no adult in charge” … “It was increasingly clear that no one was running Washington. That was trouble for everyone, but especially for Obama.”
  • Van Hollen: “The administration didn’t seem to have a strategy. It was unbelievable. There didn’t seem to be any core principles.”

Ken’s Take: I was a bit surprised that even Dems  think he’s a tool … they buy in to his ideology, hoped his charisma would make him a good front man – but have been disappointed, and are left trying to cover for his inadequacies.

* * * * *
Woodward presents a comparatively favorable picture of Dems: Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Van Hollen

  • Biden is presented as a savvy legislative pro who builds relationships and tries to work towards solutions … not the bungler he plays in public … McConnell: “ … a man I’ve come to respect as a straight-shooting negotiator.”
  • Reid and Pelosi come across as more thoughtful than their public personas …  effective leaders of their caucuses … cagey working the back channels with GOP leaders … generally trusted by GOP despite policy disagreements.
  • Van Hollen gets points for being a details man re: policy who’s willing to pitch and defend his points

* * * * *
Obama fails at basic CEO stuff … much like a freshly-minted MBA whose first job is running GE … 
 “When you don’t know what you don’t know, it gets you in big trouble.”

  • Disrespects people and their ideas and then expects them to support his ideas … “The polls are pretty good for me right now.”, “Do you think Ronald Reagan sat here like this?”, “I won, you lost”, “This isn’t negotiable” … surprised when folks don’t rally for him when he’s in a bind … “when you need friends, it’s too late to make them.”
  • Unable to separate the important from the incidental … “All we were going to do was nick everybody and irritate everybody and not accomplish anything.”
  • “There was no agility in the White House, no ability to get organized and move fast on critical issues”
  • Absolutely no comprehension of the difficulty of syndicating and implementing decisions … thinks agreements in meeting are the end, not the beginning of the process.
  • “Obama had no chief operating officer, no COO to implement his decisions.” … (you know, a Dick Cheney or Hillary Clinton)
  • Poor staffing choices … goes for comfort level over effectiveness … only yes-men need apply … notice how the entire economic team has turned over?
  • No structure or processes … “Any good manager, any good leader, has a team around him and a structure around him for making things work and making things happen. I never got the slightest clue that there was a structure there.” … ”The place [White House] is dysfunctional.”
  • No contingency planning … no anticipation of 2nd order effects … no Plan Bs
  • Poor negotiation skills … Coburn: “it showed how inexperienced a negotiator Obama was.”
  • No sell-in of ideas … just brute force … expects the power of his idea to carry the the day … Cantor: ”… not on the same page, not in the same book, or even the same library.”
  • Poor communications …“Most extraordinary was the repeated use of the telephone for critical exchanges. Especially baffling was President Obama’s decision to make his critical request for $ 400 billion more in revenue in a spur-of-the-moment phone call. The result was a monumental communications lapse between the key parties”
  • Poor listening skills … “Obama talked, then seemed to listen — but … was really just waiting to talk again, to make his points, to win the argument.”
  • “The president talks a good game, but when it comes time to actually putting these issues on the table, making decisions, he can’t quite pull the trigger.”
  • “How badly the White House had played what should have been a winning hand.”
  • “It was a failure of presidential leadership. He was not Reagan. He was not Clinton.”
  • “Obama really doesn’t have the joy of the game.”

* * * * *
Obama was (and is) is totally obsessed with 2 things …

  • Getting re-elected … e.g. Pushing big decisions past the 2012 election
  • Raising taxes on the top 2% … seems to be his driving mission in life

Ken’s Take:  Does Obama really think the world will change much if and when he gets his white whale?

* * * * *
A few Congressional and business leaders mused: “We were here before him and we’ll be here after him”  … 

  • Implication #1: We’ll have to live with this stuff when he’s gone … “Whatever the Congress decided could be undone by a future Congress anyhow.”
  • Implication #2: All we have to do is drag our feet and outlast him … “Guys like me can hunker down and wait you out.”

* * * * *
Best Teaching Point

Barney Frank’s advice to Paul Ryan:

Ryan sat down at one point with Representative Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat known for his biting wit and powerful intellect.

Though they were ideological opposites, Frank gave him what Ryan considered the best advice he got about how to be an effective congressman.

