Archive for October, 2012

Mixed signals from Gallup …

October 19, 2012

OK, we know I’m rooting for Mitt … so I like the “horse race” reporting that he leads Obama by 7 points and has a majority.

But … and it’s a big but … that measure doesn’t seem to sync with Gallup’s daily Presidential Approval survey … which has Obama at 50% approval.

So, 50% approve of the job he’s doing, but only 44% are going to vote for him?

Can be rationalized that some folks think Obama is doing a good job but that Mitt would do a better job … but that’s a stretch.

Gallup changed its approval methodology when they got poked by Axlerod and threatened by Holder & the DOJ … immediately after the methodology changed, Obama’s approval numbers improved.

I can’t decode whether Gallup changed the horse race survey methods, too.

Bottom line: results are very curious.

I’d be feeling more relaxed if the approval and election numbers were in sync.

 

image

 

image

>> Latest Posts

A post-debate head scratcher..

October 19, 2012

As we predicted, Libya monopolized the airwaves yesterday.

Most of the chatter had to do with whether Crowley was proper injecting herself into the debate as an arbiter of fact … and whether she had the facts right.

With regards to the latter point, it was widely reported that Pres. Obama approached the town hall questioner and fessed up that he hadn’t called it a terrorist attack.

According to the Washington Post:

“After the debate, the president came over  and spent about two minutes with me privately,” says 61-year-old Kelly Ladka.

According to Ladka, Obama gave him ”more information about why he delayed calling the attack a terorist attack.”

For background, Obama did apparently lump Benghazi into a reference to “acts of terror” in a Sept. 12 Rose Garden address. However, he spent about two weeks holding off on using the full “terrorist” designation.

The rationale for the delay, Obama explained to Ladka, was to make sure that the “intelligence he was acting on was real intelligence and not disinformation,” recalls Ladka.

Mr. Ladka popped up on most cable networks yesterday repeating the story.

One anchor pumped Mr. Ladka re: who he was going to vote for.

Ladka described the anxiety he faced as an undecided voter – he wasn’t sure – and, he knew it was an important election.

Then it dawned on me … the dude lives in New York.

His vote doesn’t matter one iota since Obama will landslide New York.

Which raises another question: why the heck was the town hall of undecided voters held in New York, instead of Ohio or another swing state?

Maybe it’s more evidence that the questioners were mere props for the event.

>> Latest Posts

Stainless steel is so yesterday …

October 19, 2012

According to the WSJ

This may be the end of a 25-year run for stainless steel kitchen appliances.

Stainless has been the big word in kitchen appliances for years … in part because it’s durable and versatile.

But, there is a growing sense that stainless steel’s popularity is running into overtime … that it  has outworn its welcome

What’s next?

image

Major manufacturers are placing bets on different potential successors to the shiny, upscale appliance finish

Whirlpool — the world’s largest home-appliance maker — says “White is the new stainless.”

Upscale Wolf Appliance says “Black is the new stainless steel.”

GE is betting on a metallic matte finish it calls “slate.”

Figuring that cost-conscious consumers aren’t likely to replace all their appliances at once, GE’s  new finish complements the stainless steel, white or black appliances already found in consumers’ kitchens.

“Not every consumer is ready to completely change out their kitchen appliances … They don’t see the need to swap that expensive range they bought a year ago.”

Ken’s Take:  I’ve oft told Mrs. H. that if we waited long enough, our appliances would be back “in” … I feel vindicated.

>> Latest Posts

The business of business books … for the author.

October 19, 2012

Punch line: “Books aren’t designed for you, the customer. Today, non-fiction books are business cards–for speaking, consulting, and deals.”

image

Excerpted from Fast Company

Books are no longer simply books, they are branding devices and credibility signals — not to mention the reason their authors command large speaking or consulting fees.

“Books aren’t designed for you, the customer. Today, non-fiction books are business cards–for speaking, consulting, and deals.”

Faced with declining sales and the disappearance of book retailers like Borders, authors have diversified their income streams, and many make substantially more money through new business generated by a book, rather than from it.

Today, authors are in the idea-making business, not the book business.

In short, this means that publishing a book is less about sales and much more about creating a brand.

The real customers of books are no longer just readers but now include speaking agents, CEOs, investors, and startups.

One author: “I’ve been successful in the speaking market, which is much more lucrative than writing.”

Conferences look to authors with interesting ideas to spice up their events.

“We love to invite writers because they are born storytellers … you get a great show.”

* * * * *
Factoids

A figure commonly thrown around in publishing is that close to half of all books are ghostwritten.

If that seems high to you, consider that a recent survey found that 42% of academic medical papers are ghostwritten.

>> Latest Posts

Hoisted by their own pitards … BLS unemployment claims are in.

October 18, 2012

Last week, Team Obama was crowing about the huge drop in initial unemployment claims … proof poitive that the recovery was gaining steam.

They failed to mention the fact that the state of California sat on a pile of claims … making the numbers look better than they really were.

Well, as Rev. Wright would say, the chickens have come home to roost.

According to the BLS: “In the week ending October 13, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 388,000, an increase of 46,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 342,000.”

Oops.

Headline: “Jobless claims increase 46,000”

Not exactly proof positive of an economy gaining steam.

My bet, Team Obama emphasizes that claims are overstated because of California.

Too bad.

* * * * *
And, yes … the BLS streak — understating initial claims – continued.

Now we’re up to at least 23 election season weeks in a row that the BLS’s “headline number” has under-reported the number of initial unemployment claims … and cast the jobs situation as brighter than it really is.

Based on today’s BLS report, the number for the week ending October 6  was revised upward from 339,000 to 342,000.

C’mon guys … get it right already.

image

>> Latest Posts

The “Biden Effect” …

October 18, 2012

Hot off the presses …

Gallup’s tracking has Romney up by 7 … 52% to 45%

Expect for Gallup to get calls from Axlerod and Holder …

image

The election in a nutshell … maybe jobs don’t matter as much any more!

October 18, 2012

There’s a sobering,  must read editorial in the WSJ today … Can Government Benefits Turn an Election?

Here are key points …

The federal government’s 120 means-tested programs today provide $1 trillion of benefits.

  • Unemployment insurance has stretched to 99 weeks
  • Record numbers of unemployed have qualified for disability benefits
  • Food stamps recipients have increase 40% to almost 50 million

The spending for these programs has grown 2½ times faster during the Obama presidency than in any other comparable period in American history.

To what extent might these benefits not just foster dependency but also make the economy’s performance seem less of a deciding factor in voters’ choices?

If you are concerned about your well-being and worried about a failed recovery — but getting new help from the government— do you vote for the candidate who promises more jobs or do you support the candidate who promises more government benefits?

Voters have historically set high standards and voted out incumbents not because they personally disliked them.

Rather, they’ve elected a new president because they understood the importance of a strong economy to their jobs, their income and the future prospects of their children.

Based on the economy, Mr. Obama should lose on Nov. 6. Yet it seems implausible that tens of millions of Americans who have received additional government benefits during his presidency can be completely unaffected by that largess. The election will test the relative power of private-sector aspirations and public-sector dependence.

Based on the economy, Mr. Obama should lose on Nov. 6.

Yet it seems implausible that tens of millions of Americans who have received additional government benefits during his presidency can be completely unaffected by that largess.

The election will test the relative power of private-sector aspirations and public-sector dependence.

Keep in mind that most jobs being created are relatively low paying service sector jobs … an increasing number of which are part-time … in part of duck Fed regulations and taxes (think, ObamaCare).

To get a visceral sense of the electoral “tension”, read Threats to Assassinate Romney Explode After Debate.

And, consider that an increasing number of folks feel that they are paying their fair  share (or more) with the government wasting much or most of the taxes it takes in …   what if those folks decide it’s not worth 60 hour weeks any more any more and shift into neutral?

This year’s election won’t be the end of the process … regardless of the outcome.

>> Latest Posts

Sucka Alert: It’s after 5 p.m., so the price is higher…

October 18, 2012

Excerpted from the book Pricing Segmentation and Analytics by Bodea and Ferguson

One example of using price segmentation in the price analytics process has been applied at a grocery store chain.

Previous studies have shown that consumers who shop at a grocery store after 5 p.m. on weekdays are generally less price sensitive than consumers who shop on weekdays before 5 p.m.

This finding is intuitive as the consumers who are shopping after 5 p.m. are generally working professionals who are on their way home from work and do not bother to comparison shop, while consumers who shop before 5 p.m. consist of homemakers and retired individuals who, conceivably, are more price conscious and have more time to comparison shop.

To take advantage of this knowledge, there is a grocery store chain in Texas that raises the prices of almost all items after 5 p.m. on weekdays and lowers them again before opening the next morning.

I’m a strong advocate of “dynamic pricing” but this one gives me the creeps … I’d like to be a fly on the wall when customers catch on to the pricing scheme.

>> Latest Posts

Hey, Facebook … China still doesn’t like you.

October 18, 2012

Punch line: As Facebook reaches a billion global users, the company is turning to new tactics to drive international growth.  Despite China’s firm ban on Facebook, Facebook still has opportunity in other Facebook-inclined countries.

* * * * *
Excerpted from adage.com’s, “How Facebook Will Find its Next Billion Users”

Facebook crossed the billion-user threshold last week but where it finds its next billion is a tough question, especially since the world’s largest internet market, China, is still closed to the social network.

Facebook’s mature markets are saturated. In the U.S., 61% of the 65-and-older population visited Facebook in August, while 87.3% of the 18-to-24 set did.  It’s hard to imagine those numbers getting much higher as growth has slowed to 2% a month.

by-the-numbers-facebook-reach

For Facebook, Japan qualifies as an emerging market, as does South Korea.  In Russia … the company is being upfront about its aspirations. CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent last week in Moscow, where he hosted a competition for developers to build Facebook apps tailored for the Russian market.

While it might appear that Facebook has already conquered markets such as Brazil (where it surpassed once-dominant Orkut last year) and the Philippines, millions more are likely to come online there in the next several years and will be apt to share their fellow citizens’ appetite for Facebook.

Advertising may play a part in recruiting the next billion users. Working with an agency, Facebook unveiled its first brand ad last week. The ad … was made for existing users, but also contains a message for nonusers, even without a distinct call to action.  Facebook noted the purpose of the ad isn’t to promote growth.

Facebook plans to distribute the spot using its own ad products, and the 13 markets selected shed some light on where the company thinks its next billion users could be, even if it’s not being overt in its messaging. The ad will be promoted in the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Mexico and India, as well as in what Facebook hopes are markets fueling future growth: Indonesia, the Philippines, Brazil, Japan and Russia.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Bam’s puny $6+ million pension …

October 17, 2012

President Obama drew guffaws during the date by jabbing Romney for having a bigger pension.

You know, kind of a reverse guy’s  “big thing” contest.

According to CNBC, Obama’s pension isn’t exactly teeny-weeny … and, we tax payers get to pay for it.

Pension Envy: Who Has More — Obama or Romney? 

When it comes to the presidential candidates’ pensions, size matters in more ways than one.

As president, he will receive $191,300 annually for life — win or lose in next month’s election — and receives a travel allotment as well as mailing privileges. Should Obama lose, his presidential pension kicks in immediately after leaving office.

Given that the president enjoys a normal life span, the pension allotment would be worth upwards of $6 million.

In addition, Obama may be due a nice pension for the eight years he served in the Illinois Legislature as a state senator.

Kick back, Barack

>> Latest Posts

The debate …

October 17, 2012

My morning-after thoughts, for what they’re worth …

  1. First, I didn’t learn anything … except that Obama’s 401-K has some mutual funds with foreign stocks … who cares?
  2. The town hall format was a sham … Crowley picked the questions … people were used as props — then ignored  … wonder what questions didn’t get asked?
  3. I scored the overall to Obama … but not by much … so, I wasn’t surprised by the 46 to 39 CNN instapoll
  4. Great question by one of the anchors: “did either guy help himself with the confrontational stuff?”
  5. The CNN & Fox focus groups did surprise me … CNN had undecideds in Ohio – they went 18 to 17 for Mitt … Fox had undecideds in Nevada … they went something like 24 to 4 for Mitt … logic: it’s all about the economy and Mitt won that issue.
  6. Obama neutralized the “does he want the job?” question and scored big on Libya … his team’s Libya debate strategy was well crafted and and well executed … especially when Crowley jumped in to help him … re: debate strategy”: “I’m responsible for everything that happens in my administration” – took responsibility without taking specific responsibility – that was a good play … “alQarda leadership has been decimated” – nice word-smithing – not “alQarda is on its heels” … made the Libya cover-up sound like word parsing … nicely done.
  7. My bet: the Crowley intervention will end up hurting Obama … it’s be the focus of discussion on the issue today, rather than his strong play on the issue.
  8. I agree with the focus groups that it’s all about he economy … Mitt’s riff re: “23 million looking for work, 47 million on food stamps, etc.” is damning … I thought Mitt made his economic plan sound credible (“listen, I’ve been putting together balanced budgets for decades … this guy hasn’t had a budget for 4 years”… net-net: Obama’s plan is simply tax the rich …
  9. In the CBS Instant Poll, 65% say Romney won on the issue of the economy. 34% say Obama won on the economy … that may be the story of the night.
  10. I also thought Mitt won big on energy … Obama just isn’t credible on the issue … comes across as literally tilting at windmills.
  11. Medicare-ObamaCare & Social Security are among the biggest issues … practically no discussion of them … nice job, Candy
  12.  I don’t get why such a big issue is being made of China … I can’t believe that men on the street understand the issue or care much about it.
  13. I though Mitt did a nice job re: “How are you different from Bush?” … wish Crowley had asked Obama “How are you different from Carter?”
  14. Obama’s shot re: Mitt’s taxes missed … as did Mitt’s shot at Obama for having mutual funds that invest in China …  one Nevada guy said: “whether Romney pays half as much or twice as much in taxes won’t impact my life” … that sums it up
  15. At the margins, I thought Mitt did the best he could re: immigration … the Univision line is strong “you didn’t keep your promise” … won’t move any big numbers, but may shift a point or two
  16. Obama got contraception on the table again … and, Crowley cut off Mitt’s response … so, issue will get some “war on women traction” … if this election hinges on whether law students get free condoms, we’re in big trouble.
  17. I’m curious re: why Mitt slipped in the marriage and family stuff … wasn’t accidental since it was forced in … must be something that tests well.
  18. The key number to watch is shift among the independents … both bases are revved up again.

Bottom line: no structural change in the race, Mitt’s momentum will slow some, but Mitt will still move up some in the polls.

>> Latest Posts

Electronic medical records cut costs … oops, make that raise costs.

October 17, 2012

Interesting expose In the NY Times of all places.

Punch line:

When the federal government began providing billions of dollars in incentives to push hospitals and physicians to use electronic medical and billing records, the goal was not only to improve efficiency and patient safety, but also to reduce health care costs.

But, in reality, the move to electronic health records may be contributing to billions of dollars in higher costs for Medicare, private insurers and patients by making it easier for hospitals and physicians to bill more for their services.

image

How can this be?

Simple, Watson.

First, a system can provide docs with a checklist of separately billable procedures that they might perform … ensuring a complete check-up and making sure that no billing stone is left unturned.

Second, an e-system can make it easier for doctors to “upcode” a procedure in a way to maximize reimbursement rates.

For example, when a doctor enters a billing code, the system can present him with alternative codes for very similar procedures that get higher reimbursement payments … and tell the doctor what addition work needs to be done to qualify for the higher paying code.

So, maybe just asking the patient a couple of more specific questions  may upgrade an examination from ‘simple’ to ‘ complex.  The doc can then ask the questions (or not) and check the higher paying box.

Third, an e-system makes it easy for docs to “clone” common ‘boiierplate’ findings from one patients chart to another patient’s chart … saving time and, perhaps, implying a more detailed examination.

The Times says:

As software vendors race to sell their systems to physician groups and hospitals, many are straightforward in extolling the benefits  of those systems in helping doctors increase their revenue.

In an online demonstration, one vendor promises that it “plays the level-of-service game on your behalf and beats them at their own game using their own rules.”

An expert says “What’s happening is just the problem we feared” … unintended consequences.

For the record, I think that cutting healthcare costs by reducing doctors’ pay is nuts … there is lots of waste, fraud and unnecessary expense in a grossly inefficient system.

>> Latest Posts

New from Puma: biodegradable kicks … put your $$$ where your mouth is.

October 17, 2012

Punch line: In the last few years, many companies have worked a sustainability message into their corporate mission and values statement.  For many, that’s as far as the initiative goes, but Puma is living up to the promise, and launching a new line of biodegradable shoes and apparel.

* * * * *
Excerpted from psfk.com’s, “Puma Launches Biodegradable Shoes & Apparel”

Puma has announced that it will launch a line of shoes, apparel, and accessories that are biodegradable or recyclable. Available in 2013, consumers will be able to return the products to stores for processing through the brand’s ‘Bring Me Back Program’ when they’re finished with them.

puma-biodegradable

The Puma InCycle collection shows the brand’s commitment to the environment, as it tries to help consumers reduce waste and mitigate their personal environmental footprints.

It includes:

  • Lifestyle sneaker Basket (biodegradable)
  • Puma Track Jacket (recyclable)
  • Shirts (biodegradable)
  • Backpack (recyclable)

PUMA InCycle will use biodegradable polymers, recycled polyester, and organic cotton in order to eliminate pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and other hazardous chemicals.

Puma’s CEO, Franz Koch, said, “The PUMA InCycle collection is the first step to help reduce the amounts of garbage that consumer products cause at the end of their lives. We feel that we are responsible for the environmental impact our products cause and this innovative concept in sustainability is a first step towards our long-term vision.”