Be a specialist, Frank told him, not a generalist.

Focus on one set of issues.

Get on the committee that you care about, and then learn more about the topic than anybody else.

Talk to all the experts you can find … and read everything you can.

Know these things inside and out.

* * * * *
Some factoids

  • Internal Revenue Service data shows that the current tax system produces about 85 to 86 percent of what it’s supposed to … i.e. 15% non-compliance
  • 51 percent of all federal employees, including uniformed military, were at the Department of Defense.
  • Pell college grants, a Democratic and Obama favorite aimed at assisting college students, because the annual cost was now more than $ 20 billion.

* * * * *
Some random snippets

  • Golf, a game of recovery. A bad or unlucky shot wasn’t fatal. Follow it up with a good second or third shot, and you could still find yourself on the green with a chance at par, or even better. .
  • Politics meant sitting across the table from people you might not like or who were annoying. Keeping cool was essential.

* * * * *
Final note:  Woodward’s book would have been a big deal last week … Woodward caught a bad break since the Libya assassination and mid-East uprisings pushed his book out of the news coverage … .

>> Latest Posts

Top 5% says: “Thank you, Ben” … bottom 95%, not so much.

September 17, 2012

Punch line: Quantitative easing – pumping money into the economy – helps the top 5% who have most of their net worth in stocks & bonds … but does little to help the average man on the street … especially if he doesn’t have a job.

From the Washington Post:

:It is remarkable, really, that Democrats defend the Obama economy by pointing to the rise in the stock market since the president took office.

The Dow Jones was at 8,279.63 when Barack Obama took office. It’s now over 13,500, boast the Democrats.

Swell, the Wall Street crowd rakes it in and the rest of the country is setting records for unemployment, poverty and food-stamp use.

Imagine if the Republicans made such an argument. If a Republican were in office, the left would holler that this is a jobless recovery.

image

Insightful analysis by Robert Frank of CNBC

Last month, the Bank of England issued a report that must have made Fed chairman Ben Bernanke squirm.

It said that the Bank of England’s policies of quantitative easing – similar to the Fed’s – had benefited mainly the wealthy.

Specifically, it said that its QE program had boosted the value of stocks and bonds by 26 percent … and that about 40 percent of those gains went to the richest 5 percent of British households.

The latest round of QE announced by  Bernanke yesterday has sparked growing controversy about how Fed policy has mainly helped the wealthiest Americans.

One economist says QE “is fundamentally a regressive redistribution program that has been boosting wealth for those already engaged in the financial sector or those who already own homes, but passing little along to the rest of the economy.”

The reason is simple. QE drives up the prices of assets, especially financial assets. And most of the financial assets in America are owed by the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans.

According to Fed data, the top 5 percent own 60 percent of the nation’s individually held financial assets. They own 82 percent of the individually held stocks and more than 90 percent of the individually held bonds.

[Thanks to the first two rounds of quantitative easing] the wealthy quickly recovered much of their wealth as stocks doubled in value.

But the rest of the country, which depends on houses and jobs for their wealth, remained stuck in recession.

Most Americans have most of their wealth tied up in their houses (about 50 percent for most).

For the top 5 percent, homes account for only 10 percent of wealth, while financial assets account for between one third and 40 percent.

By boosting the value of financial assets, Fed has helped the economy of Richistan but not the broader United States.

Despite lowered rates, banks remain strict on lending, restricting access to credit for most Americans. The wealthy and the asset-rich, however, will now enjoy even lower rates on their credit.

Low interest rates also penalize savers, and while the wealthy as a group have the largest savings pool in America, they have only about 13 percent of their investible assets in cash, and the rest (more than 85 percent) in stocks, bonds, alternative investments and mutual funds – all of which have benefited from easing.

The critical  question, though, is whether putting more profits into the hands of the top 5 percent will really generate jobs for the rest of America. So far, the evidence is not promising.

Trust your intuition, ladies …

September 17, 2012

According to a study reported in LiveScience, a bride’s cold feet at the wedding altar is a strong predictor of divorce.

image

When researchers asked the newlyweds, “Were you ever uncertain or hesitant about getting married?”