Edit by BJP
>> Latest Posts

Amex offers co-branded Wal-mart prepaid card … say, what?

October 17, 2012

Punch line: Wal-Mart and American Express take aim at the traditional credit card model to offer an alternative to lower-income consumers.

The new card will expand AmEx’s customer base while offering Wal-Mart another foray into financial services.

Blubird today, platinum tomorrow … I guess.

* * * * *
Excerpted from Reuters’, “Wal-Mart, Amex team up on card for lower-income shoppers”

Walmart_bluebird-card

Wal-Mart Stores Inc and American Express Co. have teamed up to provide financial services to customers who often do not have traditional bank accounts by offering a prepaid debit card called Bluebird.

The move will give American Express … a 4,000-store gateway to tens of millions of so-called “underbanked” households and … Walmart will get to extend its mantra of “every day low prices” to yet another sphere and come closer to achieving its years-long goal of offering banking services.

The Bluebird will allow for deposits by smartphone and mobile bill paying, with no minimum balance or monthly, annual or overdraft fees, the companies said on Monday.

“Bluebird is our solution to help consumers who currently may be poorly served by traditional banking products,” said Dan Schulman of American Express. “In an era where it is increasingly ‘expensive to be poor,’ we have worked with Wal-Mart to create a financial services product that rights many of the wrongs that plague the market today.”

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

HOT: If capital gains tax rates go up 8.8%, how much will after-tax capital gains ROIs go down?

October 16, 2012

Here’s another HOT: Homa Online Tutorial …

Well, Obama says he’ll jack capital gains tax rates from 15% to 20% … and ObamaCare has a 3.8 non-payroll payroll tax on investment income starting in 2013.

So, if Obama is elected and he keeps his promise … the effective capital gains tax rate goes from 15% to 23.8% … a delta of 8.8%.

That 8.8% tax rate increase will cut after-tax capital gains ROIs.

By how much?

Answer: The pre-tax ROI times 8.8%.

In other words, the answer depends on the proportion of a stock’s value that is unrealized capital gains.

The answer isn’t intuitive and the math is a bit hairy, so let’s run thru an example ….

* * * * *
Scenario 1 – CG Tax = 15%

Assume that you bought a stock for $750 and sold it for $1,000 … netting a $250 pre-tax gain.

The pre-tax ROI is 33% … $250 divided by $750.

If the capital gains tax is 15%, you pay $37.50 in taxes … netting you, after taxes, $212.50.

The after-tax ROI is 28.3% … $212.50 divided by $750.

* * * *  *
Scenario 2 – CG Tax = 23.8%

Again assume that you bought a stock for $750 and sold it for $1,000 … netting a $250 pre-tax gain.

The pre-tax ROI is still 33% … $250 divided by $750.

If the capital gains tax is 23.8%, you pay $59.50 in taxes … netting you, after taxes, $190.50.

The after-tax ROI is 25.4% … $190.50 divided by $750.

* * * * *
The Difference

The CG-ROI @15% is 28.3%, where CG-ROI @ 15% is the Capital Gains ROI at a 15% Tax Rate.

The CG-ROI @23.8% is 25.4%, where CG-ROI @ 23.8% is the Capital Gains ROI at a 23.8% Tax Rate

The difference is 2.9% … that is, the CG-ROI dropped by 2.9 percentage points.

Note that 2.9% is equal to the pre-tax ROI (33%) times the difference in the tax rates (8.8%)

* * * * *
The generalizable answer

By math magic, the difference in after tax ROIs  are always equal to the pre-tax ROI (which varies depending on the relationship between a stock’s unrealized capital gains and its cost basis) times the difference in the tax rates (in this case, the 8.8% difference between  15% and 23.8%).

If you’re interested, click to view the math work …  if you’re not, skip to the table below.

Here’s a handy look-up table.

UR-CG are unrealized capital gains as a percentage of current stock market value.

In the above example, UR-CG equals 25% … $250 pre-tax capital gains divided by stock’s current market value $1,000 … and there’s a 2.9 percentage point drop in ROI.

As you’d expected, the greater the percentage of capital gains embedded in a stock, the greater the ROI hit if marginal tax rates go up.

image

* * * * *
So what?

I don’t give investment advice, but the numbers say that if you expect Obama to be re-elected … and if you expect him to keep his promise and jack up capital gains tax rates … and you have stocks with a high proportion of embedded capital gains … you should probably consider selling.

Technical tax note: Wash sales rules don’t apply to stocks sold at a gain … that is, you can sell them pay the capital gains taxes and immediately buy them back at a stepped-up basis (i.e. the current market price).

In a subsequent post I’ll work thru the math re: whether that makes sense.

>> Latest Posts

Limit the home mortgage interest deduction … outrageous!

October 16, 2012

Not really … and, it might come up in tonite’s debate.

First, keep in mind that 2/3’s of tax filers take the standard deduction rather than itemizing deductions … so they’d be unaffected.

And, keep in mind the roughly 1/3 of folks rent the place they live … they don’t get a direct mortgage interest deduction … though, economists argue, they get an indirect deduction since their landlords get to deduct mortgage interest as a business expense. So, the playing field would be leveled for home owners and renters.

So, what about limiting the deduction for those folks who currently own a home and  itemize deductions?

Well, for openers, the home mortgage interest deduction is already limited … there’s already a  $1 million cap on the size of a family’s mortgages that qualify for the deduction … the cap is $500,000 for individuals filing separately.

Interest paid on second homes can be included in the deduction, subject to the caps.

Note that the deduction isn’t a direct cap on the amount of interest that can be deducted … it’s a cap on the size of the mortgage(s) … so, a max’ed out family with a $1,000,000 mortgage @ 6% gets to deduct $60,000 … a family with a $1 MM loan at 4% gets to deduct $40,000.

With that as background …

Tightening the limits on the home interest mortgage deduction would be a fairly simple thing to do …

Specifically, what I’d do if I were Mitt:  Slide the limit down to, say $500,000 – which is about double the median home value in the country … disallow mortgage interest on second homes … and do not raise the cap with inflation… that way, the nominal value of the deduction would stick around forever, but “real” value of the deduction would slowly vanish over time … without jolting the real estate market.

Presto.

BTW: I’d get hammered by this change … but still, I think it would be a right thing to do.

P.S.  As I’ve said before, I’m also in favor of axing the deduction for state & local taxes … if states want to tax high and spend much, that’s their perogative … but, let residents of those states foot the bills … don’t lay off the cost to those of us living in fically responsible staes.  This change would fly politically for Romney since the high tax & spend states are blue ones that won’t vote for him any way … in most red states, Mitt’s proposed rate reductions would offset the loss of the deductions.

>> Latest Posts

Just in time for tonite’s debate … battery maker A123 files for bankruptcy.

October 16, 2012

Hot off the wires from Bloomberg

A123 Systems —  the electric car battery maker that received a $249 million federal grant —  filed for bankruptcy protection after failing to make a debt payment that was due yesterday.

There is “no assurance” that A123 will be able to find a way to continue to operate its business as a going concern, the company said.

image

For those keeping score,  Solyndra left taxpayers holding a  $535 million loan guarantee granted by the U.S. Energy Department.

Employment stats: Spreading the hours around …

October 16, 2012

Obscured by the headline unemployment numbers is an oft-overlooked stat – average hours worked

In rough numbers, average weekly hours worked has declined by roughly 1/2 hour … to 41.5 hours per week.

Couple of interesting aspects to the number …

First, it’s greater than 40 – a standard 5 days – 8 hours work week … suggesting that firms are still using overtime to meet capacity needs rather than hiring … or, folks are working multiple jobs … maybe, 2 part-time jobs.

Second, while 1/2 hour doesn’t sound like much … it translates to over 600,000 full-time equivalent positions, i.e. has the economic impact of pulling more than a half-million FTE workers out of jobs.

image

>> Latest Posts

Wal-Mart to Amazon: BRING IT

October 16, 2012

Punch line: Wal-Mart is launching a new same-day delivery service to compete against Amazon.com this holiday season.  Wal-Mart boasts a huge network of stores to ship product from, but Amazon has effective operational efficiencies and loyal customers.  This season, who will win the holiday war?

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ’s “Wal-Mart Delivery Service Says to Amazon: “Bring It.”

In its latest bid to take on Internet powerhouse Amazon.com this holiday season, Wal-Mart is promising same-day delivery in some cities for orders placed online.  The retailer began testing the new service in select cities last week and says it will cost $10 regardless of the size of the order.

MK-BX850_WALMAR_G_20121009182704

Called Wal-Mart To Go, the products will be shipped from the company’s stores, not from a warehouse or distribution center.   Over the past several years, Wal-Mart has launched several attacks on its online rival, including a price war over best-selling books three years ago.

This time, Wal-Mart is betting that its network of thousands of stores … can help it compete head to head with Amazon, which has increasingly stressed fast, free or low-cost deliveries.

But shipping from stores, rather than from warehouses as Amazon does, is expensive, analysts said.  It can be three to four times the cost for the retailer to pick items and pack them from a store versus having a really efficient, automated process back in a distribution center.

Wal-Mart has been ramping up its e-commerce business, which employs 1,000 workers in San Bruno, Calif.  The retail giant has acquired nearly a dozen start-ups to help broaden its online presence and developed @Walmart Labs, its Silicon Valley tech shop that has revamped the walmart.com website and mobile applications to make them more competitive with Amazon and other online retailers.

Wal-Mart also has been trying to compete with Amazon’s prices inside its stores. In some, it has quietly begun matching the online retailer’s prices when customers ask, a practice historically done only against local brick-and-mortar competitors.

Wal-Mart also has been trying to use its stores to tap into millions of shoppers who either don’t have credit or debit cards or don’t feel comfortable disclosing their personal financial information online.  In April, the retailer began a program that allows customers to order merchandise online and pay for it at a store with cash.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Xbox: Your source for beauty and fashion

October 16, 2012

Punch line: Xbox targets the 40% of female Xbox users by launching the first female-tailored app – a beauty and fashion app produced and branded by L’Oreal.

* * * * *
Excerpted from adage.com’s, “L’Oreal Seeks Women in Unlikely Place: On Xbox”

L’Oréal is looking for women in a surprising place — on Xbox 360.

the-next-level-app

The beauty behemoth unveiled “The Next Level” app on Microsoft’s Xbox Wednesday, yet another move in the gaming console’s efforts to attract an audience beyond core gamers.

“The Next Level,” is designed to be a one-stop beauty and style hub for women where they can watch how-to videos and gain more information on products. Condé Nast’s Lucky Magazine will also help build some of the content.

The app allows users to create personalized event calendars, shopping lists and receive weather-based beauty recommendations, as well as receive rewards points that can be redeemed for branded products. L’Oréal intends for this be a total style experience, with fashion and entertainment elements beyond makeup and hair care.

This is the first female-tailored app to launch on Xbox, but as 40% of Xbox’s 20 million users are female, more apps geared toward women are expected.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

HOT: If capital gains tax rates go up 8.8%, how much will after-tax capital gains go down?

October 15, 2012

Another HOT: Homa Online Tutorial

This is a relatively simple financial math question that most people I’ve asked have gotten wrong.

Answers have ranged from less than 8.8% – since only capital gains are being taxed (huh?) … 8.8% – because that’s how much the marginal rate is going up … to more than 8.8% – “otherwise you wouldn’t be asking the question”.

First, what’s magic about 8.8%?

Well, Obama says he’ll jack capital gains tax  rates from 15% to 20% … and ObamaCare has a 3.8 non-payroll payroll tax on investment income starting in 2013.

So, if Obama is elected and he keeps his promise … the effective capital gains tax rate goes from 15% to 23.8% … a delta of 8.8%.

That 8.8% increase will cut after-tax capital gains by 10.35% !

OK, let’s run thru the math.

click for the Homa Online Tutorial
image

* * * * *

Recap

Assume that you bought a stock for $750 and sold it for $1,000 … netting a $250 pre-tax gain.

If the capital gains tax is 15%, you pay $37.50 in taxes … netting you, after taxes, $212.50.

If the capital gains tax is 23.8%, you pay $59.50 in taxes … netting you, after taxes, $190.50.

The difference, is $22 ($212.50 less $190.50 … or simply, 8.8% times $250).

So the percentage drop in after-tax net gains is 10.35% ($22 divided by $212.50)

Note that that percentage stays constant at 10.35% regardless of the size of the gain —  in absolute or relative to proportionate cost basis.

That’s not a coincidence, it’s math.

With a capital gains tax rate of 15%, the after tax gain is simply 1 minus the tax rate times the nominal gain … 1 minus 15% is 85%.

With a capital gains tax rate of 23.8%, the after tax gain is simply 1 minus that tax rate times the nominal gain … 1 minus 23.8% is 76.2%.

The difference is still 8.8%, but the denominator of the change ratio is is 85%, not 100% … and, 8.8% divided by 85% is 10.35%.

Again, that answer is generalizable … not specific to this example.

Q.E.D.

* * * * *
Advanced Financial Math Question

How much will after-tax ROI go down if capital gains tax rates are increased by 8.8%?

Hint: The math is more complicated than the above example, because the answer depends on the cost basis of the stock relative to its current market value.

I’ll give the answer is a later post.

>> Latest Posts

Why the stock market is still hanging on …

October 15, 2012

The economy is sluggish, corporate guidance has turned a bit bearish, but the stock market is still at high levels.

What’s up?

Well, broadly speaking, it’s the QE3 effect – the Fed is flooding the marketing with money again, keeping interest rates low.

Remember the low interest rates may be good for borrowers, but are awful for investors looking for more-or-less fixed incomes with some modicum of security.

More specifically, starting in 2011, benchmark Treasury rates (e.g the 5-year T-Bond) have been below the broad market dividend yield – represented by the S&P 500 Dividend yield’.

image

* * * * *
And, the spread has been widening recently – in favor of stock dividends

image

* * * * *
Bottom line: money flows to the best returns … it’s basic finance.

Thanks to SMH for feeding the lead

>> Latest Posts

Who employs more people – the government or “goods producing” industries?

October 15, 2012

Easy question since you know I wouldn’t ask if the answer wasn’t government.

Answer: There are about 22 million government workers … only about 18.5 million in producing goods.

The below charts are quite revealing.

  • Now, almost 75% are employed in service-providing industries … up about 10 million since 2000 … virtually all of the jobs added from the recession’s trough.
  • Goods-producing declined about 7 million from 2000 to the recent recession (i.e. Bush’s watch) … about 500,000 have been restored since the recession’s trough.
  • Gov’t added about 2 million (about 10%) from 2000 to 2010 … about 500,000 – largely temp census workers — have been squeezed out in the past couple of years.

Bottom line: An economy dominated by services and gov’t … not new news, but the severity of the skew surprised me… and, it’s hard to hang all this on Obama – Bush’s fingerprints are all over the trends.

image

image

image

>> Latest Posts

Soc Media: Time to get on Pinterest (even you, boys)

October 15, 2012

Punch line: Pinterest users spend more than Facebook or Twitter users.  As brands are trying to understand how to connect social media to sales, Pinterest offers a way to do that.

* * * * *

Excerpted from branchannel.com’s “Facebook Drives More Traffic to Retail, But Pinterest Users Spend More”

While Facebook dominates in socially-driven shopping, Pinterest is driving the highest average spending per online shopping session.

image.axd

RichRelevance … analyzed nearly 700 million shopping sessions to benchmark the performance of Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest as drivers of traffic to retail sites.

“Every social network promises a new way of connecting consumers with retailers and brands,” stated Diane Kegley, “However, the big take-away from our research is that not all channels in the social space are created equal.”

Key findings include:

Facebook dominates as a source of traffic: Shoppers who click-through account for the overwhelming majority of shopping sessions at nearly 86% (85.8%), followed by Pinterest (11.3%) and Twitter (2.9%).

Shoppers who started at Facebook browse more and buy more often — nearly seven pages per visit vs. nearly three for Twitter and just over four from Pinterest and purchase somewhat more frequently (conversion rates of 2.63%) than Pinterest (.93%) or Twitter (1.09%).

Pinterest is driving more revenue per session – nearly double that of other social channels: While shoppers who come to retail sites from Facebook and Twitter purchase more often, Pinterest users spend dramatically more than either ($168.83 average order value vs. $94.70 for Facebook and $70.84 for Twitter).

“As retailers and brands continue to sort out how to take advantage of social networks, this infographic provides great insight into better understanding the nuances of each channel, how they resonate with consumers and how marketers can take advantage of each in their own unique way,” adds Kegley.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Working in your jammies … it’s catching on.

October 15, 2012

Punch line: Since it can save costs and improve employee satisfaction, working from home is predicted to accelerate in the coming years.

* * * * *

Excerpted from Fast Company Co.EXIST, “The Future Of Working From Home”

4257109318_ac20e00889_z

It seems that a new study comes out every day touting the benefits of working remotely.

It’s a trend that’s good for workers’ psyches and the environment–more people working from home means fewer car trips, and fewer people in the office allows companies to scale down to smaller spaces that use fewer resources. And if you don’t like it, well, too bad–a new survey from Citrix Systems found that the movement is speeding up. Among the highlights [from the survey]:

  • The IT executives surveyed believe that by 2020 there will be seven desks for every 10 office workers.
  • That ratio will be even lower–six desks for every 10 workers–in telecommuting-friendly countries like the U.S., the U.K., Singapore, and the Netherlands.
  • 24% of companies have adopted mobile work styles … That number will balloon to 83% by mid 2014.