  • 47% of husbands answered “yes,”
  • 38% of wives said “yes”

While men were more likely to have cold feet, their wives’ reservations better predicted future problems.

Newlywed wives who had doubts about getting married before their wedding were two-and-a-half times more likely to divorce four years later than wives without these doubts.

In 36 percent of couples, both partners said they had no doubts before the wedding, and of those, just 6 percent got divorced by the four-year mark.

Among couples in which the wife or both spouses reported premarital doubts, 20 percent got divorced.

“Do the doubts  go away when you have a mortgage and two kids? Don’t count on that.”

>> Latest Posts

Encore: Why the market goes up when the Fed “quantitatively eases” …

September 14, 2012

Yesterday Bernanke announced another (and apparently infinite) round of quantitative easing … that is, substantially increasing the amount of money in circulation

The stated logic: keep interest rates low so that businesses and prospective homeowners borrow.

The cynical interpretation: 56 days until election … Obama stands by Bernanke … Mitt says he’s fire him

The immediate impact: stock jumped over 200 points.

Why?

There’s a strong link between the supply of money and stock prices.

More money => lower interest rates +> higher comparative returns from stocks => higher stock prices.

That is, until inflation kicks in and borrows face higher rates …

* * * * *

Here’s an archived post that gives more detail:

Back about 40 years ago, an economist-wannabe co-authored a study in the Journal of Finance titled “The Supply of Money and Common Stock Prices”.

image

The article summarized an econometric study that demonstrated a tight link between the amount of money floating around and, on a slightly time-delayed basis, the price of stocks.

OK, fast forward to today.

Now, when the Feds expand the money supply, it’s called “Quantitative Easing” … or QE, for short.

Recently, Jason Trennert of Strategas Research Partners published a revealing chart that visually relates stock prices (the S&P 500) to the recent periods of quantitative easing.

Hmmm.

Looks like the supply of money and common stock prices are still related.

Partially explains why the Dow is over 13,000 despite a sluggish and uncertain economy.

image

>> Latest Posts

How many Tea Partiers voted for Obama?

September 14, 2012

According to pollsters Rasmussen & Schoen in their book “Mad as Hell … …

A significant number of self-identified Tea Party supporters —20 to 30 percent, depending on the poll — voted for Obama,

To put hat number in context:

  • A February 20, 2010, Economist/YouGov poll found that one in five Americans identify themselves as being part of the Tea Party movement.
  • Approximately 35 percent of the electorate self-identifies as Tea Party “supporters.

* * * * *

Source: Rasmussen, Scott; Schoen, Doug,
Mad As Hell (pp. 44, 219, 220).
Harper Collins, Kindle Edition.

image

>> Latest Posts

MBA applicants declining … more $$$ for top students and minorities.

September 14, 2012

Punch line: Top US business schools are reporting single and double digit applicant decline, making admission easier for candidates.  After years of applicant increases, admissions offices explain the trend by tough competition – with cheaper and more convenient programs, and ramped up efforts from 2nd tier schools. 

image

* * * * *

Excerpted from businessweek.com’s, “At Top Business Schools, an MBA Application Drought.”

In the last few weeks, a handful of top business schools have reported single-digit, and in some cases double-digit, declines in applications for their full-time MBA classes, including most recently Columbia Business School and New York University’s Stern School of Business.

Full-time MBA applications have sunk at at least a dozen of the top 30 B-schools.

Among the schools that have reported declines are the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, the Yale School of Management and Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business (down 3.5 percent, 9.5 percent, and 7 percent, respectively).

A handful of schools reported even steeper drops, including Michigan State University’s Broad College of Business, where applications fell 18 percent, and Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business, with a significant dip of nearly 21 percent.

The decline in applications is attributed to increased competition from rival business schools and a plethora of available choices, including part-time and online programs.

Second-tier schools are working more aggressively to recruit top MBA candidates and entice them with hefty financial aid packages.  “…employer sponsorship for full-time MBA programs is almost nonexistent, and doing an MBA part-time or online can be an attractive offer for some students, especially when there is funding available.

With a smaller pool of MBA applicants, getting an offer to a top business school has become slightly easier … To meet their target enrollment for this year’s incoming MBA class, schools had to work harder to ensure admitted students accepted their offers. For many of those schools, that extra push paid off. Yield was up at nine of the 13 schools on which information was available.

This year, competition was especially stiff for women, underrepresented minorities, and students from nontraditional work backgrounds, says Liz Riley Hargrove at Fuqua. “It was just a really competitive environment, and I think it impacted everybody’s yield this year,” she says.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Sorry, but the BLS streak continues …

September 14, 2012

I promise that I’ll stop writing about BLS reporting bias when the streak ends.

Now we’re up to 78 out of 79 weeks — and, at least 19 election season weeks in a row — that the BLS’s “headline number” has under-reported the number of initial unemployment claims … and cast the jobs situation as brighter than it really is.

Based on Thursday’s BLS report, the number for the week ending Sept. 1 was revised upward from 365,000 to 367,000.

In itself, the 2,000 isn’t a big deal.

But, in context it is

Again, I ask: statistical bias or political bias?

If the former: fix it already, BLS.

Hint to BLS: just add 2k or 3k … or .8% to your prelim forecast !

image

* * * * *

And, oh yeah, the initial jobless claims increased by 15,000 … above the consensus estimates … and consistent with an unemployment rate higher than 8.1%.

image

>> Latest Posts

Some people just shouldn’t vote!

September 13, 2012

Sometimes I scratch my head and wonder whether “one man, one vote” makes sense.

Polls routinely reveal that a majority of Americans have marginal knowledge of government, politics, and political issues.

Try this: ask folks to explain the difference between the Federal deficit and the Federal debt … ask them where the money money that funds, say unemployment benefits, comes from.

Jason Brennan is a young prof at MSB … his research is at the nexus of ethics and politics.

He has written an insightful book called The Ethics of Voting

image

The essence of Jason’s argument is that all adult citizens have the right to vote … but that they shouldn’t exercise that right unless they are informed, rational, and aiming for the common good.

More specifically, he argues:

“If a citizen has a right to vote, this means at minimum that she ought to be permitted to vote — no one should stop her or deprive her of the vote — and that her vote must be counted.

However, if citizens do vote, they must vote well, on the basis of sound evidence for what is likely to promote the common good.

That is, in general, they must vote for the common good rather than for narrow self-interest.

Citizens who lack the motive, knowledge, rationality, or ability to vote well should abstain from voting.

Some voters are well informed about what candidates are likely to do.

They know what policies candidates endorse and whether the candidates are sincere.

They know the track records and general trends of different political parties.

Other voters are ignorant of such things.

Another way voters vary is in their degree of rationality .

Some voters are scrupulously rational, while others are irrational.

Some have patently stupid beliefs.

[Some citizens] are politically engaged, but they are nonetheless often ignorant of or misinformed about the relevant facts or, worse, are simply irrational.

Though they intend to promote the common good, they all too often lack sufficient evidence to justify the policies they advocate.

When they do vote, I argue, they pollute democracy with their votes and make it more likely that we will have to suffer from bad governance.”

* * * * *

Ken’s Take: An interesting perspective that has been constantly on my mind during this election cycle.

At least read the sample chapter … book is available in paperback at Amazon.

>> Latest Posts

I was struck by a Volt of lightning …

September 13, 2012

What are the odds?

I actually (not virtually, actually) passed a Chevy Volt on the road

Note that “I passed” not “I was passed by”

image

Again I ask, what are the odds?

Well, according to the Detroit News, there have been about 16,000 Volts sold from its birth to date.

Note: about 2,000 have been bought by the gov’t and GE – pandering to the Feds

According to the Dept. of Transportation, There are about 250 million registered vehicles in the U.S.

So, the statistical likelihood of the next car I pass being a Volt is about .0064% … or, less than 1 in 15,000, given the geographic distribution of Volts. 

According to the NOAA, the odds of being struck by lighting in your lifetime are 1 in 10,000.

Hmmm.

* * * * *

Side Note

Reuters reports that nearly two years after the introduction of Volt, GM is still losing as much as $49,000 on each one it builds

It currently costs GM “at least” $75,000 to build the Volt,

According to experts, GM’s basic problem is that “the Volt is over-engineered and over-priced,”

Weak sales are forcing GM to idle the Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant that makes the Chevrolet Volt for four weeks starting September 17

>> Latest Posts

Which states’ residents are most impacted by Obama’s plan to raise taxes on the rich?