There are generational differences, to be sure. But, … there are many people who want to work remotely, and age has nothing to do with it.

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

Biden: “The AMA supported what we did (on healthcare). AARP endorsed what we did, too” … here’s why, Joe.

October 14, 2012

More from the debate …

This one always makes me scream.

Biden said: “The AMA supported what we did. AARP endorsed what we did, too”

That’s factually correct, but very misleading.

* * * * *

AARP

As we wrote last week, the AARP told Team Obama to stop using their name in the campaign.

Why?

Probably because they feel a bit vulnerable when folks learn that their support had little to do with what’s best for seniors … AARP received a windfall pay-off.

Except for an election year transitional provision, ObamaCare fundamentally eliminates the popular Medicare Advantage program … and, the elimination of Medicare Advantage is a windfall for the AARP insurance business:

Thanks to its cuts to Medicare Advantage, ObamaCare is expected to expand the number of seniors buying “medigap” supplemental insurance plans,”

AARP controls 34 percent of the market for such plans.

According to a 2011 House Ways and Means Committee report, AARP stands to make between $55 million and $166 million from ObamaCare in 2014 alone
Source: Washington Examiner

* * * * *
AMA

Similarly, we previously wrote that the AMA endorsed ObamaCare for self-serving financial reasons.

Yes, the AMA supported ObamaCare, but … according to Forbes, less than 15% of practicing docs belong to the AMA … and “90% of the AMA’s funding comes via a government sanctioned monopoly whereby the AMA sells the billing codes upon which the entire health care system relies”

A provision of ObamaCare explicitly provides for the AMA’s coding monopoly and perpetual government funded  income stream.

How do doctors really feel?

According to Forbes

This past February, 60 percent of more than 5,000 doctors surveyed said the Obama health law would have a negative impact on patients  …. more than half thought it would have a negative impact on their relationships with patients  …43 percent said the health care reform itself would likely lead them to retire over the next 5 years, and only 37 percent said that was an unlikely consequence of this law.

* * * * *

If Obama uses the line again on Tuesday, I hope Mitt pounces.

>> Latest Posts

Biden: “Some of the 47% pay higher effective rates than Gov. Romney” … say, what?

October 13, 2012

I’ve been re-watching the Biden-Ryan debate and reading the transcript … this time, it’s for comedy value.

image

Beyond the whoppers, I can’t believe how many fundamentally dumb things Biden said.  Many got obscured by his bluster.

Here’s one of my favorites … suitable for the Yogi Berra quote book:

These people [the 47%]  are my mom and dad, the people I grew up with, my neighbors.

They pay more effective tax than Governor Romney pays in his federal income tax.

I’ve had it up to here with this notion that 47 percent …

Full transcript & video

An obvious non sequitur.

By definition, the folks in the 47% don’t pay any Federal income taxes, so their effective rates are zero

And, zero is less than 14% … or any other positive tax rate.

Geez.

And that dufass is in line to be President.

>> Latest Posts

Biden: “Syria is 5 times larger than Libya” … say, what?

October 12, 2012

During the Vice Presidential debate on Thursday night, Joe Biden claimed, incorrectly, that that Team Obama is turning a blind eye towards Syria because – compared to Libya —  it  “is a different country, it is five times as large geographically, it has one fifth the population”.

Ordinarily, we’d give him a pass (yeah, right), but Biden claims to be Mr. International and was trying to discredit Ryan’s foreign policy knowledge.

Turns out –- according to Google –that Syria is about 1/10th the size of Libya with over 3 times the population.

Oops.

image

image

Thanks to AG-C for feeding the lead.

>> Latest Posts

Veep Debate: morning after thoughts …

October 12, 2012

For what they’re worth …

1. Watching the debate I thought Biden won. Yes, he was a condescending bully … but he dominated. He didn’t raise any new points and told some rehashed whoppers, but he showed passion and a will-to-fight.  Most important, his interruptions and distracting behavior when Ryan was talking kept Ryan from completing any of his logic.  I thought Ryan should have been firmer – with Biden & the moderator – to stop the interruptions.

2. Given the above, I was surprised when the post-debate commentary started.  I was watching CNN. Blitzer’s first reaction was a tie.  Except for ultra-lib Van Jones, all of the panelists took Biden to the hoop for being disrespectful – with virtually no remarks re: content.  Switched to Fox and Chris Wallace – who I think is pretty fair – said “I’ve seen every presidential and VP debate – this was an unprecedented level of disrespect and discourtesy …. by a sitting VP.”  Then came the CNN insta-poll … Ryan 48, Biden 44.  Maybe I should have more faith in the American people.

3. The debate reminded me of the 1976 Olympics (I think it was 1976).  The US boxers were very good, very well trained, very “scientific”. Cuban boxers came with a vengeance and charged the ring like bulls.  They knocked the Americans off-stride and took away a handful of medals.

4. I also flashed back to the Cheney-Lieberman debate – which I thought was the best ever. They disagreed on practically every issue.  But, they were logical and respectful.  So, people could really understand their views.  When they shook hands afterwards, you could see the mutual respect.

5. I expect 2 big stories: Libya and abortion.  Libya because Biden contradicted the prior day’s sworn testimony and threw the Intelligence folks under the bus.  That’ll keep Libya in the news.  I was surprised that the moderator asked about abortion. I thought Ryan stated a sincere pro-life position – but will get hammered for being at war with women.

6. Best line of the night was when Biden asserted that Catholic organizations weren’t being forced to fund abortions & contraception. Ryan’s retort;”Then, why are 20 Catholic organizations suing the government?”

7. Yes, Biden said 47% three or four times.  Did it have any impact?

8. Yeah, Ryan is young – probably too young to be President.  He’ll grow out of that limitation fast. The thought of Biden ascending to the Presidency literally scares me – anybody want that personna running the country?

9. My wild card: keep in mind that Obama owns the youth vote … many (most?) people vote on emotions and candidate’s “cues” … I think that Ryan played as a smart, young, next-gen kind of a guy … (and, jacked, to boot) … it’ll be interesting to see if Ryan connected with some young guys and single women.

10. Bottom line: debate will have little no impact on the polls or the election …

Now, I’ll turn on the TV and listen to what the pundits are saying this morning …

>> Latest Posts

Unemployment claims are down (if you don’t count California) … and, yes, the BLS streak continues.

October 12, 2012

The BLS would morph into a punch line if the stakes weren’t so high.

Let’s do the easy part first.

Now we’re up to at least 22 election season weeks in a row that the BLS’s “headline number” has under-reported the number of initial unemployment claims … and cast the jobs situation as brighter than it really is.

Based on Thursday’s BLS report, the number for the week ending Sept. 29 was revised upward from 367,000 to 369,000.

I’ll complain to the BLS Commish when President Obama appoints one.

see the HFs post: BLS Commissioner’s post vacant since January

image

* * * * *

Bigger Issue this Week

This week, the BLS reported spectacularly good news …  claims down 30,000 (after revising last week’s claims up).

While the BLS report failed to mention the point, somewhere between 15,000 and 25,000 claims from California weren’t processed in time to be included.

Say what?

Business Insider did a nice job decoding the situation:

Some of the jobless claims in one large state–California–were not included in the claims reported to the Department of Labor this week. 

When a state’s jobless claims bureau is short-staffed, sometimes the state does not process all of the claims that came in during the week in time to get them to the DOL.

Our source [at the BLS]  believes that this is what happened this week.

The California claims that were not processed in time to get into this week’s jobless report will appear in future reports, most likely next week’s or the following week’s.

In other words, those reports might be modestly higher than expected.

Our source believes that the number of California claims that were not processed totaled about 15,000-25,000.

Thus, if one were to “normalize” the overall not-seasonally-adjusted jobless claims number, it would increase by about 15,000-25,000.

This week’s “normalized” jobless claims number, therefore, would be about 355,000-365,000, not the 339,000 that was reported.

Are you kidding me?

And, Business Insider missed a key line in the BLS report:

“The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending September 29 were in New York (+2,764) and  California (+2,069)”

So, the missing California claims may be even higher … if the missing regions kept pace with the rest of the state

This is getting silly.

>> Latest Posts

Let’s go throw down a couple brewskies …

October 12, 2012

Beer sales are rising for the first time since 2008 in another sign that consumers — particularly young men—are slowly but surely emerging from the recession.

image

Much of the rebound is being driven by small-batch “craft” brewers, reflecting shifting tastes and forcing dominant players Anheuser-Busch InBev and MillerCoors to increasingly borrow from upstarts’ playbooks.

Big brewers also are rolling out alternative malt beverages after liquor companies swiped drinkers.

Americans are branching out from traditional American lager to sample ales, porters and wheat beers from fast-growing small brewers.

The move to craft-style beers could limit consumption.

In addition to charging higher prices, many specialty brews have a heavier taste and higher alcohol content than mainstream beers, making them less likely to be guzzled in rapid-fire.

“People will go out and pound Coronas or Miller Lites, but they’ll sip craft beer.”.

>> Latest Posts

Psst: They like you, but sorry … they’re fakes.

October 12, 2012

Punch line: Analyst firm Gartner predicts that by 2014 up to 15% of social media engagements could be fraudulent.

* * * * *

Excerpted from TechCrunch, “Fans, Likes And Reviews Will Be Fake By 2014, Says Gartner”

facebook-like-mobile-carriers

Fake fans, fake “likes” and fake reviews are some of the worst aspects of social media.

Now, new research from Gartner lays bare the fact that it’s only going to get worse.

The analysts predict that by 2014, some 10%-15% of all social media reviews and other forms of engagement will be fake, paid for by the companies getting endorsed.

Gaming social media is not exactly a new concept, but given it’s a space that in theory relies on the goodwill of the masses, doing so is a pretty sleazy art.

What makes it more difficult to parse is that a lot of it is hard to pin down.

Meanwhile, another class of social media marketeers appears to be emerging: those who are helping with “reputation defense”: that is, rather than flooding sites with paid endorsements, rising to the task of making sure the negative critiques are complemented by interaction and response (oh, and positive reviews) in a slightly more organic way.

Edit by JDC

>> Latest Posts

Flash: BLS Commissioner’s post vacant since January … previously headed by Bush appointee.

October 11, 2012

That’s right, the BLS Commissioner’s position has been vacant since January 2012.  A Deputy Commissioner has been doing double-duty — running his department and overseeing day-to-day ops for the entire BLS.
BLS org chart

Question: Has Labor Secretary Hilda Solis been providing the “quality control” of the numbers coming out of BLS this year?

So, during an important time period, BLS has either been (a) under-supervised, or (b) more aggressively managed from above by one of the President’s cabinet members.

Either way, sounds like what we in b-school call “sub-optimal”.

Hmmm.

Imagine if  Jack Welch catches wind of this one.

* * * * *
Story Line

Dr. Keith Hall was the Commissioner of the BLS from January 2008 to January 2012.

He was appointed by George W. Bush (uh-oh) and approved by the Senate to serve a 4-year term

When his term expired, President Obama cut him loose, and still hasn’t filled the position.

Since January,  the entire Bureau of Labor Statistics has apparently been managed more directly by Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, with day-to-day ops handled by Deputy Commissioners.

The Labor Secretary, of course, is a cabinet member reporting to President Obama

* * * * *
Resume: Hilda Solis

Hilda Lucia Solis is the 25th United States Secretary of Labor, serving in the Obama administration.

She is a member of the Democratic Party and served in the United States House of Representatives from 2001 to 2009, representing the 31st and 32nd congressional districts of California.

She gained degrees from the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) and the University of Southern California (USC) and worked for two federal agencies in Washington, D.C.

She was elected to the Rio Hondo Community College Board of Trustees in 1985, the California State Assembly in 1992, and the California State Senate in 1994. She was the first Hispanic woman to serve in the State Senate, and was reelected there in 1998.

Solis was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000, where she focused mainly on labor causes and environmental work.

She was reelected easily to four subsequent terms.

In December 2008, President-elect Barack Obama announced his intention to nominate Solis as the next United States Secretary of Labor.

She took office after being confirmed by the United States Senate in February 2009, becoming the first Hispanic woman to serve in the U.S. Cabinet

Source

* * * * *
Resume: Dr. Keith Hall

Keith Hall received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of Virginia and M.S. and Ph.D. in Economics from Purdue University.

Prior to his government service, Dr. Hall was a full time-faculty member in the economics departments at the Universities of Arkansas and Missouri.

Dr. Hall had over 20 years of federal service with the Department of the Treasury, the International Trade Commission, the Department of Commerce, the Executive Office of the President, and BLS.

Prior to becoming BLS Commissioner, he served as Chief Economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisers, where he analyzed a broad range of fiscal, regulatory and macroeconomic policies and directed a team that monitored the state of the economy and developed economic forecasts.

He served as the Chief Economist for the U.S. Department of Commerce for four years. In that role, he was the principal economic adviser to the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs and served as a special adviser to the Secretary of Commerce.

Dr. Hall previously served as a Senior International Economist in the Research Division at the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent agency that investigates any matter involving tariffs, international trade, and competition between U.S. and foreign industries.

In 2007, President George W. Bush nominated Dr. Hall to be the 13th Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He was confirmed by the Senate in December 2007 and officially sworn in to office in January 2008.

Source

* * * * *
Recent Developments

From Watchdog.com

“Ex-BLS chief says unemployment data flawed”

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ method of calculating unemployment is a “flawed measure” that contains “real problems,” the agency’s former commissioner, Keith Hall told the Wisconsin Reporter on Tuesday.

He said: “The monthly unemployment data is an imperfect tool”.

Appointed by former President George W. Bush, Hall served as commissioner for much of Obama’s term in office (until January of this year).

Hall said he understands, even agrees with, some criticism of BLS unemployment data.

Among his concerns:

  • The unemployment rate is “artificially low” because only people who are actively seeking employment are counted as “unemployed.” People who got frustrated and stopped looking for work aren’t technically “unemployed,” according to the data.
  • The rate does a poor job measuring “underemployment,” those people who are working but not at the level or to the extent they should be, based on their education and experience. “If you worked one hour (in a given month), and got paid at all, you’re employed,” according to BLS data, Hall said
  • The payroll survey, conducted by interviewing businesses and government agencies, gives a good, broad overview, but not a lot of information. The household survey gets a lot of information from households about their earnings, hours of work, demographics, etc. But Hall said the sample size probably needs to be larger for the statistics to be more accurate.
    “And that’s the one that probably should be larger than it is,” he said. “It’s a cost thing.”

“There’s no one best single indicator that tells you about the health of the labor market,” Hall said.

“You have to look at a number of things.”

* * * * * *

Bottom line: In January, Obama sends an experienced, highly qualified BLS Commissioner packing.  For the past 8 months, the BLS has been reporting to the Secretary of Labor – who has a deep political background, but no particular expertise in economic statistics.  For the past 9 months (as frequently reported here in the HomaFiles) the BLS data has been arousing curiosity, culminating in last week’s incredible (i.e. not credible) pre-election unemployment report.

Hmmm.

See also “Why would anybody distrust the BLS?”

>> Latest Posts

Are people well enough informed to vote?

October 11, 2012

In his book The Ethics of Voting, MSB prof Jason Brennan argues that all adult citizens have the right to vote … but that they shouldn’t exercise that right unless they are informed, rational, and aiming for the common good.

image

Regarding how informed citizens are, Prof. Brennan, referencing other research and studies, writes

Overall levels of political knowledge are low.

For example, 79% of Americans can’t identify their state senators.

During election years, most citizens cannot identify any congressional candidates in their district.

And, political knowledge is distributed unevenly.

The top quartile (of informed citizens) knows much, but the bottom quartiles knows hardly anything.

Ballparking, political scientists conclude that less than half of voters are informed; some put the number as low as 10%

Against that backdrop, I was pretty encouraged when Nielsen reported that over 67 million households tuned into last weeks Presidential debate.

To put that number in context, about 125 million people voted in the 2008 Presidential election.

That means that over half the number of people likely to vote this year watched the debates.

And, the 67 million was almost evenly divided between those over and under 55 years old.

Interestingly, Pew Research reports that over 80% of Romney supporters have given the election a lot of thought … not so much for Obama supporters … 1 in 3 of them have not given the election a lot of thought.

Hmmm.

Too bad all voters aren’t required to watch the debate before voting …

image

>> Latest Posts

Darden increases class size …. to 50,000!

October 11, 2012

According to Fortune

UVA’s Darden School has joined up with Coursera and plans to launch its first B-school class in January.

In a typical year, Professor Ed Hess figures he teaches no more than 300 students in his courses on managing smaller enterprises and the challenges of business growth.

When Hess walks into the classroom this January to teach Smart Growth for Private Businesses, however, as many as 50,000 people are expected to have signed up for it — more students than Darden has graduated since its founding nearly 60 years ago and in all probability the largest single audience ever assembled for a business course.

The professor will be the first to deliver a so-called MOOC (a massively open online course) for Darden to anyone with a computer and an Internet connection.

The free online class is part of a partnership with Coursera, an online education startup.

Since it began six months ago, Coursera has enrolled 1.57 million students in a wide range of courses taught by professors from Princeton, Stanford, the University of Pennsylvania, and other prominent schools.

Very few of those courses, however, have been in business.

Mostly, students have gravitated to classes in computer science, math and engineering.

For Prof. Hess, it means learning an entirely new way to teach.

Like other MOOC courses, his course will be broken into manageable chunks, with short video modules, PowerPoint slides, and interactive quizzes.

An online forum will allow students to ask questions, get answers, and collaborate in learning teams by industry sector, work backgrounds, or geography. “This is like going to Mars,” he laughs.