September 12, 2012

This may be common knowledge, but it was a surprise to me …

Based on the 2009 census data (latest available), just under 4% of U.S. households have income greater than $200,000.

Below are the 20 states with the highest proportion of households with incomes greater than $200,000 … led by DC, Connecticut, New Jersey and Maryland (a suburb of DC).

The interesting part:

15 of the states (or 16 depending on how you count Colorado) are Blue- Democratic states

… only 3 are Red-Republican states

… 2 are Purple-Swing states.

Hmmm.

image

>> Latest Posts

Obama’s problem with men …

September 12, 2012

Lots of media coverage re: Romney’s “problem “ with women … less about Obama’s man problem.

According to the latest CNN poll, Romney-Ryan trails Obama-Biden by 12 points among women … 42% to 54%.

But, the numbers flip for men ,,, with Romney-Ryan leading by 12 points … 55% to 43%.

Hmmm.

image

>> Latest Posts

You can slip into these sneaks for about $300 … deal or no deal?

September 12, 2012

Punch line: How do you market a pair of $300-plus sneakers? If you’re Nike, you just do it quietly. And by acting like you’re not marketing them at all.

image

* * * * *

Excerpted from Advertising Age, “Nike’s $300 Shoe Has the Marketing Built Right In”

Nike found itself in another controversy this week when news surfaced that it’s planning its most-expensive sneaker ever: the uber expensive LeBron X …

As the Swoosh is no stranger to controversy it is poised to combat the backlash through:

  1. Counterattack: The athletic giant hasn’t said what the final price will be for the shoe but it ripped the $315 price tag quoted by the WSJ as “inaccurate.”
  2. Word of mouth: Instead of expensive ads, Nike’s relying on word-of-mouth to build anticipation. The result: the buzz from athletes and sneaker blogs has helped score stories in every major media outlet.
  3. Product placement: Nike had the placement of all placements when millions of NBC TV viewers watched LeBron wear the shoes while leading the U.S. men’s basketball team to the gold medal in London.

 

One of the strongest selling features for shoes like the LeBron X is that they’re not for everybody.

In fact, Nike will only make 25,000 to 50,000 pairs which is expected to drive up prices and demand.

Edited by JDC

>> Latest Posts

In total, how much do Americans pay in taxes? For what? To whom?.

September 11, 2012

Americans pay a tad over $5 trillion in taxes to the Feds, States and Local Governments.

Technical note: In government parlance, the taxes are called “revenue”.

By taxing authority

Drilling down, the $5 trillion is split roughly 50%-30%-20% to the Feds, States and Locals, respectively

image

* * * * *

By type of tax

Roughly 1/3 of the $5 trillion is income taxes individual and corporate)

about 1/4 is ad valorem taxes (think sales and property taxes)

just under 1/5 are social insurance (i.e. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid)

… slightly more than 1/5 are fees and charges (think tolls, business licenses)

image

* * * * *

Income taxes

Roughly 1/3 of the $5 trillion – about $1.8 trillion — is income taxes

…  83.4% are individual income taxes; only 16.6% are corporate income taxes

… about 80% of income taxes go to the Feds; around 20% goes to the States & Locals

image

* * * * *

Ad-valorem taxes

Roughly 1/4 of the $5 trillion in total taxes paid – about $1.2 trillion – is ad-valorem taxes – taxes paid based on the value of something bought or owned.

…  about 40% of ad-valorem taxes are Local property taxes

…  about 1/3 are Sales Taxes …  going mostly to the States

image

* * * * *

Social Insurance

Roughly 1/5 of the $5 trillion in total taxes paid – about $961 billion – is social insurance – with about 80% going to the Feds

…  roughly 60% of the social insurance payments going to the Feds is for Social Security

…  almost 1/4 of the social insurance payments going to the Feds is for Medicare.

image

* * * * *

Pulling it all together Ken’s Rosetta Stone of Taxes

All the details — now much? to whom? for what?