Hess also plans two live webinars in addition to the five class sessions, one to give students real time access to him and another with an entrepreneur to help students create a growth plan.

Students who complete the course with passing grades will receive a certificate of completion.

>> Latest Posts

Who would you trust to handle your family’s money & bank accounts – Obama or Romney?

October 10, 2012

Interesting question asked in the latest Fox News poll.

Not surprisingly, Romney gets the nod 50% to 38%

image

Hmmm.

Remember, the Fed gov’t doesn’t have any money of it’s own – it just takes and manages our money.

And, since voter preferences are running about 50-50 … about 12% either don’t think the question is relevant or are satisfied having the inferior money-handler handling their dough.

Go figure.

* * * * *
Update

I was asked about possible sampling bias …. here are the “internals” with party affiliation … and more

click to view

Draw your own conclusions.

>> Latest Posts

Re: job creation … Steve Wynn blasts Obama … again!

October 10, 2012

Holy Smokes!

Steve Wynn, is CEO of Wynn Resorts.

image

He unloaded on President Obama again.

Punch line: “I’m afraid of the president. I have no idea what goofy idea, what crazy, anti-business program this administration will come up. I have no idea. And I have to tell you Jon that every business guy I know in the country is frightened of Barack Obama and the way he thinks.”

click to view
image

Wrap: “I can’t stand the idea of being demagogued, that is put down by a president who has never created any jobs and who doesn’t even understand how the economy works.”

* * * * *
Ken’s Prediction: I heard directly from a Fortune 500 CEO that he – and other CEO’s – were afraid to speak out against Obama because they feared retaliation from the administration. I heard directly from a guy who owned a highly profitable chain of auto dealerships that were closed when he spoke out against the auto bailouts.

Now, since Obama’s on the ropes, I expect a cascade of business execs to start speaking out.

>> Latest Posts

After losing Big Bird, Obama loses old birds … AARP tells Team O to cease and desist.

October 10, 2012

One of the few shots that Romney missed during the debate was when Pres. Obama gave the AARP a shout-out for supporting ObamaCare.

Why?

Do you think that the  AARP supported ObamaCare because it cares deeply about seniors?

image

Nope.  It’s because the elimination of Medicare Advantage programs was a windfall for the AARP insurance business:

Thanks to its cuts to Medicare Advantage, ObamaCare is expected to expand the number of seniors buying “medigap” supplemental insurance plans,”

AARP controls 34 percent of the market for such plans.

According to a 2011 House Ways and Means Committee report, AARP stands to make between $55 million and $166 million from ObamaCare in 2014 alone
Source: Washington Examiner

Apparently the AARP is feeling guilty about their ObamCare pay-off

According to the Washington Examiner

AARP released a statement telling Obama not to do that again.

“While we respect the rights of each campaign to make its case to voters, AARP has never consented to the use of its name by any candidate or political campaign. AARP is a nonpartisan organization and we do not endorse political candidates nor coordinate with any candidate or political party.”

Losing Big Bird and Old Birds in the same week can’t be a good sign.

>> Latest Posts

Extinct species list: full-time jobs.

October 10, 2012

Last week’s BLS report has focused attention on the boom in temporary and part-time employees.

Of the jobs “created” since March, about 1 million of them are part-timers.

 

image

* * * * *
Why part-timers?

Two basic reasons:

(1) companies are trying to stay flexible in the face of uncertain demand, and …

(2) companies are bracing for the certain impact of regulation … especially ObamaCare.

More specifically, according to the Orlando Sentinel

In an experiment apparently aimed at keeping down the cost of health-care reform, Orlando-based Darden Restaurants has stopped offering full-time schedules to many hourly workers in at least a few Olive Gardens, Red Lobsters and LongHorn Steakhouses.

In a statement, Darden said staffing changes are “just one of the many things we are evaluating to help us address the cost implications health care reform will have on our business.”

Analysts say many other companies, including the White Castle hamburger chain, are considering employing fewer full-timers because of key features of the Affordable Care Act scheduled to go into effect in 2014.

Under that law, large companies must provide affordable health insurance to employees working an average of at least 30 hours per week.

If they do not, the companies can face fines of up to $3,000 for each employee.

Under the system Darden is testing, employees are to be scheduled for no more than 28 hours each week.

They can run over that if things get busy, but Darden acknowledged they are not supposed to exceed 30 hours.

“I think a lot of those employers, especially restaurants, are just going to ensure nobody gets scheduled more than 30 hours a week,” said Matthew Snook, partner with human-resources consulting company Mercer.

* * * * *

I guess the part-timer boom is an unintended consequence … but it sure should have been an anticipated consequence, for sure.

Maybe, if you’ve never worked in a business, you don’t know how businesses behave.

>> Latest Posts

Soc Marketing: Making the Goodwill cool

October 10, 2012

Punch line: Here’s some real social marketing at work … Target’s former creative director has moved to Goodwill, and is launching an entire rebrand of the company’s stores, website, and delivery trucks. 

* * * * *
Excerpted from psfk.com’s, “Former Target Creative Director Redesigns Goodwill Thrift Stores.”

The former creative director of Target, Tim Murray, has fully rebranded San Francisco’s Goodwill, the social enterprise organization that helps people back into work.

Murray has redesigned the website, in-store signage and its fleet of trucks, with help from illustrator and designer Craig Frazier.
goodwill-site

goodwill-store 2

goodwill-lorries

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Dissed: Big Bird tells Team O to pull ad.

October 9, 2012

According to the WSJ

Big Bird  isn’t thrilled about his cameo in the presidential race.

image

The folks at Sesame Street are asking the Obama campaign to pull down its TV ad  that mocks Mitt Romney for vowing to yank the subsidy to PBS.

At the presidential debate in Denver last week, Mr. Romney said he would end the subsidy in view of the nation’s fiscal troubles.

Team O’s retort: “Mitt Romney knows it’s not Wall Street you have to worry about, it’s Sesame Street.”

Sesame Street isn’t amused.

Sesame Workshop, a nonprofit educational organization, told Team O: “we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns. We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down.”

An Obama campaign spokesman said the campaign is “reviewing their concerns”

You know you’ve had a bad week when Big Bird doesn’t want to be associated with you … even when you vow to keep shoveling dough at him.

>> Latest Posts

Obama preps for next debate with another meatgrinder interview ..

October 9, 2012

Obviously, Letterman and the ladies of The View didn’t rough Obama up enough.

So, he’s changing venues.

Obama taped an interview with Linda Ellerbee of Nick News

That’s Nick as in Nickelodeon.

image

He answered questions regarding gun control, jobs, immigration, same-sex marriage, outsourcing, bullying and obesity, as well as light-hearted questions including his most embarrassing moment.

“By answering kids’ questions directly, candidates show respect for kids,” says Linda Ellerbee.

Source

* * * * *

Flash: Big Bird Appears in Obama ad

click to view
image

>> Latest Posts

“Liar, liar pants on fire” …. eh, fugetaboutit

October 9, 2012

President Obama thought that his go-to punch during the debate was a study by the a non-partisan research group that “proved” that Romney’s tax plan “didn’t add up” and would result in middle class tax increases and cuts to Autistic kids’ healthcare.

image

Since Romney boldly rejected that shot during the debate, Team Obama has been running around with their hair on fire, screaming that Romney lied when he said his plan’s numbers tied together.

Well, for openers, the non-partisan research group is the left-leaning Tax Policy Center … and one of the economists used to work on the Obama campaign.

Hmmm.

More important, the assertion that Mitt’s plan is out-of-whack is based on a paper written by Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen.

Prof. Rosen has stepped forward to say that’s not true.

Prof. Rosen told the Weekly Standard  that the Obama campaign is misrepresenting his paper on Romney’s tax plan

Specifically, Prof. Rosen said:

I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work.

It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal.

The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same.

That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.

You can check the math that shows Romney’s plan is mathematically possible … and, shows that the only hurdle is repealing ObamaVare and its tax hikes … an action that’s high on Romney’s to do list.

Bottom line: Seems that Team Obama may be lying when it says that Romney is lying … at least about his tax plan.

>> Latest Posts

NFL players to Nike: “You make me look fat”

October 9, 2012

Punch line: After decades of wearing Reebok uniforms, NFL teams switched to Nike jerseys this year.  Nike introduced new tighter, sleeker uniforms, claiming enhanced performance, but some of the bigger linemen are asking the question, “Does this make me look fat?”

* * * * *

Excerpted from WSJ’s, “The NFL’s 300-Pound Fashion Victims”

PJ-BK010_FATJER_G_20121003001607

Pondered in the NFL locker room this season, as some players try on their new tighter, sleeker Nike uniforms, is a question usually reserved for Nordstrom fitting lounges:

Does this make me look fat?

After a decade of wearing Reebok-made jerseys, NFL teams this year switched to Nike, which unveiled a new model that has what it calls a “body-contoured fit.

” While it looks great on Adonis-like players such as Arizona wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald and Miami running back Reggie Bush, it’s a bit less popular among those who are a bit more full-figured.

Tight jerseys are all the fashion in some sports.

How better to show off the sculpted physiques of NBA players?

Adidas even claims its tight Chelsea jersey “stabilizes and focuses the muscles’ energy.” 

Outfitting the NFL presents a range of problems—or rather, a problem of range.

Some receivers, running backs and kickers weigh less than 200 pounds. Linemen, meanwhile, routinely top 300. 

Making jerseys for lineman has become a bigger challenge in recent years.

The 1966 Green Bay Packers, winners of the first Super Bowl, did not feature an offensive lineman heavier than 250 pounds.

Today, the Packers’ five offensive line starters weigh an average of 312.8.

“We have 40 years of experience in the football business and the idea in our products is for optimal performance and we work with the athletes to find fit and function,” a Nike spokesman said. “The uniforms are available in a variety of sizes and cuts for different players with enhanced performance in mind.”

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Boing! Boing !!

October 8, 2012

Pew Research reported the results of its first post-debate poll.

Better news for Mitt than I expected.

First, Pew confirms the insta-poll number from debate nite … 2 of 3 people thought that Romney won the debate … 20% of all people (mostly the 44% of Dems) thought Obama won it … (those people also probably think that Elvis is still alive.)

image

* * * * *
Likeability

Interestingly, Romney pulled even with Obama on likeability … Obama lost 5 points, Mitt gained 5 points  … now,roughly half of all folks view each of the candidates favorability.

That’s a big deal since Obama has been showcasing his likeability on The View, Letterman, etc.

image

 

* * * * *
Most important

There was a 12 point swing in the Presidential horse race number among likely voters … pre-debate, Obama was leading by 8 points … after the debate, Mitt is leading by 4.

Based on the poll’s “internals”, Romney gained ground among all groups except blacks …  who still gave Obama 92% support.

Game on.

image

>> Latest Posts

Boing!

October 8, 2012

Gallup’s Daily Tracking Poll says that Romney got a 5-point bounce from the debates … Mitt +2, Obama –3 … putting the race dead even.

image

>> Latest Posts

Why would anybody distrust the BLS numbers?

October 8, 2012

The BLS is  an independent organization that just reports the facts, right?

Former GOP administration insiders are coming to the BLS’ defense, testifying that the number crunchers are innocent as babies.

So, why should anybody be suspicious just because  the “household survey” is giving answers that conflict with the “establishment survey” and  is reporting job gains greater than in any other month for the past 30 or 40 years?

Here are four documented reasons to be skeptical:

1. The administration has used bullying tactics with outside pollsters – specifically Gallup

Recently, Team Obama didn’t like Gallup’s polling numbers.  So campaign chief Axlerod called them to provide some statistical counseling, and and Attorney General Holder launched a DOJ investigation of Gallup’s human resource practices. Suddenly, Gallup’s  poll numbers turned more favorable to the President, including a 1-day 12 point improvement in Obama’s approval rating.  Coincidence?   Source

2. The administration has been bullying defense contractors to violate Federal employment laws.

ABC is reporting that the White House has told defense contractors to not issue layoff notices until after the election. They even went as far as to offer to pay for any legal fees associated with their violating the law by not giving employees proper notice. Specifically, “defense contractor Lockheed Martin heeded a request from the White House – one with political overtones – and announced it will not issue layoff notices to thousands of employees just days before the November presidential election.” Source

3. Obama has used bullying tactics with other “independent government agencies – specifically the CBO.

The Congressional Budget Office is supposed to be strictly objective, and completely detached from the Administration. But, during the ObamaCare debate, when the CBO numbers weren’t looking favorable, the President ordered CBO director Doug Elmendorf to the White House for counseling.  The next week, the CBO revised its numbers.  The new estimates were  more favorable towards ObamaCare.  Another coincidence? click for news report

4. The BLS has a recent track record of questionable numbers.

Most important, for at least the last 22 election season weeks, the same BLS that reports the unemployment statistics has systematically underreported weekly initial unemployment claims by an average of roughly 1% – about 3,000 claims per week – and then revised the estimates up the next week.

Why is the preliminary under-reporting a problem?

Because each week’s “headline” number of changes in unemployment claims is derived by taking the current week’s preliminary number and comparing it to the prior week’s revised number.

For example, in the week ending September 22, the preliminary number (367,000) was compared to September 15th’s revised number (363,000) and and 4,000 drop in unemployment claims was reported. The September 15 preliminary number – the basis for the September 15 report — was 359,000. So, comparing preliminary estimates for the two weeks, unemployment claims increased by 8,000 not 4,000. And, based on the past 22 weeks of initial underreporting, that number is likely to swell when the September 22 number is revised – most certainly upwards.

image

* * * * *

My point: the Administration has demonstrated a willingness to bully supposedly independent groups, both in and out of government.

And, the BLS has exhibited some curious statistical reporting.

Still believe the latest unemployment report?

>> Latest Posts

Want to sell more? … Then, limit purchase quantities.

October 8, 2012

The effect is called “anchoring” … and it’s a well known cognitive bias.

When somebody is “primed” with a number, they will tend to internalize it and sub-consciously anchor their minds on the number.

Any estimates they then make are more often than not fine tuning adjustments around the anchor point.

“Any number that you are asked to consider as a possible solution to an estimation problem will induce an anchoring effect.”

For example, researchers consistently find that home appraisals and offer bids are invariably influenced by listing prices … even if objective, professional agents are involved … and even if they’re explicitly told to ignore the listing price.

Anchoring effects explain why, for example, arbitrary rationing is an effective marketing ploy.

A few years ago, supermarket shoppers in Sioux City, Iowa, encountered a sales promotion for Campbell’s soup at about 10% off the regular price.

On some days, a sign on the shelf said limit of 12 per person.

On other days, the sign said no limit per person. Shoppers purchased an average of 7 cans when the limit was in force, twice as many as they bought when the limit was removed.

Anchoring is not the sole explanation.

Rationing also implies that the goods are flying off the shelves, and shoppers should feel some urgency about stocking up.

But we also know that the mention of 12 cans as a possible purchase

So, to boost sales, tell customers that there’s a limit on the number of items they can buy.

They’ll get anchored on the limiting number … and often buy up to the limit.

The same effect occurs when products are priced as multiples … say, 3 for $6.

Shoppers will tend to buy 3, even if the retailer is only charging $2 each regrdless of how many are sold.

Excerpted from Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow

>> Latest Posts

Dress classy and dance cheesy

October 8, 2012

Punch line: In a world where youtube can make anyone a star, what type of staying power do youtube stars hold?  Despite widespread national fame, and over 300,000,000 hits on his youtube video, marketers in the US are hesitant to get on board with Korean Pop star Psy, and do it ‘Gangnam style.’

* * * * *’

Excerpted from Ad Age’s, “Will Brands Buy Into Gangnam Style?”

20121001-NEWS--0016-NAT-CCI-IN_--.qxd

“Gangnam style” has swept the world, but marketers have been slower to embrace it..

Psy, the Korean pop star behind the over-the-top video with 283 million YouTube views (and counting), is a veteran pitchman in his native country, involved in marketing products such as Cass light beer. And since his song took off this summer, the colorful 34-year-old and the catchy beats of “Gangnam Style” have been attached to campaigns in Korea including LG’s mobile service, Samsung kimchi refrigerators and an energy tonic drink.

In the West, however, Psy’s marketing potential is less clear as it’s uncertain whether Psy is a one-hit wonder. Psy just returned home after a U.S. tour that included appearances on the MTV Video Music Awards, “Saturday Night Live,” the “Today” show and “Ellen,” where he taught his moves to Britney Spears and shared his motto of “Dress classy and dance cheesy.”

Working in his favor is his deal with Schoolboy Records, run by Justin Bieber’s manager, Scooter Braun, who helped make the Canadian teen singer a social-media sensation and pitchman.

“We have seen quite a lot of interest from big brands, largely international ones,” said Brad Haugen, CMO of Scooter Braun Projects.   Mr. Haugen said the obvious categories for a Psy marketing assist are cars, packaged goods and electronics, and that the first U.S. deal is a few weeks away.

Everyone in Korea is surprised that a singer who doesn’t fit the usual mold of the coiffed, beautiful pop star is the one to become an overnight international success story. But he thinks Psy’s appeal is universal because he’s “smart, funny, talented, yet sincere.”

That said, unless he had several hits and broadened his image, it’s hard to see the average marketer going for it.

Edit by BJP

>> Latest Posts

Unemployment claims up, unemployment rate down … huh?

October 7, 2012

Here’s some more conflicting data for you.

The BLS has been reporting unemployment claims pretty level for the year … but increasing lately.

Defying gravity (and logic), the unemployment rate has going down … an inverse relationship.

Hmmm.

Magic?

image

>> Latest Posts