Click for a PDF: Ken’s Rosetta Stone of Taxes

image

PDF          Data Source

>> Latest Posts

How to think like a rich guy …

September 11, 2012

Steve Siebold, author of “How Rich People Think,” spent nearly three decades interviewing millionaires around the world to find out what separates them from everyone else.

“It had little to do with money itself, he told Business Insider. It was about their mentality.”

image

Here are my favorites from his 21 Ways that Rich People Think Differently:

3. Average people have a lottery mentality. Rich people have an action mentality.

“While the masses are waiting to pick the right numbers and praying for prosperity, the great ones are solving problems”

4. Average people think the road to riches is paved with formal education. Rich people believe in acquiring specific knowledge.

“Many world-class performers have little formal education, and have amassed their wealth through the acquisition and subsequent sale of specific knowledge.”

5. Average people long for the good old days. Rich people dream of the future.

“People who believe their best days are behind them rarely get rich, and often struggle with unhappiness and depression.”

7. Average people earn money doing things they don’t love. Rich people follow their passion.

“To the average person, it looks like the rich are working all the time … But one of the smartest strategies of the world class is doing what you love and finding a way to get paid for it.”

8. Average people set low expectations so they’re never disappointed. Rich people are up for the challenge.

“No one would ever strike it rich and live their dreams without huge expectations.”

12. Average people live beyond their means. Rich people live below theirs.

“The rich live below their means, not because they’re so savvy” … but because they can … and they do!

15. Average people would rather be entertained than educated. Rich people would rather be educated than entertained.

“The rich appreciate the power of learning long after college is over … Walk into a wealthy person’s home and one of the first things you’ll see is an extensive library of books they’ve used to educate themselves on how to become more successful … The middle class reads novels, tabloids and entertainment magazines.”

click for the full list

Thanks to CH for feeding the lead

>> Latest Posts

Maybe sex doesn’t sell … yeah, right.

September 11, 2012

Punch line: Sex no longer sells for traditional teen retailer Abercrombie & Fitch. 

Faced with new consumers who want unique, affordable fashion, the clothing giant is seeing sales decline and shutting down US stores. 

* * * * *

Excerpted from Businessweek, “At Abercrombie & Fitch, Sex No Longer Sells

A&F

Abercrombie & Fitch’s skin-filled ads and nightclub vibe once delighted American teenagers and infuriated parents.

Today, many aren’t even paying attention.

The once-edgy retailer has lost a third of its market value in the past year as it grapples with falling sales in Europe and the U.S.

While Abercrombie blames the economy for its woes, brand consultants say it also has failed to change with the times.

Today’s teens are underwhelmed by the half-naked models and blaring, dimly lit stores.

They’re also less inclined to wear Abercrombie’s longtime uniform of pricey denim and graphic T-shirts.

Sales at non-U.S. stores open at least a year plunged 26 percent in the second quarter.

Abercrombie shuttered 71 U.S. stores in its most recent fiscal year, and in February said it will close another 180 through 2015.

Today’s teens are “radically different” from other generations … and have a bevy of options thanks to the boom in fast fashion from Forever 21 and H&M. 

Abercrombie is “positioned well to take advantage of this group’s desire to be rebellious and indie and different, because that’s what the brand is about … but right now the product mix doesn’t communicate that or facilitate it.”

Edit by BJP

With dismal job growth, how did the unemployment rate drop to 8.1%?

September 10, 2012

The August employment report was expectedly dismal, but equivocal in that  it gave both parties data points to selectively highlight.

First, the BLS Establishment Survey reported that 96,000 jobs were added … that’s good since it’s a positive number.

But, there was a decline in “goods producing jobs” – i.e. manufacturing … and the 96,000 is below the the 125,000 level that is commonly held as the number required to keep pace with population growth and keep the unemployment rate constant.

image

* * * * *

Nonetheless, the reported unemployment rate went down to 8.1%.

How can that be?

Good question since the Employment reported from the Household Survey – the basis of the 8.1% calculation – declined by 119,000.

image

* * * * *

Now, stop and think about that for a second.

The Establishment Survey said 96,000 jobs were added.

The Household Survey said employment dropped by 119,000.

Yet the unemployment rate went down – from 8.3% to 8.1%.

Hmmm. How can that be?

Well, 368,000 people dropped out of the labor force – stopped looking for work – either retired, became disabled, or simply kicked back on unemployment benefits.

If they hadn’t quit looking for work, they would have been counted as unemployed … and the reported unemployment rate would have been 8.33% – up more than .1% from 8.25% last month

The puts a whole new paint job on things, right?

image

* * * * *

The number of folks dropping out of the labor market is a big deal … since the magnitude is big and the trend is bad – especially this year.

 

image

* * * * *

The KEY METRIC

To consolidate all of the above “stuff” into a single metric, I like to look at the employment-to-population ratio … what % of adults who are employed.

The employment-to-population ratio is now at 58.3% … meaning that 41.7% of adults AREN’T employed … that’s a big number !

Note that the employment-to-population ratio hovered around 63% during most of the Bush years … then collapsed during the financial crisis … dropping a 5 points … and then hovering around the lower level.

image

* * * * *

While the employment-to-population ratio looks like it’s “hovering”, look at the past couple of months … it has dropped by .5%.

That may sound like rounding error, but multiply it times the working age population … and you get over 1.2 million fewer people employed.

Ouch.  That’s not rounding error!

 

image

Bottom line: we’re stalled !

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Key data source

image

>> Latest Posts

Encore: “It is important not to read too much into any one monthly report” … unless the data is good.

September 10, 2012

Team Obama’s reaction to last week’s dismal jobs report was quite predictable:

“It is important not to read too much into any one monthly report”

Why predictable?

Because it’s EXACTLY the same thing they say whenever the jobs numbers are bad.

Below is an encore post … a stroll down memory lane …

Question: Is it ok to read something into, say, 42 jobs reports?

* * * * *

What are you going to believe, the facts or our rhetoric?

Reported by Chris Moody of Yahoo News

When the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the nation’s latest national employment last week, the Obama administration stressed that people should not “read too much” into the data.

Mitt Romney’s campaign pounced, and flagged the fact that the White House has repeated that same line nearly every month since November 2009.

See below for the roundup of articles from WhiteHouse.gov that Romney’s campaign posted on its site. In many of the posts, the authors for the administration do acknowledge that they repeat themselves:

June 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is informative to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”

May 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”

April 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”

March 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.” (LINK:)

February 2012: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign.”

January 2012: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign.”

December 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

November 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

October 2011: “The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and employment estimates are subject to substantial revision. There is no better example than August’s jobs figure, which was initially reported at zero and in the latest revision increased to 104,000. This illustrates why the Administration always stresses it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

September 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

August 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

July 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

June 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

May 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

April 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

March 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

February 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

January 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

December 2010: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

November 2010: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

October 2010: “Given the volatility in monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

September 2010: “Given the volatility in the monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”

July 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative. It is essential that we continue our efforts to move in the right direction and replace job losses with robust job gains.”

August 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

June 2010: “As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

May 2010: “As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

April 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

March 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

January 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

November 2009: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”

In other words, it’s important not to read too much into the Obama administration’s past 3-1/2 years of performance.

So much for accountability …

Thanks to SMH for feeding the lead

>> Latest Posts

To spur innovation, hire people who agitate you …

September 10, 2012

Punch line: Nearly 66% of companies on the Fortune 100 list in 1990 are not on the list today.

Why?

It is largely because they didn’t innovate and open themselves up to their next market.

* * * * *

Excerpted from Fast Company, “Why Hiring People Who Annoy You Helps You Innovate”

So are there ways for large, established companies to innovate?

Yes and here are some unconventional guidelines to follow.

1. Hire people who annoy you:

image

A lot of research shows that diverse teams tend to come up with a wider variety of answers, and, thus, are more likely to find the surprising winning idea.

This suggests a hiring strategy–hire people who annoy you.

As long as you’re ensuring they are smart, the people who annoy you represent the diversity you and your company require.

2. Don’t copy, remake:

There is an entire cottage industry devoted to teaching you how to be innovative.

Most answers are glib because they point to some surface feature of a behavior.

3. Don’t create, listen:

The purpose of innovation is not simply to build something new, but to win new customers, new markets, or new products …

If you want to find out what customers want, nix the focus groups and instead watch their behavior.

Edited by JDC
>> Latest Posts